skip to main content
research-article

CROWD: Crow Search and Deep Learning based Feature Extractor for Classification of Parkinson’s Disease

Published:09 June 2021Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

The authors have requested minor, non-substantive changes to the VoR and, in accordance with ACM policies, a Corrected VoR was published on September 4, 2021. For reference purposes the VoR may still be accessed via the Supplemental Material section on this page.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Edge Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the latest trend for next-generation computing for data analytics, particularly in predictive edge analytics for high-risk diseases like Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Deep learning learning techniques facilitate edge AI applications for enhanced, real-time handling of data. Dopamine is the cause of Parkinson’s that happens due to the interference of brain cells that produce the substance to regulate the communication of brain cells. The brain cells responsible for generating the dopamine perform adaptation, control, and movement with fluency. Parkinson’s motor symptoms appear on the loss of 60% to 80% of cells, due to the non-production of appropriate dopamine. Recent research found a close connection between the speech impairment and PD. Many researchers have developed a classification algorithm to identify the PD from speech signals. In this article, Adaptive Crow Search Algorithm (ACSA) and Deep Learning (DL)–based optimal feature selection method are introduced. The proposed model is the combination of CROW Search and Deep learning (CROWD) stack sparse autoencoder neural network. Parkinson’s dataset is taken for the experiment from the Irvine dataset repository at the University of California (UCI). In the first phase, dataset cleaning is performed to handle the missing values in the dataset. After that, the proposed ACSA algorithm is employed to find the scrunched feature vector. Furthermore, stack spare autoencoder with seven hidden layers is employed to generate the compressed feature vector. The performance of the proposed CROWD autoencoder model is compared with three feature selection approaches for six supervised classification techniques. The experiment result demonstrates that the performance of the proposed CROWD autoencoder feature selection model has outperformed the benchmarked feature selection techniques: (i) Maximum Relevance (mRMR) (ii) Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and (iii) Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS), to classify Parkinson’s disease. This research has significance in the healthcare sector for the enhancement of classification accuracy up to 0.96%.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Enas Abdulhay, N. Arunkumar, Kumaravelu Narasimhan, Elamaran Vellaiappan, and V. Venkatraman. 2018. Gait and tremor investigation using machine learning techniques for the diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Fut. Gen. Comput.Syst. 83 (Mar. 2018), 366–373. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.02.009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jefferson S. Almeida, Pedro P. Rebouças Filho, TiagoCarneiro, Wei Wei, Robertas Damaševičius, Rytis Maskeliūnas, and Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque. 2019. Detecting Parkinson’s disease with sustained phonation and speech signals using machine learning techniques. Pattern Recog. Lett. 125 (July 2019), 55–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2019.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alireza Askarzadeh. 2016. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 169 (June 2016), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Freddie Åström and Rasit Koker. 2011. A parallel neural network approach to prediction of Parkinson’s Disease. Exp. Syst. Applic. 38, 10 (Sept. 2011), 12470–12474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.028 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Julia Camps, Albert Sama, Mario Martin, Daniel Rodriguez-Martin, Carlos Perez-Lopez, Joan M. Moreno Arostegui, Joan Cabestany, Andreu Catala, Sheila Alcaine, and Berta Mestre. 2018. Deep learning for freezing of gait detection in Parkinson’s disease patients in their homes using a waist-worn inertial measurement unit. Knowl.-based Syst. 139, 1 (Jan. 2018), 119–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Filippo Cavallo, Alessandra Moschetti, Dario Esposito, Carlo Maremmani, and Erika Rovini. 2019. Upper limb motor pre-clinical assessment in Parkinson’s disease using machine learning. Parkinson. Relat. Disord. 63 (June 2019), 111–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsiao-Chun Cheng, Christina M. Ulane, and Robert E. Burke. 2010. Clinical progression in Parkinson disease and the neurobiology of axons. Ann. Neurol. 67, 6 (May 2010), 715–725. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chris Ding and Hanchuan Peng. 2005. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J. Bioinf. Comput. Biol. 3, 2 (Apr. 2005), 185–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219720005001004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lysia S. Forno. 1988. The neuropathology of Parkinson’s disease. In Progress in Parkinson Research. Springer, Boston, MA, 11–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0759-4_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Srishti Grover, Saloni Bhartia, Abhilasha Yadav, and K. R. Seeja. 2018. Predicting severity of Parkinson’s disease using deep learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132 (June 2018), 1788–1794. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Deepak Gupta, Arnav Julka, Sanchit Jain, Tushar Aggarwal, Ashish Khanna, N. Arunkumar, and Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque. 2018. Optimized cuttlefish algorithm for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Cog. Syst. Res. 52 (Dec. 2018), 36–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.06.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark A. Hall. 2000. Correlation-based feature selection of discrete and numeric class machine learning. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’00). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 359–366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yixue Hao, Yiming Miao, Long Hu, M. Shamim Hossain, Ghulam Muhammad, and Syed Umar Amin. 2019. Smart-Edge-CoCaCo: AI-enabled smart edge with joint computation, caching, and communication in heterogeneous IoT. IEEE Netw. 33, 2 (Mar. 2019), 58–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2019.1800235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. S. Hossain and G. Muhammad. 2019. Emotion recognition using secure edge and cloud computing. Inf. Sci. 504 (July 2019), 589–601. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Kotsavasiloglou, N. Kostikis, Dimitrios Hristu-Varsakelis, and M. Arnaoutoglou. 2017. Machine learning-based classification of simple drawing movements in Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Sig. Proc. Contr. 31 (Jan. 2017), 174–180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.08.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kai Lin, Chensi Li, Daxin Tian, Ahmed Ghoneim, M. Shamim Hossain, and Amin Syed Umar. 2019. Artificial-intelligence-based data analytics for cognitive communication in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wirel. Commun. 26, 3 (June 2019), 83–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2019.1800351 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Seyedali Mirjalili, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili, and Andrew Lewis. 2014. Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 69 (May 2014), 46–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ghulam Muhammad, M. S. Hossain, and Muhammad A. Yasmine. 2020. Tree-based deep networks for edge devices. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 16, 3 (Mar. 2020), 2022–2028. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2950326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, Othman Ibrahim, and Ali Ahani. 2016. Accuracy improvement for predicting Parkinson’s disease progression. Sci. Rep. 6, 1 (Sept. 2016), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34181Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, Othman Ibrahim, Hossein Ahmadi, Leila Shahmoradi, and Mohammadreza Farahmand. 2018. A hybrid intelligent system for the prediction of Parkinson’s Disease progression using machine learning techniques. Biocyber. Biomed. Eng. 38, 1 (Oct. 2018), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2017.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shu Lih Oh, Yuki Hagiwara, U. Raghavendra, Rajamanickam Yuvaraj, N. Arunkumar, M. Murugappan, and Rajendra U. Acharya. 2018. A deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from EEG signals. Neural Comput. Applic. 32 (Aug. 2018), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3689-5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Akin Ozcift. 2012. SVM feature selection based rotation forest ensemble classifiers to improve computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson disease. J. Med. Syst. 36, 4 (Mar. 2012), 2141–2147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9678-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemal Polat. 2012. Classification of Parkinson’s disease using feature weighting method on the basis of fuzzy C-means clustering. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 43, 4 (May 2012), 597–609. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2011.581395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kemal Polat. 2019. A hybrid approach to Parkinson disease classification using speech signal: The combination of smote and random forests. In Proceedings of the Scientific Meeting on Electrical-Electronics & Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (EBBT’19). IEEE, 1–3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EBBT.2019.8741725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jorge Peña Queralta, Tuan Nguyen Gia, Hannu Tenhunen, and Tomi Westerlund. 2019. Edge-AI in LoRa-based health monitoring: Fall detection system with fog computing and LSTM recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP’19). IEEE, 601–604. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.8768883Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. UCI ML Repository. 2008. Parkinson’s Data Set. Retrieved from https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Parkinson%27s+Disease+Classification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yvan Saeys, Thomas Abeel, and Yves Van de Peer. 2008. Robust feature selection using ensemble feature selection techniques. In Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, Berlin, 313–325. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87481-2_21Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Betul Erdogdu Sakar, M. Erdem Isenkul, C. Okan Sakar, Ahmet Sertbas, Fikret Gurgen, Sakir Delil, Hulya Apaydin, and Olcay Kursun. 2013. Collection and analysis of a Parkinson speech dataset with multiple types of sound recordings. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 17, 4 (July 2013), 828–834. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2245674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. C. Okan Sakar and Olcay Kursun. 2010. Telediagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using measurements of dysphonia. J. Med. Syst. 34, 4 (Aug. 2010), 591–599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9272-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohammad R. Salmanpour, Mojtaba Shamsaei, Abdollah Saberi, Saeed Setayeshi, Ivan S. Klyuzhin, Vesna Sossi, and Arman Rahmim. 2019. Optimized machine learning methods for prediction of cognitive outcome in Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Biolo. Med. 111 (Aug. 2019), 1033–1047. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103347Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gurpreet Singh, Meet Vadera, Lakshminarayanan Samavedham, and Erle Chuen-Hian Lim. 2016. Machine learning-based framework for multi-class diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: A study on Parkinson’s disease. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49, 7 (Aug. 2016), 990–995. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.331Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Noelia Sánchez-Maroño, Amparo Alonso-Betanzos, and María Tombilla-Sanromán. 2007. Filter methods for feature selection—A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL’07). Springer, 178–187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77226-2_19 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kai Rui Wan, Tomasz Maszczyk, Angela An Qi, Justin Dauwels, and Nicolas Kon Kam King. 2019. A review on microelectrode recording selection of features for machine learning in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophys. 130, 1 (Jan. 2019), 145–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Yang Wang, An-Na Wang, Qing Ai, and Hai-Jing Sun. 2017. An adaptive kernel-based weighted extreme learning machine approach for effective detection of Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Sig. Proc. Contr. 38 (Aug. 2017), 400–410. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.06.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Xue wen Chen and Jong Cheol Jeong. 2007. Enhanced recursive feature elimination. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA’07). IEEE, 429–435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2007.35 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yanhao Xiong and Yaohua Lu. 2020. Deep feature extraction from the vocal vectors using sparse autoencoders for Parkinson’s classification. IEEE Access 8 (Jan. 2020), 27821–27830. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968177Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Geeta Yadav, Yugal Kumar, and Gadadhar Sahoo. 2012. Predication of Parkinson’s disease using data mining methods: A comparative analysis of tree, statistical and support vector machine classifiers. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Computing and Communication Systems. IEEE, 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/NCCCS.2012.6413034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Orhan Yaman, Fatih Ertam, and Turker Tuncer. 2020. Automated Parkinson’s disease recognition based on statistical pooling method using acoustic features. Med. Hypoth. 135 (Feb. 2020), 109483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109483Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Xin-She Yang. 2014. Nature-inspired Optimization Algorithms. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-01368-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CROWD: Crow Search and Deep Learning based Feature Extractor for Classification of Parkinson’s Disease

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
          ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 21, Issue 3
          August 2021
          522 pages
          ISSN:1533-5399
          EISSN:1557-6051
          DOI:10.1145/3468071
          • Editor:
          • Ling Liu
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 June 2021
          • Accepted: 1 August 2020
          • Revised: 1 July 2020
          • Received: 1 January 2020
          Published in toit Volume 21, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!