skip to main content
research-article

A Structured and Linguistic Approach to Understanding Recovery and Relapse in AA

Published:05 November 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Alcoholism, also known as Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), is a serious problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Recovery from AUD is known to be challenging and often leads to relapse at various points after enrolling in a rehabilitation program such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). In this work, we present a structured and linguistic approach using hinge-loss Markov random fields (HL-MRFs) to understand recovery and relapse from AUD using social media data. We evaluate our models on AA-attending users extracted from: (i) the Twitter social network and predict recovery at two different points—90 days and 1 year after the user joins AA, respectively, and (ii) the Reddit AA recovery forums and predict whether the participating user is currently sober. The two datasets present two facets of the same underlying problem of understanding recovery and relapse in AUD users. We flesh out different characteristics in both these datasets: (i) In the Twitter dataset, we focus on the social aspect of the users and the relationship with recovery and relapse, and (ii) in the Reddit dataset, we focus on modeling the linguistic topics and dependency structure to understand users’ recovery journey. We design a unified modeling framework using HL-MRFs that takes the different characteristics of both these platforms into account. Our experiments reveal that our structured and linguistic approach is helpful in predicting recovery in users in both these datasets. We perform extensive quantitative analysis of different groups of features and dependencies among them in both datasets. The interpretable and intuitive nature of our models and analysis is helpful in making meaningful predictions and can potentially be helpful in identifying and preventing relapse early.

References

  1. Laura House. 2017. Research finds Reddit helping 40,000 recovering addicts find sobriety. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4093086/Research-finds-Reddit-helping-40-000-recovering-alcoholics-sobriety.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Althoff, Eric Horvitz, Ryen W. White, and Jamie Zeitzer. 2017. Harnessing the web for population-scale physiological sensing: A case study of sleep and performance. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. American Psychological Association. 2012. Recovery principles. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/01/recovery-principles.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephen H. Bach, Matthias Broecheler, Bert Huang, and Lise Getoor. 2017. Hinge-loss Markov random fields and probabilistic soft logic. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18 (2017), 1--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sairam Balani and Munmun De Choudhury. 2015. Detecting and characterizing mental health related self-disclosure in social media. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ana-Maria Bliuc, Muhammad Iqbal, and David Best. 2019. Integrating computerized linguistic and social network analyses to capture addiction recovery capital in an online community. J. Vis. Experim.147 (2019), e58851.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Munmun De Choudhury and Emre Kiciman. 2017. The language of social support in social media and its effect on suicidal ideation risk. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shaika Chowdhury, Chenwei Zhang, and Philip S. Yu. 2018. Multi-task pharmacovigilance mining from social media posts. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Neil S. Coulson. 2005. Receiving social support online: An analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. J. CyberPsychol. Behav. 8, 6 (2005), 580--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Brenda L. Curtis, Robert D. Ashford, Katherine I. Magnuson, and Stacy R. Ryan-Pettes. 2019. Comparison of smartphone ownership, social media use, and willingness to use digital interventions between Generation Z and millennials in the treatment of substance use: Cross-sectional questionnaire study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, 4 (2019), e13050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental health discourse on Reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting depression via social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ronda L. Dearing, Jeffrey Stuewig, and June Price Tangney. 2005. On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: Relations to problematic alcohol and drug use. Addict. Behav. 30, 7 (2005), 1392--1404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tao Ding, Warren K. Bickel, and Shimei Pan. 2017. Multi-view unsupervised user feature embedding for social media-based substance use prediction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’17).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tao Ding, Fatema Hasan, Warren K. Bickel, and Shimei Pan. 2018. Interpreting social media-based substance use prediction models with knowledge distillation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Dredze. 2012. How social media will change public health. J. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27 (2012), 81--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marica Ferri, Laura Amato, and Marina Davoli. 2006. Alcoholics anonymous and other 12-step programmes for alcohol dependence. The Cochrane Library (2006). DOI:https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD012880Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Pollyanna Gonçalves, Matheus Araújo, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Meeyoung Cha. 2013. Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods. In Proceedings of the Conference on Online Social Networks.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Donald S. Grant and Karen E. Dill-Shackleford. 2017. Using social media for sobriety recovery: Beliefs, behaviors, and surprises from users of face-to-face and social media sobriety support. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult. 6, 1 (2017), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christian Greiner, Anne Chatton, and Yasser Khazaal. 2017. Online self-help forums on cannabis: A content assessment. J. Patient Educ. Couns. 100, 10 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Haripriya Harikumar, Thin Nguyen, Sunil Gupta, Santu Rana, Ramachandra Kaimal, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2016. Understanding behavioral differences between short and long-term drinking abstainers from social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA’16).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Matthew Honnibal and Mark Johnson. 2015. An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. K. Misra, A. Epner, G. M. Cooper, and T. Horvath. 2010. Social Learning Theory of Addiction and Recovery Implications. Retrieved from http://www.amhc.org/1408-addictions/article/48347-social-learning-theory-of-addiction-and-recovery-implications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nabil Hossain, Tianran Hu, Roghayeh Feizi, Ann Marie White, Jiebo Luo, and Henry A. Kautz. 2016. Precise localization of homes and activities: Detecting drinking-while-tweeting patterns in communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsiao-Ying Huang and Masooda Bashir. 2016. Online community and suicide prevention: Investigating the linguistic cues and reply bias. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. George M. Hunt and Nathan H. Azrin. 1973. A community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism. J. Behav. Res. Ther. 11 (1973), 91--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. Rosenquist, J. Murabito, J. H. Fowler, and N. A. Christakis. 2010. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. J. Ann. Intern. Med. 152 (2010), 426--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Hal Daumé, III, and Raghavendra Udupa. 2012. Incorporating lexical priors into topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL’12).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Deeptanshu Jha and Rahul Singh. 2019. SMARTS: The social media-based addiction recovery and intervention targeting server. Bioinformatics 36, 6 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hua Jin, Sean B. Rourke, Thomas L. Patterson, Michael J. Taylor, and Igor Grant. 1998. Predictors of relapse in long-term abstinent alcoholics.J. Stud. Alc. 59 (1998), 640--646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Yoram M. Kalman, Kathleen Geraghty, Cynthia K. Thompson, and Darren Gergle. 2012. Detecting linguistic HCI markers in an online aphasia support group. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computers and Accessibility (SIGACCESS’12).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Maulik R. Kamdar and Mark A. Musen. 2017. PhLeGrA: Graph analytics in pharmacology over the web of life sciences linked open data. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Payam Karisani and Eugene Agichtein. 2018. Did you really just have a heart attack?: Towards robust detection of personal health mentions in social media. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Animesh Koratana, Mark Dredze, Margaret S. Chisolm, Matthew W. Johnson, and Michael J. Paul. 2016. Studying anonymous health issues and substance use on college campuses with Yik Yak. In AAAI Workshop on WWW and Population Health Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Adam D. I. Kramer, Susan R. Fussell, and Leslie D. Setlock. 2004. Text analysis as a tool for analyzing conversation in online support groups. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Edward Loper and Steven Bird. 2002. NLTK: The natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Diana MacLean, Sonal Gupta, Anna Lembke, Christopher Manning, and Jeffrey Heer. 2015. Forum77: An analysis of an online health forum dedicated to addiction recovery. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Stephen A. Maisto, Kate B. Carey, and Clara M. Bradizza. 1999. Social learning theory. J. Psychol. Theor. Drink. Alc. 2 (1999), 106--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Lydia Manikonda, Heather Pon-Barry, Subbarao Kambhampati, Eric Hekler, and David W. McDonald. 2014. Discourse analysis of user forums in an online weight loss application. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Social Dynamics and Personal Attributes in Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. David J. McIver, Jared B. Hawkins, Rumi Chunara, Arnaub K. Chatterjee, Aman Bhandari, Timothy P. Fitzgerald, Sachin H. Jain, and John S. Brownstein. 2015. Characterizing sleep issues using Twitter. J. Med. Internet Res. 17 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Yelena Mejova, Ingmar Weber, and Michael W. Macy. 2015. Twitter: A Digital Socioscope. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Liesbeth Mercken, Christian Steglich, Ronald Knibbe, and Hein de Vries. 2012. Dynamics of friendship networks and alcohol use in early and mid-adolescence. J. Stud. Alc. Drugs 73 (2012), 99--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Megan A. Moreno and Jennifer M. Whitehill. 2014. Influence of social media on alcohol use in adolescents and young adults. J. Alc. Res.: Curr. Rev. 36 (2014), 91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization. Management of Substance Abuse Unit. 2014. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Michael J. Paul and Mark Dredze. 2011. You are what you tweet: Analyzing Twitter for public health. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael J. Paul and Mark Dredze. 2014. Discovering health topics in social media using topic models. PLoS One 9 (2014), e103408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. James W. Pennebaker, Martha E. Francis, and Roger J. Booth. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Arti Ramesh, Dan Goldwasser, Bert Huang, Hal Daumé III, and Lise Getoor. 2014. Learning latent engagement patterns of students in online courses. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Julie Repper and Rachel Perkins. 2003. Social Inclusion and Recovery: A Model for Mental Health Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Hannah C. Rettie, Lee M. Hogan, and W. Miles Cox. 2018. Negative attentional bias for positive recovery-related words as a predictor of treatment success among individuals with an alcohol use disorder. Addict. Behav. 84 (2018), 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Nicolas Rey-Villamizar, Prasha Shrestha, Farig Sadeque, Steven Bethard, Ted Pedersen, Arjun Mukherjee, and Thamar Solorio. 2016. Analysis of anxious word usage on online health forums. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Takaya Saito and Marc Rehmsmeier. 2015. The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS One 10, 3 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandra Servia-Rodríguez, Kiran K. Rachuri, Cecilia Mascolo, Peter J. Rentfrow, Neal Lathia, and Gillian M. Sandstrom. 2017. Mobile sensing at the service of mental well-being: A large-scale longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Bruce Simons-Morton. 2007. Social influences on adolescent substance use. Amer. J. Health Behav. 31 (2007), 672--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Acar Tamersoy, Duen Horng Chau, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. Analysis of smoking and drinking relapse in an online community. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Health.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Sabina Tomkins, Lise Getoor, Yunfei Chen, and Yi Zhang. 2018. A socio-linguistic model for cyberbullying detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Morgan Walker, Laura Thornton, Munmun De Choudhury, Jaime Teevan, Cynthia M. Bulik, Cheri A. Levinson, and Stephanie Zerwas. 2015. Facebook use and disordered eating in college-aged women. J. Adol. Health 57 (2015), 157--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Yilin Wang, Jiliang Tang, Jundong Li, Baoxin Li, Yali Wan, Clayton Mellina, Neil O’Hare, and Yi Chang. 2017. Understanding and discovering deliberate self-harm content in social media. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Yi-Chia Wang, Robert Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2012. To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Marsha White and Steve M. Dorman. 2001. Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. J. Health Educ. Res. 16 (2001), 693--707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Andrew J. Winzelberg, Catherine Classen, Georg W. Alpers, Heidi Roberts, Cheryl Koopman, Robert E. Adams, Heidemarie Ernst, Parvati Dev, and C. Barr Taylor. 2003. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. J. Cancer 97 (2003), 1164--1173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Mark D. Wood, Jennifer P. Read, Roger E. Mitchell, and Nancy H. Brand. 2004. Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates.J. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 18 (2004), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Ronghua Xu and Qingpeng Zhang. 2016. Understanding online health groups for depression: Social network and linguistic perspectives. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Shaodian Zhang, Tian Kang, Lin Qiu, Weinan Zhang, Yong Yu, and Noémie Elhadad. 2017. Cataloguing treatments discussed and used in online autism communities. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Yue Zhang and Arti Ramesh. 2018. Fine-grained analysis of cyberbullying using weakly-supervised topic models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Yue Zhang, Arti Ramesh, Jennifer Golbeck, Dhanya Sridhar, and Lise Getoor. 2018. A structured approach to understanding recovery and relapse in AA. In Proceedings of the Web Conference (WWW’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Bin Zou, Vasileios Lampos, and Ingemar Cox. 2018. Multi-task learning improves disease models from web search. In Proceedings of the Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Structured and Linguistic Approach to Understanding Recovery and Relapse in AA

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!