skip to main content
research-article

What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy Engagement

Published:05 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Widespread conspiracy theories, like those motivating anti-vaccination attitudes or climate change denial, propel collective action, and bear society-wide consequences. Yet, empirical research has largely studied conspiracy theory adoption as an individual pursuit, rather than as a socially mediated process. What makes users join communities endorsing and spreading conspiracy theories? We leverage longitudinal data from 56 conspiracy communities on Reddit to compare individual and social factors determining which users join the communities. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we first identify 30K future conspiracists?(FC) and30K matched non-conspiracists?(NC). We then provide empirical evidence of the importance of social factors across six dimensions relative to the individual factors by analyzing 6 million Reddit comments and posts. Specifically, in social factors, we find that dyadic interactions with members of the conspiracy communities and marginalization outside of the conspiracy communities are the most important social precursors to conspiracy joining-even outperforming individual factor baselines. Our results offer quantitative backing to understand social processes and echo chamber effects in conspiratorial engagement, with important implications for democratic institutions and online communities.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Marina Abalakina-Paap, Walter G. Stephan, Traci Craig, and W. Larry Gregory. 1999. Beliefs in Conspiracies. Political Psychology, Vol. 20, 3 (1999), 637--647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John A Banas and Gregory Miller. 2013. Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, Vol. 39, 2 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jason Baumgartner, Savvas Zannettou, Brian Keegan, Megan Squire, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2020. The pushshift reddit dataset. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 830--839.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Howard S Becker. 2008. Outsiders. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lois Beckett. 2020. Hanau attack part of pattern of white supremacist violence flowing from US | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/21/hanau-attack-part-of-pattern-of-white-supremacist-violence-flowing-from-us. (Accessed on 05/28/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015a. Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation. PLOS ONE, Vol. 10, 2 (2 2015), e0118093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118093Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015b. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one, Vol. 10, 2 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Michela Del Vicario, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015c. Trend of narratives in the age of misinformation. PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, 8 (2015), 1-16. r1932-6203 (Linking) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134641Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerlof Bouma. 2009. Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Proceedings of GSCL (2009), 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David M Buss. 1987. Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 53, 6 (1987).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lisa D Butler, Cheryl Koopman, and Philip G Zimbardo. 1995. The psychological impact of viewing the film "JFK": Emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions. Political psychology(1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonathan P Chang, Justin Cheng, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2020. Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood: Comparing Intentions and Perceptions in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2066--2077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David Coady. 2006. Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannah Darwin, Nick Neave, and Joni Holmes. 2011. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 50, 8 (2011), 1289--1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mario Diani. 1992. The concept of social movement. The sociological review, Vol. 40, 1 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ronald J Feise. 2002. Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 2, 1 (2002), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Meagan Flynn. 2020. Conspiracy theory leads engineer to crash train near hospital ship | Boston.com. https://www.boston.com/news/national-news-2/2020/04/02/coronavirus-conspiracy-california-train-crash-usns-mercy. (Accessed on 05/25/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradley Franks, Adrian Bangerter, Martin W Bauer, Viren Swami, Jan Willem, and Van Prooijen. 2013. Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. CJ Hutto Eric Gilbert. 2014. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proc. ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ted Goertzel. 1994. Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Benjamin Goggin. 2019. 'White genocide': racist conspiracy theory fueled New Zealand shooting - Insider. https://www.insider.com/white-genocide-racist-conspiracy-theory-fueled-new-zealand-shooting-2019-3. (Accessed on 05/28/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mark S. Granovetter. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology (1973). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. William L. Hamilton, Justine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Dan Jurafsky, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Loyalty in Online Communities. (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03386Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chip Heath, Chris Bell, and Emily Sternberg. 2001. Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 81, 6 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Richard Hofstadter. 2012. The paranoid style in American politics. Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Benjamin D Horne, Sibel Adali, and Sujoy Sikdar. 2017. Identifying the social signals that drive online discussions: A case study of reddit communities. In 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Isabel Í nigo-Mora. 2004. On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics, Vol. 3, 1 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirk Job-Sluder and Sasha A Barab. 2004. Shared "we" and shared "they" indicators of group identity in online teacher professional development. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Marius Kaminskas and Derek Bridge. 2014. Measuring surprise in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the workshop on recommender systems evaluation: dimensions and design (Workshop programme of the 8th ACM conference on recommender systems). Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Brian L Keeley. 1999. Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 96, 3 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Emre Kiciman, Scott Counts, and Melissa Gasser. 2018. Using longitudinal social media analysis to understand the effects of early college alcohol use. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Colin Klein, Peter Clutton, and Adam G. Dunn. 2019. Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit's conspiracy theory forum. PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, 11 (2019), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Colin Klein, Peter Clutton, and Vince Polito. 2018. Topic modeling reveals distinct interests within an online conspiracy forum. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, FEB (2018), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, Yunan Chen, and Kathleen Pine. 2017. Conspiracy Talk on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134696Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Danai Koutra, Paul N Bennett, and Eric Horvitz. 2015. Events and controversies: Influences of a shocking news event on information seeking. In Proc. WWW.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Péter Krekó. 2015. CONSPIRACY THEORY AS COLLECTIVE MOTIVATED COGNITION. In The Psychology of Conspiracy. Routledge, Chapter 10. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746838Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Srijan Kumar, William L. Hamilton, Jure Leskovec, and Dan Jurafsky. 2018. Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 933--943. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Cliff Lampe and Paul Resnick. 2004. Slash (dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 543--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Alex Leavitt and John J Robinson. 2017. The Role of Information Visibility in Network Gatekeeping. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 (2017), 1246--1261. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz. 2009. Social construction of reality. Encyclopedia of communication theory, Vol. 2 (2009), 891--894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Trevor Martin. 2017. community2vec: Vector representations of online communities encode semantic relationships. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Clark McCauley and Susan Jacques. 1979. The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 5 (1979).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Tanushree Mitra, Scott Counts, and James W Pennebaker. 2016a. Understanding anti-vaccination attitudes in social media. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanushree Mitra, Scott Counts, and James W Pennebaker. 2016b. Understanding Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Social Media. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media - ICWSM '16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Brendan Thomas Noone. 2020. Conspiracy in the time of coronavirus ? United States Studies Centre. https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/conspiracy-in-the-time-of-coronavirus. (Accessed on 05/28/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Umashanthi Pavalanathan and Munmun De Choudhury. 2015. Identity management and mental health discourse in social media. In WWW. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. James W Pennebaker. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Aaron Rupar. 2019. El Paso shooting: Fox & Friends continues to push ?invasion? conspiracy theory - Vox. https://www.vox.com/2019/8/6/20756711/fox-friends-invasion-el-paso-shooting-trump-live-tweets. (Accessed on 05/28/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Koustuv Saha and Amit Sharma. 2020. Causal Factors of Effective Psychosocial Outcomes in Online Mental Health Communities. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Koustuv Saha, Benjamin Sugar, John Torous, Bruno Abrahao, Emre Kiciman, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019. A social media study on the effects of psychiatric medication use. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 440--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Mattia Samory and Tanushree Mitra. 2018a. Conspiracies Online: User Discussions in a Conspiracy Community Following Dramatic Events. In Proceedings of the 12th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media - ICWSM '18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Mattia Samory and Tanushree Mitra. 2018b. 'The Government Spies Using Our Webcams?: The Language of Conspiracy Theories in Online Discussions. Proc. CSCW 4 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Simon Sheather. 2009. A modern approach to regression with R. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ben Smith. 2011. More than half of Democrats believed Bush knew - POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/2011/04/more-than-half-of-democrats-believed-bush-knew-035224. (Accessed on 05/24/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Kate Starbird. 2017. Examining the Alternative Media Ecosystem Through the Production of Alternative Narratives of Mass Shooting Events on Twitter.. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Carl Stempel, Thomas Hargrove, and Guido H Stempel. 2007. Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 84, 2 (6 2007), 353--372. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Cass R Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. 2009a. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 17, 2 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule. 2009b. Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 17, 2 (2009), 202--227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--9760.2008.00325.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, Vol. 29, 1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Joseph Uscinski and Casey Klofstad. 2018. New poll: the QAnon conspiracy movement is very unpopular - The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/08/30/the-qanon-conspiracy-movement-is-very-unpopular-our-new-poll-finds/. (Accessed on 05/24/2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Joseph E Uscinski, Casey Klofstad, and Matthew D Atkinson. 2016. What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 69, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jan-Willem van Prooijen, Karen M Douglas, and Clara De Inocencio. 2018. Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 48, 3 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Jan Willem van Prooijen and Nils B. Jostmann. 2013. Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 43, 1 (2013), 109--115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Joseph A Vitriol and Jessecae K Marsh. 2018. The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 48, 7 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2019 a. Generalists and specialists: Using community embeddings to quantify activity diversity in online platforms. The Web Conference 2019 - Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, Vol. 2 (2019), 1954--1964. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2019 b. Generalists and Specialists: Using Community Embeddings to Quantify Activity Diversity in Online Platforms. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Yi-Chia Wang, Moira Burke, and Robert Kraut. 2016. Modeling self-disclosure in social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. 74--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Marvin Zonis and Craig M Joseph. 1994. Conspiracy Thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, Vol. 15, 3 (1994), 443--459. https://doi.org/papers2://publication/uuid/15ECA456-C8E9-40E2-A96E-2773EF20B6B5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy Engagement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!