Abstract
Many popular social network sites (SNSs) provide the post-syncing functionality, which allows users to synchronize posts automatically among different SNSs. Nowadays there exists divergence on this functionality from the view of sink SNS. The key to solving this problem is to understand the characteristics of users’ post-syncing practice and goals and evaluate whether they are consistent with an SNS’s norms, cultures, and goals. However, studying and understanding the characteristics of post-syncing practice and goal are challenging tasks as a result of the difficulty of data sampling and the complexity of post-syncing behavior. In this article, we focus on investigating this question by quantitative analysis in combination with qualitative analysis. In the quantitative study, by utilizing 211,233 synced-posts sampled from Weibo, we aim to investigate characteristics of post-syncing from three perspectives: user, content, and goal. The results suggest that post-syncing plays an important role in exhibiting one’s current activities, creations, and skills as well as advertisements but involves a risk of exhibiting personal sensitive profiles. To understand the results, we present an interview-based qualitative study based on thematic analysis. It indicates that the publicity, urgency, and remarkableness of contents and differences of social affordances and social circles between sink SNS and source SNS as well as the one-time consent of post-syncing authentication jointly account for the major role of post-syncing. Based on these results, we propose insights for post-syncing functionality’s adoption, design, and promotion.
- Smith Aaron and Anderson Monica. 2018. Social media use in 2018. Retrieved March 2018 from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.Google Scholar
- Ime Archibong. 2018. Platform update on publish permission. Retrieved August 2018 from https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/v2/2018/07/31/platform-update-publish-permission/.Google Scholar
- Joseph B. Bayer, Nicole B. Ellison, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Emily B. Falk. 2016. Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society 19, 7 (2016), 956–977.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage.Google Scholar
- Twitter Help Center. 2020. How to Tweet. https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-tweet#source-labels.Google Scholar
- Sachin Date. 2019. An illustrated guide to the Poisson regression model. https://towardsdatascience.com/an-illustrated-guide-to-the-poisson-regression-model-50cccba15958.Google Scholar
- Chaffey Dave. 2019. Global social media research summary 2019. Retrieved February 2019 from https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/.Google Scholar
- Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Jeffery T. Hancock. 2017. Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 740–754. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Nicole B. Ellison and Jessica Vitak. 2015. Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology 32 (2015), 205–228.Google Scholar
- Reza Farahbakhsh, Angel Cuevas, and Noël Crespi. 2016. Characterization of cross-posting activity for professional users across Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Social Network Analysis and Mining 6, 1 (2016), 33:1–33:14.Google Scholar
- Casey Fiesler, Michaelanne Dye, Jessica L. Feuston, Chaya Hiruncharoenvate, Clayton J. Hutto, Shannon Morrison, Parisa Khanipour Roshan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Amy S. Bruckman, Munmun De Choudhury, et al. 2017. What (or who) is public? Privacy settings and social media content sharing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 567–580. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Teresa Gil-Lopez, Cuihua Shen, Grace A. Benefield, Nicholas A. Palomares, Michal Kosinski, and David Stillwell. 2018. One size fits all: Context collapse, self-presentation strategies and language styles on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 23, 3 (2018), 127–145.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Nir Grinberg, P. Alex Dow, Lada A. Adamic, and Mor Naaman. 2016. Changes in engagement before and after posting to Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 564–574. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tsahi Zack Hayat, Ofrit Lesser, and Tal Samuel-Azran. 2017. Gendered discourse patterns on online social networks: A social network analysis perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 77 (2017), 132–139. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Shiu-Li Huang and Chih-Yu Chang. 2020. Understanding how people select social networking services: Media trait, social influences and situational factors. Information & Management 57, 6 (2020), 103323.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero, and Fang Wu. 2008. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1045 (2008).Google Scholar
- Kokil Jaidka, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, and Lyle H. Ungar. 2018. Facebook versus Twitter: Differences in self-disclosure and trait prediction. In Proceedings of the 12nd International Conference on Web and Social Media. AAAI, 141–150.Google Scholar
- Yongick Jeong and Yeuseung Kim. 2017. Privacy concerns on social networking sites: Interplay among posting types, content, and audiences. Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 302–310. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sanjay Kairam, Mike Brzozowski, David Huffaker, and Ed Chi. 2012. Talking in circles: Selective sharing in Google+. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1065–1074. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sanjay Kairam, Joseph ‘Jofish’ Kaye, John Alexis Guerra-Gomez, and David A. Shamma. 2016. Snap decisions?: How users, content, and aesthetics interact to shape photo sharing behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 113–124. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mayur Karnik, Ian Oakley, Jayant Venkatanathan, Tasos Spiliotopoulos, and Valentina Nisi. 2013. Uses & gratifications of a Facebook media sharing group. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 821–826. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 1746–1751.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2019. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management 45 (2019), 191–210.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kyumin Lee, Brian David Eoff, and James Caverlee. 2011. Seven months with the devils: A long-term study of content polluters on Twitter. In In Proceedings of the AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Citeseer.Google Scholar
- Kathy Lee, Diana Palsetia, Ramanathan Narayanan, Md Mostofa Ali Patwary, Ankit Agrawal, and Alok Choudhary. 2011. Twitter trending topic classification. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 251–258. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kai Li, Liangqi Cheng, and Ching-I Teng. 2020. Voluntary sharing and mandatory provision: Private information disclosure on social networking sites. Information Processing & Management 57, 1 (2020), 102128.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bang Hui Lim, Dongyuan Lu, Tao Chen, and Min-Yen Kan. 2015. # mytweet via Instagram: Exploring user behaviour across multiple social networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ACM, 113–120. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Han Lin and Lin Qiu. 2013. Two sites, two voices: Linguistic differences between Facebook status updates and tweets. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. Springer, 432–440.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Xiaolin Lin, Mauricio Featherman, and Saonee Sarker. 2017. Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective. Information & Management 54, 3 (2017), 383–395. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Siân E. Lindley, Catherine C. Marshall, Richard Banks, Abigail Sellen, and Tim Regan. 2013. Rethinking the web as a personal archive. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 749–760. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jing-Kai Lou, Kunwoo Park, Meeyoung Cha, Juyong Park, Chin-Laung Lei, and Kuan-Ta Chen. 2013. Gender swapping and user behaviors in online social games. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 827–836. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yunshan Ma, Xun Yang, Lizi Liao, Yixin Cao, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Who, where, and what to wear? Extracting fashion knowledge from social media. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 257–265. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lydia Manikonda, Venkata Vamsikrishna Meduri, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2016. Tweeting the mind and instagramming the heart: Exploring differentiated content sharing on social media. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media. AAAI, 639–642.Google Scholar
- Fred Morstatter, Liang Wu, Tahora H. Nazer, Kathleen M. Carley, and Huan Liu. 2016. A new approach to bot detection: Striking the balance between precision and recall. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’16). IEEE, 533–540. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mor Naaman, Jeffrey Boase, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2010. Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 189–192. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Raphael Ottoni, Diego Las Casas, Joao Paulo Pesce, Wagner Meira Jr, Christo Wilson, Alan Mislove, and Virgilio Almeida. 2014. Of pins and tweets: Investigating how users behave across image-and text-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Lauren Scissors, Moira Burke, and Steven Wengrovitz. 2016. What’s in a like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving likes on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1501–1510. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lin Shi, Mingzhe Xing, Mingyang Li, Yawen Wang, Shoubin Li, and Qing Wang. 2020. Detection of hidden feature requests from massive chat messages via deep siamese network. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering. 641–653. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Sauvik Das, Amber Lynn McConahy, Jason Wiese, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013. The post that wasn’t: Exploring self-censorship on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 793–802. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Manya Sleeper, William Melicher, Hana Habib, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2016. Sharing personal content online: Exploring channel choice and multi-channel behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 101–112. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Iraklis Symeonidis, Gergely Biczók, Fatemeh Shirazi, Cristina Pérez-Solà, Jessica Schroers, and Bart Preneel. 2018. Collateral damage of Facebook third-party applications: A comprehensive study. Computers & Security 77 (2018), 179–208.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sue Yeon Syn and Sanghee Oh. 2015. Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? Journal of Information Science 41, 5 (2015), 553–569. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Samuel Hardman Taylor and Andrew M. Ledbetter. 2017. Extending media multiplexity theory to the extended family: Communication satisfaction and tie strength as moderators of violations of media use expectations. New Media & Society 19, 9 (2017), 1369–1387.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jessica Vitak and Jinyoung Kim. 2014. “You can’t block people offline”: Examining how Facebook’s affordances shape the disclosure process. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 461–474. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Na Wang, Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, and Jens Grossklags. 2014. Designing the default privacy settings for Facebook applications. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 249–252. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yaqing Wang, Fenglong Ma, Zhiwei Jin, Ye Yuan, Guangxu Xun, Kishlay Jha, Lu Su, and Jing Gao. 2018. Eann: Event adversarial neural networks for multi-modal fake news detection. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 849–857. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yichuan Wang and Chiahui Yu. 2017. Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: The role of word of mouth and observational learning. International Journal of Information Management 37, 3 (2017), 179–189. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Honghao Wei, Fuzheng Zhang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Chuan Cao, Hao Fu, Xing Xie, Yong Rui, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2017. Beyond the words: Predicting user personality from heterogeneous information. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 305–314. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wikipedia. 2020. Chi-squared test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_test.Google Scholar
- Bin Xu, Pamara Chang, Christopher L. Welker, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Automatic archiving versus default deletion: What Snapchat tells us about ephemerality in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1662–1675. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Diyi Yang, Robert Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2017. Commitment of newcomers and old-timers to online health support communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6363–6375. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Peng Zhang, Haiyi Zhu, Tun Lu, Hansu Gu, Wenjian Huang, and Ning Gu. 2017. Understanding relationship overlapping on social network sites: A case study of Weibo and Douban. PACMHCI 1, CSCW (2017), 120:1–120:18. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Xuan Zhao, Cliff Lampe, and Nicole B. Ellison. 2016. The social media ecology: User perceptions, strategies and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 89–100. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Xuan Zhao and Siân E. Lindley. 2014. Curation through use: Understanding the personal value of social media. In Proceedings of the 2014 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2431–2440. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Changtao Zhong, Hau-wen Chang, Dmytro Karamshuk, Dongwon Lee, and Nishanth Sastry. 2017. Wearing many (social) hats: How different are your different social network personae? In Proceedings of the 11st International Conference on Web and Social Media. AAAI, 397–407.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Studying and Understanding Characteristics of Post-Syncing Practice and Goal in Social Network Sites
Recommendations
Understanding Relationship Overlapping on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of Weibo and Douban
Nowadays people have many overlapping relationships across different social network sites. Will the communication frequency of a relationship on a focal SNS increase or decrease after the corresponding parties begin interacting with each other on a new ...
Homeless young people on social network sites
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper reports on the use of social network sites (MySpace and Facebook) by homeless young people, an extraordinary user population, made so in part by its vulnerability. Twenty-three participants of diverse ethnicities, 11 women and 12 men (mean ...
Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes
This study explores the relationship between perceived bridging social capital and specific Facebook-enabled communication behaviors using survey data from a sample of U.S. adults N=614. We explore the role of a specific set of Facebook behaviors that ...






Comments