Abstract

People are increasingly subject to the tracking of data about them at their workplaces. Sensor tracking is used by organizations to generate data on the movement and interaction of their employees to monitor and manage workers, and yet this data also poses significant risks to individual employees who may face harms from such data, and from data errors, to their job security or pay as a result of such analyses. Working with a large hospital, we developed a set of intervention strategies to enable what we call "collective sensemaking" describing worker contestation of sensor tracking data. We did this by participating in the sensor data science team, analyzing data on badges that employees wore over a two-week period, and then bringing the results back to the employees through a series of participatory workshops. We found three key aspects of collective sensemaking important for understanding data from the perspectives of stakeholders: 1) data shadows for tempering possibilities for design with the realities of data tracking; 2) data transducers for converting our assumptions about sensor tracking, and 3) data power for eliciting worker inclusivity and participation. We argue that researchers face what Dourish (2019) called the "legitimacy trap" when designing with large datasets and that research about work should commit to complementing data-driven studies with in-depth insights to make them useful for all stakeholders as a corrective to the underlying power imbalance that tracked workers face.
- Cecilia Aragon, Shion Guha, Marina Kogan, Michael Muller & Gina Neff. (forthcoming). Human Centered Data Science: An Introduction. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kirstie Ball. 2010. Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History, 51(1), 87--106.Google Scholar
- Michael R. Berthold, Nicolas Cebron, Fabian Dill, Thomas R. Gabriel, Tobias Kötter, Thorsten Meinl, Peter Ohl, Kilian Thiel & Bernd Wiswedel. 2009. KNIME - the Konstanz information miner: version 2.0 and beyond. SIGKDD Explor. Newsletter, 11(1), 26--31. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. 20:18 Naja Holten Møller et al. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Christopher M. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer Verlag, New York. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pernille Bjørn & Nina Boulus-Rødje. 2015. The multiple intersecting sites of design in CSCW research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW), 24(3): 319--351. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Pernille Bjørn, Mark Wulff, Mathias Schmidt Petræus, & Naja Holten Møller. 2021. Immersive cooperative work environments (CWE): Designing human-building interaction in virtual reality. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW).Google Scholar
- Jeanette Blomberg & Helena Karasti. 2013. Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW), 22(4--6), 373--423. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Jeanette Blomberg, Jean Giacomi, Andrea Mosher & Pat Swenton-Hall. 1993. Ethnographic Field Methods and their Relation to Design. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. (ed.) D. Schuler and A. Namioka. London, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 123--155.Google Scholar
- Morten Bonde, Claus Bossen & Peter Danholt. 2019. Data-work and friction: Investigating the practices of repurposing healthcare data. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 558--566.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Claus Bossen, Lotte Groth Jensen, and Flemming Witt. 2012. Medical secretaries' care of records: the cooperative work of a non-clinical group. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 921--930. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Claus Bossen, & Martin Foss. 2016. The collaborative work of hospital porters: Accountability, visibility and configurations of work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 965--979. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mads Christophersen, Tue Langhoff, & Pernille Bjørn. 2015. Unforseen challenges: Adopting wearable health data tracking devices to reduce health insurance costs in organizations. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 288--299.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Adrian Clear, Sam Mitchell Finnigan, Patrick Olivier, & Rob Comber. 2017. "I'd want to burn the data or at least nobble the numbers": Towards data-mediated building management for comfort and energy use. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 2448--2461. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Frank Codd. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6), 377--387. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Andy Crabtree & Richard Mortier. 2015. Human Data Interaction: Historical lessons from social studies and CSCW. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), 1--20.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, & Sarah Fox (2016). Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), 656--671. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lynn Dombrowski, Adriana Alvarado Garcia & Jessica Despard. 2017. Low-wage precarious workers' sociotechnical practices working towards addressing wage theft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 4585--4598. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2019. User experience as legitimacy trap. ACM Interactions, December 2019, 46--49. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2017. The Stuff of Bits. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Paul Dourish & Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2018. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 1--10.Google Scholar
- Christina Farr. 2020. Some hospitals are tracking Covid-19 by adding sensors to employees' badges. Accessed 12.08.2020 from CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/02/hospitals-tracking-covid-19-with-badge-sensors-swipesense-technology.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Brittany Fiore-Gartland & Gina Neff. 2015. Communication, mediation, and the expectations of data: Data valences across health and wellness communities. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1466--1484.Google Scholar
- Nanna Gorm & Irina Shklovski. 2016. Sharing steps in the workplace: Changing privacy concerns over time. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 4315--4319. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Richard R. Harper. 1992. Looking at ourselves: An examination of the social organization of two research laboratories. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), 330--337. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Richard R. Harper, Michael G. Lamming & William M. Newman. 1992. Locating systems at work: Implications for the development of active badge applications. Interacting with Computers 4(3), 343--363. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Simon Head. 2014. Mindless: Why Smarter Machines are Making Dumber Human. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Emily D. Heaphy. 2017. "Dancing on hot coals": How emotion work facilitates collective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 642--670.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Brent Hecht, Lauren Wilcox, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Johannes Schöning, Ehsan Hoque, Jason Ernst, Yonatan Bisk, Luigi De Russis, Lana Yarosh, Bushra Anjum, Danish Contractor & Cathy Wu. 2018. It's time to do something. Mitigating the negative impacts of computing through a change to the peer review process https://elib.suub.uni- bremen.de/edocs/00106471--1.pdf. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? 20:19Google Scholar
- Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2019. Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information, Communication & Society 22(7), 900--915.Google Scholar
- Azra Ismail & Neha Kumar. 2018. Engaging solidarity in data collection practices for community health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2 (CSCW), no. 76. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Leonard Kaufman & Peter J. Rousseeuw. 1987. Clustering by means of Medoids, in Statistical Data Analysis Based on the l_1--Norm and Related Methods, (ed) by Y. Dodge, 405--416.Google Scholar
- Rob Kitchin. 2014. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1--12.Google Scholar
- Young Ming Kow & Waikuen Cheng. 2018. Complimenting invisible work: Identifying hidden employee contributions through a voluntary, positive and open work review system. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), Article 96.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kristian Helbo Kristiansen, Mathias A. Valeur-Meller, Lynn Dombrowski & Naja L. Holten Møller. 2018. Accountability in the blue-collar data-driven workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), paper 332. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Vladimir I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10 (8), 707--710.Google Scholar
- Adrian MacKenzie. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. A&C Black.Google Scholar
- Gloria Mark, Shamsi T Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski & Paul Johns. 2014. Bored Mondays and focused afternoons: The rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 3025--3034. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Helena M. Mentis, Anita Komlodi, Katrina Schrader, Michael Phipps, Ann Gruber Baldini, Karen Yarbrough & Lisa Shulman. 2017. Crafting a view of self-tracking data in the clinical visit. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 5800--5812. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P Shayan Mirjafari, Kizito Masaba, Ted Grover, et al. 2019. Differentiating higher and lower job performers in the workplace using mobile sensing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(2), Article no. 37. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Phoebe Moore & Andrew Robinson. 2016. The Quantified Self: What Counts in the Neoliberal Workplace. New Media & Society 18(1), 2774 -- 2792.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Michael Muller, Shion Guha, Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, and Sadat Shami. 2016. Machine Learning and Grounded Theory Method: Convergence, Divergence, and Combination. In Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP), 3--8. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Naja Holten Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the interaction of administrative and clinical work in the diagnosing process. In J. C. Dugsdale, M.A. Masclet, J.F. Grasso, H.P. Boujut (ed.) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges (COOP), 33--47.Google Scholar
- Naja Holten Møller. 2013. Achieving continuity of care: A study of the challenges in a Danish and a US hospital department. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), 229--247.Google Scholar
- Naja Holten Møller, Irina Shklovski, Six M. Silberman; Lynn Dombrowski, & Airi Lampinen (2017). A constructive- critical approach to the changing workplace and its technologies. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW) Panel.Google Scholar
- Naja Holten Møller, Pernille Bjørn, Jonas Christopher Villumsen, Tine C. Hansen Hancock, Toshimitsu Aritake, Shigeyuki Tani. 2017. Data tracking in search of workflows. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 2153--2165. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Naja Holten Møller. 2017. The Future of clerical work is precarious. ACM Interactions, 25(4), 75--77. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Gina Neff & Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Gina Neff, Anissa Tanweer, Brittany Fiore-Gartland & Laura Osborn. 2017. Critique and contribute: A practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science. Big Data, 5(2), 85--97.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Office for National Statistics. 2019. The Probability of Automation in England.Google Scholar
- Samir Passi & Solon Barocas. 2019. Problem Formulation and Fairness. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Samir Passi & Steven J. Jackson. 2017. Data vision: Learning to see through algorithmic abstraction. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 2436--2447. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Caroline Criado Perez (2019). Invisible Women. Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Chatto & Windus, London.Google Scholar
- Kathleen H. Pine & Max Liboiron (2015). The politics of measurement. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 3147--3156. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Dave Randall, Richard Harper & Mark Rouncefield. 2007. Fieldwork for Design. Theory and Practice. Springer. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Evelyn Rupert, Engin Isin & Didier Bigo. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society, 1--7. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. 20:20 Naja Holten Møller et al.Google Scholar
- Andrew D. Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A. Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian & Janet Vertesi. 2019. Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lucy Suchman. 1995. Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56--64. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hilda Tellioglu & Ina Wagner. 2001. Work practices surrounding PACS: The politics of space in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW) 10, 163--188. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James Colley & Ewa Luger. 2016. ?This has to be cats" -- personal data legibility in networked sensing systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 491--502. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Satomi Tsuji, Kazuo Yano, Norihiko Moriwaki, Nobou Sato, Minoru Ogushi & Yoshihiro Wakisaka. 2009. Business microscope system. U.S. Patent Application No. 12/022, 630.Google Scholar
- Tricia Wang. 2013. Big Data Needs Thick Data. Ethnography Matters. Posted 13. May 2013.Google Scholar
- Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Karl E. Weick, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409--421. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Christine Wolf & Jeanette Blomberg. 2019. Evaluating the promise of human-algorithm collaborations in everyday work practices. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3 (CSCW), Article 143. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Daniela Wurhofer, Thomas Meneweger, Verena Fuchsberger & Manfred Tscheligi. 2018. Reflections on operators' and maintenance engineers' experiences of smart factories. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Supporting Groupwork, 284--296. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kazuo Yano, Koji Ara, Norihiko Moriwaki & Hiroyuki Kuriyama. 2009. Measurement of Human Behavior: Creating a Society for Discovering Opportunities, Hitachi Review, 58(4), 139.Google Scholar
- Shosana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
(auto-classified)Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? Collective Sensemaking for the Responsible Use of Sensor Data at Work
Recommendations
Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation
This article discusses the integration of work practice and system design. By scrutinising the unfolding discourse of workshop participants the co-construction of work practice issues as relevant design considerations is described. Through a mutual ...
Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography
UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous ComputingThe domestic use of tracking technology with pets is on the rise, yet is under-researched. We investigate how tracking practices reconfigure human-dog relationships changing both humans and dogs. We question the sensemaking mechanisms by which both ...
Digital workplace transformation: Subtraction logic as deinstitutionalising the taken-for-granted
Highlights- Outlines the rationale and process of an incumbent car manufacturer’s digital workplace transformation.
AbstractDigital technology enables the transformation of work and workplaces. Previous digital workplace transformation (DWT) literature has shown how organisations add new digital technologies to create new workplace routines. However, such ...






Comments