skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Ming Shan Digital Experience: Immersive Technology for Traditional Taoist Meditation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 August 2021Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

The authors have requested minor, non-substantive changes to the VoR and, in accordance with ACM policies, a Corrected VoR was published on August 19, 2021. For reference purposes the VoR may still be accessed via the Supplemental Material section on this page.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Ming Shan Digital Experience is an immersive installation designed to support meditation in the context of a new Taoist center. Its creation confronted current academic literature on digital technology for meditation with the practical and cultural requirements of Taoist practice. Quantitative and qualitative learnings show the effectiveness of multimodal biofeedback on individual and collective meditative experience. Now instated in the Taoist center, the installation opens new perspectives for combining digital technology with ancient practice.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Himani Anand. 2014. Effect of meditation ("OM" chanting) on alpha EEG and galvanic skin response: measurement of an altered state of consciousness. Indian J. Posit. Psychol. 5, 3 (2014), 255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew Bierman, Mariana Figueiro, and Mark Rea. 2011. Measuring and predicting eyelid spectral transmittance. J. Bio-med. Opt. 16, 6 (June 2011), 067011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3593151Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Esko Dijk and Alina Weffers. 2010. Breathe with the ocean: a system for relaxation using audio, haptic and visual stimuli. EuroHaptics 2010, 47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pierre Flor-Henry, Yakov Shapiro, and Corine Sombrun. 2017. Brain changes during a shamanic trance: altered modes of consciousness, hemispheric laterality, and systemic psychobiology. Cogent Psychol. 4, 1 (2017), 1313522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Xiang Gao, Hongbao Cao, Dong Ming, Hongzhi Qi, Xuemin Wang, Xiaolu Wang, Runge Chen, and Peng Zhou. 2014. Analysis of EEG activity in response to binaural beats with different frequencies. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 94, 3 (December 2014), 399--406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.10.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christopher Gilbert. 2003. Clinical applications of breathing regulation: beyond anxiety management. Behav. Modif. 27, 5 (2003), 692--709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Philippe Gouédard. 2014. La méditation taoïste. Librairie Eyrolles, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nicolas Henchoz and Allison Crank. 2018. Digital Heritage: Bringing New Life to the Montreux Jazz Festival's Audio-Visual Archives with Immersive Installations. Leonardo 51, 4 (August 2018), 375--380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/leona01646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kristina Höök, Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic appreciation design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3131--3142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Scott Brave, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space. In Proceedings of CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sarah Kenderdine and Jeffrey Shaw. 2017. Archives in Motion: Motion as Meaning. In Museum and Archive on the Move: Changing Cultural Institutions in the Digital Era. Oliver Grau, Wendy Coones, Viola Rühse (Eds.) (2017), 211--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhiqiang Liu and Zhengyang Li. 2018. The study on the design of Taoist cultural & creative products based on Wuhan intangible cultural heritage resources. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Economic Management (ICESEM 2018). Atlantis Press, 83--86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icesem-18.2018.19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Osten Bang Ping Mah, Yingwei Yan, Jonathan Song Yi Tan, Yi-Xuan Tan, Geralyn Qi Ying Tay, Da Jian Chiam, Yi-Chen Wang, Kenneth Dean, and Chen-Chieh Feng. 2019. Generating a virtual tour for the preservation of the (in)tangible cultural heritage of Tampines Chinese Temple in Singapore. J. Cult. Herit. 39, (September--October 2019), 202--211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lizzie Muller, Greg Turner, George Khut, and Ernest Edmonds. 2006. Creating affective visualisations for a physiologically interactive artwork. IEEE, 651--657.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sara Riggs, Christopher Wickens, Nadine Sarter, Lisa Thomas, Mark Nikolic, and Angelia Sebok. 2017. Multimodal information presentation in support of NextGen operations. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 27, 1--2 (April 2017), 29--43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2017.1365608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mary Ross, Paul Guthrie, and Justin-Claude Dumont. 2013. The impact of modulated, colored light on the autonomic nervous system. Adv. Mind Body Med. 27, 4 (2013), 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadine Sarter. 2006. Multimodal information presentation: design guidance and research challenges. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36, 5 (2006), 439--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jaime Snyder, Mark Matthews, Jacqueline Chien, Pamara F. Chang, Emily Sun, Saeed Abdullah, and Geri Gay. 2015. MoodLight: exploring personal and social implications of ambient display of biosensor data. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 143--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Anna Ståhl, Martin Jonsson, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Kristina Höök, and Eva-Carin Banka Johnson. 2016. The soma mat and breathing light. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 305--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jay Vidyarthi and Bernhard Riecke. 2013. Mediated meditation: cultivating mindfulness with Sonic Cradle. In Proceedings of CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 2305--2314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joanneke Weerdmeester, Marieke van Rooij, Owen Harris, Niki Smit, Rutger Engels, and Isabela Granic. 2017. Exploring the role of self-efficacy in biofeedback video games. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '17), 453--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1995. Designing calm technology. PowerGrid J. 1 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Alex Gamburg, and Neema Moraveji. 2012. You can't force calm: designing and evaluating respiratory regulating interfaces for calming technology. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST Adjunct Proceedings '12), 69--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, and Loe Feijs. 2018a. DeLight: biofeedback through ambient light for stress intervention and relaxation assistance. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 22, 4 (2018), 787--805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, Rong-Hao Liang, Mengru Xue, and Loe Feijs. 2018b. RESonance: lightweight, room-scale audio-visual biofeedback for immersive relaxation training. IEEE Access 6, (2018), 38336--38347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ming Shan Digital Experience: Immersive Technology for Traditional Taoist Meditation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
        Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques  Volume 4, Issue 2
        July 2021
        128 pages
        EISSN:2577-6193
        DOI:10.1145/3479233
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 August 2021
        Published in pacmcgit Volume 4, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format