skip to main content
research-article

Can the Subaltern Speak?: Feminism in Robotic Mask Design

Published:02 August 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper presents AI-controlled robotic masks intended to empower women and allow them to communicate with one another. These are inspired by the historical masks worn by the Bandari women from southern Iran. Legend has it that these masks were developed during Portuguese colonial rule as a way of protecting the wearer from the gaze of slave masters looking for attractive women. In this project two robotic masks seemingly begin to develop their own language to communicate with each other, blinking their eyelashes in rapid succession using AI-generated Morse code. This project draws upon a Facebook experiment where two AI bots apparently began to develop their own language. It also draws upon an incident when an American soldier used his eyes to blink and spell out the word "TORTURE" using Morse code during his captivity in Vietnam, as well as stories of women using code to report domestic abuse during the COVID-19 lockdown. The aim is to sow anxiety within the patriarchal system where the "wink" of the sexual predator is subverted into a language to protect women from the advances of a predator. The project bridges AI, interactive design, and critical thinking (Figure 1).

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Benjamin H. Bratton. 2019. Further Trace Effects of the Post-Anthropocene. In Liam Young (Ed.), Machine Landscapes: Architectures of the Post Anthropocene (1st ed.) Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2005.14165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David Chalmers. 2020. GPT-3 and General Intelligence. In Philosophers On GPT-3 by Justin Weinberg. Retrieved from https://dailynous.com/2020/07/30/philosophers-gpt-3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew Griffin. 2017. Facebook's Artificial Intelligence Robots Shut Down after They Start Talking to Each Other in Their Own Language. Independent (July 31, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-artificial-intelligence-ai-chatbot-new-language-research-openai-google-a7869706.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Will Knight. 2016. AI's Language Problem. MIT Technology Review (August 9, 2016). Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/08/09/158125/ais-language-problem/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ivana Kottasová and Valentina Di Donato. 2020. Women Are Using Code Words at Pharmacies to Escape Domestic Violence during Lockdown. CNN (April 6, 2020). Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/02/europe/domestic-violence-coronavirus-lockdown-intl/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mike Lewis, Denis Yarats, Yann N. Dauphin, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues. arXiv:1706.05125. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.05125.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yun Li, Yongyao Jiang, Justin C. Goldstein, Lewis J. Mcgibbney, and Chaowei Yang. 2020. A Query Understanding Framework for Earth Data Discovery. Appl. Sci. 10, 3 (February 2020), 1127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson Ryan. 2021. Elon Musk's Neuralink Reveals Monkey Playing Pong with Brain Implant. CNET (April 8, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.cnet.com/news/elon-musks-neuralink-reveals-monkey-playing-pong-with-brain-implant/?fbclid=IwAR1HSFL5bsds2SwhtcODstWNmctM03nvsdssbydOP1YZfl10KFSfE7Xr6nwGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke, Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Traum, Stacy C. Marsella, Jonathan Gratch, Jina Lee, and Arno Hartholt. 2008. Multi-party, multi-issue, multi-strategy negotiation for multi-modal virtual agents. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA '08), September 1--3, 2008, Tokyo, Japan. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 117--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Deju Zhang and Xiaomin Zhang. 2009. Study on Forecasting the Stock Market Trend Based on Stochastic Analysis Method. International Journal of Business and Management 4, 6. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n6p163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can the Subaltern Speak?: Feminism in Robotic Mask Design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
          Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques  Volume 4, Issue 2
          July 2021
          128 pages
          EISSN:2577-6193
          DOI:10.1145/3479233
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 August 2021
          Published in pacmcgit Volume 4, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format