skip to main content
research-article
Open Access
Best Paper

EMBody: A Data-Centric Toolkit for EMG-Based Interface Prototyping and Experimentation

Published:29 May 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Body movements, from a short smile to a marathon run, are driven by muscle activity. Despite the fact that measuring muscle activity with electromyography (EMG) is technically well established, it is highly complex and its use in interfaces has been limited. Easy access to muscle sensing can offer new opportunities to Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. Off-the-shelf sensors often only provide low-level access, hence requiring expertise in signal processing and widening the gulf of execution for users without engineering skills. To address this challenge, we introduce EMBody, a data-centric toolkit for EMG-based interface prototyping and experimentation. EMBody offers multiple levels of prototyping fidelity for EMG sensing, signal processing, and data interpretation. Our data-centric toolkit encapsulates the different data representation stages, offering a wide range of customization opportunities to experts while also allowing non-technical designers to focus on creating new interaction techniques. EMBody features a lightweight form factor and wireless connectivity. Additionally, the system leverages an exploration-centered workflow by allowing rapid access to measurement data via the accompanying software. Users define a set of motions to be recognized and interactively provide example data points. The toolkit then handles signal processing and classification. The recognized movements are streamed on the local network, ready to be used by interactive applications. This paper reports on how to use EMBody and its implementation. We iteratively developed the toolkit in a series of workshops and example applications. Users who had none or very limited knowledge of EMG could rapidly create engaging functional prototypes, while experts appreciated the modularity of the software component allowing for a high degree of customization. We contribute the software and hardware components of EMBody as a tool for the research community to stimulate creative exploration of EMG systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

V5eics195VF.mp4

Supplemental video

References

  1. Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics, Vol. 9, 1 (2016), 1--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marta G. Carcedo, Soon Hau Chua, Simon Perrault, Paweł Wozniak, Raj Joshi, Mohammad Obaid, Morten Fjeld, and Shengdong Zhao. 2016. HaptiColor: Interpolating Color Information as Haptic Feedback to Assist the Colorblind. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3572--3583. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858220Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Pei-Yu (Peggy) Chi and Yang Li. 2015. Weave: Scripting Cross-Device Wearable Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3923--3932. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Enrico Costanza, Samuel A. Inverso, Rebecca Allen, and Pattie Maes. 2007. Intimate Interfaces in Action : Assessing the Usability and Subtlety of Emg -Based Motionless Gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 819--828. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240747Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul Dourish. 1999. Embodied interaction: Exploring the foundations of a new approach to HCI. Unpublished paper, on-line: http://www.ics.uci.edu/jpd/publications/misc/embodied.pdf (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stephen H. Fairclough. 2009. Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interact Comput, Vol. 21, 1--2 (Jan. 2009), 133--145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tong Gao, Jessica R. Hullman, Eytan Adar, Brent Hecht, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2014. NewsViews: An Automated Pipeline for Creating Custom Geovisualizations for News. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3005--3014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557228Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Saul Greenberg and Chester Fitchett. 2001. Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces through Physical Widgets. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '01). Association for Computing Machinery, Orlando, Florida, 209--218. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tobias Grosse-Puppendahl, Yannick Berghoefer, Andreas Braun, Raphael Wimmer, and Arjan Kuijper. 2013. OpenCapSense : A Rapid Prototyping Toolkit for Pervasive Interaction Using Capacitive Sensing. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom ). 152--159. https://doi.org/10.1109/PerCom.2013.6526726Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Juan Haladjian. 2019. The Wearables Development Toolkit : An Integrated Development Environment for Activity Recognition Applications. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 3, 4 (Dec. 2019), 134:1--134:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369813Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Juan Haladjian, Katharina Bredies, and Bernd Brügge. 2016. Interactex: An Integrated Development Environment for Smart Textiles. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Heidelberg, Germany) (ISWC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 8--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971763.2971776Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Björn Hartmann, Leith Abdulla, Manas Mittal, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2007. Authoring Sensor-Based Interactions by Demonstration with Direct Manipulation and Pattern Recognition. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 145--154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cedric Honnet, Hannah Perner-Wilson, Marc Teyssier, Bruno Fruchard, Jürgen Steimle, Ana C. Baptista, and Paul Strohmeier. 2020. PolySense : Augmenting Textiles with Electrical Functionality Using In -Situ Polymerization. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376841Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Steven Houben, Connie Golsteijn, Sarah Gallacher, Rose Johnson, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, Licia Capra, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Physikit: Data Engagement Through Physical Ambient Visualizations in the Home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1608--1619. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Steven Houben and Nicolai Marquardt. 2015. WatchConnect: A Toolkit for Prototyping Smartwatch-Centric Cross-Device Applications. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1247--1256. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Scott E. Hudson and Jennifer Mankoff. 2006. Rapid Construction of Functioning Physical Interfaces from Cardboard, Thumbtacks, Tin Foil and Masking Tape. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '06). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreux, Switzerland, 289--298. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166299Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin Kaltenbrunner and Ross Bencina. 2007. ReacTIVision: A Computer-Vision Framework for Table-Based Tangible Interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69--74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jakob Karolus, Annika Kilian, Thomas Kosch, Albrecht Schmidt, and Paweł W. Wozniak. 2020. Hit the Thumb Jack! Using Electromyography to Augment the Piano Keyboard. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429--440. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395500Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jakob Karolus, Hendrik Schuff, Thomas Kosch, Pawel W. Wozniak, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2018. EMGuitar: Assisting Guitar Playing with Electromyography. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 651--655. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196803 event-place: Hong Kong, China.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mohamed Khamis, Ozan Saltuk, Alina Hang, Katharina Stolz, Andreas Bulling, and Florian Alt. 2016. TextPursuits: Using Text for Pursuits-Based Interaction and Calibration on Public Displays. In Proc. ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp). 274--285. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. David Ledo, Fraser Anderson, Ryan Schmidt, Lora Oehlberg, Saul Greenberg, and Tovi Grossman. 2017. Pineal: Bringing Passive Objects to Life with Embedded Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2583--2593. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Johnny C. Lee, Daniel Avrahami, Scott E. Hudson, Jodi Forlizzi, Paul H. Dietz, and Darren Leigh. 2004. The Calder Toolkit: Wired and Wireless Components for Rapidly Prototyping Interactive Devices. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04). Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, MA, USA, 167--175. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Javier Marco, Eva Cerezo, and Sandra Baldassarri. 2012. ToyVision: A Toolkit for Prototyping Tabletop Tangible Games. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (Copenhagen, Denmark) (EICS '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71--80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2305484.2305498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Nicolai Marquardt, Robert Diaz-Marino, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2011. The Proximity Toolkit: Prototyping Proxemic Interactions in Ubiquitous Computing Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). Association for Computing Machinery, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 315--326. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nicolai Marquardt and Saul Greenberg. 2007. Distributed Physical Interfaces with Shared Phidgets. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 13--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226973Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Roberto Merletti and Dario Farina. 2016. Surface Electromyography : Physiology, Engineering and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberto Merletti and Philip A. Parker. 2004. Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Non -Invasive Applications. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael Nebeling, Theano Mintsi, Maria Husmann, and Moira Norrie. 2014. Interactive Development of Cross-Device User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2793--2802. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556980Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Arshad Khan, Klaus Kruttwig, Tobias Kraus, and Jürgen Steimle. 2020. PhysioSkin : Rapid Fabrication of Skin -Conformal Physiological Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Galen Panger. 2012. Kinect in the Kitchen: Testing Depth Camera Interactions in Practical Home Environments. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1985--1990. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. G. M. Paul, F. Cao, R. Torah, K. Yang, S. Beeby, and J. Tudor. 2014. A Smart Textile Based Facial EMG and EOG Computer Interface. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 14, 2 (2014), 393--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Max Pfeiffer, Tim Duente, and Michael Rohs. 2016. Let Your Body Move: A Prototyping Toolkit for Wearable Force Feedback with Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Florence, Italy) (MobileHCI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 418--427. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Angkoon Phinyomark, Pornchai Phukpattaranont, and Chusak Limsakul. 2012. Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, 8 (June 2012), 7420--7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Raf Ramakers, Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. RetroFab: A Design Tool for Retrofitting Physical Interfaces Using Actuators, Sensors and 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409--419. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Raf Ramakers, Kashyap Todi, and Kris Luyten. 2015. PaperPulse: An Integrated Approach for Embedding Electronics in Paper Designs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2457--2466. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. T Scott Saponas, Desney S. Tan, Dan Morris, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2008. Demonstrating the Feasibility of Using Forearm Electromyography for Muscle -Computer Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 515--524. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Valkyrie Savage, Colin Chang, and Björn Hartmann. 2013. Sauron: Embedded Single-Camera Sensing of Printed Physical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13). Association for Computing Machinery, St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom, 447--456. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2501992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, Jingyi Li, and Björn Hartmann. 2015. Makers' Marks: Physical Markup for Designing and Fabricating Functional Objects. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Valkyrie Savage, Xiaohan Zhang, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Midas: Fabricating Custom Capacitive Touch Sensors to Prototype Interactive Objects. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12). Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 579--588. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R. Want. 1994. Context-Aware Computing Applications. In 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 85--90. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMCSA.1994.16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Biosignals in human-computer interaction. interactions, Vol. 23, 1 (Dec. 2016), 76--79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851072Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin Schmitz, Martin Stitz, Florian Müller, Markus Funk, and Max Mühlh"auser. 2019. ../Trilaterate: A Fabrication Pipeline to Design and 3D Print Hover-, Touch-, and Force-Sensitive Objects. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Teddy Seyed, Alaa Azazi, Edwin Chan, Yuxi Wang, and Frank Maurer. 2015. SoD-Toolkit: A Toolkit for Interactively Prototyping and Developing Multi-Sensor, Multi-Device Environments. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (Madeira, Portugal) (ITS '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2817750Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. C. Estelle Smith, Eduardo Nevarez, and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Disseminating Research News in HCI: Perceived Hazards, How-To's, and Opportunities for Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Evan Strasnick, Sean Follmer, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2019. Pinpoint: A PCB Debugging Pipeline Using Interruptible Routing and Instrumentation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300278Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Paul Strohmeier, Narjes Pourjafarian, Marion Koelle, Cedric Honnet, Bruno Fruchard, and Jürgen Steimle. 2020. Sketching On -Body Interactions Using Piezo -Resistive Kinesiology Tape. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Humans International Conference (AHs '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384657.3384774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction Design for and with the Lived Body: Some Implications of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 20, 1, Article 8 (April 2013), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Marc Teyssier, Gilles Bailly, Catherine Pelachaud, Eric Lecolinet, Andrew Conn, and Anne Roudaut. 2019. Skin-On Interfaces : A Bio -Driven Approach for Artificial Skin Design to Cover Interactive Devices. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New Orleans, LA, USA, 307--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Nicolas Villar, James Scott, Steve Hodges, Kerry Hammil, and Colin Miller. 2012. .NET Gadgeteer: A Platform for Custom Devices. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive'12). Springer-Verlag, Newcastle, UK, 216--233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--31205--2_14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Scott R. Vrana. 1993. The Psychophysiology of Disgust: Differentiating Negative Emotional Contexts with Facial EMG. Psychophysiology, Vol. 30, 3 (May 1993), 279--286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469--8986.1993.tb03354.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Chiuan Wang, Hsuan-Ming Yeh, Bryan Wang, Te-Yen Wu, Hsin-Ruey Tsai, Rong-Hao Liang, Yi-Ping Hung, and Mike Y. Chen. 2016. CircuitStack: Supporting Rapid Prototyping and Evolution of Electronic Circuits. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 687--695. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984527Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Michael Wessely, Theophanis Tsandilas, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2018. Shape-Aware Material : Interactive Fabrication with ShapeMe. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Berlin, Germany, 127--139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242619Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2017. EagleSense: Tracking People and Devices in Interactive Spaces Using Real-Time Top-View Depth-Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3929--3942. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Jishuo Yang and Daniel Wigdor. 2014. Panelrama: Enabling Easy Specification of Cross-Device Web Applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2783--2792. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EMBody: A Data-Centric Toolkit for EMG-Based Interface Prototyping and Experimentation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!