skip to main content
10.1145/3416012.3424617acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Impact of SDN for Transmission Power Adaptation and FIB Population in NDN-VANETs

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vehicular communications suffer from intermittent connectivity due to sudden topology changes. Content retrieval is based on broadcasting and/or cellular infrastructure that allows vehicles to download or upload content. This paper investigates how Named Data Networking (NDN) in combination with Software Defined Networking (SDN) impacts vehicular communications. SDN is used to centralize network control by performing routing calculation and transmission range adaptation to improve the number of interconnected cars. NDN is used as the communication mechanism since a vehicle is not interested in where the content is located, but rather in what the content is. For improving communication we install multiple antennas in vehicles and Road Side Units along streets and study the impact on communication according to the number of installed antennas. Finally, SDN deployment allows us to use unicast transmissions for content retrieval. Our results show that the SDN controller is responsible for routing 5%-10% of the total requests existing in the vehicular network.

References

  1. Retrieved 2020. 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Release 14 Description; Summary of Rel-14 Work Items (Release 14). "https://www.3gpp.org/release-14".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Retrieved 2020. "IEEE 1609 - Family of Standards for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE). "https://www.standards.its.dot.gov/Factsheets/Factsheet/80".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Retrieved 2020. An NDN framework for OMNeT++. "https://github.com/amar-ox/NDNOMNeT".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Retrieved 2020. An OpenFlow Extension for the OMNeT++ INET Framework. "https://github.com/lsinfo3/ofomnet".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad Baheej Al-Khalil, Ali Al-Sherbaz, and Scott J Turner. 2013. Enhancing the physical layer in V2V communication using OFDM-MIMO techniques. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Maen Artimy. 2007. Local density estimation and dynamic transmission-range assignment in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 8, 3 (2007), 400--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Elian Aubry, Thomas Silverston, and Isabelle Chrisment. 2015. SRSC: SDN-based routing scheme for CCN. In Proceedings of the 2015 1st IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Charitos and Grigorios Kalivas. 2017. MIMO HetNet IEEE 802.11 p--LTE deployment in a vehicular urban environment. Vehicular Communications, Vol. 9 (2017), 222--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sergio Charpinel, Celso Alberto Saibel Santos, Alex Borges Vieira, Rodolfo Villaca, and Magnos Martinello. 2016. SDCCN: A novel software defined content-centric networking approach. In 2016 IEEE 30Th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA). IEEE, 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lara Codeca, Raphael Frank, Sébastien Faye, and Thomas Engel. 2017. Luxembourg sumo traffic (lust) scenario: Traffic demand evaluation. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, Vol. 9, 2 (2017), 52--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. DSRC Committee et al. [n.d.]. DSRC Message Communication Minimum Performance Requirements: Basic Safety Message for Vehicle Safety Applications. SAE, Draft Std. J, Vol. 2945 ( [n.,d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin Friedlander. 2005. Using MIMO to increase the range of wireless systems. In Conference Record of the Thirty-Ninth Asilomar Conference onSignals, Systems and Computers, 2005. IEEE, 1404--1408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Matthew S Gast. 2013. 802.11 ac: a survival guide: Wi-Fi at gigabit and beyond ." O'Reilly Media, Inc.". Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eirini Kalogeiton and Torsten Braun. 2018. Infrastructure-assisted communication for NDN-VANETs. In 2018 IEEE 19th International Symposium on" A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks"(WoWMoM). IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Eirini Kalogeiton and Torsten Braun. 2020. Equipping NDN-VANETs with Directional Antennas for Efficient Content Retrieval. In 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Eirini Kalogeiton, Domenico Iapello, and Torsten Braun. 2019. A Geographical Aware Routing Protocol Using Directional Antennas for NDN-VANETs. In 2019 IEEE 44rd Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Georgios Karagiannis, Onur Altintas, Eylem Ekici, Geert Heijenk, Boangoat Jarupan, Kenneth Lin, and Timothy Weil. 2011. Vehicular networking: A survey and tutorial on requirements, architectures, challenges, standards and solutions. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, Vol. 13, 4 (2011), 584--616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Diego Kreutz, Fernando MV Ramos, Paulo Esteves Verissimo, Christian Esteve Rothenberg, Siamak Azodolmolky, and Steve Uhlig. 2014. Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 103, 1 (2014), 14--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rodolfo I Meneguette and Luis HV Nakamura. 2017. A flow control policy based on the class of applications of the vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access. 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Steffen Moser, Luis Behrendt, and Frank Slomka. 2015. MIMO-enabling PHY layer enhancement for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW). IEEE, 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Eldad Perahia and Robert Stacey. 2013. Next generation wireless LANs: 802.11 n and 802.11 ac .Cambridge university press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Danda B Rawat, Dimitrie C Popescu, Gongjun Yan, and Stephan Olariu. 2011. Enhancing VANET performance by joint adaptation of transmission power and contention window size. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 22, 9 (2011), 1528--1535. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tobias Rueckelt, Halis Altug, Daniel Burgstahler, Doreen Böhnstedt, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2016. Movenet: Mobility management for vehicular networking. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access. 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ali Safa Sadiq, Suleman Khan, Kayhan Zrar Ghafoor, Mohsen Guizani, and Seyedali Mirjalili. 2018. Transmission power adaption scheme for improving IoV awareness exploiting: evaluation weighted matrix based on piggybacked information. Computer Networks, Vol. 137 (2018), 147--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christoph Sommer and Falko Dressler. 2011. Using the right two-ray model? A measurement based evaluation of PHY models in VANETs. In Proc. ACM MobiCom. 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Christoph Sommer, David Eckhoff, and Falko Dressler. 2013. IVC in cities: Signal attenuation by buildings and how parked cars can improve the situation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 13, 8 (2013), 1733--1745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Christoph Sommer, David Eckhoff, Reinhard German, and Falko Dressler. 2011. A computationally inexpensive empirical model of IEEE 802.11 p radio shadowing in urban environments. In 2011 Eighth international conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services. IEEE, 84--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Christoph Sommer, Stefan Joerer, and Falko Dressler. 2012. On the applicability of two-ray path loss models for vehicular network simulation. In 2012 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). IEEE, 64--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Qi Sun, Wang Wendong, Yannan Hu, Xirong Que, and Gong Xiangyang. 2014. SDN-based autonomic CCN traffic management. In 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps). IEEE, 183--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ting Wang, Bo Ai, Ruisi He, and Zhangdui Zhong. 2015. Two-dimension direction-of-arrival estimation for massive MIMO systems. IEEE Access, Vol. 3 (2015), 2122--2128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Xuyu Wang, Shiwen Mao, and Michelle X Gong. 2017. An overview of 3GPP cellular vehicle-to-everything standards. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, Vol. 21, 3 (2017), 19--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wenfeng Xia, Yonggang Wen, Chuan Heng Foh, Dusit Niyato, and Haiyong Xie. 2014. A survey on software-defined networking. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 17, 1 (2014), 27--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On the Impact of SDN for Transmission Power Adaptation and FIB Population in NDN-VANETs

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MobiWac '20: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access
            November 2020
            148 pages
            ISBN:9781450381192
            DOI:10.1145/3416012

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 16 November 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Author Tags

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate83of272submissions,31%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader