Abstract
To understand the lived experience of how people with disabilities telework in the United States, 25 people were interviewed. The participants included people who are blind or low vision, deaf or hard of hearing, neurodiverse, have limited mobility/dexterity, and have chronic health issues. The interviews focused on how they used video calling, screen sharing, and collaborative editing technologies to accomplish their telework. The interviews found ways in which design choices made in telework technologies interact with people's abilities, especially those who are blind or low vision, since the tools rely heavily on the visual channel to enable remote collaboration. A central theme emerged around how design choices made in telework technologies affect the digital representation of people's online activities in the video call interface: those who turn off their video (because they are blind or do not want to expend the cognitive effort to present themselves over video) are relegated to a static icon on a blank video frame with their name while those who are deaf and speak silently through a sign language interpreter never show up in interfaces that use active speaker detection to choose which video streams to display. Users with disabilities may avoid using screen sharing and collaborative editing tools which "leak" cues that disclose their disabilities. Because the interviews were conducted during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic response, they also provided a preview of how the sudden shift to pervasive teleworking affected their telework experience.
- Mason Ameri, Lisa Schur, Meera Adya, F. Scott Bentley, Patrick McKay, Douglas Kruse. 2017. The Disability Employment Puzzle: A Field Experiment on Employer Hiring Behavior. ILR Review, 71, 2, (2017) 329--364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917717474Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Diane E Bailey and Nancy B Kurland. 2002. A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. .Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23, 4 (2002) 383--400.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Paul M.A. Baker, Andrew C. Ward, Nathan W. Moon. 2006. Virtual exclusion and telework: Barriers and opportunities of technocentric workplace accommodation policy. Work, 27, 4, (2006) 421--430.Google Scholar
- Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. (October 2015) 163--171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864Google Scholar
- Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (April 2015) 2373--2382 https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702511Google Scholar
- John C. Bricout, Paul M.A. Baker, Andrew C. Ward, Nathan W. Moon. 2010. Teleworking and the ?Disability Divide". In Handbook on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society, IGI Global, 155--178.Google Scholar
- Margret Buchholz, Ulrika Ferm, and Kristina Holmgren. 2018. "That is how I speak nowadays" -- experiences of remote communication among persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40, 12 (2018) 1468--1479 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1300340Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. "It doesn't win you friends": Understanding Accessibility in Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 191 (November 2019) 26 pages https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3359293Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Donna Z. Davis & Karikarn Chansiri. 2019. Digital identities -- overcoming visual bias through virtual embodiment, Information, Communication & Society, 22, 4, (2019) 491--505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1548631Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Nicole Ellison. 2004. Telework and Social Change: How Technology Is Reshaping the Boundaries between Home and Work. ABC-CLIO, Incorporated, 2004.Google Scholar
- Alan Felstead and Golo Henseke. 2017. Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 3 (November 2017) 195--212.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Erving Goffman. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. AnchorGoogle Scholar
- Bradford Hesse. 1996. Using Telework to Accommodate the Needs of Employees with Disabilities. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 6, 4 (January 1996), 327--343Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sasa Junuzovic, Kori Inkpen, John Tang, Mara Sedlins, Kristie Fisher. 2012. To See or Not to See: A Study Comparing Four-way Avatar, Video, and Audio Conferencing for Work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP 2012). 31--34 https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389181Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Demetrios Karis, Daniel Wildman & Amir Mané. 2014. Improving Remote Collaboration With Video Conferencing and Video Portals. Human-Computer Interaction, 31, 1(2016) 1--58 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.921506Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Maureen Linden. 2104. Telework research and practice: Impacts on people with disabilities. Work, 48, 1 (2014), 65--67.Google Scholar
- Maureen Linden and Karen Milchus. 2014. Teleworkers with disabilities: Characteristics and accommodation use. Work, 47, 4 (2014), 473--483.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- David McNaughton, Tracy Rackensperger, Dana Dorn, and Natasha Wilson. 2014. "Home is at work and work is at home": Telework and individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Work, 48 (2014), 117--126. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141860Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Nathan W. Moon, Maureen A. Linden, John C. Bricout, and Paul M.A. Baker. 2014. Telework rationale and implementation for people with disabilities: Considerations for employer policymaking. Work, 48 (2014), 105--115. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131819Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Allison Norlain. 2020. Workers With Disabilities Disproportionately Impacted By Covid-19 Pandemic. Forbes.com, June 22, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/allisonnorlian/2020/06/22/workers-with-disabilities-disproportionately-impacted-by-covid-19-pandemic/#7709131d1ad1 (Retrieved August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
- Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction. 2000, Volume 15, pp. 139--178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4Google Scholar
- Margrethe H Olson. 1983. Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time. Communications of the ACM, 26, 3 (1983) 182--187.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lisa A. Schur, Mason Ameri, and Douglas Kruse. 2020. Telework After COVID: A "Silver Lining" for Workers with Disabilities? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30 (2020), 521--536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09936-5Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Emily Q. Wang, Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Accessibility in Action: Co-Located Collaboration among Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. November 2018 Article No.: 180 https://doi.org/10.1145/3274449Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Michael D. West and Jane Anderson. 2005. Telework and employees with disabilities: Accommodation and funding options. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 23 (2005) 115--122.Google Scholar
- Annuska Zolyomi, Andrew Begel, Jennifer Frances Waldern, John Tang, Michael Barnett, Edward Cutrell, Daniel J. McDuff, Sean Andrist, Meredith Ringel Morris. 2019. Managing Stress: The Needs of Autistic Adults in Video Calling. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3(CSCW): 134:1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359236Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities
Recommendations
A web design framework for improved accessibility for people with disabilities (WDFAD)
W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)Information and Communication Technology (ICT) such as the World Wide Web (WWW) has increasingly become embedded in everyday life and is progressively becoming indispensable for public, business, personal efficiency or even improvement of livelihoods [1]...
E-Inclusion for People with Disabilities in E-Government Services through Accessible Multimedia
One of the main challenges of e-Government is the communication of these services to citizens. In the context of people with disabilities, communication channels should be equally accessible, in particular those based on innovative media such as e-...
A Systematic Mapping of Guidelines for the Development of Accessible Digital Games to People with Disabilities
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User ExperienceAbstractAccessibility is a right for everyone. For this, sets of guidelines are created by authors and organizations with the objective to develop technologies more inclusive. Actually, digital games are one of the most used resources for entertainment, ...






Comments