Carpooling Platforms in Smart Cities for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis

ABSTRACT

Formulation of carpooling schemes for mutual cost benefits between the driver and the passengers has a long history. However, the convenience of driving alone, especially under the current COVID-19 pandemic, the increase of car ownership and the difficulties in finding travelers with matching schedule and route keeps car occupancy low. The technology is a key enabler of online platforms which facilitate the ride matching process and lead the increase of carpooling services. The aim of this work-in-progress article is to clarify the value proposition of carpooling platforms in smart cities, especially under conditions like the pandemic. Thus, an extensive bibliometric analysis of three separate specialized literature collections using the bibliometrix R-Tool combined with a systematic literature review of selected papers is performed. It is identified that smart carpooling platforms could generate additional value for participants and smart cities with real-time ride matching, interconnection with public transportation and other city services, secure transactions, reputation-based services and closed organization carpooling schemes. To deliver this value to a smart city, a multi-sided platform business model is proposed, suitable for a carpooling service provider with multiple customer segments and partners.

References

1. O. Turetken, P. Grefen, R. Gilsing and O.E. Adali, 2019. Service-Dominant Business Model Design for Digital Innovation in Smart Mobility. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0565-x.
2. R., Giffinger, C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Milanović, and E. Meijers, 2007. Smart cities—Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology Publishing.
3. H., Guyader and L. Piscicelli, 2019. Business model diversification in the sharing economy: The case of GoMore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.114
4. H.T. Mouftah and M. Erol-Kantarci, 2016. Smart grid: Networking, data management, and business models. CRC Press.
5. S. A. Shaheen, N.D. Chan and T. Gaynor, 2016. Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003.
6. J. J. Montero, 2019. Regulating Transport Platforms: The Case of Carpooling in Europe. In M. Finger & M. Audouin (Eds.), The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems (pp. 13–35). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_2
7. A., Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur and T. Clark, 2010. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley
8. A. Pritchard, 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? J. Documentation, 25.
9. D. Tranfield, D. Denyer and P. Smart, 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
10. J. Dahlgren, 1998. High occupancy vehicle lanes: Not always more effective than general purpose lanes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(97)00021-9
11. G. Monchambert, 2020. Why do (or don't) people carpool for long distance trips? A discrete choice experiment in France. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.033
12. P. Bansal, K.M. Kockelman and A. Singh, 2016. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
13. X. Wei, W. Yu, W. Wang, D. Zhao and X. Hua, 2020. Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Traffic Restriction Policy by Jointly Considering Carpool Exemptions. Sustainability, 12(18), 7734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187734
14. P. Minett, J. Niles, R. Lee, B. Bogue and M.D. Schaefer, 2020. Congestion-clearing payments to passengers. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.112
15. J. E. Hughes and D. Kaffine, 2019. When Should Drivers be Encouraged to Carpool In HOV Lanes?: Carpooling In HOV Lanes. Economic Inquiry, 57(1), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12728
16. J. Arellano-Verdejo, F. Alonso-Pecina, E. Alba and A. Guzmán Arenas, 2019. Optimal allocation of public parking spots in a smart city: Problem characterisation and first algorithms. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 31(4), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1591522
17. T. Shen, K. Hua and J. Liu, 2019. Optimized Public Parking Location Modelling for Green Intelligent Transportation System Using Genetic Algorithms. IEEE Access, 7, 176870–176883. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957803
18. K. Timeus, J. Vinaixa and F. Pardo-Bosch, 2020. Creating business models for smart cities: A practical framework. Public Management Review, 22(5), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718187
19. T. W. Andreassen, L. Lervik-Olsen, H. Snyder, A.C.R. Van Riel, J.C. Sweeney and Y. Van Vaerenbergh, 2018. Business model innovation and value-creation: The triadic way. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2018-0125
20. T. Abbate, F. Cesaroni, M.C. Cinici and M. Villari, 2019. Business models for developing smart cities. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of an IoT platform. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.031
21. L. Anthopoulos, P. Fitsilis and C. Ziozias, 2016. What is the Source of Smart City Value?: A Business Model Analysis. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(2), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2016040104
22. O. Turetken, P. Grefen, R, Gilsing and O.E. Adali, 2019. Service-Dominant Business Model Design for Digital Innovation in Smart Mobility. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0565-x
23. N. Walravens, 2015. Qualitative indicators for smart city business models: The case of mobile services and applications. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3–4), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.011