Gilles Simon
Abstract
It is generally accepted that Jan van Eyck was unaware of perspective. However, an a-contrario analysis of the vanishing points in five of his paintings, realized between 1432 and 1439, unveils a recurring fishbone-like pattern that could only emerge from the use of a polyscopic perspective machine with two degrees of freedom. A 3D reconstruction of Arnolfini Portrait compliant with this pattern suggests that van Eyck's device answered a both aesthetic and scientific questioning on how to represent space as closely as possible to human vision. This discovery makes van Eyck the father of today's immersive and nomadic creative media such as augmented reality and synthetic holography.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Jan van Eyck's Perspectival System Elucidated Through Computer Vision
- Leon Battista Alberti and Rocco Sinisgalli (Ed. and Transl.). 2011. On Painting: A New Translation and Critical Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Rachel Billinge and Lorne Campbell. 1995. The infra-red reflectograms of Jan van Eyck's portrait of Giovanni(?) Arnolfini and his wife Giovanna Cenami(?). National Gallery Technical Bulletin 16.Google Scholar
- Antonio Criminisi and David G. Stork. 2004. Did the great masters use optical projections while painting? Perspective comparison of paintings and photographs of Renaissance chandeliers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004), 645--648.Google Scholar
- Antonio Criminisi, Ian Reid, and Andrew Zisserman. 2000. Single view metrology. International Journal of Computer Vision 40, 2, 123--148.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacques Desbiens. 2009. The perspectives of synthetic holography. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Display Holography (ISDH 2009).Google Scholar
- James Elkins. 1991. On the Arnolfini Portrait and the Lucca Madonna: did Jan van Eyck have a perspectival system? The Art Bulletin 73, 1 (March 1991), 53--62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vladimir Geroimenko (Ed.). 2018. Augmented Reality Art: From an Emerging Technology to a Novel Creative Medium. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Penny Howell Jolly. 1998. Jan van Eyck's Italian pilgrimage: a miraculous Florentine Annunciation and the Ghent altarpiece. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 61, 369--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonio di Tuccio Manetti, Howard Saalman, and Catherine Enggass (Transl.). 1970. The Life of Brunelleschi. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
- Maximiliaan Martens, Till-Holger Borchert, Jan Dumolyn, Johan De Smet, and Frederica Van Dam (Eds.). 2020. Van Eyck. Thames & Hudson, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Erwin Panofsky. 1927. Die Perspektive «als symbolische Form.» Lectures of the Warburg Library, Leipzig/Berlin.Google Scholar
- Agnès Desolneux, Lionel Moisan, and Jean-Michel Morel. 2008. From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis: A Probabilistic Approach. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Gilles Simon, Antoine Fond, and Marie-Odile Berger. 2018. A-contrario horizon-first vanishing point detection using second-order grouping laws. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV 2018), September 8-14, 2018, Munich, Germany, 323--338.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
Jan van Eyck's Perspectival System Elucidated Through Computer Vision
Recommendations
Interview with Andy van Dam
Andries van Dam, is the Thomas J. Watson Jr. University Professor of Technology and Education and Professor of Computer Science at Brown University. He has been a member of Brown's faculty since 1965, was a co-founder of Brown's Computer Science ...
Doug Van Houweling: Building the NSFNet
Doug Van Houweling describes how the NSFNet went from connecting a few supercomputers to becoming "the Internet." The first Web extra at http://youtu.be/uY7dUJT7OsU is a video interview in which author Charles Severance speaks with Doug Van Houweling ...
Comments