skip to main content
research-article

Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

To understand the lived experience of how people with disabilities telework in the United States, 25 people were interviewed. The participants included people who are blind or low vision, deaf or hard of hearing, neurodiverse, have limited mobility/dexterity, and have chronic health issues. The interviews focused on how they used video calling, screen sharing, and collaborative editing technologies to accomplish their telework. The interviews found ways in which design choices made in telework technologies interact with people's abilities, especially those who are blind or low vision, since the tools rely heavily on the visual channel to enable remote collaboration. A central theme emerged around how design choices made in telework technologies affect the digital representation of people's online activities in the video call interface: those who turn off their video (because they are blind or do not want to expend the cognitive effort to present themselves over video) are relegated to a static icon on a blank video frame with their name while those who are deaf and speak silently through a sign language interpreter never show up in interfaces that use active speaker detection to choose which video streams to display. Users with disabilities may avoid using screen sharing and collaborative editing tools which "leak" cues that disclose their disabilities. Because the interviews were conducted during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic response, they also provided a preview of how the sudden shift to pervasive teleworking affected their telework experience.

References

  1. Mason Ameri, Lisa Schur, Meera Adya, F. Scott Bentley, Patrick McKay, Douglas Kruse. 2017. The Disability Employment Puzzle: A Field Experiment on Employer Hiring Behavior. ILR Review, 71, 2, (2017) 329--364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917717474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Diane E Bailey and Nancy B Kurland. 2002. A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. .Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23, 4 (2002) 383--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Paul M.A. Baker, Andrew C. Ward, Nathan W. Moon. 2006. Virtual exclusion and telework: Barriers and opportunities of technocentric workplace accommodation policy. Work, 27, 4, (2006) 421--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. (October 2015) 163--171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (April 2015) 2373--2382 https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702511Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. John C. Bricout, Paul M.A. Baker, Andrew C. Ward, Nathan W. Moon. 2010. Teleworking and the ?Disability Divide". In Handbook on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society, IGI Global, 155--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Margret Buchholz, Ulrika Ferm, and Kristina Holmgren. 2018. "That is how I speak nowadays" -- experiences of remote communication among persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40, 12 (2018) 1468--1479 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1300340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. "It doesn't win you friends": Understanding Accessibility in Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 191 (November 2019) 26 pages https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3359293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Donna Z. Davis & Karikarn Chansiri. 2019. Digital identities -- overcoming visual bias through virtual embodiment, Information, Communication & Society, 22, 4, (2019) 491--505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1548631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nicole Ellison. 2004. Telework and Social Change: How Technology Is Reshaping the Boundaries between Home and Work. ABC-CLIO, Incorporated, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alan Felstead and Golo Henseke. 2017. Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 3 (November 2017) 195--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Erving Goffman. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. AnchorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradford Hesse. 1996. Using Telework to Accommodate the Needs of Employees with Disabilities. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 6, 4 (January 1996), 327--343Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Sasa Junuzovic, Kori Inkpen, John Tang, Mara Sedlins, Kristie Fisher. 2012. To See or Not to See: A Study Comparing Four-way Avatar, Video, and Audio Conferencing for Work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP 2012). 31--34 https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Demetrios Karis, Daniel Wildman & Amir Mané. 2014. Improving Remote Collaboration With Video Conferencing and Video Portals. Human-Computer Interaction, 31, 1(2016) 1--58 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.921506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Maureen Linden. 2104. Telework research and practice: Impacts on people with disabilities. Work, 48, 1 (2014), 65--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maureen Linden and Karen Milchus. 2014. Teleworkers with disabilities: Characteristics and accommodation use. Work, 47, 4 (2014), 473--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. David McNaughton, Tracy Rackensperger, Dana Dorn, and Natasha Wilson. 2014. "Home is at work and work is at home": Telework and individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Work, 48 (2014), 117--126. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141860Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nathan W. Moon, Maureen A. Linden, John C. Bricout, and Paul M.A. Baker. 2014. Telework rationale and implementation for people with disabilities: Considerations for employer policymaking. Work, 48 (2014), 105--115. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Allison Norlain. 2020. Workers With Disabilities Disproportionately Impacted By Covid-19 Pandemic. Forbes.com, June 22, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/allisonnorlian/2020/06/22/workers-with-disabilities-disproportionately-impacted-by-covid-19-pandemic/#7709131d1ad1 (Retrieved August 18, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction. 2000, Volume 15, pp. 139--178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Margrethe H Olson. 1983. Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time. Communications of the ACM, 26, 3 (1983) 182--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lisa A. Schur, Mason Ameri, and Douglas Kruse. 2020. Telework After COVID: A "Silver Lining" for Workers with Disabilities? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30 (2020), 521--536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09936-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Emily Q. Wang, Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Accessibility in Action: Co-Located Collaboration among Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. November 2018 Article No.: 180 https://doi.org/10.1145/3274449Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Michael D. West and Jane Anderson. 2005. Telework and employees with disabilities: Accommodation and funding options. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 23 (2005) 115--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Annuska Zolyomi, Andrew Begel, Jennifer Frances Waldern, John Tang, Michael Barnett, Edward Cutrell, Daniel J. McDuff, Sean Andrist, Meredith Ringel Morris. 2019. Managing Stress: The Needs of Autistic Adults in Video Calling. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3(CSCW): 134:1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359236Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!