skip to main content
10.1145/3416012.3424622acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Aiding a Disaster Spot via an UAV-Based Mobile AF Relay: Joint Trajectory and Power Optimization

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Followed by the destruction of existing infrastructure or the emergence of the necessity for a new infrastructure, disaster events (e.g., earthquakes and pandemic) may require inspection of certain area and passing information to a dedicated help unit. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-aided mobile relaying technology is one of the effective means of provisioning service in such situations. In this paper, as the part of the rescuing operation in a certain disaster spot, we consider a mobile relaying technique, where an UAV acts as a relay node to ferry data between two disconnected floating or fixed nodes. For the sake of simplicity and low cost, amplify-and-forward relaying capability is adopted for the UAV. We consider the maximization of end-to-end throughput of such a system by optimizing the source/UAV power allocation as well as the trajectory of the UAV while considering practical mobility constraints (on the speed and initial/final locations of the UAV) as well as signal causality constraints. The formulated optimization problem is non-convex, and hence intractable to solve. Therefore, similar to the existing solution approach, we solve the problem via an iteration-based solution strategy, however we solve the source/UAV power allocation and the UAV trajectory design problems per iteration in a different manner. For the source/UAV power allocation problem, we provide heuristic solutions while considering both the availability and absence of a buffer at the UAV node. On the other hand, for the given power assignment, we adopt the geometric programming (GP)-based approach upon the transformation of variables and constraints. Furthermore, under the free initial and final UAV locations, jointly optimal power allocation and UAV trajectory are derived. Through extensive simulation, we verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme while comparing with one existing work.

References

  1. Stephen Boyd, Seung-Jean Kim, Lieven Vandenberghe, and Arash Hassibi. 2007. A tutorial on geometric programming. Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 8, 1 (2007), 67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Chen, M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, C. Yin, M. Debbah, and C. S. Hong. 2017. Caching in the Sky: Proactive Deployment of Cache-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Optimized Quality-of-Experience. IEEE J. Sel. A. Commun., Vol. 35, 5 (2017), 1046--1061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Chen, N. Zhao, Z. Ding, and M. Alouini. 2018. Multiple UAVs as Relays: Multi-Hop Single Link Versus Multiple Dual-Hop Links. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 17, 9 (2018), 6348--6359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. F. Cheng, S. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Chen, N. Zhao, F. R. Yu, and V. C. M. Leung. 2018. UAV Trajectory Optimization for Data Offloading at the Edge of Multiple Cells. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 67, 7 (2018), 6732--6736.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Chiang. 2005. Geometric Programming for Communication Systems. Commun. Inf. Theory, Vol. 2, 1/2 (jul 2005), 1--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Cui, Y. Cai, Z. Qin, M. Zhao, and G. Y. Li. 2019. Multiple Access for Mobile-UAV Enabled Networks: Joint Trajectory Design and Resource Allocation. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 67, 7 (2019), 4980--4994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Deruyck, J. Wyckmans, W. Joseph, and L. Martens. 2018. Designing UAV-aided emergency networks for large-scale disaster scenarios. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., Vol. 2018, 79 (2018), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Gong, T. Chang, C. Shen, and X. Chen. 2018. Flight Time Minimization of UAV for Data Collection Over Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE J. Sel. A. Commun., Vol. 36, 9 (2018), 1942--1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. X. Hu, K. Wong, K. Yang, and Z. Zheng. 2019. UAV-Assisted Relaying and Edge Computing: Scheduling and Trajectory Optimization. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 18, 10 (2019), 4738--4752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Jeong, O. Simeone, and J. Kang. 2018. Mobile Edge Computing via a UAV-Mounted Cloudlet: Optimization of Bit Allocation and Path Planning. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 67, 3 (2018), 2049--2063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. X. Jiang, Z. Wu, Z. Yin, and Z. Yang. 2018. Power and Trajectory Optimization for UAV-Enabled Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks. IEEE Access, Vol. 6 (2018), 48688--48696.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ju-Hyung Lee, Ki-Hong Park, Young-Chai Ko, and Mohamed-Slim Alouini. 2020. Throughput Maximization of Mixed FSO/RF UAV-aided Mobile Relaying with a Buffer. (2020). arxiv: 2001.01193Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Li, T. Chang, and S. Cai. 2020. UAV Positioning and Power Control for Two-Way Wireless Relaying. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 19, 2 (2020), 1008--1024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. X. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, and L. Hanzo. 2019. Trajectory Design and Power Control for Multi-UAV Assisted Wireless Networks: A Machine Learning Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. 68, 8 (2019), 7957--7969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Google Patent. 2016. Fixed Wing Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft. (2016). arxiv: 2001.01193 https://pixhawk.org/platforms/vtol/startGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Wang, R. Ruby, V. C. M. Leung, and Z. Yao. 2016. A Low-Complexity Power Allocation Strategy to Minimize Sum-Source-Power for Multi-User Single-AF-Relay Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 4, 8 (2016), 3275--3283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang. 2018. Joint Trajectory and Communication Design for Multi-UAV Enabled Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 17, 3 (2018), 2109--2121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. W. Yi, Y. Liu, E. Bodanese, A. Nallanathan, and G. K. Karagiannidis. 2019. A Unified Spatial Framework for UAV-Aided MmWave Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 67, 12 (2019), 8801--8817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim. 2016. Throughput Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 64, 12 (2016), 4983--4996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Zhan and Y. Zeng. 2019. Completion Time Minimization for Multi-UAV-Enabled Data Collection. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., Vol. 18, 10 (2019), 4859--4872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Zhang, H. Zhang, Q. He, K. Bian, and L. Song. 2018. Joint Trajectory and Power Optimization for UAV Relay Networks. IEEE Commun. Lett., Vol. 22, 1 (2018), 161--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Zhao, F. Cheng, F. R. Yu, J. Tang, Y. Chen, G. Gui, and H. Sari. 2018. Caching UAV Assisted Secure Transmission in Hyper-Dense Networks Based on Interference Alignment. IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 66, 5 (2018), 2281--2294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Aiding a Disaster Spot via an UAV-Based Mobile AF Relay: Joint Trajectory and Power Optimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiWac '20: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access
      November 2020
      148 pages
      ISBN:9781450381192
      DOI:10.1145/3416012

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate83of272submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader