Abstract
Extended Reality (XR) systems (which encapsulate AR, VR and MR) is an emerging field which enables the development of novel visualization and interaction techniques. To develop and to assess such techniques, researchers and designers have to face choices in terms of which development tools to adopt, and with very little information about how such tools support some of the very basic tasks for information visualization, such as selecting data items, linking and navigating. As a solution, we propose Flex-ER, a flexible web-based environment that enables users to prototype, debug and share experimental conditions and results. Flex-ER enables users to quickly switch between hardware platforms and input modalities by using a JSON specification that supports both defining interaction techniques and tasks at a low cost. We demonstrate the flexibility of the environment through three task design examples: brushing, linking and navigating. A qualitative user study suggest that Flex-ER can be helpful to prototype and explore different interaction techniques for immersive analytics.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
JSON specification and documentation.
- W. Aigner, S. Hoffmann, and A. Rind. 2013. EvalBench: A Software Library for Visualization Evaluation. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3pt1 (2013), 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12091 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12091Google Scholar
- Caroline Appert and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2006. SwingStates: Adding State Machines to the Swing Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Montreux, Switzerland) (UIST '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166302Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Caroline Appert, Stéphane Huot, Pierre Dragicevic, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2009. FlowStates: Prototypage D'Applications Interactives Avec Des Flots De DonnÉEs Et Des Machines À ÉTats. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Association Francophone D'Interaction Homme-Machine (Grenoble, France) (IHM '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629826.1629845Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2013. A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers Graphics 37, 3 (2013), 121 - 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.12.003Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Bach, R. Sicat, J. Beyer, M. Cordeil, and H. Pfister. 2018. The Hologram in My Hand: How Effective is Interactive Exploration of 3D Visualizations in Immersive Tangible Augmented Reality? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan 2018), 457--467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2745941Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Renaud Blanch and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2006. Programming Rich Interactions Using the Hierarchical State Machine Toolkit. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Venezia, Italy) (AVI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133275Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Bostock, V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. 2011. D3 Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec 2011), 2301--2309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Doug A. Bowman, Donald B. Johnson, and Larry F. Hodges. 2001. Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 1 (2001), 75--95. https://doi.org/10.1162/ 105474601750182333 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601750182333Google Scholar
Digital Library
- W. Broll, I. Lindt, J. Ohlenburg, I. Herbst, M. Wittkamper, and T. Novotny. 2005. An infrastructure for realizing custom-tailored augmented reality user interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 6 (Nov 2005), 722?733. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2005.90Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. W. S. Butcher, N. W. John, and P. D. Ritsos. 2020. VRIA: A Web-based Framework for Creating Immersive Analytics Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1--1.Google Scholar
- W. Büschel, S. Vogt, and R. Dachselt. 2019. Augmented Reality Graph Visualizations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39, 3 (2019), 29--40.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Zhutian Chen, Wai Tong, Qianwen Wang, Benjamin Bach, and Huamin Qu. 2020. Augmenting Static Visualizations with PapARVis Designer. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831. 3376436Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Choi, D. G. Park, Y. L. Wong, E. Fisher, and N. Elmqvist. 2015. VisDock: A Toolkit for Cross-Cutting Interactions in Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21, 9 (Sep. 2015), 1087--1100. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2414454Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Cordeil, A. Cunningham, B. Bach, C. Hurter, B. H. Thomas, K. Marriott, and T. Dwyer. 2019. IATK: An Immersive Analytics Toolkit. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 200--209. https://doi.org/10. 1109/VR.2019.8797978Google Scholar
- M. Cordeil, T. Dwyer, K. Klein, B. Laha, K. Marriott, and B. H. Thomas. 2017. Immersive Collaborative Analysis of Network Connectivity: CAVE-style or Head-Mounted Display? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 441--450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599107Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, William B. Thompson, Nathan Nash, and Michael McCardell. 2015. Egocentric Distance Perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (Tbingen, Germany) (SAP '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804408.2804422Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Drogemuller, A. Cunningham, J.Walsh, M. Cordeil,W. Ross, and B. Thomas. 2018. Evaluating Navigation Techniques for 3D Graph Visualizations in Virtual Reality. In 2018 International Symposium on Big Data Visual and Immersive Analytics (BDVA). 1--10.Google Scholar
- Alexander Eiselmayer, Chat Wacharamanotham, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Touchstone2: An Interactive Environment for Exploring Trade-offs in HCI Experiment Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. 195:18 María-Jesús Lobo et al. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 217, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300447Google Scholar
- Niklas Elmqvist and Ji Soo Yi. 2015. Patterns for visualization evaluation. Information Visualization 14, 3 (2015), 250--269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871613513228 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871613513228Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Englund, S. Kottravel, and T. Ropinski. 2016. A crowdsourcing system for integrated and reproducible evaluation in scientific visualization. In 2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 40--17. https://doi.org/10.1109/ PACIFICVIS.2016.7465249Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ugo Erra, Delfina Malandrino, and Luca Pepe. 2019. Virtual Reality Interfaces for Interacting with Three-Dimensional Graphs. International Journal of Human?Computer Interaction 35, 1 (2019), 75--88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318. 2018.1429061Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Etemadpour, E. Monson, and L. Linsen. 2013. The Effect of Stereoscopic Immersive Environments on Projection-Based Multi-dimensional Data Visualization. In 2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation. 389--397.Google Scholar
- Fiona Fidler and John Wilcox. 2018. Reproducibility of Scientific Results. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2018 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- J. A. W. Filho, W. Stuerzlinger, and L. Nedel. 2020. Evaluating an Immersive Space-Time Cube Geovisualization for Intuitive Trajectory Data Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 514--524.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Daniel Filonik, Tomasz Bednarz, Markus Rittenbruch, and Marcus Foth. 2016. Glance: Generalized Geometric Primitives and Transformations for Information Visualization in AR/VR Environments. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry - Volume 1 (Zhuhai, China) (VRCAI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 461--468. https://doi.org/10.1145/3013971.3014006Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Fonnet and Y. Prié. 2019. Survey of Immersive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2019), 1--1.Google Scholar
- GW French, J Richard Kennaway, and AM Day. 2014. Programs as visual, interactive documents. Software: Practice and Experience 44, 8 (2014), 911--930.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- N. Greffard, F. Picarougne, and P. Kuntz. 2014. Beyond the classical monoscopic 3D in graph analytics: An experimental study of the impact of stereoscopy. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis). 19--24.Google Scholar
- B. Hoppenstedt, T. Probst, M. Reichert, W. Schlee, K. Kammerer, M. Spiliopoulou, J. Schobel, M. Winter, A. Felnhofer, O. D. Kothgassner, and R. Pryss. 2019. Applicability of Immersive Analytics in Mixed Reality: Usability Study. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 71921--71932.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Hurter, N. H. Riche, S. M. Drucker, M. Cordeil, R. Alligier, and R. Vuillemot. 2019. FiberClay: Sculpting Three Dimensional Trajectories to Reveal Structural Insights. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 704--714. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865191Google Scholar
Digital Library
- N.W. Kim, E. Schweickart, Z. Liu, M. Dontcheva,W. Li, J. Popovic, and H. Pfister. 2017. Data-Driven Guides: Supporting Expressive Design for Information Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 491--500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598620Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. Koytek, C. Perin, J. Vermeulen, E. André, and S. Carpendale. 2018. MyBrush: Brushing and Linking with Personal Agency. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan 2018), 605--615. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TVCG.2017.2743859Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Matthias Kraus, Katrin Angerbauer, Juri Buchmüller, Daniel Schweitzer, Daniel A. Keim, Michael Sedlmair, and Johannes Fuchs. 2020. Assessing 2D and 3D Heatmaps for Comparative Analysis: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376675Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Kraus, N.Weiler, D. Oelke, J. Kehrer, D. A. Keim, and J. Fuchs. 2020. The Impact of Immersion on Cluster Identification Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 525--535.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- O. Kwon, C. Muelder, K. Lee, and K. Ma. 2016. A Study of Layout, Rendering, and Interaction Methods for Immersive Graph Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 7 (July 2016), 1802-1815. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2520921Google Scholar
Digital Library
- H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. 2012. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 9 (Sep. 2012), 1520--1536. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.279Google Scholar
Digital Library
- David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574. 3173610Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. K. Li and K. Ma. 2020. P5: Portable Progressive Parallel Processing Pipelines for Interactive Data Analysis and Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 1151--1160. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. Flex-ER: A Platform to Evaluate Interaction Techniques for Immersive Visualizations 195:19Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Liu, A. Prouzeau, B. Ens, and T. Dwyer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 588--597.Google Scholar
- P. Lubos, G. Bruder, and F. Steinicke. 2014. Analysis of direct selection in head-mounted display environments. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 11--18. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2014.6798834Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wendy E. Mackay, Caroline Appert, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Olivier Chapuis, Yangzhou Du, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Yves Guiard. 2007. Touchstone: Exploratory Design of Experiments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1425--1434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240840Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kim Marriott, Jian Chen, Marcel Hlawatsch, Takayuki Itoh, Miguel A. Nacenta, Guido Reina, andWolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2018. Just 5 Questions: Toward a Design Framework for Immersive Analytics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 259--288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030-01388--2_9Google Scholar
- Xiaojun Meng, Pin Sym Foong, Simon Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2017. NexP: A Beginner Friendly Toolkit for Designing and Conducting Controlled Experiments. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017, Regina Bernhaupt, Girish Dalvi, Anirudha Joshi, Devanuj K. Balkrishan, Jacki O'Neill, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 132-141.Google Scholar
- T. Munzner. 2009. A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (Nov 2009), 921--928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.111Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Brad Myers, Scott E Hudson, and Randy Pausch. 2000. Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1 (2000), 3--28.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Brad A Myers. 1986. Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: a taxonomy. ACM sigchi bulletin 17, 4 (1986), 59--66.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, Xizi Wang, Shwetha Rajaram, Brian D. Hall, Zijian Xie, Alexander R. E. Raistrick, Michelle Aebersold, Edward G. Happ, Jiayin Wang, Yanan Sun, Lotus Zhang, Leah E. Ramsier, and Rhea Kulkarni. 2020. MRAT: The Mixed Reality Analytics Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376330Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Alex Olwal and Steven Feiner. 2004. Unit: Modular Development of Distributed Interaction Techniques for Highly Interactive User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia (Singapore) (GRAPHITE '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--138. https://doi.org/10.1145/988834.988857Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Stephen Oney, Brad Myers, and Joel Brandt. 2014. InterState: A Language and Environment for Expressing Interface Behavior. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647358Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Etienne Peillard, Thomas Thebaud, Jean-Marie Normand, Ferran Argelaguet, Guillaume Moreau, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2019. Virtual Objects Look Farther on the Sides: The Anisotropy of Distance Perception in Virtual Reality. In VR 2019 - 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces. IEEE, Osaka, Japan, 1--10. https://hal.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-02084069Google Scholar
- Emmanuel Pietriga, Caroline Appert, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2007. Pointing and beyond: an operationalization and preliminary evaluation of multi-scale searching. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1215--1224.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ivan Poupyrev, SuzanneWeghorst, Mark Billinghurst, and Tadao Ichikawa. 1997. A Framework and Testbed for Studying Manipulation Techniques for Immersive VR. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Lausanne, Switzerland) (VRST '97). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 21--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/261135.261141Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Arnaud Prouzeau, Maxime Cordeil, Clément Robin, Barrett Ens, Bruce H. Thomas, and Tim Dwyer. 2019. Scaptics and Highlight-Planes: Immersive Interaction Techniques for Finding Occluded Features in 3D Scatterplots. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk). Glasgow, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300555Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Donghao Ren, Bongshin Lee, and Tobias Höllerer. 2017. Stardust: Accessible and Transparent GPU Support for Information Visualization Rendering. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 179--188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13178Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Maxime Reynal, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2020. Avoiding Collisions When Interacting with Levitating Particle Displays. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3334480.3382965Google Scholar
- Arvind Satyanarayan and Jeffrey Heer. [n.d.]. Lyra: An Interactive Visualization Design Environment. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 3 ([n. d.]), 351--360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12391 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.12391 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, No. ISS, Article 195. Publication date: November 2020. 195:20 María-Jesús Lobo et al.Google Scholar
- A. Satyanarayan, D. Moritz, K. Wongsuphasawat, and J. Heer. 2017. Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 341--350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG. 2016.2599030Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Satyanarayan, R. Russell, J. Hoffswell, and J. Heer. 2016. Reactive Vega: A Streaming Dataflow Architecture for Declarative Interactive Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan 2016), 659--668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467091Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Sicat, J. Li, J. Choi, M. Cordeil, W. Jeong, B. Bach, and H. Pfister. 2019. DXR: A Toolkit for Building Immersive Data Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 715--725. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865152Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mark Simpson, Jiayan Zhao, and Alexander Klippel. 2017. Take a walk: Evaluating movement types for data visualization in immersive virtual reality. In Proceedings of Workshop on Immersive Analytics (IA).Google Scholar
- Terece L. Turton, Anne S. Berres, David H. Rogers, and James Ahrens. 2017. ETK: An Evaluation Toolkit for Visualization User Studies. In Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: Short Papers (Barcelona, Spain) (EuroVis '17). Eurographics Association, Goslar Germany, Germany, 43--47. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort. 20171131Google Scholar
- Teoman Ulusoy, Kurtis Thorvald Danyluk, and Wesley J Willett. 2018. Beyond the Physical: Examining Scale and Annotation in Virtual Reality Visualizations. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
- J. A.Wagner Filho, C.M.D.S. Freitas, and L. Nedel. 2018. VirtualDesk: A Comfortable and Efficient Immersive Information Visualization Approach. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 3 (2018), 415--426. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13430Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. A. Wagner Filho, M. F. Rey, C. M. D. S. Freitas, and L. Nedel. 2018. Immersive Visualization of Abstract Information: An Evaluation on Dimensionally-Reduced Data Scatterplots. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 483--490. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8447558Google Scholar
- Y. Yang, T. Dwyer, B. Jenny, K. Marriott, M. Cordeil, and H. Chen. 2019. Origin-Destination Flow Maps in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan 2019), 693--703. https://doi.org/10. 1109/TVCG.2018.2865192Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yalong Yang, Tim Dwyer, Kimbal Marriott, Bernhard Jenny, and Sarah Goodwin. 2020. Tilt Map: Interactive Transitions Between Choropleth Map, Prism Map and Bar Chart in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2020.3004137Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yalong Yang, Bernhard Jenny, Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, Haohui Chen, and Maxime Cordeil. [n.d.]. Maps and Globes in Virtual Reality. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 3 ([n. d.]), 427--438. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13431 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13431Google Scholar
- Ji Soo Yi, Youn ah Kang, and John Stasko. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1224--1231.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Flex-ER: A Platform to Evaluate Interaction Techniques for Immersive Visualizations
Recommendations
XREmul: An Emulation Environment for XR Application Development
HotMobile '19: Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and ApplicationsEXtended Reality(XR), which includes the concepts of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality, is a promising technology for the research community and also the commercial domain in the sense that it can open a variety of new applications in ...
Building a Prototype for Easy to Use Collaborative Immersive Analytics
Computational Science – ICCS 2021AbstractThe increase in the size and complexity of today’s datasets creates a need to develop and experiment with novel data visualization methods. One of these innovations is immersive analytics, in which extended reality technologies such as virtual ...
STREAM: Exploring the Combination of Spatially-Aware Tablets with Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Analytics
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent research in the area of immersive analytics demonstrated the utility of head-mounted augmented reality devices for visual data analysis. However, it can be challenging to use the by default supported mid-air gestures to interact with ...






Comments