Abstract
The quick growth and fast spread of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) have created a new threat to Internet merchants and marketers through paid online reviewers flooding sites with product and service reviews that could confuse and deter customers. This study examined the effects of the posts by paid reviewers—specifically, the negative reviews—on consumers’ risk perception, product attitude, and purchase intention. While extant research examined negative eWOM as an information source, little attention has been paid to the role of a hired reviewer's post aimed at destroying the reputation of certain targets (Internet Water Army Attack [IWAA]). To gain a better understanding of this phenomenon, three experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of the amount, quality, and presentation order of negative eWOM on consumers’ perception change and decision making. We tested the hypothesis using a test environment that mimicked a PTT online forum (https://www.ptt.cc/) in Taiwan. Three simulation cases (smartphone, digital camera, and tablet) based on real-world events were used. A total of 193 participants completed all three experiments and provided valid responses. The results of this study are mostly consistent with previous research findings that online marketing is greatly threatened by negative eWOM. Nevertheless, it was also found that the effects of the amount, quality, and presentation order of negative eWOM are more complicated than we have anticipated. The findings revealed that IWAA can effectively increase customers’ risk perception toward a product and change their attitude and purchase intention.
- T. Araujo and P. Neijens. 2012. Friend me: which factors influence top global brands participation in social network sites. Internet Research 22, 5 (2012), 626–640.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Berger, A. T. Sorensen, and S. J. Rasmussen. 2010. Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science 29, 5 (2010), 815–827.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. F. Bone. 1995. Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. Journal of Business Research 32, 3 (1995), 213–223. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. M. Carlsmith, P. C. Ellsworth, and E. Aronson. 1976. Methods of Research in Social Psychology 1976. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- A. Chang, S. H. Hsieh, and T. H. Tseng. 2013. Online brand community response to negative brand events: the role of group eWOM. Internet Research 23, 4 (2013), 486–506.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Chen, K. Wu, V. Srinivasan, and X. Zhang. 2013. Battling the internet water army: Detection of hidden paid posters. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.Google Scholar
- J. Chen, L. Teng, Y. Yu, and X. Yu. 2016. The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to informational influence. Journal of Business Research 69, 2 (2016), 467–475. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. A. Chevalier and D. Mayzlin. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3 (2006), 345–354.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. S. Chiou, C. C. Hsiao, and F. Y. Su. 2014. Whose online reviews have the most influences on consumers in cultural offerings? Professional vs consumer commentators. Internet Research 24, 3 (2014), 353–368.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- W. B. De Bruin and G. Keren. 2003. Order effects in sequentially judged options due to the direction of comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 92, 1 (2003), 91–101.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. E. Escalas. 2007. Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research 33, 4 (2007), 421–429.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- L. Gaines-Ross. 2010. Reputation warfare. Harvard Business Review 88, 12 (2010), 70–76.Google Scholar
- A. Golmohammadi, A. S. Mattila, and D. K. Gauri. 2020. Negative online reviews and consumers' service consumption. Journal of Business Research 116 (2020), 27--36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.004.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Goodwin and I. Ross. 1992. Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research 25, 2 (1992), 149–163.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Gopinath, J. S. Thomas, and L. Krishnamurthi. 2014. Investigating the relationship between the content of online word of mouth, advertising, and brand performance. Marketing Science 33, 2 (2014), 241–258, 308–310.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Ha. 2015. Assessing quality of consumer reviews in mobile application markets: A principal component analysis approach. Paper presented at the 2015 Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2015). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. V. Heerden, E. Salehi-Sangari, L. Pitt, and A. Caruana. 2010. Do b2b bloggers believe in blogs?: PR insights on blogger skepticism. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal 10 (2010), 123–132.Google Scholar
- A. A. Israeli, S. A. Lee, and A. C. Karpinski. 2019. The relationship between internet addiction and negative eWOM. The Service Industries Journal 39 (2019), (13-14): 943–965.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. R. Jalilvand and N. Samiei. 2012a. The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 30, 4 (2012), 460–476.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. R. Jalilvand and N. Samiei. 2012b. The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 22, 5 (2012), 591–612.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- N. Jindal and B. Liu. 2008. Opinion spam and analysis. Paper presented at the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.Google Scholar
- P. John Mello, Jr. 2011. Research: Paid Posters Poison the Internet. http://www.pcworld.com/article/244805/research_paid_posters_poison_the_internet.html.Google Scholar
- E. C. Ku. 2012. Beyond price: how does trust encourage online group's buying intention? Internet Research 22, 5 (2012), 569–590. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Lee and I. B. Hong. 2019. Consumer's electronic word-of-mouth adoption: The trust transfer perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 23, 4 (2019), 595–627.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Lee, D. H. Park, I. Han. 2008. The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 7, 3 (2008), 341–352.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. M. Legg and K. Sweeny. 2014. Do you want the good news or the bad news first? The nature and consequences of news order preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40, 3 (2014), 279–288.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Levy and Y. Gvili. 2020. Online shopper engagement in price negotiation: the roles of culture, involvement and eWOM. International Journal of Advertising 39, 2 (2020), 232–257.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Y. Lian, X. Dong, Y. Chi, X. Tang, and Y. Liu. 2019. An Internet water army detection supernetwork model. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 55108--55120. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Lindgreen, A. Dobele, and J. Vanhamme. 2013. Word-of-mouth and viral marketing referrals: what do we know? and what should we know. European Journal of Marketing 47, 7 (2013), 1028–1033.Google Scholar
- A. Mantonakis, P. Rodero, I. Lesschaeve, and R. Hastie. 2009. Order in choice effects of serial position on preferences. Psychological Science 20, 11 (2009), 1309–1312.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. W. Maynard. 1997. The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30, 2 (1997), 93–130.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. McCarthy, J. Rowley, C. Jane Ashworth, and E. Pioch. 2014. Managing brand presence through social media: the case of UK football clubs. Internet Research 24, 2 (2014), 181–204.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. L. Meuter, D. B. McCabe, and J. M. Curran. 2013. Electronic word-of-mouth versus interpersonal word-of-mouth: Are all forms of word-of-mouth equally influential? Services Marketing Quarterly 34, 3 (2013), 240–256.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Mitchell and J. Olson. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research 18, 3 (1981), 318–332.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, and N. Glance. 2012. Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 International World Wide Web Conference.Google Scholar
- A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, J. Wang, N. Glance, and N. Jindal. 2011. Detecting group review spam. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference Companion on World Wide Web.Google Scholar
- K. B. Murray and J. L. Schlacter. The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 1 (1990), 51–65. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Nakhata and H. C. Kuo. 2013. How does discount size reduce the negative effect of negative online consumer reviews on online hotel booking? Paper presented at the 2013 AMA Winter Educators' Conference. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Nam, J. Baker, N. Ahmad, and J. Goo. 2019. Determinants of writing positive and negative electronic word-of-mouth: Empirical evidence for two types of expectation confirmation. Decision Support Systems 2019; 113168.Google Scholar
- S. Park and J. L. Nicolau. 2015. Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research 50 (201), 67–83.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- B. C. Perdue and J. O. Summers. 1986. Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 23, 4 (1986), 317–326.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- N. Purnawirawan, P. De Pelsmacker, and N. Dens. 2012. Balance and sequence in online reviews: How perceived usefulness affects attitudes and intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26, 4 (2012), 244–255.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. D. Rucker, Z. L. Tormala, R. E. Petty, and P. Briñol. 2014. Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology 24, 1 (2014), 119–136.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- A. Rynarzewska. 2019. It's not fake, it's biased: insights into morality of incentivized reviewers. Journal of Consumer Marketing 36, 3 (2019), 401--409.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- B. Sago and C. Hinnenkamp. 2014. The impact of significant negative news on consumer behavior towards favorite brands. Global Journal of Business Research 8, 1 (2014), 65–72.Google Scholar
- E. W. See-To and K. K. Ho. 2014. Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic word-of-mouth and trust – a theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 31, (2014) 182–189.Google Scholar
- C. Silverman and J. Singer-Vine. 2016. Most Americans who see fake News believe It, new survey says. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Silverman and J. Singer-Vine. 2020. Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. Retrieved September 14, 2020, from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey.Google Scholar
- Y. S. Su, W. L. Chiang, C. T. J. Lee, and H. C. Chang. 2016. The effect of flow experience on player loyalty in mobile game application. Computers in Human Behavior 63, (2016) 240–248.Google Scholar
- J. L. Swasy and J. M. Munch. 1985. Examining the target of receiver elaborations: Rhetorical question effects on source processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 11, 4 (1985), 877–886.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- T. S. H. Teo and Y. D. Yeong. 2003. Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace. Omega 31, 5 (2003), 349–363. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- The Financial Times. Amazon's assault on the internet's spoof reviews: Online retailer is right to confront practice that distorts competition. Retrieved September 16, 2018, from https://www.ft.com/content/a3d98042-7658-11e5-933d-efcdc3c11c89.Google Scholar
- G. L. Urban, F. Sultan, and W. J. Qualls. 2000. Placing trust at the center of your internet strategy. Sloan Management Review 42, 1 (2000), 39.Google Scholar
- K. Weidner, F. Beuk, and A. Bal. 2019. Fake news and the willingness to share: A schemer schema and confirmatory bias perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- P. S. Wei and H. P. Lu. 2013. An examination of the celebrity endorsements and online customer reviews influence female consumers’ shopping behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 1 (2013), 193–201.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- W. Wood, C. A. Kallgren, and R. M. Preisler. 1985. Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21, 1 (1985), 73–85.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. Q. Yan. 2013. Samsung Watergate. from http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business/2013/10/131024_samsung_taiwan_fine.shtml. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Q. Yan. 2018. Samsung Watergate. Retrieved September 16, 2018, from http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business/2013/10/131024_samsung_taiwan_fine.shtml.Google Scholar
- J. Zhou. 2015. Amazon tackles plague of fake online reviews. The Epoch Times 2015; A1, A12.Google Scholar
- S. Q. Yan. 2018. Samsung Watergate. Retrieved September 16, 2018, from http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business/2013/10/131024_samsung_taiwan_fine.shtml.Google Scholar
- J. Zhou. 2015. Amazon tackles plague of fake online reviews. The Epoch Times 2015; A1, A12.Google Scholar
Index Terms
The Effects of Negative Online Reviews on Consumer Perception, Attitude and Purchase Intention: Experimental Investigation of the Amount, Quality, and Presentation Order of eWOM
Recommendations
Assessing the influence of consumer perceived value, trust and attitude on purchase intention of online shopping
IC4E '18: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-LearningThe acceptance and usage of online shopping is influenced by numerous factors such as perceived value, trust, buyer's uncertainty which has constituted key hindrances to online transactions [22] This study investigates the effect of consumer perceived ...
The Impact of EWOM Referral, Celebrity Endorsement, and Information Quality on Purchase Decision: A Case of Instagram
This study aims to explore factors that have impact on purchase decision on a social commerce, viz., social media Instagram. Thus, several dimensions namely eWOM referral, celebrity endorsement, information quality, brand satisfaction, brand trust and ...
Understanding the effects of eWOM social ties on purchase intentions: A moderated mediation investigation
Highlights- Strong-tie eWOM and weak-tie eWOM both facilitate consumer purchase intentions.
AbstractElectronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) social ties have been well recognized to exert influence on consumer decision making. However, the underlying mechanism through which eWOM social ties impart influence remains unclear. ...






Comments