Andrew Bernat
ABSTRACT
The benefits of working in a research group are clear: students develop domain expertise, gain an understanding and appreciation of the research process and its practice, and acquire team, communication, problem-solving, and higher-level thinking skills. Students with this experience are better equipped to make informed judgments about technical matters and to communicate and work in teams to solve complex problems. However, it is difficult to provide a quality experience to large numbers of students, particularly to students of differing abilities.The Systems and Software Engineering Affinity Research Group model provides a socialization mechanism and infrastructure that supports the development and management of large research groups that engage undergraduate and graduate students, who have a wide range of skill levels and experiences, in research and projects. This non-hierarchical model integrates students into both small research groups and an encompassing large research group, and uses structured activities to develop their research, technical, communication, and group skills.In this paper we introduce the model and report how the model meets independently developed Best Practice guidelines for student research experiences and we provide indicators of success for use by other projects.
- 1.Gates, A., Kubo Della-Piana, C., and Bernat, A. Affinity Groups: A Framework for Developing Wokplace Skills. Proc. Frontiers in Education 1997, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1997. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Gates, A., Teller, P., Bemat, A., Delgado, N., and Della-Piana, C. Meeting the Challenge of Expandhag Participation in the Undergraduate Research Experience. Journal of Engineering Education 88 (1000), 409-414.Google Scholar
- 3.Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity (1992), ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
- 4.Kubo Della-Piana, C., and Bemat, A. Evaluating the Undergraduate Research Experience in Computer Science: Developing a Framework for Gathering Information about Effectiveness and Impact. Proc. Frontiers in Education 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Melvin D. George (Chairman) Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (May 1996).Google Scholar
- 6.U.S. Department of Energy. Profiling the Science and Engineering Research Semester: An Approach to Formative Evaluation, (August 1996).Google Scholar
Index Terms
Structuring the student research experience
Recommendations
Research on Undergraduate Classroom Teaching Quality Assurance System Based on Student Experience
Design, User Experience, and UsabilityAbstractTeaching quality is the lifeline of college education and teaching. At present, undergraduate classroom teaching evaluation experience and learning achievements is unclear. Hence, with reference to the four stages of PDCA (“Plan”, “Do”, “Check”, ...
REU PACI---undergraduate student research experiences
SC '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/IEEE conference on SupercomputingThe Education, Outreach, and Training Partnerships for Advanced Computational Infrastructure (EOT PACI) Program funded by the National Science Foundation, has launched a new Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) PACI Program. The REU PACI ...
Bringing Undergraduate Research Experience in Non-R1 Institutions
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationIn recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in computer science undergraduate research activities at colleges and universities nationwide. Developing and maintaining undergraduate research benefits students, faculty mentors, and the institution. ...
Comments