Abstract
Optimality Theory (OT) and Exemplar Theory (ET) are two enchanting theories to many scholars, but each still faces criticism and remaining persistent problems. Application of both theories to areas in linguistics where conflicts may arise has been attempted, but still the suitability of combining the two theories to resolve contradictions awaits further analysis and verification. This article takes Polish singular-plural pairs as the object of study and argues in favor of an OT-ET combined model of analyzing the linguistic phenomenon. First, an underlying representation is identified to be the input in an OT analysis. Then two main changes are recognized between the input and output, and are regarded as instances of positional neutralization, and their relevant constraints and constraint hierarchies are presented. Following this, challenges are posed to OT despite its merits. It turns out that the combined OT-ET model works well, with historical development, underspecification, constraint hierarchy, and resemblance to existing word clouds, among others, all playing relevant parts. The current study adds to the extensiveness of language data analyzed for or against combining OT and ET, and sketches the analysis pattern of thus doing, with a view to offering more real-life language materials for an OT-ET combined model.
- A. Prince and P. Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Van de Weijer. 2019. Where now with optimality theory? Acta Linguistica Academica 66, 1 (2019), 115–135.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Archangeli and D. Langendoen. 1997. Optimality Theory: An Overview. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- R. Kager. 2001. Optimality Theory. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
- P. De Lacy. 2007. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy. 2004. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy. 2007. Hidden Generalizations: Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory. Equinox, London, UK.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy. 2008. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25, 2 (2008), 271–319.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. McCarthy. 2010. An introduction to harmonic serialism. Language and Linguistic Compass 4, 10 (2010), 1001–1018.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. McCarthy and J. Pater. 2016. Harmonic Grammar and Harmonic Serialism. Equinox, London, UK.Google Scholar
- B. Hyde. 2016. Layering and Directionality: Metrical Stress in Optimality Theory. Equinox, London, UK.Google Scholar
- S. Goldinger, D. Pisoni, and J. Logan. 1991. On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17 (1991), 152–162.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Medin and M. Schaffer. 1978. A context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85 (1978), 207–238.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Nosofsky. 1988. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988), 54–65.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- K. Johnson. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Talker Variability in Speech Perception, K. Johnson and J. Mullennix (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 145–166.Google Scholar
- J. Pierrehumbert. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, J. Bybee and P. Hopper (Eds.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 137–157.Google Scholar
- J. Bybee. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82 (2006), 711–733.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Bybee. 2012. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, G. Trousdale and T. Hoffmann (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 49–69.Google Scholar
- A. Wedel. 2007. Feedback and regularity in the lexicon. Phonology 24 (2007), 147–185.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- K. Jesney. 2011. Positional faithfulness, non-locality, and the Harmonic Serialism solution. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
- J. Pater. 2012. Serial harmonic grammar and Berber syllabification. In Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of Lisa Selkirk, T. Borowsky, S. Kawahara, T. Shinya, and M. Sugahara (Eds.). Equinox, London, UK, 43–72.Google Scholar
- Q. Ma. 2016. A survey of harmonic serialism. Contemporary Linguistics 18, 3 (2016), 401–415.Google Scholar
- Q. Ma and L. Wu. 2018. On the computational complexity of optimality theory. Tongji University Journal (Social Science Section) 29, 1 (2018), 108–115.Google Scholar
- L. Zhu and Q. Ma. 2018. Review of the overseas studies on phonological acquisition. Foreign Language Research 3 (2018), 58–64.Google Scholar
- C. Qin. 2018. On the initial state in OT grammar. Foreign Language Research 2 (2018), 18–26.Google Scholar
- Q. Ma. 2012. Optimality theory with candidate chains: Problem and solution. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy & Social Science) 35, 1 (2012), 30–37.Google Scholar
- J. Van de Weijer. 2017. Emergent phonological constraints: The acquisition of *COMPLEX in English. Acta Linguistica Academica 64 (2017), 153–165.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- J. Van de Weijer and Marina Tzakosta. 2017. The status of *COMPLEX in Greek. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, T. Georgakopoulos (Ed.). Vol. 2. Edition Romiosini & Center for Modern Greece, Berlin, Germany, 1259–1274.Google Scholar
- J. Zheng. 2016. An OT analysis of English existential clauses. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice 1 (2016), 25–33.Google Scholar
- L. Zhu. 2017. A syntax-prosody interface perspective of the consecutive 3rd tone Sandhi: Take Lao Li Mai Hao Jiu as an example. Journal of Foreign Languages 40, 1 (2017), 66–76.Google Scholar
- J. Van de Weijer. 2014. The origin of OT constraint. Lingua 142 (2014), 66–75.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- D. Odden. 2005. Introducing Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- J. Pater. 1999. Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In The Prosody-Morphology Interface, R. Kager, H. Van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 310–343.Google Scholar
- J. Zheng and J. Van de Weijer. 2013. An OT analysis of nasal-obstruent clusters in English. Journal of Foreign Languages 36, 6 (2013), 2–17.Google Scholar
- J. Van de Weijer. 2012. Grammar as Selection: Combining Optimality Theory and Exemplar Theory. Kougaku Shuppan, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
- C. Kisseberth. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1 (1970), 291–306.Google Scholar
- E. Buckley. 2001. Polish o-Raising and phonological explanation. In Proceedings of the LSA Annual Meeting. 1–8.Google Scholar
- E. Gussmann. 1980. Studies in Abstract Phonology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- N. Chomsky and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- D. Archangeli. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- B. Dresher. 2009. The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
An OT-ET Analysis of Polish Singular-Plural Pairs
Recommendations
Blazing Fast OT for Three-Round UC OT Extension
Public-Key Cryptography – PKC 2020AbstractOblivious Transfer (OT) is an important building block for multi-party computation (MPC). Since OT requires expensive public-key operations, efficiency-conscious MPC protocols use an OT extension (OTE) mechanism [Beaver 96, Ishai et al. 03] to ...
OT-combiners via secure computation
TCC'08: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Theory of cryptographyAn OT-combiner implements a secure oblivious transfer (OT) protocol using oracle access to n OT-candidates of which at most t may be faulty.We introduce a newgeneral approach for combining OTs by making a simple and modular use of protocols for secure ...
Round-Optimal Black-Box Secure Computation from Two-Round Malicious OT
Theory of CryptographyAbstractWe give round-optimal black-box constructions of two-party and multiparty protocols in the common random/reference string (CRS) model, with security against malicious adversaries, based on any two-round oblivious transfer (OT) protocol in the same ...






Comments