DataMoves: Entangling Data and Movement to Support Computer Science Education

ABSTRACT

In the domain of computing education for children, much work has been done to devise creative and engaging methods of teaching about programming. However, there are many other fundamental aspects of computing that have so far received relatively less attention. This work explores how the topics of number systems and data representation can be taught in a way that piques curiosity and captures learners’ imaginations. Specifically, we present the design of two interactive physical computing artefacts, which we collectively call DataMoves, that enable students, 12-14 years old, to explore number systems and data through embodied movement and dance. Our evaluation of DataMoves, used in tandem with other pedagogical methods, demonstrates that the form of embodied, exploration-based learning adopted has much potential for deepening students’ understandings of computing topics, as well as for shaping positive perceptions of topics that are traditionally considered boring and dull.

References

1. Dor Abrahamson, Alejandro Andrade, Arthur Bakker, Mitchell J Nathan, Candace Walkington, Robb Lindgren, David E Brown, Asnat R Zohar, Sharona T Levy, Joshua A Danish, and Others. 2018. Moving forward: In search of synergy across diverse views on the role of physical movement in design for stem education. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS, Vol. 2. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1243–1250.
2. Edith Ackermann. 1996. Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ(1996), 25–35.
3. Neil Anderson, Colin Lankshear, Carolyn Timms, and Lyn Courtney. 2008. ’Because it’s boring, irrelevant and I don’t like computers’: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers and Education 50, 4 (2008), 1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.003
4. Alissa N. Antle. 2009. Embodied child computer interaction: Why embodiment matters. Interactions 16, 2 (2009), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1487632.1487639
5. Alissa N Antle. 2013. Research opportunities: Embodied child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1(2013), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.001
6. Massimo Banzi. 2014. Getting Started with Arduino(3rd ed.). Maker Media. 262 pages.
7. Angelos Barmpoutis, Qianwen Ding, Lisa Anthony, Wanda Eugene, and Marko Suvajdzic. [n.d.]. Exploration of kinesthetic gaming for enhancing elementary math education using culturally responsive teaching methodologies. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR). IEEE, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/KELVAR.2016.7563674
8. Tilde Bekker, Saskia Bakker, Iris Douma, Janneke Van Der Poel, and Koen Scheltenaar. 2015. Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5 (2015), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.001
9. Tilde Bekker, Janienke Sturm, and Berry Eggen. 2010. Designing playful interactions for social interaction and physical play. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 5 (2010), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0264-1
10. Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors 4, 1 (2013), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423820.203
11. Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Gears of our Childhood: Constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2013), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485786
12. Neil C.C. Brown, Sue Sentance, Tom Crick, and Simon Humphreys. 2014. Restart: The resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 14, 2 (2014), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602484
13. Kayla DesPortes, Monet Spells, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2016. Interdisciplinary Computing and the Emergence of Boundary Objects: A Case-Study of Dance and Technology. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
14. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.
15. Paul Dourish. 2017. The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information. The MIT Press.
16. Michail N. Giannakos, Letizia Jaccheri, and Roberta Proto. 2013. Teaching Computer Science to Young Children through Creativity: Lessons Learned from the Case of Norway. In Proceedings of the 3rd Computer Science Education Research Conference on Computer Science Education Research (Arnhem, Netherlands) (CSERC ’13). Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Heerlen, NLD, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.5555/2541917.2541927
17. Anuradha A. Gokhale. 1995. Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education 7, 1 (1995), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
18. Tom Hitron, Idan David, Netta Ofer, Andrey Grishko, Iddo Yehoshua Wald, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2018. Digital Outdoor play: Benefits and risks from an interaction design perspective. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173858
19. Tom Hitron, Yoav Orlev, Iddo Wald, Ariel Shamir, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Can children understand machine learning concepts? The effect of uncovering black boxes. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300645
20. Michael S Horn and Robert J K Jacob. 2007. Tangible Programming in the Classroom with Tern. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1965–1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240933
21. Peter Hubwieser, Michail N. Giannakos, Marc Berges, Torsten Brinda, Ira Diethelm, Johannes Magenheim, Yogendra Pal, Jana Jackova, and Egle Jasute. 2015. A global snapshot of computer science education in K-12 schools. ITiCSE-WGP 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports (2015), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858799
22. Robert J K Jacob, Audrey Girouard, Leanne M Hirshfield, Michael S Horn, Orit Shaer, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2008. Reality-Based Interaction: A Framework for Post-WIMP Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357089
23. Yasmin B Kafai, Kylie A Peppler, Quinn Burke, Michael Moore, and Diane Glosson. 2010. Fröbel’s forgotten gift: textile construction kits as pathways into play, design and computation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810574
24. Susan Lechelt, Yvonne Rogers, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2020. Coming to your senses: Promoting critical thinking about sensors through playful interaction in classrooms. Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020 (2020), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394401
25. Zuzanna Lechelt, Yvonne Rogers, Nicolai Marquardt, and Frederick Brudy. 2017. MakeMe, CodeMe, ConnectUs: Learning digital fluency through tangible Magic Cubes Abstract. In ETIS 2017: 3rd European Tangible Interaction Studio.
26. Zuzanna Lechelt, Yvonne Rogers, Nicola Yuill, Lena Nagl, Grazia Ragone, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2018. Inclusive computing in special needs classrooms: Designing for all. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174091
27. Eunkyoung Lee, Yasmin Kafai, Veena Vasudevan, and Richard Davis. 2014. Playing in the Arcade: Designing Tangible Interfaces with MaKey MaKey for Scratch Games. 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_13
28. Victor R. Lee and Joel Drake. 2013. Quantified recess: Design of an activity for elementary students involving analyses of their own movement data. ACM International Conference Proceeding SeriesIdc (2013), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485822
29. Robb Lindgren and Mina Johnson-Glenberg. 2013. Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational researcher 42, 8 (2013), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13511661
30. Edward Melcer. 2017. Moving to Learn: Exploring the Impact of Physical Embodiment in Educational Programming Games. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027129
31. Netta Ofer, Idan David, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Coding for outdoor play: A coding platform for children to invent and enhance outdoor play experiences. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300394
32. Sara Price and Yvonne Rogers. 2004. Let’s get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education 43, 1-2 (2004), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.009
33. Jessica Roberts, Leilah Lyons, Francesco Cafaro, and Rebecca Eydt. 2014. Interpreting data from within: Supporting humandata interaction in museum exhibits through perspective taking. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2593974
34. Yvonne Rogers, William R Hazlewood, Paul Marshall, Nick Dalton, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Ambient Influence: Can Twinkly Lights Lure and Abstract Representations Trigger Behavioral Change?. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864372
35. Y. Rogers, S. Price, G. Fitzpatrick, R. Fleck, E. Harris, H. Smith, C. Randell, H. Muller, C. O’malley, D. Stanton, M. Thompson, and M. Weal. 2004. Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children: Building a Community, IDC 2004(2004), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017833.1017834
36. Yvonne Rogers, Venus Shum, Nicolai Marquardt, Susan Lechelt, Rose Johnson, Howard Baker, and Matt Davies. 2017. From the BBC Micro to micro: Bit and beyond: A British innovation. Interactions 24, 2 (2017), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029601
37. Yvonne Rogers, Ian Taylor, Danae Stanton, Claire O’Malley, Greta Corke, Silvia Gabrielli, Mike Scaife, Eric Harris, Ted Phelps, Sara Price, Hilary Smith, Henk Muller, Cliff Randell, and Andrew Moss. 2002. Things aren’t what they seem to be. (2002), 373. https://doi.org/10.1145/778757.778766
38. Daniela K. Rosner. 2012. The material practices of collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (2012), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145375
39. Sue Sentence, Jane Waite, Steve Hodges, Emily Macleod, and Lucy Yeomans. 2017. Creating cool stuff” - Pupils’ experience of the BBC micro:bit. Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSESeptember 2014 (2017), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017749
40. Tiffanie R Smith and Juan E Gilbert. 2018. Dancing to design: a gesture elicitation study. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 638–643. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210790
41. Emilia Sobolewska. 2017. Tailoring methodological bricolage to investigate non-discretionary use of digital technology. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017) (2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.49
42. Anna Vallg\rarda and Ylva Fernaeus. 2015. Interaction Design as a Bricolage Practice. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680594
43. Benjamin Wohl, Barry Porter, and Sarah Clinch. 2015. Teaching computer science to 5-7 year-Olds: An initial study with scratch, Cubelets and unplugged computing. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 09-11-Nove (2015), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314:2818340