skip to main content
research-article

"I was afraid, but now I enjoy being a streamer!": Understanding the Challenges and Prospects of Using Live Streaming for Online Education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has led to a sharp transition from offline to online education in many countries and areas. This transition heightens the intensity of existing challenges of online education, such as student attendance and education equality. During this time of uncertainty, the vast disparities in teachers? online experience and technical backgrounds, students' education level and their families' economic status, and schools' support, further pose new challenges to teachers and students. In this work, we study how Chinese teachers and students addressed challenges during this transition. We interviewed 15 teachers and 18 students from diverse backgrounds at varying education levels (K-12 and college). Our work makes timely and new contributions to the literature of online education. For example, our results showed that teachers applied Live Video Streaming (LVS) on multiple social media platforms and re-purposed different entertainment features to deliver online teaching for better student engagement; some teachers came to enjoy this new form of instruction after being resistant to it in the beginning, and students developed a better sense of intimacy with their teachers after experiencing certain online interactions. Our work also reveals the remaining challenges and prospects of LVS-based online education and sheds light on the future design of collaborative technologies for online education.

References

  1. M'hammed Abdous and Wu He. 2011. Using text mining to uncover students' technology-related problems in live video streaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 42, 1 (2011), 40--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Raniah Samir Adham and Karsten Oster Lundqvist. 2015. MOOCs as a method of distance education in the Arab world--A review paper. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, Vol. 18, 1 (2015), 123--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Karan Ahuja, Dohyun Kim, Franceska Xhakaj, Virag Varga, Anne Xie, Stanley Zhang, Jay Eric Townsend, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2019. EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 3, 3 (2019), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gonzalo Almerich, Natividad Orellana, Jesús Suárez-Rodríguez, and Isabel Díaz-García. 2016. Teachers? information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, Vol. 100 (2016), 110--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Terry Anderson, Krista Poscente, and Liam Rourke. 2006. Perceptions of an impending high speed, broadband network: Anticipation and anxiety among K-12 teachers, technical support personnel, and administrators. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zane L Berge and Susan E Mrozowski. 1999. Barriers to online teaching in elementary, secondary, and teacher education. UMBC Faculty Collection (1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Robert M Bernard, Philip C Abrami, Yiping Lou, Evgueni Borokhovski, Anne Wade, Lori Wozney, Peter Andrew Wallet, Manon Fiset, and Binru Huang. 2004. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of educational research, Vol. 74, 3 (2004), 379--439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Chen, Dustin Freeman, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2019. Integrating Multimedia Tools to Enrich Interactions in Live Streaming for Language Learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Aimei consulting. 2020. A special report on the evaluation of the effect of the online resumption of Chinese schools in the spring of 2020. https://www.iimedia.cn/c460/69584.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthew S Crow, Jamie A Snyder, Vaughn J Crichlow, and John Ortiz Smykla. 2017. Community perceptions of police body-worn cameras: The impact of views on fairness, fear, performance, and privacy. Criminal justice and behavior, Vol. 44, 4 (2017), 589--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Larry Cuban, Heather Kirkpatrick, and Craig Peck. 2001. High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American educational research journal, Vol. 38, 4 (2001), 813--834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Southern Daily. 2020. Within an hour, 5 million students were streaming into live classes. http://edu.sina.com.cn/zxx/2020-02--23/doc-iimxxstf3734431.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Guangming daily education research center. 2020. An interactive study on online education in primary and secondary schools during the covid-19 outbreak. http://edu.gog.cn/system/2020/04/02/017570781.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paul Diver and Ignacio Martinez. 2015. MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: Opportunities and challenges. Distance Education, Vol. 36, 1 (2015), 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Audubon Dougherty. 2011. Live-streaming mobile video: production as civic engagement. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 425--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Michaelanne Dye, David Nemer, Neha Kumar, and Amy S Bruckman. 2019. If it Rains, Ask Grandma to Disconnect the Nano: Maintenance & Care in Havana's StreetNet. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Brianna Dym, Jed R Brubaker, Casey Fiesler, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. "Coming Out Okay" Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sina education. 2020. The epidemic has affected the online education industry. http://edu.sina.com.cn/l/2020-03-10/doc-iimxyqvz9292648.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. The education ministry in China. 2020. Organize and manage online teaching in colleges during the epidemic. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202002/t20200205_418131.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Travis Faas, Lynn Dombrowski, Alyson Young, and Andrew D Miller. 2018. Watch me code: Programming mentorship communities on twitch. tv. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Samantha Finkelstein, Evelyn Yarzebinski, Callie Vaughn, Amy Ogan, and Justine Cassell. 2013. The effects of culturally congruent educational technologies on student achievement. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 493--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D Randy Garrison, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer. 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, Vol. 2, 2--3 (1999), 87--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Donald Gillies. 2008. Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance. Distance Education, Vol. 29, 1 (2008), 107--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S Greenwald, Alexander Kulik, André Kunert, Stephan Beck, B Frohlich, Sue Cobb, Sarah Parsons, and Nigel Newbutt. 2017. Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lassi Haaranen. 2017. Programming as a performance: Live-streaming and its implications for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 353--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. William A Hamilton, Oliver Garretson, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1315--1324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Erik Harpstead, Juan Sebastian Rios, Joseph Seering, and Jessica Hammer. 2019. Toward a Twitch Research Toolkit: A Systematic Review of Approaches to Research on Game Streaming. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 111--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wu He. 2013. Examining students? online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, 1 (2013), 90--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Khe Foon Hew and Wing Sum Cheung. 2014. Students? and instructors? use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, Vol. 12 (2014), 45--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C Ho and C Yang. 2015. A study on behavior intention to use live streaming video platform based on TAM model. In The Asian Conference on Psychology and Behavioral Sciences 2015 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Charles Hodges, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust, and Aaron Bond. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er. educause. edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teachingand-online-learning (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2017. Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference. 257--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2018. Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education. Springer, 154--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2019. Designing for complementarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in ai-enhanced classrooms. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 157--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Stefan Hrastinski. 2006. Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: how is participation affected? The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 9, 2 (2006), 117--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Stefan Hrastinski. 2008. Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, Vol. 31, 4 (2008), 51--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiao-qin HUANG and HONG Wien. 2017. Live Streaming Teaching Applied in Real English Classroom. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science aems (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Kristine H Hutchinson. 2003. The teach act: Copyright law and online education. NYUL Rev., Vol. 78 (2003), 2204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. EO Intelligence. 2020. An analysis of the impact of covid-19 on the education industry. http://www.199it.com/archives/1030767.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Anbareen Jan. 2020. Online Teaching Practices During COVID-19: An Observation Case Study.(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kanchana Kariyawasam and Matthew Tsai. 2017. Copyright and live streaming of sports broadcasting. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 31, 3 (2017), 265--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), Vol. 7, 3--4 (1998), 167--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. René F Kizilcec, Kathryn Papadopoulos, and Lalida Sritanyaratana. 2014. Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2095--2102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. René F Kizilcec, Justin Reich, Michael Yeomans, Christoph Dann, Emma Brunskill, Glenn Lopez, Selen Turkay, Joseph Jay Williams, and Dustin Tingley. 2020. Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, 26 (2020), 14900--14905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. René F Kizilcec, Andrew J Saltarelli, Justin Reich, and Geoffrey L Cohen. 2017. Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs. Science, Vol. 355, 6322 (2017), 251--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kenneth R Koedinger, John R Anderson, William H Hadley, and Mary A Mark. 1997. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Steve Kolowich. 2013. The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 18 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Nicole C Kr"amer and Stephan Winter. 2008. Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of media psychology, Vol. 20, 3 (2008), 106--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Matthew J Kruger-Ross and Richard D Waters. 2013. Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers & Education, Vol. 61 (2013), 176--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Daniel G Krutka and Kenneth T Carano. 2016. 'As long as I see you on Facebook I know you are safe': Social media experiences as humanizing pedagogy. In Rethinking social studies teacher education in the twenty-first century. Springer, 207--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Daniel G Krutka, Kenneth T Carano, Leigh Cassell, Melissa Lavoie, and Karin Davidson-Taylor. 2019. Wise Practices and Intercultural Understandings: A Framework for Educator Videoconferencing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 51, 4 (2019), 356--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Chinmay Kulkarni, Julia Cambre, Yasmine Kotturi, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer. 2015. Talkabout: Making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1116--1128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Chinmay Kulkarni, Koh Pang Wei, Huy Le, Daniel Chia, Kathryn Papadopoulos, Justin Cheng, Daphne Koller, and Scott R Klemmer. 2013. Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 20, 6 (2013), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Tony Lawson and Chris Comber. 2010. Videoconferencing in English schools: one technology, many pedagogies? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 19, 3 (2010), 315--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Tony Lawson, Chris Comber, Jenny Gage, and Adrian Cullum Hanshaw. 2010. Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: a literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 19, 3 (2010), 295--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Zhicong Lu, Michelle Annett, Mingming Fan, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. "I feel it is my responsibility to stream" Streaming and Engaging with Intangible Cultural Heritage through Livestreaming. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Zhicong Lu, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel J Wigdor. 2018a. Streamwiki: Enabling viewers of knowledge sharing live streams to collaboratively generate archival documentation for effective in-stream and post hoc learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Zhicong Lu, Haijun Xia, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018b. You watch, you give, and you engage: a study of live streaming practices in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Michael A Madaio, Fabrice Tanoh, Axel Blahoua Seri, Kaja Jasinska, and Amy Ogan. 2019. "Everyone Brings Their Grain of Salt" Designing for Low-Literate Parental Engagement with a Mobile Literacy Technology in Côte d'Ivoire. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Uwe Matzat. 2013. Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers' professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, Vol. 60, 1 (2013), 40--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. C Milligan, A Margaryan, and A Littlejohn. 2013. Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. Journal of Online Learning with Technology, Vol. 9, 2 (2013), 149--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Liz Mineo. 2020. Time to fix American education with race-for-space resolve. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/04/the-pandemics-impact-on-education/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. China national network information center (CNNIC). 2020. Statistical report on Internet development in China(the 43th version). http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-02/28/c_1124175686.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Eric C Nippard. 2005. Social presence in the web-based synchronous secondary classroom. Ph.D. Dissertation. Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Thelma Obiakor and Adedeji Peter Adeniran. 2020. Covid-19: Impending Situation Threatens to Deepen Nigeria's Education Crisis. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Amy Ogan, Erin Walker, Ryan SJd Baker, Genaro Rebolledo Mendez, Maynor Jimenez Castro, Tania Laurentino, and Adriana De Carvalho. 2012. Collaboration in cognitive tutor use in Latin America: Field study and design recommendations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1381--1390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Murat Oztok, Daniel Zingaro, Clare Brett, and Jim Hewitt. 2013. Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers & Education, Vol. 60, 1 (2013), 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Rachael M Paton, Andrew E Fluck, and Joel D Scanlan. 2018. Engagement and retention in VET MOOCs and online courses: A systematic review of literature from 2013 to 2017. Computers & Education, Vol. 125 (2018), 191--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Anthony J Pellicone and June Ahn. 2017. The Game of Performing Play: Understanding streaming as cultural production. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4863--4874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. William R Penuel, Jeremy Roschelle, and Nicole Shechtman. 2007. Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, Vol. 2, 01 (2007), 51--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Katarina Pisutova, Rhianna Rogers, and J. Mercer. 2018. Engaging Students at a Distance: Advantages and Pitfalls of Video-Conference use in Teaching. In 2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). IEEE, 431--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Drew Polly. 2012. Developing Technology-Rich Teacher Education Programs: Key Issues: Key Issues. IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Lin Qiu, Jiahui Lu, Shanshan Yang, Weina Qu, and Tingshao Zhu. 2015. What does your selfie say about you? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 52 (2015), 443--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. David Raths. 2015. 6 Ways Videoconferencing Is Expanding the Classroom: With Instant Access to International Collaborators, Virtual Field Trips and Courses in Other Districts, Learning Can Happen Anywhere in the World. THE Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), Vol. 42, 4 (2015), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Petrea Redmond. 2011. From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In Proceedings ASCILITE 2011: 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), 1050--1060.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Justin Reich, Christopher J Buttimer, Dan Coleman, Richard D Colwell, Farah Faruqi, and Laura R Larke. 2020. What's Lost, What's Left, What's Next: Lessons Learned from the Lived Experiences of Teachers During the 2020 Novel Coronavirus Pandemic. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Janet Ward Schofield. 1995. Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Graduate school of Peking University. 2020. Online teaching arrangement during the spring semester of epidemic prevention and control in Peking University. https://grs.pku.edu.cn/tzgg/326351.htm .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Richard Schwier and Shelly Balbar. 2002. The interplay of content and community in synchronous and asynchronous communication: Virtual communication in a graduate seminar. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, Vol. 28, 2 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Andrew Senior, Sharath Pankanti, Arun Hampapur, Lisa Brown, Ying-Li Tian, Ahmet Ekin, Jonathan Connell, Chiao Fe Shu, and Max Lu. 2005. Enabling video privacy through computer vision. IEEE Security & Privacy, Vol. 3, 3 (2005), 50--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Liping Shen, Minjuan Wang, and Ruimin Shen. 2009. Affective e-learning: Using ?emotional? data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 12, 2 (2009), 176--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Petr Slovák, Kael Rowan, Christopher Frauenberger, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Mia Doces, Brian Smith, Rachel Kamb, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2016. Scaffolding the scaffolding: Supporting children's social-emotional learning at home. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1751--1765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Anselm Straus and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Na Sun and Mary Beth Rosson. 2017. Finding the community in online education: It's in the instructors? eyes. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Na Sun, Xiying Wang, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2019. How Do Distance Learners Connect?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Jane Sutterlin. 2018. Learning is Social with Zoom Video Conferencing in your Classroom. eLearn, Vol. 2018, 12 (2018), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Tsinghua university news. 2020. The first training for teachers of online streaming teaching in the rain classroom was carried out smoothly in Tsing Hua University. https://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1043/77154.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Alf Inge Wang and Andreas Lieberoth. 2016. The effect of points and audio on concentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using Kahoot. In European Conference on Games Based Learning, Vol. 20. Academic Conferences International Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Chun-Min Wang and Thomas C Reeves. 2007. Synchronous online learning experiences: The perspectives of international students from Taiwan. Educational Media International, Vol. 44, 4 (2007), 339--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Xu Wang, Srinivasa Teja Talluri, Carolyn Rose, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2019. UpGrade: Sourcing Student Open-Ended Solutions to Create Scalable Learning Opportunities. In Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Xu Wang, Diyi Yang, Miaomiao Wen, Kenneth Koedinger, and Carolyn P Rosé. 2015. Investigating How Student's Cognitive Behavior in MOOC Discussion Forums Affect Learning Gains. International Educational Data Mining Society (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Yi-Shun Wang. 2003. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, Vol. 41, 1 (2003), 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Bing Wu and Xiaohui Chen. 2017. Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 67 (2017), 221--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Man Wu and Qin Gao. 2019. Using Live Video Streaming in Online Tutoring: Exploring Factors Affecting Social Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2019), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Diyi Yang, Tanmay Sinha, David Adamson, and Carolyn Penstein Rosé. [n.d.]. Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Michele L Ybarra and Kimberly J Mitchell. 2008. How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics, Vol. 121, 2 (2008), e350--e357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Jason C Yip, Tamara Clegg, June Ahn, Judith Odili Uchidiuno, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Austin Beck, Daniel Pauw, and Kelly Mills. 2016. The evolution of engagements and social bonds during child-parent co-design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3607--3619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Liang Yu and Shijian Chen. 2016. Synchronous remote classroom connecting K-12 schools in developed and undeveloped areas: A case study from China. In ICT in education in global context. Springer, 277--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Errol Yudko, Randy Hirokawa, and Robert Chi. 2008. Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid course. Computers & Education, Vol. 50, 4 (2008), 1217--1227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Michalinos Zembylas. 2003. Caring for teacher emotion: Reflections on teacher self-development. Studies in philosophy and education, Vol. 22, 2 (2003), 103--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Haoqi Zhang, Matthew W Easterday, Elizabeth M Gerber, Daniel Rees Lewis, and Leesha Maliakal. 2017. Agile research studios: Orchestrating communities of practice to advance research training. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 220--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Ningning Zhao, Martin Valcke, Annemie Desoete, Guoyuan Sang, and Chang Zhu. 2014. Does teacher-centered teaching contribute to students? performance in primary school? A video analysis in Mainland China. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, Vol. 3, 3 (2014), 21--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Saijing Zheng, Mary Beth Rosson, Patrick C Shih, and John M Carroll. 2015. Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 1882--1895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Saijing Zheng, Pamela Wisniewski, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2016. Ask the instructors: Motivations and challenges of teaching massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 206--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Ye Zheng and Ruo-Yu Yang. 2017. The Rise of MOOCs: The Literature Review of Research Progress and Hot Spots of MOOCs Education in Mainland China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 13 (08 2017), 6165--6174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01056aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Longjun Zhou, Shanshan Wu, Ming Zhou, and Fangmei Li. 2020. 'School?s Out, But Class? On', The Largest Online Education in the World Today: Taking China's Practical Exploration During The COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control As an Example. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "I was afraid, but now I enjoy being a streamer!": Understanding the Challenges and Prospects of Using Live Streaming for Online Education

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!