skip to main content
research-article

Characterizing Student Engagement Moods for Dropout Prediction in Question Pool Websites

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a popular approach to instruction that supports students to get hands-on training by solving problems. Question Pool websites (QPs) such as LeetCode, Code Chef, and Math Playground help PBL by supplying authentic, diverse, and contextualized questions to students. Nonetheless, empirical findings suggest that 40% to 80% of students registered in QPs drop out in less than two months. This research is the first attempt to understand and predict student dropouts from QPs via exploiting students' engagement moods. Adopting a data-driven approach, we identify five different engagement moods for QP students, which are namely challenge-seeker, subject-seeker, interest-seeker, joy-seeker, and non-seeker. We find that students have collective preferences for answering questions in each engagement mood, and deviation from those preferences increases their probability of dropping out significantly. Last but not least, this paper contributes by introducing a new hybrid machine learning model (we call Dropout-Plus) for predicting student dropouts in QPs. The test results on a popular QP in China, with nearly 10K students, show that Dropout-Plus can exceed the rival algorithms' dropout prediction performance in terms of accuracy, F1-measure, and AUC. We wrap up our work by giving some design suggestions to QP managers and online learning professionals to reduce their student dropouts.

References

  1. Najwa Alghamdi, Nora Alrajebah, and Shiroq Al-Megren. 2019. Crowd Behavior Analysis Using Snap Map: A Preliminary Study on the Grand Holy Mosque in Mecca. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Austin, TX, USA) (CSCW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137--141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359473Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nese Alyuz, Eda Okur, Utku Genc, Sinem Aslan, Cagri Tanriover, and Asli Arslan Esme. 2017. An Unobtrusive and Multimodal Approach for Behavioral Engagement Detection of Students. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multimodal Interaction for Education (Glasgow, UK) (MIE 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 26--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139513.3139521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2013. Steering User Behavior with Badges. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (WWW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95--106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sinem Aslan, Nese Alyuz, Cagri Tanriover, Sinem E. Mete, Eda Okur, Sidney K. D'Mello, and Asli Arslan Esme. 2019. Investigating the Impact of a Real-Time, Multimodal Student Engagement Analytics Technology in Authentic Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300534Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Babbie. 2016. The Basics of Social Research. Cengage Learning. 2015936245 https://books.google.com/books?id=0CJTCwAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryan Baker, Jason Walonoski, Neil Heffernan, Ido Roll, Albert Corbett, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2008. Why students engage in "gaming the system" behavior in interactive learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Vol. 19, 2 (2008), 185--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ryan Shaun Baker. 2005. Designing intelligent tutors that adapt to when students game the system. Ph.D. Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ryan S.J.d. Baker. 2007. Modeling and Understanding Students' off-Task Behavior in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1059--1068. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ryan Shaun Baker, Albert T. Corbett, Kenneth R. Koedinger, and Angela Z. Wagner. 2004. Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students "Game the System". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383--390. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985741Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E.F. Barkley. 2009. Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. Wiley. 2009029117 https://books.google.com/books?id=muAStyrwyZgCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alexander Bartel, Paula Figas, and Georg Hagel. 2015. Towards a Competency-Based Education with Gamification Design Elements. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 457--462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810325Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jonathan Bassen, Bharathan Balaji, Michael Schaarschmidt, Candace Thille, Jay Painter, Dawn Zimmaro, Alex Games, Ethan Fast, and John C. Mitchell. 2020. Reinforcement Learning for the Adaptive Scheduling of Educational Activities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376518Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonard E. Baum, Ted Petrie, George Soules, and Norman Weiss. 1970. A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 41, 1 (1970), 164--171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2239727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Johann Benerradi, Horia A. Maior, Adrian Marinescu, Jeremie Clos, and Max L. Wilson. 2019. Exploring Machine Learning Approaches for Classifying Mental Workload Using FNIRS Data from HCI Tasks. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, bibinfonumpages11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Muhammad Ilyas Bhutto. 2011. Effects of Social Reinforcers on Students'Learning Outcomes at Secondary School Level. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, 2 (2011), 71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Christopher M Bishop. 2006. Machine learning and pattern recognition. Information science and statistics. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nigel Bosch. 2016. Detecting Student Engagement: Human Versus Machine. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (UMAP '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 317--320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, Vol. 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elise Cappella, Ha Yeon Kim, Jennifer W. Neal, and Daisy R. Jackson. 2013. Classroom Peer Relationships and Behavioral Engagement in Elementary School: The Role of Social Network Equity. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 52, 3--4 (Oct. 2013), 367--379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9603-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jonathan Carlton, Andy Brown, Caroline Jay, and John Keane. 2019. Inferring User Engagement from Interaction Data. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Xunru Che, Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2018. Fake News in the News: An Analysis of Partisan Coverage of the Fake News Phenomenon. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Jersey City, NJ, USA) (CSCW '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 289--292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274079Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Code Chef. 2019. Code Chef. https://www.codechef.com/ Retrieved January 24, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott Chen, Ponani Gopalakrishnan, et almbox. 1998. Speaker, environment and channel change detection and clustering via the bayesian information criterion. In Proc. DARPA broadcast news transcription and understanding workshop, Vol. 8. Virginia, USA, 127--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (KDD '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 785--794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yuanzhe Chen, Qing Chen, Mingqian Zhao, Sebastien Boyer, Kalyan Veeramachaneni, and Huamin Qu. 2016. DropoutSeer: Visualizing learning patterns in Massive Open Online Courses for dropout reasoning and prediction. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE, 111--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yinghan Chen, Steven Andrew Culpepper, Shiyu Wang, and Jeffrey Douglas. 2017. A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 42, 1 (Sept. 2017), 5--23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617721250Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1217--1230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chia-Fang Chung, Nanna Gorm, Irina A. Shklovski, and Sean Munson. 2017. Finding the Right Fit: Understanding Health Tracking in Workplace Wellness Programs. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4875--4886. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025510Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Evandro B. Costa, Baldoino Fonseca, Marcelo Almeida Santana, Fabrísia Ferreira de Araújo, and Joilson Rego. 2017. Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 73 (2017), 247--256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M Csikszentmihalyi. 1975. Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: JosseyBass. Well-being: Thefoundations of hedonic psychology (1975), 134--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan S. J. d. Baker, Albert T. Corbett, Ido Roll, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2008. Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 18, 3 (Jan. 2008), 287--314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-007-9045-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Matt Dixon, Nalin Asanka Gamagedara Arachchilage, and James Nicholson. 2019. Engaging Users with Educational Games: The Case of Phishing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313026Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Edson B. dos Santos Junior, Carlos Sim oes, Ana Cristina Bicharra Garcia, and Adriana S. Vivacqua. 2018. What Does a Crowd Routing Behavior Change Reveal?. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Jersey City, NJ, USA) (CSCW '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297--300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274081Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Gideon Dror, Dan Pelleg, Oleg Rokhlenko, and Idan Szpektor. 2012. Churn Prediction in New Users of Yahoo! Answers. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (Lyon, France) (WWW '12 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 829--834. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Louis Faucon, Lukasz Kidzinski, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2016. Semi-Markov Model for Simulating MOOC Students. International Educational Data Mining Society (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarah Foley, Nadia Pantidi, and John McCarthy. 2020. Student Engagement in Sensitive Design Contexts: A Case Study in Dementia Care. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376161Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. G David Forney Jr. 2005. The viterbi algorithm: A personal history. arXiv preprint cs/0504020 (2005). http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0504020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Pascal E. Fortin, Elisabeth Sulmont, and Jeremy Cooperstock. 2019. Detecting Perception of Smartphone Notifications Using Skin Conductance Responses. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jennifer A Fredricks, Phyllis C Blumenfeld, and Alison H Paris. 2004. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74, 1 (March 2004), 59--109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Adabriand Furtado, Nazareno Andrade, Nigini Oliveira, and Francisco Brasileiro. 2013. Contributor Profiles, Their Dynamics, and Their Importance in Five Q&a Sites. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1237--1252. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. W.L. Gardiner. 1974. Psychology: a story of a search .Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. 73089595 https://books.google.fr/books?id=q50bAQAAMAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nate Gruver, Ali Malik, Brahm Capoor, Chris Piech, Mitchell L Stevens, and Andreas Paepcke. 2019. Using Latent Variable Models to Observe Academic Pathways. In Proceedings of The 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. EDM, 294--299. http://educationaldatamining.org/edm2019/proceedings/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Juho Hamari, David J. Shernoff, Elizabeth Rowe, Brianno Coller, Jodi Asbell-Clarke, and Teon Edwards. 2016. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 54 (2016), 170--179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Siti Suhaila Abdul Hamid, Novia Admodisastro, Noridayu Manshor, Azrina Kamaruddin, and Abdul Azim Abd Ghani. 2018. Dyslexia adaptive learning model: student engagement prediction using machine learning approach. In International Conference on Soft Computing and Data Mining. Springer, 372--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Mitchell M Handelsman, William L Briggs, Nora Sullivan, and Annette Towler. 2005. A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 98, 3 (2005), 184--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kotaro Hara, Abigail Adams, Kristy Milland, Saiph Savage, Chris Callison-Burch, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2018. A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers' Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 449, bibinfonumpages14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174023Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Xiaofei He, Xinbo Gao, Yanning Zhang, Zhi-Hua Zhou, Zhi-Yong Liu, Baochuan Fu, Fuyuan Hu, and Zhancheng Zhang. 2015. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques: 5th International Conference, IScIDE 2015, Suzhou, China, June 14--16, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Vol. 9243. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Matthew Hertz. 2010. What Do "CS1" and "CS2" Mean? Investigating Differences in the Early Courses. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) (SIGCSE '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199--203. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Hayati Hind, Mohammed Khalidi Idrissi, and Samir Bennani. 2017. Applying Text Mining to Predict Learners' Cognitive Engagement. In Proceedings of the Mediterranean Symposium on Smart City Application (Tangier, Morocco) (SCAMS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, bibinfonumpages6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3175628.3175655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Beryl Hoffman, Ralph Morelli, and Jennifer Rosato. 2019. Student Engagement is Key to Broadening Participation in CS. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1123--1129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Jeroen Janssen and Paul A Kirschner. 2020. Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development (2020), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kenneth Joseph, Wei Wei, and Kathleen M. Carley. 2017. Girls Rule, Boys Drool: Extracting Semantic and Affective Stereotypes from Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1362--1374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998187Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Libor Juha?ák, Ji?í Zounek, and Lucie Rohlíková. 2019. Using process mining to analyze students' quiz-taking behavior patterns in a learning management system. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 92 (2019), 496--506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jutge. 2019. jutge. https://jutge.org/ Retrieved January 24, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Saskia M. Kelders and Hanneke Kip. 2019. Development and Initial Validation of a Scale to Measure Engagement with EHealth Technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312917Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Jina Kim, Kunwoo Bae, Eunil Park, and Angel P. del Pobil. 2019. Who Will Subscribe to My Streaming Channel? The Case of Twitch. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Austin, TX, USA) (CSCW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 247--251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359470Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Juho Kim, Philip J. Guo, Daniel T. Seaton, Piotr Mitros, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2014. Understanding In-Video Dropouts and Interaction Peaks Inonline Lecture Videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) ([email protected] '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566237Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Marios Kokkodis. 2019. Reputation Deflation Through Dynamic Expertise Assessment in Online Labor Markets. In The World Wide Web Conference (San Francisco, CA, USA) (WWW '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 896--905. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313479Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. George D Kuh. 2001. Assessing what really matters to student learning inside the national survey of student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, Vol. 33, 3 (2001), 10--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Il-Youp Kwak, Jun Ho Huh, Seung Taek Han, Iljoo Kim, and Jiwon Yoon. 2019. Voice Presentation Attack Detection through Text-Converted Voice Command Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Young D. Kwon, Dimitris Chatzopoulos, Ehsan ul Haq, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, and Pan Hui. 2019. GeoLifecycle: User Engagement of Geographical Exploration and Churn Prediction in LBSNs. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 3, 3, Article 92 (Sept. 2019), bibinfonumpages29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. D Langley. 2006. The student engagement index: A proposed student rating system based on the national benchmarks of effective educational practice. University of Minnesota: Center for Teaching and Learning Services (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Hyunsoo Lee, Uichin Lee, and Hwajung Hong. 2019. Commitment Devices in Online Behavior Change Support Systems. In Proceedings of Asian CHI Symposium 2019: Emerging HCI Research Collection (Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom) (AsianHCI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105--113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309700.3338446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. LeetCode. 2019. LeetCode. https://leetcode.com/ Retrieved January 24, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Pascal Lessel, Maximilian Altmeyer, Lea Verena Schmeer, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. "Enable or Disable Gamification?": Analyzing the Impact of Choice in a Gamified Image Tagging Task. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300380Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Zipeng Liu, Zhicheng Liu, and Tamara Munzner. 2020. Data-Driven Multi-Level Segmentation of Image Editing Logs. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Suman Kalyan Maity, Aishik Chakraborty, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2017. Detection of Sockpuppets in Social Media. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 243--246. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3026360Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, René F. Kizilcec, Nicolás Morales, and Jorge Munoz-Gama. 2018. Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 80 (2018), 179--196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Hiroaki Masaki, Kengo Shibata, Shui Hoshino, Takahiro Ishihama, Nagayuki Saito, and Koji Yatani. 2020. Exploring Nudge Designs to Help Adolescent SNS Users Avoid Privacy and Safety Threats. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 27, 1 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Pardis Miri, Emily Jusuf, Andero Uusberg, Horia Margarit, Robert Flory, Katherine Isbister, Keith Marzullo, and James J. Gross. 2020. Evaluating a Personalizable, Inconspicuous Vibrotactile(PIV) Breathing Pacer for In-the-Moment Affect Regulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376757Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Reza Hadi Mogavi, Sujit Gujar, Xiaojuan Ma, and Pan Hui. 2019. HRCR: Hidden Markov-Based Reinforcement to Reduce Churn in Question Answering Forums. In PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Springer International Publishing, 364--376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_29Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Michael Morgan, Matthew Butler, Neena Thota, and Jane Sinclair. 2018. How CS Academics View Student Engagement. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Larnaca, Cyprus) (ITiCSE 2018). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 284--289. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Abdallah Moubayed, Mohammadnoor Injadat, Abdallah Shami, and Hanan Lutfiyya. 2020. Student Engagement Level in an e-Learning Environment: Clustering Using K-means. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 34, 2 (March 2020), 137--156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1696140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Benjamin Murauer and Günther Specht. 2018. Detecting Music Genre Using Extreme Gradient Boosting. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (Lyon, France) (WWW '18). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 1923--1927. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191822Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Saurabh Nagrecha, John Z. Dillon, and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2017. MOOC Dropout Prediction: Lessons Learned from Making Pipelines Interpretable. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (Perth, Australia) (WWW '17). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 351--359. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054162Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Junpei Naito, Yukino Baba, Hisashi Kashima, Takenori Takaki, and Takuya Funo. 2018. Predictive modeling of learning continuation in preschool education using temporal patterns of development tests. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Tuan Dinh Nguyen, Marisa Cannata, and Jason Miller. 2016. Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 111, 2 (Oct. 2016), 163--174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Kenji Okamoto. 2017. Analyzing Single Molecule FRET Trajectories Using HMM. In Hidden Markov Models. Springer New York, 103--113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6753-7_7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Judith A Ouimet and Robert A Smallwood. 2005. Assessment Measures: CLASSE--The Class-Level Survey of Student Engagement. Assessment Update, Vol. 17, 6 (2005), 13--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Steven Pace. 2004. A grounded theory of the flow experiences of Web users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 60, 3 (2004), 327--363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Zilong Pan, Chenglu Li, and Min Liu. 2020. Learning Analytics Dashboard for Problem-Based Learning. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Virtual Event, USA) ([email protected] '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 393--396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3406751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sira Park, Susan D. Holloway, Amanda Arendtsz, Janine Bempechat, and Jin Li. 2011. What Makes Students Engaged in Learning? A Time-Use Study of Within- and Between-Individual Predictors of Emotional Engagement in Low-Performing High Schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 41, 3 (Dec. 2011), 390--401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Sophie Parsons, Peter M. Atkinson, Elena Simperl, and Mark Weal. 2015. Thematically Analysing Social Network Content During Disasters Through the Lens of the Disaster Management Lifecycle. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence, Italy) (WWW '15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1221--1226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2741721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Filipe D. Pereira, Elaine Oliveira, Alexandra Cristea, David Fernandes, Luciano Silva, Gene Aguiar, Ahmed Alamri, and Mohammad Alshehri. 2019. Early Dropout Prediction for Programming Courses Supported by Online Judges. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 67--72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Jordi Petit, Omer Giménez, and Salvador Roura. 2012. Jutge.Org: An Educational Programming Judge. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (SIGCSE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 445--450. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Math Playground. 2019. Math Playground. https://www.mathplayground.com/ Retrieved January 24, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Jagat Sastry Pudipeddi, Leman Akoglu, and Hanghang Tong. 2014. User Churn in Focused Question Answering Sites: Characterizations and Prediction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (Seoul, Korea) (WWW '14 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 469--474. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576965Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Jiezhong Qiu, Jie Tang, Tracy Xiao Liu, Jie Gong, Chenhui Zhang, Qian Zhang, and Yufei Xue. 2016. Modeling and Predicting Learning Behavior in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (WSDM '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93--102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Rezvaneh Rezapour and Jana Diesner. 2017. Classification and Detection of Micro-Level Impact of Issue-Focused Documentary Films Based on Reviews. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1419--1431. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Juan D Rodriguez, Aritz Perez, and Jose A Lozano. 2009. Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 32, 3 (2009), 569--575.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Cristó bal Romero and Sebastiá n Ventura. 2016. Educational data science in massive open online courses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 7, 1 (Sept. 2016), e1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1187Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Matthew Rowe. 2013. Mining user lifecycles from online community platforms and their application to churn prediction. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 637--646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Victor B. Saenz, Deryl Hatch, Beth E. Bukoski, Suyun Kim, Kye hyoung Lee, and Patrick Valdez. 2011. Community College Student Engagement Patterns. Community College Review, Vol. 39, 3 (July 2011), 235--267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552111416643Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Koya Sato, Mizuki Oka, and Kazuhiko Kato. 2019. Early Churn User Classification in Social Networking Service Using Attention-Based Long Short-Term Memory. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 45--56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26142-9_5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Junfeng Shang and Joseph E. Cavanaugh. 2008. Bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion for mixed model selection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 52, 4 (2008), 2004--2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. David J Shernoff and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2009), 131--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Hongzhi Shi, Chao Zhang, Quanming Yao, Yong Li, Funing Sun, and Depeng Jin. 2019. State-Sharing Sparse Hidden Markov Models for Personalized Sequences. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (Anchorage, AK, USA) (KDD '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1549--1559. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Hyunjin Shin, Bugeun Kim, and Gahgene Gweon. 2020. Guessing or Solving? Exploring the Use of Motion Features from Educational Game Logs. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Manya Sleeper, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Patrick Gage Kelley, Sean A. Munson, and Norman Sadeh. 2015. I Would Like To..., I Shouldn't..., I Wish I...: Exploring Behavior-Change Goals for Social Networking Sites. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1058--1069. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675193Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. A. Spanos. 2019. Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: Empirical Modeling with Observational Data. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=nm_IDwAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova. 2016. A Comprehensive Survey and Classification of Approaches for Community Question Answering. ACM Trans. Web, Vol. 10, 3, Article 18 (Aug. 2016), 63 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Cor JM Suhre, Ellen PWA Jansen, and Egbert G Harskamp. 2007. Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, Vol. 54, 2 (2007), 207--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Stephanie D. Teasley. 2017. Student Facing Dashboards: One Size Fits All? Technology, Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 22, 3 (01 Oct 2017), 377--384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9314-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Anbang Xu, Jilin Chen, Jalal Mahmud, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2016. Exploring Engagement in a 'Social Crowd' on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417--420. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Timus. 2019. Timus Online Judge. https://acm.timus.ru/ Retrieved January 24, 2019 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Gustavo F. Tondello, Dennis L. Kappen, Marim Ganaba, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2019. Gameful Design Heuristics: A Gamification Inspection Tool. In Human-Computer Interaction. Perspectives on Design. Springer International Publishing, 224--244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Gustavo F. Tondello, Rina R. Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2016. The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI PLAY '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229--243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Richard Tucker. 2016. Collaboration and Student Engagement in Design Education .IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. T. Vafeiadis, K.I. Diamantaras, G. Sarigiannidis, and K.Ch. Chatzisavvas. 2015. A comparison of machine learning techniques for customer churn prediction. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 55 (2015), 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Wil Van Der Aalst. 2011. Process mining: discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Vol. 2. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Devin Waldrop, Amy L. Reschly, Kathleen Fraysier, and James J. Appleton. 2018. Measuring the Engagement of College Students: Administration Format, Structure, and Validity of the Student Engagement InstrumenttextendashCollege. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Developmen , Vol. 52, 2 (Nov. 2018), 90--107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2018.1497429Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Danding Wang, Qian Yang, Ashraf Abdul, and Brian Y. Lim. 2019 b. Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300831Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Qianwen Wang, Yao Ming, Zhihua Jin, Qiaomu Shen, Dongyu Liu, Micah J. Smith, Kalyan Veeramachaneni, and Huamin Qu. 2019 a. ATMSeer: Increasing Transparency and Controllability in Automated Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300911Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Wei Wang, Han Yu, and Chunyan Miao. 2017. Deep Model for Dropout Prediction in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering (Beijing, China) (ICCSE'17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 26--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126973.3126990Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Vicky Ward, Allan House, and Susan Hamer. 2009. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature. Journal of health services research & policy, Vol. 14, 3 (2009), 156--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Szymon Wasik, Maciej Antczak, Jan Badura, Artur Laskowski, and Tomasz Sternal. 2016. Optil.Io: Cloud Based Platform For Solving Optimization Problems Using Crowdsourcing Approach. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433--436. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Szymon Wasik, Maciej Antczak, Jan Badura, Artur Laskowski, and Tomasz Sternal. 2018. A Survey on Online Judge Systems and Their Applications. ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. 51, 1, Article 3 (Jan. 2018), bibinfonumpages34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Jacob Whitehill, Kiran Mohan, Daniel Seaton, Yigal Rosen, and Dustin Tingley. 2017. MOOC Dropout Prediction: How to Measure Accuracy?. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) ([email protected] '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Meng Xia, Mingfei Sun, Huan Wei, Qing Chen, Yong Wang, Lei Shi, Huamin Qu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. PeerLens: Peer-inspired Interactive Learning Path Planning in Online Question Pool. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 634, bibinfonumpages12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Wanli Xing and Dongping Du. 2018. Dropout Prediction in MOOCs: Using Deep Learning for Personalized Intervention. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 57, 3 (March 2018), 547--570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Yuan Xuan, Yang Chen, Huiying Li, Pan Hui, and Lei Shi. 2016. LBSNShield: Malicious Account Detection in Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437--440. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Carl Yang, Xiaolin Shi, Luo Jie, and Jiawei Han. 2018b. I Know You'll Be Back: Interpretable New User Clustering and Churn Prediction on a Mobile Social Application. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD (London, United Kingdom) (KDD '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 914--922. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Yang Yang, Zongtao Liu, Chenhao Tan, Fei Wu, Yueting Zhuang, and Yafeng Li. 2018a. To Stay or to Leave: Churn Prediction for Urban Migrants in the Initial Period. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (Lyon, France) (WWW '18). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 967--976. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Zamzami Zainuddin, Samuel Kai Wah Chu, Muhammad Shujahat, and Corinne Jacqueline Perera. 2020. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review (2020), 100326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Jiawei Zhang, Xiangnan Kong, and S Yu Philip. 2016. Social badge system analysis. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 453--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Xi Zhang, Shan Jiang, and Yihang Cheng. 2017. Inferring the Student Social Loafing State in Collaborative Learning with a Hidden Markov Model: A Case on Slack. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (Perth, Australia) (WWW '17). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 149--152. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054145Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Sabrina Zirkel, Julie A Garcia, and Mary C Murphy. 2015. Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher, Vol. 44, 1 (2015), 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing Student Engagement Moods for Dropout Prediction in Question Pool Websites

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!