Abstract
With social media becoming the most frequently used mode of modern-day communications, the propagation of fake or vicious news through such modes of communication has emerged as a serious problem. The scope of the problem of fake or vicious news may range from rumour-mongering, with intent to defame someone, to manufacturing false opinions/trends impacting elections and stock exchanges to much more alarming and mala fide repercussions of inciting violence by bad actors, especially in sensitive law-and-order situations. Therefore, curbing fake or vicious news and identifying the source of such news to ensure strict accountability is the need of the hour. Researchers have been working in the area of using text analysis, labelling, artificial intelligence, and machine learning techniques for detecting fake news, but identifying the source or originator of such news for accountability is still a big challenge for which no concrete approach exists as of today. Also, there is another common problematic trend on social media whereby targeted vicious content goes viral to mobilize or instigate people with malicious intent to destabilize normalcy in society. In the proposed solution, we treat both problems of fake news and vicious news together. We propose a blockchain and keyed watermarking-based framework for social media/messaging platforms that will allow the integrity of the posted content as well as ensure accountability on the owner/user of the post. Intrinsic properties of blockchain-like transparency and immutability are advantageous for curbing fake or vicious news. After identification of fake or vicious news, its spread will be immediately curbed through backtracking as well as forward tracking. Also, observing transactions on the blockchain, the density and rate of forwarding of a particular original message going beyond a threshold can easily be checked, which could be identified as a possible malicious attempt to spread objectionable content. If the content is deemed dangerous or inappropriate, its spread will be curbed immediately. The use of the Raft consensus algorithm and bloXroute servers is proposed to enhance throughput and network scalability, respectively. Thus, the framework offers a proactive as well as reactive, practically feasible, and effective solution for curtailment of fake or vicious news on social media/messaging platforms. The proposed work is a framework for solving fake or vicious news spread problems on social media; the complete design specifications are beyond scope of the current work and will be addressed in the future.
- [1] . 1999. Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation
(OSDI’99) . 173–186.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [2] . 2008. Group key management protocols: A novel taxonomy. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Eng. 2, 10 (2008), 3620–3633.Google Scholar
- [3] . 2018. Towards trusted social networks with blockchain technology. arXiv:1801.02796. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02796.Google Scholar
- [4] . 2016. Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4 (2016), 2292–2303.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [5] . 2016. The Information Disorder Ecosystem: A Study on the Role of Social Media, the Initiatives to Tackle Disinformation and a Systematic Literature Review of False Information Taxonomies.Retrieved from https://repository.ihu.edu.gr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11544/29381/a.christopoulou_ebdm_16-04-2019.pdf?sequence=2.Google Scholar
- [6] . 2016. Blockchain Technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Retrieved from http://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/AIR-2016-Blockchain.pdf.Google Scholar
- [7] . 2019. Optimized blockchain model for internet of things based healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP’19), (Ed.).
IEEE , 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.8769060Google ScholarCross Ref
- [8] . 2019. A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for iot. Sensors 19, 2 (2019), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020326Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [9] . 2020. Fake news, disinformation, and deepfakes: Leveraging distributed ledger technologies and blockchain to combat digital deception and counterfeit reality. IT Prof. 22, 2 (2020), 53–59.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [10] . 2020. A digital rights management system based on a scalable blockchain. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 14, 5 (2021), 2665–2680.
DOI : 10.1007/s12083-020-01023-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- [11] . 2019. Combating deepfake videos using blockchain and smart contracts. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 41596–41606. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905689Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [12] . 2018. False news on social media.
DOI : 10.13140/RG.2.2.35434.57285Google Scholar - [13] . 2017. Fake news: a technological approach to proving the origins of content, using blockchains. Big Data 5, 4 (2017), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0071Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [14] . 2019. A review of blockchain architecture and consensus protocols: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. Symmetry 11, 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11101198Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [15] . 2018. A blockchain-based location privacy protection incentive mechanism in crowd sensing networks. Sensors 18, 11 (2018), 3894. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113894Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [16] . 2012. Ppcoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake. Self-published article, August 19.Google Scholar
- [17] . 2017. Smart Contracts—How Will Blockchain Technology Affect Contractual Practices?
ETLA Report 68. Helsinki.Google Scholar - [18] . 2017. The current state of fake news: Challenges and opportunities. Proc. Comput. Sci. 121 (2017), 817–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.106Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [19] . 2019. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System.
Technical Report . Manubot.Google Scholar - [20] . 2018. Media-rich fake news detection: A survey. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval
(MIPR’18) . 436–441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [21] . 2019. Towards impact scoring of fake news. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval
(MIPR’19) . 529–533.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [22] . 2019. Using blockchain to rein in the new post-truth world and check the spread of fake news. IT Prof. 21, 4 (2019), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2910503Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [23] . 2019. Fighting fake news propagation with blockchains. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security
(CNS’19) . 1–4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [24] . 2019. Security services using blockchains: A state of the art survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 1 (2019), 858–880.Google Scholar
- [25] . 2017. Survey of consensus protocols on blockchain applications. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS’17). 1–5.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [26] . 2019. Trust it or not: Effects of machine-learning warnings in helping individuals mitigate misinformation. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci’19), , , , , , and (Eds.). ACM, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326012Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [27] . 2018. Tracing the source of news based on blockchain. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Science
(ICIS’18) . 377–381.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [28] . 2018. Tracing the source of news based on blockchain. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS’18). IEEE Computer Society, 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2018.8466516Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [29] . 2020. A game theoretic analysis of resource mining in blockchain. J. Netw. Softw. Tools Appl. 23, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03046-wGoogle Scholar
- [30] . 2019. Blockchain education. In Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE’19). IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2019.8861828Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [31] . 2018. Automated remote patient monitoring: Data sharing and privacy using blockchain. arXiv:1811.03417. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03417.Google Scholar
- [32] . 2018. Crypto-democracy: a decentralized voting scheme using blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on E-business and Telecommunications
(ICETE’18) , and (Eds.). SciTePress, 674–679. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006881906740679Google ScholarCross Ref
- [33] . 2018. PHANTOM protocol as the new crypto-democracy. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management
(CISIM’18) ,Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 11127, and (Eds.). Springer, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99954-8_41Google ScholarCross Ref
- [34] . 1994. Smart Contracts. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.contracts.html.Google Scholar
- [35] . 2020. Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 57 (2020), 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102197Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [36] . 2019. Proof of credibility: A blockchain approach for detecting and blocking fake news in social networks. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 10, 12 (2019), 321–327.Google Scholar
- [37] . 2019. Bloxroute: A Scalable Trustless Blockchain Distribution Network. Retrieved from https://bloxroute.com/.Google Scholar
- [38] . 2018. A blockchain based privacy-preserving incentive mechanism in crowdsensing applications. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 17545–17556.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [39] . 2020. A blockchain-based hybrid incentive model for crowdsensing. Electronics 9, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020215Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [40] . 2019. A blockchain-based location privacy-preserving crowdsensing system. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 94 (2019), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.11.046Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Blockchain-based Framework for Reducing Fake or Vicious News Spread on Social Media/Messaging Platforms
Recommendations
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
Social media for news consumption is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, its low cost, easy access, and rapid dissemination of information lead people to seek out and consume news from social media. On the other hand, it enables the wide spread of \...
Interpretable Fake News Detection on Social Media
ICSIM '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Information ManagementWith the development of information technology, public opinion can quickly spread to all over the world, permeate every corner of social life, and have a great impact on human's lives. Extracted from large-scale and multi-mode social media, user-...
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide webTwitter, a microblogging service less than three years old, commands more than 41 million users as of July 2009 and is growing fast. Twitter users tweet about any topic within the 140-character limit and follow others to receive their tweets. The goal ...






Comments