skip to main content
10.1145/3450618.3469148acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Animated Futurist Sculpting as Dynamic Implicit Shapes

Published:06 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work, we present an approach to obtain futurist sculptures. Our approach is inspired by the works of Italian Futurist artists such as Umberto Boccioni. Futurism, as an art movement, aims to achieve to define forms that are a product of time but is permanent in space. In this work, we have developed a methodology to produce a set of futurist sculptures from any given animation of any object that is defined as a triangular mesh. Each produced futurist sculpture is a still frame of what can be rendered as a sculpture animation. Our method is based on the conversion of a given polygonal mesh and its motion into an implicit shape in 4D space which consists of 3-spatial and one temporal dimension. To create each specific futurist sculpture, we compute a subset of this 4D implicit shape in a given time interval. The resulting immersion of 4D structure into the 3D spatial domain provides us desired futurist sculpture for the given time interval. The most important aspect of our methodology is the conversion of animated polygonal mesh into a 4D implicit shape. We first convert a polygonal mesh into a set of particles. Each particle can have its own color. All the points that are closer to the trajectory of the particle form an implicitly defined swept volume [Kim et al. 2004]. These swept volumes appear to be similar to the extrusion of a circle along a curve, but they are guaranteed to be free of artifacts caused by intersections.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3450618.3469148.mp4

References

  1. Umbro Apollonio, Robert Brain, RW Flint, JC Higgitt, and Caroline Tisdall. 1973. Futurist manifestos. Thames and Hudson London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marta Braun. 1994. Picturing time: the work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830-1904). University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen Cavalier and Sylvain Chomet. 2011. The world history of animation. Vol. 416. University of California Press Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ester Coen 1988. Umberto Boccioni. Metropolitan Museum of Art New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Florian Gelzenleuchter. 2021. Animation Smear Frames via shader!https://twitter.com/flogelz/status/1345029634283474945.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Haller, Christian Hanl, and Jeremiah Diephuis. 2004. Non-photorealistic rendering techniques for motion in computer games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 2, 4 (2004), 11–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Liang He, Huaishu Peng, Michelle Lin, Ravikanth Konjeti, François Guimbretière, and Jon E Froehlich. 2019. Ondulé: Designing and controlling 3D printable springs. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 739–750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Tovi Grossman, Cory Mogk, Ryan Schmidt, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. ChronoFab: fabricating motion. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 908–918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Young J Kim, Gokul Varadhan, Ming C Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2004. Fast swept volume approximation of complex polyhedral models. Computer-Aided Design 36, 11 (2004), 1013–1027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Doris HU Kochanek and Richard H Bartels. 1984. Interpolating splines with local tension, continuity, and bias control. In Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 33–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Piotr Krawczyk. 2006. Futurist sculpting: Modeling movement in 3D. Master’s thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John Lasseter. 1987. Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 35–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Maic Masuch, Stefan Schlechtweg, and Ronny Schulz. 1999. Speedlines: Depicting motion in motionless pictures. In In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999. Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Junya C Motomura. 2015. GuiltyGearXrd’s Art Style : The X Factor Between 2D and 3D. Youtube, Game Developers Conference. https://youtu.be/yhGjCzxJV3E?t=2997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Johannes Schmid, Robert W Sumner, Huw Bowles, and Markus H Gross. 2010. Programmable motion effects.ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4 (2010), 57–1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Animated Futurist Sculpting as Dynamic Implicit Shapes
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGGRAPH '21: ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Posters
        August 2021
        90 pages
        ISBN:9781450383714
        DOI:10.1145/3450618

        Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 August 2021

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format