Abstract
The design of new technologies is a cooperative task (between designers on teams, and between designers and users) with ethical import. Studying technology development teams' engagement with the ethical aspects of their work is important, but engagement with ethical issues is an unobservable construct without agreement on what observable factors comprise it. Ethical sensitivity (ES), a construct studied in medicine, accounting, and other professions, offers a framework of observable factors by operationalizing ethical engagement in workplaces into component parts. However, ES has primarily been studied as a property of individuals rather than groups and in professions outside of computing. This paper uses a corpus of 108 ES studies from 1985-2020 to adapt the framework for studies of technology design teams. From the ES corpus, we build an umbrella framework that conceptualizes ES as comprising the moment of noticing an ethical problem (recognition), the process of building understanding of the situation (particularization), and the decision about what to do (judgment). This framework makes theoretical and methodological contributions to the study of how ethics are operationalized on design teams. We find that ethical sensitivity provides useful language for studies of collaboration and communication around ethics; suggests opportunities for, and evaluations of, ethical interventions for design workplaces; and connects team members' backgrounds, educational experiences, work practices, and organizational factors to design decisions. Simultaneously, existing research in HCI and CSCW addresses the limited range of research methods currently employed in the ES literature, adding rich, contextualized data about situated and embodied ethical practice to the theory.
- [n.d.].P7000 - IEEE Draft Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design. https://standards.ieee.org/project/7000.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 2019.Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2019/?utm_source=social-share&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dev-survey-2019Google Scholar
- Ishmael P. Akaah. 1989. Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. 8, 5 (1989), 375--381.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381729Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ali A Al-Kazemi and Gary Zajac. 1999. Ethics Sensitivity and Awareness Within Organizations in Kuwait: An Empirical Exploration of Espoused Theory and Theory-in-Use. (1999), 9.Google Scholar
- Taghreed Alshehri, Reuben Kirkham, and Patrick Olivier. 2020. Scenario Co-Creation Cards: A Culturally Sensitive Tool for Eliciting Values.InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA, 2020-04--21)(CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376608 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Morgan G. Ames, Janet Go, Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Hangzhou, China, 2011-03--19)(CSCW '11). Association for Computing Machinery, 55--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958834 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Eric P.S. Baumer, Timothy Berrill, Sarah C. Botwinick, Jonathan L. Gonzales, Kevin Ho, Allison Kundrik, Luke Kwon, Tim LaRowe, Chanh P.Nguyen, Fredy Ramirez, Peter Schaedler, William Ulrich, Amber Wallace, Yuchen Wan, and Benjamin Weinfeld. 2018. What Would You Do?:Design Fiction and Ethics. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork(Sanibel Island Florida USA, 2018-01-07). ACM, 244--256. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3149405 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Muriel Bebeau, J Rest, and C Yamoor. 1985. Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity. 49 (1985), 225--35.Google Scholar
- Lawrence Blum. 1991.Moral Perception and Particularity. www.jstor.org/stable/2381661Google Scholar
- Mary M. Brabeck, Lauren A. Rogers, Selcuk Sirin, Jennifer Henderson, Michael Benvenuto, Monica Weaver, and Kathleen Ting. 2000. Increasing Ethical Sensitivity to Racial and Gender Intolerance in Schools: Development of the.... 10, 2 (2000), 119. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1002_02Google Scholar
- Stacy M. Branham, Anja Thieme, Lisa P. Nathan, Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Co-creating & identity-making in CSCW:revisiting ethics in design research. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work& social computing - CSCW Companion '14(Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2014). ACM Press, 305--308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2558859 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald McMillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New York, NY, USA, 2016-05-07)(CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery,852--863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Amy Bruckman. 2014. Research Ethics and HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (Eds.). Springer, 449--468.https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4939-0378--8_18Google Scholar
- Louis L. Bucciarelli. 1994. Designing engineers. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Howard Buchan. 2014. Reidenbach and Robinís Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Testing a Second-Order Factor Model. 4, 10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159--5542/2014.10.007Google Scholar
- Kenneth D. Butterfield, Linda Klebe Trevin, and Gary R. Weaver. 2000. Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. 53, 7 (2000), 981--1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700537004Google Scholar
- Lisa Marie Byrd. 2006. Development of an Instrument to Identify the Virtues of Expert Nursing Practice: Byrds Nurses Ethical Sensitivity Test(Byrds Nest). (2006), 186.Google Scholar
- Erin A. Cech. 2014. Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? 39, 1 (2014), 42--72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391350430518Google Scholar
- Audrey Chia and Lim Swee Mee. 2000. The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues. (2000), 16.Google Scholar
- Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Colin M. Gray, and Jason A. Brier. 2019. Analyzing Value Discovery in Design Decisions Through Ethicography. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019-05-02)(CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300307 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. A. Claypool, D. F. Fetyko, and M. A. Pearson. 1990. Reactions to ethical dilemmas: A study pertaining to certified public accountants. 9, 9 (1990),699--706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386352Google Scholar
- Mark Coeckelbergh. 2006. Regulation or Responsibility? Autonomy, Moral Imagination, and Engineering. (2006). https://journals-sagepub-com.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/doi/abs/10.1177/0162243905285839Google Scholar
- Peggy Desautels. 1996.Gestalt Shifts in Moral Perception. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Gestalt-Shifts-in-Moral-Perception-Desautels/6eeb71c68b09d0d39bda10e0baff0c0cb5d8efa2 Library Catalog: www.semanticscholar.org.Google Scholar
- Paul Dourish. 2001.Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Anders Ericsson and Herbert A. Simon. 1984.Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nermin Ersoy and Fügen Göz. 2001. The Ethical Sensitivity of Nurses in Turkey. 8, 4 (2001), 299--312. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973300100800403Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wesley J. Erwin. 2000. Supervisor Moral Sensitivity. 40, 2 (2000), 115--127. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556--6978.2000.tb01243.xGoogle Scholar
- Casey Fiesler. 2019. Ethical Considerations for Research Involving (Speculative) Public Data. 3 (2019), 1--13. Issue GROUP. https://doi.org/10.1145/3370271 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi Analysis. In Proceedings of the 51stACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(Portland OR USA, 2020-02--26). ACM, 289--295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Alyson Young, Tamara Peyton, Amy S. Bruckman, Mary Gray, Jeff Hancock, and Wayne Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(New York, NY, USA, 2015-02--28) (CSCW'15 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, 289--292. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2685558 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Erik Fisher, Michael O'Rourke, Robert Evans, Eric B. Kennedy, Michael E. Gorman, and Thomas P. Seager. 2015. Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. 2, 1 (2015), 39--61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671.Google Scholar
- Kenneth R. Fleischmann, William A. Wallace, and Justin M. Grimes. 2011. Computational Modeling and Human Values: A Comparative Study of Corporate, Academic, and Government Research Labs. In2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)(2011-01). 1 --10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.123 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2012. The envisioning cards: a toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. In Proceedings ofthe SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Austin, Texas, USA, 2012-05-05) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery,1145--1148. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208562 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Batya Friedman, David G. Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. 11, 2 (2017), 63--125.https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11(Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011). ACM Press, 1551. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(2011-01). 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.455 ISSN: 1530--1605. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jet Gispen. [n.d.].Ethics for Designers. https://www.ethicsfordesigners.comGoogle Scholar
- Colin Gray, Sai Shruthi Chivukula, and Ahreum Lee. 2020. What Kind of Work Do "Asshole Designers" Create? Describing Properties of Ethical Concern on Reddit. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395486 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Colin M. Gray. 2019. Revealing Students Ethical Awareness during Problem Framing. 38, 2 (2019), 299--313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12190_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jade.12190.Google Scholar
- Colin M. Gray and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2019. Ethical Mediation in UX Practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019-05-02)(CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300408 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Colin M. Gray, Cesur Dagli, Muruvvet Demiral-Uzan, Funda Ergulec, Verily Tan, Abdullah A. Altuwaijri, Khendum Gyabak, Megan Hilligoss, Remzi Kizilboga, Kei Tomita, and Elizabeth Boling. 2015. Judgment and Instructional Design: How ID Practitioners Work In Practice. 28, 3 (2015), 25--49. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21198_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/piq.21198.Google Scholar
- Daniel Greene, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Luke Stark. 2019. Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.258 Accepted: 2019-01-03T00:00:45Z.Google Scholar
- Carla L. Harenski, Olga Antonenko, Matthew S. Shane, and Kent A. Kiehl. 2008. Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity. 3, 4 (2008), 313--321. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn026 Publisher: Oxford Academic.Google Scholar
- P Hebert, E M Meslin, E V Dunn, N Byrne, and S R Reid. 1990. Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument. 16, 3 (1990), 141--145. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.16.3.141Google Scholar
- Anne Kari T Heggestad, Per Nortvedt, and Ashild Slettebo. 2013. The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research. 20, 1 (2013), 30--40. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973301245556419Google Scholar
- Jessica Hemberg and Elisabeth Bergdahl. 2020. Ethical sensitivity and perceptiveness in palliative home care through co-creation. 27, 2 (2020), 446--460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019849464Google Scholar
- David Hollingworth and Sean Valentine. 2015. The Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Ethical Context on Employees Ethical Issue Recognition and Ethical Judgments. 128, 2 (2015), 457--466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014--2088--9Google Scholar
- Lara Houston, Steven J. Jackson, Daniela K. Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(San Jose, California, USA, 2016-05-07)(CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, 1403--1414. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858470 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hangyu Huang, Yun Ding, Honghong Wang, Kaveh Khoshnood, and Min Yang. 2018. The Ethical Sensitivity of Health Care Professionals Who Care For Patients Living With HIV Infection in Hunan, China: A Qualitative Study. 29, 2 (2018), 266--274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2017.09.001Google Scholar
- Chuck Huff, Laura Barnard, and William Frey. 2008. Good computing: a pedagogically focused model of virtue in the practice of computing (part 1). 6, 3 (2008), 246--278.Google Scholar
- Steven J. Jackson, Tarleton Gillespie, and Sandy Payette. 2014. The policy knot: re-integrating policy, practice and design in cscw studies of social computing. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing(New York, NY, USA, 2014-02--15) (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, 588--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531674 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Abigail Z. Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2019. Measurement and Fairness. (2019). arXiv:1912.05511 http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05511 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Nassim Jafari Naimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values. 31, 4 (2015), 91--104. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00354 Conference Name: Design Issues.Google Scholar
- Mark Johnson. 1993. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jennifer Jordan. 2007. Taking the First Step Toward a Moral Action: A Review of Moral Sensitivity Measurement Across Domains. 168, 3 (2007),323--359. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.168.3.323--360Google Scholar
- Rebecca Lind. 1997. Ethical Sensitivity in Viewer Evaluations of a TV News Investigative Report. 23, 4 (1997), 535--561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2958.1997.tb00409.xGoogle Scholar
- Rebecca Ann Lind and David L. Rarick. 1995. Assessing Ethical Sensitivity in Television News Viewers: A Preliminary Investigation. 10, 2 (1995), 69--82. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme1002_1Google Scholar
- Rebecca Ann Lind and David L. Rarick. 1997. Cognitive maps assess news viewer ethical sensitivity. 12, 3 (1997), 133--147. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme1203_1Google Scholar
- Rebecca Ann Lind and David L. Rarick. 1999. Viewer Sensitivity to Ethical Issues in TV Coverage of the Clinton-Flowers Scandal. 16, 2 (1999), 169--181. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198712Google Scholar
- Rebecca Ann Lind and Tammy Swenson-Lepper. 2013. Measuring Sensitivity to Conflicts of Interest: A Preliminary Test of Method. 19, 1 (2013), 43--62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011--9319--6Google Scholar
- Rebecca Ann Lind, Tammy Swenson-Lepper, and David L. Rarick. 1998. Identifying patterns of ethical sensitivity in TV news viewers: An assessment of some critical viewing skills. 42, 4 (1998), 507--519. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364465Google Scholar
- Jie Liu, Binke Yuan, Yue-jia Luo, and Fang Cui. 2019. Intrinsic functional connectivity of medial prefrontal cortex predicts the individual moral bias in economic valuation partially through the moral sensitivity trait. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00152--1Google Scholar
- Ewa Luger, Lachlan Urquhart, Tom Rodden, and Michael Golembewski. 2015. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015-04--18)(CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, 457--466. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702142 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yotam Lurie and Shlomo Mark. 2016. Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework. 22, 2 (2016), 417--434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015--9665-xGoogle Scholar
- Kim Lutzen, Agneta Johansson, and Gun Nordstrom. 2000. Moral Sensitivity: some differences between nurses and physicians. 7, 6 (2000), 520--530. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973300000700607Google Scholar
- Nonna Martinov-Bennie and Rosina Mladenovic. 2015. Investigation of the Impact of an Ethical Framework and an Integrated Ethics Education on Accounting Students Ethical Sensitivity and Judgment. 127, 1 (2015), 189--203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013--2007--5Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jacob Metcalf, Emanuel Moss, and Danah Boyd. 2019. Owning Ethics: Corporate Logics, Silicon Valley, and the Institutionalization of Ethics. 8, 2(2019), 449--476. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/732185 Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Pascal Molenberghs, Joshua Gapp, Bei Wang, Winnifred R. Louis, and Jean Decety. 2016. Increased Moral Sensitivity for Outgroup Perpetrators Harming In group Members. 26, 1 (2016), 225--233. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu195Google Scholar
- Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New York, NY, USA, 2015-04--18)(CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702481 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Liisa Myyry and Klaus Helkama. 2002. The Role of Value Priorities and Professional Ethics Training in Moral Sensitivity. 31, 1 (2002), 35--50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240120111427Google Scholar
- Darcia F. Narvaez. 1996. Moral Perception: A New Construct? (1996). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED398636Google Scholar
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2001. How computer systems embody values. 34, 3 (2001), 120--119. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.910905 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Denise M Patterson. 2001. Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity. (2001), 37.Google Scholar
- Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen. 2009. See no evil: moral sensitivity in the formulation of business problems. 18, 4 (2009), 335--348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--8608.2009.01567.xGoogle Scholar
- Robin R Radtke. 2000. The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants' Ethically Sensitive Decisions. (2000), 14.Google Scholar
- R Eric Reidenbach and Donald P Robin. 1988. Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities. (1988), 871--879.Google Scholar
- R Eric Reidenbach and Donald P Robin. 1990. Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics.(1990), 15.Google Scholar
- R Eric Reidenbach, Donald R Robin, and Lyndon Dawson. 1991. An application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups. (1991), 10.Google Scholar
- James Rest, Darcia Narvaez, Muriel J. Bebeau, and Stephen J. Thoma. 1999. Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Pages: ix, 229.Google Scholar
- James R. Rest. 1982. A Psychologist Looks at the Teaching of Ethics. 12, 1 (1982), 29--36. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560621Google Scholar
- Diana Robertson, John Snarey, Opal Ousley, Keith Harenski, F. DuBois Bowman, Rick Gilkey, and Clinton Kilts. 2007. The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. 45, 4 (2007), 755--766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014Google Scholar
- Mostafa Roshanzadeh, Zohreh Vanaki, and Afsaneh Sadooghiasl. 2020. Sensitivity in ethical decision-making: The experiences of nurse managers. 27, 5 (2020), 1174--1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019864146 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Troy D. Sadler. 2004. Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. 33, 3 (2004), 339--358.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091Google Scholar
- Michael K. Shaub. 1989. An empirical examination of the determinants of auditors' ethical sensitivity. (1989). http://ttu.ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/20429Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design. 38, 3 (2013), 374--397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912436985Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton. 2018. Engaging Values Despite Neutrality: Challenges and Approaches to Values Reflection during the Design of Internet Infrastructure. 43, 2 (2018), 247--269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917714869Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. 12, 2 (2018), 107--171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Katie Shilton and Daniel Greene. 2019. Linking Platforms, Practices, and Developer Ethics: Levers for Privacy Discourse in Mobile Application Development. 155, 1 (2019), 131--146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017--3504--8Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton and Jes A. Koepfler. 2013. Making space for values: communication & values levers in a virtual team. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies(New York, NY, USA, 2013-06--29) (C&T '13). Association for Computing Machinery, 110--119. https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2482993 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Can Simga-Mugan, Bonita A. Daly, Dilek Onkal, and Lerzan Kavut. 2005. The Influence of Nationality and Gender on Ethical Sensitivity: An Application of the Issue-Contingent Model. 57, 2 (2005), 139--159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004--4601-zGoogle Scholar
- Selcuk R. Sirin, Mary M. Brabeck, Anmol Satiani, and Lauren Rogers-Serin. [n.d.]. Validation of a Measure of Ethical Sensitivity and Examination of the Effects of Previous Multicultural and Ethics Courses on Ethical Sensitivity. 13, 3 ([n. d.]), 221--235. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1303_02Google Scholar
- John R. Sparks and Shelby D. Hunt. 1998. Marketing Researcher Ethical Sensitivity: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Exploratory Investigation. 62, 2 (1998), 92--109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252163Google Scholar
- Lucy Suchman, Jeanette Blomberg, Julian Orr, and Randall Trigg. 1999. Reconstructing technologies as social practice. 43, 3 (1999), 392--408.https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955335 Num Pages: 17 Number: 3.Google Scholar
- Tammy Swenson-Lepper. 2005. Ethical Sensitivity for Organizational Communication Issues: Examining Individual and Organizational Differences.59, 3 (2005), 205--231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005--2925-yGoogle Scholar
- Linda K. Treviño, Gary R. Weaver, and Scott J. Reynolds. 2006. Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review. 32, 6 (2006), 951--990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258Google Scholar
- Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2006. Materializing morality. 31, 3 (2006), 361 --380. http://sth.sagepub.com/content/31/3/361.abstractGoogle Scholar
- Jessica Vitak, Katie Shilton, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2016. Beyond the Belmont Principles: Ethical Challenges, Practices, and Beliefs in the Online Data Research Community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(New York, NY, USA, 2016-02--27) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, 941--953. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820078 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kathryn Weaver. 2007. Ethical Sensitivity: State of Knowledge and Needs for Further Research. 14, 2 (2007), 141--155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007073694Google Scholar
- Kathryn Weaver, Janice Morse, and Carl Mitcham. 2008. Ethical sensitivity in professional practice: concept analysis. 62, 5 (2008), 607--618.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365--2648.2008.04625.xGoogle Scholar
- Kathryn Weaver and Janice M. Morse. 2006. Pragmatic utility: using analytical questions to explore the concept of ethical sensitivity. 20, 3 (2006),191--214. https://doi.org/10.1891/rtnp.20.3.191Google Scholar
- Dennis Wittmer. 1992. Ethical Sensitivity and Managerial Decision making: An Experiment. 2, 4 (1992), 443--462. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037147Google Scholar
- Dennis P. Wittmer. 2000. Ethical Sensitivity in Management Decisions: Developing and Testing a Perceptual Measure Among Management and Professional Student Groups. 4, 2 (2000), 181--205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009866315139Google Scholar
- Richmond Y. Wong, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting Values Reflections by Engaging Privacy Futures Using Design Workbooks. 1 (2017), 111:1--111:26. Issue CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/313474621 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Scott A Yetmar and Kenneth K Eastman. 2000. Tax Practitioners' Ethical Sensitivity: A Model and Empirical Examination. (2000), 18.Google Scholar
- Doug Zytko, Jessa Lingel, Jeremy Birnholtz, Nicole B. Ellison, and Jeff Hancock. 2015. Online Dating as Pandora's Box: Methodological Issues for the CSCW Community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(New York, NY, USA, 2015-02--28)(CSCW'15 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, 131--134. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699335 Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Adapting Ethical Sensitivity as a Construct to Study Technology Design Teams
Recommendations
Beyond Checklist Approaches to Ethics in Design
CSCW '20 Companion: Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingRecent public discussions about technologies and social values have called for greater consideration of ethics during technology development and deployment, leading many organizations to create and promote compliance- or checklist-oriented toolkits and ...
Ethics and technology design
This article offers a discussion of the connection between technology and values and, specifically, I take a closer look at ethically sound design. In order to bring the discussion into a concrete context, the theory of Value Sensitive Design (VSD) will ...
From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy
FAT* '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyThe word 'ethics' is under siege in technology policy circles. Weaponized in support of deregulation, self-regulation or handsoff governance, "ethics" is increasingly identified with technology companies' self-regulatory efforts and with shallow ...






Comments