skip to main content
10.1145/3416012.3424621acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

End-to-End Millimeter-Wave Network Performance and Mobility Management Overhead in Urban Cellular Deployments with Realistic Pedestrian Traffic and Blockages

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Millimeter-wave (mm-wave) frequencies are seen as the new frontier in enabling high capacity for 5G-and-beyond cellular networks. However, spatio-temporal variations of the mm-wave channel impose significant challenges for high rate error-free communication, due to increased propagation loss and blockage susceptibility. In this paper, we analyze the end-to-end mobile user performance and the extent of mobility management overhead in the presence of dynamic pedestrian blockages. We use site-specific propagation data obtained via high resolution ray-tracing and realistic pedestrian traffic to implement site-specific user mobility and pedestrian blockage models, and integrate these in an extensive ns-3 framework to study the end-to-end mobile user performance. Our results show that the number of mm-wave mobility management events -- beam tracking, beam steering and handover -- strongly depends on the pedestrian walk nature and number of blockage events, i.e. the primary mm-wave serving link can be blocked for up to 36% of a walk duration. These frequent short-term pedestrian blockages can lead to TCP throughput degradation of up to 35% and TCP round-trip-time spikes of over 1 s, compared to the achievable network performance when pedestrian blockages are not considered, assuming mobility management with up-to-date CSI. We also show that stale CSI -- arising from delay in periodic beam training procedures -- results in more frequent and sub-optimal mobility management decisions and an additional TCP throughput degradation of up to 30%, compared to the achievable TCP throughput assuming mobility management with up-to-date CSI.

References

  1. T. Anup, C. Mark, and G. Amitava. 2014. Handoff Rates for Millemeter wave 5G Systems. In Proc. IEEE VTC. Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Gapeyenko, A. Samuylov, M. Gerasimenko, D. Moltchanov, S. Singh, M. R. Akdeniz, E. Aryafar, N. Himayat, S. Andreev, and Y. Koucheryavy. 2017. On the Temporal Effects of Mobile Blockers in Urban Millimeter-Wave Cellular Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 66, 11 (2017), 10124--10138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Giordani, M. Mezzavilla, and M. Zorzi. 2016. Initial Access in 5G mmWave Cellular Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 54, 11 (Nov. 2016), 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Giordani, M. Polese, A. Roy, D. Castor, and M. Zorzi. 2019. A Tutorial on Beam Management for 3GPP NR at mmWave Frequencies. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 21, 1 (2019), 173--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. PVT Group. [n.d.] a. Final assesment of PVT Viswalk. https://www.ptvgroup.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Areas_of_Application/Microscopic_Traffic_Simulation/AoA_Microscopic_SuccessStory_ProRail_Amsterdam_EN.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. PVT Group. [n.d.] b. PVT Viswalk. https://www.ptvgroup.com/en/solutions/products/ptv-viswalk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Ichkov, P. M"ahönen F. Malloli, and L. Simić. 2018. Network Control Overhead of Mobility Support in Millimeter-Wave Urban Cellular Networks. In Proc. ACM mmNets. New Delhi, India. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Ichkov, P. Mähönen, and L. Simić. 2020. Is Ray-Tracing Viable for Millimeter-Wave Networking Studies?. In Proc. IEEE PIMRC. London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ITU-R Resolution 238 (WRC-15). 2015. Studies on frequency-related matters for International Mobile Telecommunications identification including possible additional allocations to the mobile services on a primary basis in portion(s) of the frequency range between 24.25 and 86 GHz for the future development of International Mobile Telecommunications for 2020 and beyond.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. K. Jain, R. Kumar, and S. S. Panwar. 2019. The Impact of Mobile Blockers on Millimeter Wave Cellular Systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 37, 4 (2019), 854--868.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. J. Mateo, C. Fiandrino, and J. Widmer. 2019. Analysis of TCP Performance in 5G mm-Wave Mobile Networks. In Proc. IEEE ICC. Shangai, China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Mezzavilla, M. Zhang, M. Polese, R. Ford, S. Dutta, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2018. End-to-End Simulation of 5G mmWave Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, Vol. 20, 3 (thirdquarter 2018), 2237--2263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2017. Mobility Management for TCP in MmWave Networks. In Proc. ACM mmNets. Snowbird, Utah, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip. 2014. Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 102, 3 (2014), 366--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Rebato, L. Resteghini, C. Mazzucco, and M. Zorzi. 2018. Study of Realistic Antenna Patterns in 5G mmWave Cellular Scenarios. In Proc. IEEE ICC. Kansas City, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Simić, S. Panda, J. Riihijärvi, and P. Mähönen. 2017. Coverage and Robustness of mm-Wave Urban Cellular Networks: Multi-Frequency HetNets Are the 5G Future. In Proc. IEEE SECON. San Diego, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Simic, J. Riihijärvi, A. Venkatesh, and P. Mähönen. 2017. Demo abstract: An open source toolchain for planning and visualizing highly directional mm-wave cellular networks in the 5G era. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM Workshops. Atlanta, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Xiao, S. Mumtaz, Y. Huang, L. Dai, Y. Li, M. Matthaiou, G. K. Karagiannidis, E. Björnson, K. Yang, C. I, and A. Ghosh. 2017. Millimeter wave communications for future mobile networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 35, 9 (Sep. 2017), 1909--1935.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Xylomenos, G. C. Polyzos, P. Mahonen, and M. Saaranen. 2001. TCP performance issues over wireless links. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 39, 4 (2001), 52--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Zhang, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, J. Zhu, S. Rangan, S. Panwar, and a. M. Zorzi. 2019. Will TCP Work in mmWave 5G Cellular Networks? IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 57, 1 (Jan. 2019), 65--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Zhangi, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2017. Ns-3 Implementation of the 3GPP MIMO Channel Model for Frequency Spectrum above 6 GHz. In Proc. of the Workshop on Ns-3. Porto, Portugal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. End-to-End Millimeter-Wave Network Performance and Mobility Management Overhead in Urban Cellular Deployments with Realistic Pedestrian Traffic and Blockages

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiWac '20: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access
          November 2020
          148 pages
          ISBN:9781450381192
          DOI:10.1145/3416012

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 November 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate83of272submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader