skip to main content
research-article

Bad Mother / Good Mother: The Poetics and Politics of the Sounds of Invisible Labor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 August 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Bad Mother / Good Mother is an audiovisual performance that explores societal perceptions about ideal and non-ideal motherhood through sound and projected visuals. The sound comes from an amplified breast pump, while the visuals are projected on a single screen. In the performance, the artist plays the breast pump at different speeds. She plays it as a solo instrument and as part of an arrangement, and---at certain points in the performance---processes the breast pump sound using filters. This paper situates the performance within a discussion of how audiovisual performance can help express the relationship between gender and invisible labor.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ableton. n.d. Ableton Live. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.ableton.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Charlotte Alter. 2015. Sheryl Sandberg Explains Why Facebook Covers Egg-Freezing. Time (April 25, 2015). Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://time.com/3835233/sheryl-sandberg-explains-why-facebook-covers-egg-freezing/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arduino. n.d. Arduino. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.arduino.cc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlo Bellieni. 2016. The best age for pregnancy and undue pressures. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health 10, 3 (2016), 104--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mark Brown. 2008. Variations on a Musical Enigma: John Cage's Strangest Work to Get Its British Premiere. The Guardian (January 2, 2008). Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/jan/02/musicnews.artnewsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Phillip Burgess. 2013. Powering NeoPixels. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-neopixel-uberguide/powering-neopixelsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. John Cage. 1966. Variations VII. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.numeridanse.tv/en/playlists/9-evenings-theatre-engineeringGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cynthia Cockburn. 1988. Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men, and Technical Know-How. Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA, 42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cycling '74. n.d. Max. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://cycling74.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daft Punk. 2013. Get Lucky. Random Access Memories. Daft Life and Columbia Records.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jess Dobkin. 2006, 2012, 2016. The Lactation Station. Retrieved June 21, 2020 from https://www.jessdobkin.com/jd_work/the-lactation-station/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly Dobson. 2003--2004. Blendie. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://web.media.mit.edu/∼monster/blendie/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Feminist Art Collective. 2020. 2020 Toronto Feminist Art Festival. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.factoronto.org/about-the-festivalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anna Gorman. 2017. At Egg Freezing Parties, Women Sip Wine, Chat about Postponing Motherhood. Chicago Tribune (November 16, 2017). Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/ct-egg-freezing-parties-20171116-story.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matmos. 2016. Ultimate Care II. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://matmos.bandcamp.com/album/ultimate-care-iiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Claire Cain Miller. 2014. The Motherhood Penalty vs. the Fatherhood Bonus. New York Times Online (September 6, 2014). Retrieved June 19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Claire Cain Miller. 2020. Nearly Half of Men Say They Do Most of the Home Schooling. 3 Percent of Women Agree. New York Times Online (May 6, 2020). Retrieved June 19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. NIME 2019: New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.ufrgs.br/nime2019/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tara Rodgers. 2010. Pink Noises: Women on Electronic Music and Sound. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Emma Rosenblum. 2014. Later, Baby: Will Freezing Your Eggs Free Your Career?. Bloomberg (April 2014). Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-17/new-egg-freezing-technology-eases-womens-career-family-angstGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannah Rosin. 2009. The Case Against Breast-Feeding. The Atlantic (April 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Margaret Schedel, Jocelyn Ho, and Matthew Blessing. 2019. Women's labor: creating NIMEs from domestic tools. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME '19), Vol. 19, 337--380. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression 2019, Porto Alegre (Brazil), 3-6 June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SparkFun. n.d. SparkFun Spectrum Shield. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://www.sparkfun.com/products/13116Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. U.S. Department of Labor. n.d. Family and Medical Leave (FMLA). Retrieved November 8, 2019 from https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/benefits-leave/fmlaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wacky But True. 2019. The Washboard. Poppy For Real (April 2019), 20. Retrieved June 19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rachel Meltzer Warren. 2020. The Foods to Avoid When You're Pregnant. New York Times Online (April 17, 2020). Retrieved June 19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anna Xambó. 2018. Who are the women authors in NIME?---improving gender balance in NIME research. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME '18), Vol. 18, 174--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. xCoAx 2019: 7th Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X. Retrieved June 19, 2020 from https://2019.xcoax.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bad Mother / Good Mother: The Poetics and Politics of the Sounds of Invisible Labor

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
        Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques  Volume 4, Issue 2
        July 2021
        128 pages
        EISSN:2577-6193
        DOI:10.1145/3479233
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 August 2021
        Published in pacmcgit Volume 4, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format