ABSTRACT
Followed by the destruction of existing infrastructure or the emergence of the necessity for a new infrastructure, disaster events (e.g., earthquakes and pandemic) may require inspection of certain area and passing information to a dedicated help unit. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-aided mobile relaying technology is one of the effective means of provisioning service in such situations. In this paper, as the part of the rescuing operation in a certain disaster spot, we consider a mobile relaying technique, where an UAV acts as a relay node to ferry data between two disconnected floating or fixed nodes. For the sake of simplicity and low cost, amplify-and-forward relaying capability is adopted for the UAV. We consider the maximization of end-to-end throughput of such a system by optimizing the source/UAV power allocation as well as the trajectory of the UAV while considering practical mobility constraints (on the speed and initial/final locations of the UAV) as well as signal causality constraints. The formulated optimization problem is non-convex, and hence intractable to solve. Therefore, similar to the existing solution approach, we solve the problem via an iteration-based solution strategy, however we solve the source/UAV power allocation and the UAV trajectory design problems per iteration in a different manner. For the source/UAV power allocation problem, we provide heuristic solutions while considering both the availability and absence of a buffer at the UAV node. On the other hand, for the given power assignment, we adopt the geometric programming (GP)-based approach upon the transformation of variables and constraints. Furthermore, under the free initial and final UAV locations, jointly optimal power allocation and UAV trajectory are derived. Through extensive simulation, we verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme while comparing with one existing work.
- Stephen Boyd, Seung-Jean Kim, Lieven Vandenberghe, and Arash Hassibi. 2007. A tutorial on geometric programming. Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 8, 1 (2007), 67.Google Scholar
- M. Chen, M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, C. Yin, M. Debbah, and C. S. Hong. 2017. Caching in the Sky: Proactive Deployment of Cache-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Optimized Quality-of-Experience. IEEE J. Sel. A. Commun., Vol. 35, 5 (2017), 1046--1061.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Y. Chen, N. Zhao, Z. Ding, and M. Alouini. 2018. Multiple UAVs as Relays: Multi-Hop Single Link Versus Multiple Dual-Hop Links. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 17, 9 (2018), 6348--6359.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- F. Cheng, S. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Chen, N. Zhao, F. R. Yu, and V. C. M. Leung. 2018. UAV Trajectory Optimization for Data Offloading at the Edge of Multiple Cells. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 67, 7 (2018), 6732--6736.Google Scholar
- M. Chiang. 2005. Geometric Programming for Communication Systems. Commun. Inf. Theory, Vol. 2, 1/2 (jul 2005), 1--154. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- F. Cui, Y. Cai, Z. Qin, M. Zhao, and G. Y. Li. 2019. Multiple Access for Mobile-UAV Enabled Networks: Joint Trajectory Design and Resource Allocation. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 67, 7 (2019), 4980--4994.Google Scholar
- M. Deruyck, J. Wyckmans, W. Joseph, and L. Martens. 2018. Designing UAV-aided emergency networks for large-scale disaster scenarios. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., Vol. 2018, 79 (2018), 1--10.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Gong, T. Chang, C. Shen, and X. Chen. 2018. Flight Time Minimization of UAV for Data Collection Over Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE J. Sel. A. Commun., Vol. 36, 9 (2018), 1942--1954.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- X. Hu, K. Wong, K. Yang, and Z. Zheng. 2019. UAV-Assisted Relaying and Edge Computing: Scheduling and Trajectory Optimization. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 18, 10 (2019), 4738--4752.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Jeong, O. Simeone, and J. Kang. 2018. Mobile Edge Computing via a UAV-Mounted Cloudlet: Optimization of Bit Allocation and Path Planning. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 67, 3 (2018), 2049--2063.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- X. Jiang, Z. Wu, Z. Yin, and Z. Yang. 2018. Power and Trajectory Optimization for UAV-Enabled Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks. IEEE Access, Vol. 6 (2018), 48688--48696.Google Scholar
- Ju-Hyung Lee, Ki-Hong Park, Young-Chai Ko, and Mohamed-Slim Alouini. 2020. Throughput Maximization of Mixed FSO/RF UAV-aided Mobile Relaying with a Buffer. (2020). arxiv: 2001.01193Google Scholar
- L. Li, T. Chang, and S. Cai. 2020. UAV Positioning and Power Control for Two-Way Wireless Relaying. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 19, 2 (2020), 1008--1024.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- X. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, and L. Hanzo. 2019. Trajectory Design and Power Control for Multi-UAV Assisted Wireless Networks: A Machine Learning Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 68, 8 (2019), 7957--7969.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Google Patent. 2016. Fixed Wing Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft. (2016). arxiv: 2001.01193 https://pixhawk.org/platforms/vtol/startGoogle Scholar
- S. Wang, R. Ruby, V. C. M. Leung, and Z. Yao. 2016. A Low-Complexity Power Allocation Strategy to Minimize Sum-Source-Power for Multi-User Single-AF-Relay Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 4, 8 (2016), 3275--3283.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang. 2018. Joint Trajectory and Communication Design for Multi-UAV Enabled Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 17, 3 (2018), 2109--2121.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- W. Yi, Y. Liu, E. Bodanese, A. Nallanathan, and G. K. Karagiannidis. 2019. A Unified Spatial Framework for UAV-Aided MmWave Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 67, 12 (2019), 8801--8817.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim. 2016. Throughput Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 64, 12 (2016), 4983--4996.Google Scholar
- C. Zhan and Y. Zeng. 2019. Completion Time Minimization for Multi-UAV-Enabled Data Collection. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 18, 10 (2019), 4859--4872.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Zhang, H. Zhang, Q. He, K. Bian, and L. Song. 2018. Joint Trajectory and Power Optimization for UAV Relay Networks. IEEE Commun. Lett., Vol. 22, 1 (2018), 161--164.Google Scholar
- N. Zhao, F. Cheng, F. R. Yu, J. Tang, Y. Chen, G. Gui, and H. Sari. 2018. Caching UAV Assisted Secure Transmission in Hyper-Dense Networks Based on Interference Alignment. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 66, 5 (2018), 2281--2294.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
Index Terms
Aiding a Disaster Spot via an UAV-Based Mobile AF Relay: Joint Trajectory and Power Optimization
Recommendations
UAV Placement and Trajectory Design Optimization: A Survey
AbstractUnmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have recently attracted attention in military areas as well as a wide range of commercial and civilian applications. With UAVs equipped with advanced transmitters and sensors, and with high mobility and flexibility ...
Analysis and optimization of a rateless coded joint relay system
We consider the code design for a half-duplex 4- node joint relay system with two sources, one relay, and one destination. The relay combines the information from both sources and transmits it to the destination together with both sources. We consider ...
Outage probability optimization of UAV relay system based on elliptical trajectory
AbstractUnmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which enable both high flexibility and low cost, have been widely used in both military and civilian application scenarios. In this paper, we investigate a fixed-wing UAV relay system, where the fixed-wing UAV acts ...





Comments