skip to main content
research-article

Personalised Services in Social Situations: Principal-Agent Relationships in Account Sharing

Published:05 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present a qualitative study of how personal accounts on online services, such as Tinder, Netflix and Spotify, may be shared in particular social situations. We draw from agency theory's focus on principal-agent relationships and Goffman's work on frames in analysing situations where others are allowed to use personal accounts, either for a shared purpose or on behalf of the account owner. We deploy Goffman's concepts of regrounding to understand how interests behind activities are transformed and brackets to draw attention to the boundaries of different frames, and how these are incurred or broken in situations that exceed personal account use. Based on a set of 43 written descriptions of account sharing, we depict how employing others to act as agents to use one's personal accounts may lead to playful or serious use. Additionally, we discuss consequentiality of sharing personalised services, considering both what services might reveal about the account owner and how sharing takes place in the context of relationships. We contribute by illustrating how users' relationships with personalised services are complicated by the different interests that are served when accounts are shared.

References

  1. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Md. Romael Haque, Jay Chen, and Nicola Dell. 2017. Digital Privacy Challenges with Shared Mobile Phone Use in Bangladesh. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 1, CSCW, Article 17 (Dec. 2017), bibinfonumpages20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ali Alkhatib and Michael Bernstein. 2019. Street-Level Algorithms: A Theory at the Gaps Between Policy and Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-Userism. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6291--6303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robert D. Benford and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26, 1 (aug 2000), 611--639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry Brown, Moira McGregor, and Eric Laurier. 2013. IPhone in Vivo: Video Analysis of Mobile Device Use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1031--1040. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Barry Brown, Moira McGregor, and Donald McMillan. 2015. Searchable objects: Search in everyday conversation. In CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 508--517. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Barry Brown, Kenton O'Hara, Moira McGregor, and Donald McMillan. 2018. Text in talk: Lightweight messages in co-present interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 24, 6 (jan 2018), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152419Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jed R. Brubaker, Gillian R. Hayes, and Paul Dourish. 2013. Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. Information Society, Vol. 29, 3 (may 2013), 152--163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Taina Bucher. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, 1 (feb 2017), 30--44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Robin Burke. 2007. Hybrid web recommender systems. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 4321 LNCS. 377--408. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Niall Docherty. 2020. Facebook's Ideal User: Healthy Habits, Social Capital, and the Politics of Well-Being Online. Social Media and Society, Vol. 6, 2 (apr 2020), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915606Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anton Fedosov, Jarno Ojala, Thomas Olsson, Kaisa Vűűnűnen, and Marc Langheinrich. 2017. From travel plans to magic wands: A cross-domain study of practices and privacy requirements for sharing emerging types of online content. In ECSCW 2017 - Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), 138--157. https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2017-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Erving Goffman. 1986. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nathaniel Good, J Ben Schafer, Joseph A Konstan, Al Borchers, Badrul Sarwar, Jon Herlocker, and John Riedl. 1999. Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1999), 439--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sukeshini A. Grandhi, Linda Plotnick, and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2020. An internet-less world? Expected impacts of a complete internet outage with implications for preparedness and design. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, GROUP (jan 2020), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375183Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jesse Haapoja, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, and Airi Lampinen. 2020. Gaming Algorithmic Hate-Speech Detection: Stakes, Parties, and Moves. Social Media Society, Vol. 6, 2 (apr 2020), 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120924778Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jesse Haapoja and Airi Lampinen. 2018. 'Datafied' reading: Framing Behavioral Data and Algorithmic News Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI '18. ACM Press, Oslo, 125--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a desiring user: Discourse, rurality, and design in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daniel Herron, Wendy Moncur, and Elise van den Hoven. 2016. Digital Possessions After a Romantic Break Up. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Maia Jacobs, Henriette Cramer, and Louise Barkhuus. 2016. Caring about sharing: Couples' practices in single user device access. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Vol. 13--16-November-2016. Association for Computing Machinery, 235--243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Airi Lampinen. 2014. Account sharing in the context of networked hospitality exchange. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Airi Lampinen, Vilma Lehtinen, Asko Lehmuskallio, and Sakari Tamminen. 2011. We're in It Together: Interpersonal Management of Disclosure in Social Network Services. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3217--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ida Larsen-Ledet and Henrik Korsgaard. 2019. Territorial Functioning in Collaborative Writing: Fragmented Exchanges and Common Outcomes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, Vol. 28, 3--4 (jun 2019), 391--433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09359-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Edward J Lawler. 2001. An affect theory of social exchange. Amer. J. Sociology, Vol. 107, 2 (2001), 321--352. https://doi.org/10.1086/324071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tuukka Lehtiniemi and Jesse Haapoja. 2020. Data agency at stake: MyData activism and alternative frames of equal participation. New Media & Society, Vol. 22, 1 (jan 2020), 87--104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819861955Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tara Matthews, Kerwell Liao, Anna Turner, Marianne Berkovich, Robert Reeder, and Sunny Consolvo. 2016. "She'll just grab any device that's closer": A Study of Everyday Device & Account Sharing in Households. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (2016), 5921--5932. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. John W. Meyer and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. The ?Actors' of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, Vol. 18, 1 (2000), 100--120. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wendy Moncur, Lorna Gibson, and Daniel Herron. 2016. The Role of Digital Technologies During Relationship Breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 371--382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Miira Niska and Kari Mikko Vesala. 2013. SME policy implementation as a relational challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 25, 5--6 (jun 2013), 521--540. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.798354Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jonathan A Obar and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2020. The biggest lie on the Internet: ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 23, 1 (2020), 128--147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Wanda J Orlikowski and Debra C. Gash. 1994. Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 12, 2 (1994), 174--207. https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Juho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja, and Airi Lampinen. 2020. Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic Systems. In Proceedings of CHI 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376780Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Anthony T. Pinter, Jialun Jiang, Katie Z. Gach, Melanie M. Sidwell, James E. Dykes, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2019. 'Am I never going to be free of all this crap'' Upsetting encounters with algorithmically curated content about ex-partners. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (nov 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359172Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nimmi Rangaswamy and Supriya Singh. 2009. Personalizing the shared mobile phone. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 5623 LNCS. 395--403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02767-3_44Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kurt Riezler. 1941. Play and Seriousness. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 38, 19 (1941), 505. https://doi.org/10.2307/2017298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Minna Ruckenstein and Julia Granroth. 2020. Algorithms, advertising and the intimacy of surveillance. Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 13, 1 (2020), 12--24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1574866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Nithya Sambasivan, Ed Cutrell, Kentaro Toyama, and Bonnie Nardi. 2010. Intermediated Technology Use in Developing Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2583--2592. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Nick Seaver. 2018. What should an anthropology of algorithms do? Cultural anthropology, Vol. 33, 3 (2018), 1--8. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca33.3.04Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Susan P. Shapiro. 2005.Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 31, 1 (2005), 263--284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Susan P. Shapiro. 2016. Standing in another's shoes: How agents make life-and-death decisions for their principals Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 30, 4 (nov 2016), 404--427. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0158Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ignacio Siles, André s Segura-Castillo, Ricardo Solí s, and Mó nica Sancho. 2020. Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South. Big Data & Society, Vol. 7, 1 (jan 2020), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Suvi Silfverberg, Lassi a Liikkanen, and Airi Lampinen. 2011. I'll press play, but I won't listen: Profile work in a music-focused social network service. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 207--216. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Supriya Singh, Anuja Cabraal, Catherine Demosthenous, Gunela Astbrink, and Michele Furlong. 2007. Password Sharing: Implications for Security Design Based on Social Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 895--904. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sharifa Sultana, Franccois Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Emily Sun, Rodrigo De Oliveira, and Joshua Lewandowski. 2017. Challenges on the journey to co-watching YouTube. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. Association for Computing Machinery, 783--793. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998228Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Alexandra Weilenmann and Catrine Larsson. 2002. Local Use and Sharing of Mobile Phones. In Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age, Barry Brown, Nicola Green, and Richard Harper (Eds.). Springer London, London, 92--107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0665-4_7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson Wong, Anthony Tang, Ian Livingston, Carl Gutwin, and Regan Mandryk. 2009. Character sharing in World of Warcraft. In ECSCW 2009 - Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London, 343--362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Steve Woolgar. 1990. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociological Review, Vol. 38 (1990), 58--99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Personalised Services in Social Situations: Principal-Agent Relationships in Account Sharing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!