skip to main content
survey

Defining Scents: A Systematic Literature Review of Olfactory-based Computing Systems

Published:27 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The human sense of smell is a primal ability that has the potential to reveal unexplored relationships between user behaviors and technology. Humans use millions of olfactory receptor cells to observe the environment around them. Olfaction studies are gaining popularity with the progression of scent delivering (commercial and prototype) devices. This influx of research features various software and hardware designs. Additionally, previous studies have explored numerous target audiences and evaluation methodologies. This article presents a systematic review of pertinent literature that investigates olfactory-based computing (OBC) systems in the field of Human-Computer Interaction. Last, this article highlights state-of-the-art study/system designs, evaluation methods, and offers insights on ways to address current challenges/contributions relevant to OBC technologies.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Ademoye Oluwakemi A. and Ghinea Gheorghita. 2013. Information recall task impact in olfaction-enhanced multimedia. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 9, 3, Article 17 (July 2013), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487268.2487270 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Ademoye Oluwakemi A., Murray Niall, Muntean Gabriel-Miro, and Ghinea Gheorghita. 2016. Audio masking effect on inter-component skews in olfaction-enhanced multimedia presentations. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 12, 4, Article 51 (Aug. 2016), 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957753 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Amores Judith and Maes Pattie. 2017. Essence: Olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2834. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Arzi Anat, Shedlesky Limor, Ben-Shaul Mor, Nasser Khitam, Oksenberg Arie, Hairston Ilana S., and Sobel Noam. 2012. Humans can learn new information during sleep. Nature Neurosci. 15, 10 (2012), 1460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Barker Shannon, Grayhem Pamela, Koon Jerrod, Perkins Jessica, Whalen Allison, and Raudenbush Bryan. 2003. Improved performance on clerical tasks associated with administration of peppermint odor. Percept. Motor Skills 97, 3 (2003), 10071010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Chaudhury Dipesh, Manella Laura, Arellanos Adolfo, Escanilla Olga, Cleland Thomas A., and Linster Christiane. 2010. Olfactory bulb habituation to odor stimuli.Behav. Neurosci. 124, 4 (2010), 490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Choi Yongsoon, Cheok Adrian David, Roman Xavier, Nguyen The Anh, Sugimoto Kenichi, and Halupka Veronica. 2011. Sound perfume: Designing a wearable sound and fragrance media for face-to-face interpersonal interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE’11). ACM, New York, NY, Article 4, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071428 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Cornelius Cory, Peterson Ronald, Skinner Joseph, Halter Ryan, and Kotz David. 2014. A wearable system that knows who wears it. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 5567. https://doi.org/10.1145/2594368.2594369 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Crowther Bosley. 1960. Screen: Olfactory Debut: Scent of Mystery’ Opens at Warner. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1960/02/19/archives/screen-olfactory-debut-scent-of-mystery-opens-at-warner.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Diego Miguel A., Jones Nancy Aaron, Field Tiffany, Hernandez-Reif Maria, Schanberg Saul, Kuhn Cynthia, Galamaga Mary, McAdam Virginia, and Galamaga Robert. 1998. Aromatherapy positively affects mood, EEG patterns of alertness and math computations. Int. J. Neurosci. 96, 3–4 (1998), 217224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Diekelmann Susanne and Born Jan. 2010. The memory function of sleep. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 2 (2010), 114126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Dinh Huong Q., Walker Neff, Hodges Larry F., Song Chang, and Kobayashi Akira. 1999. Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (VR’99). IEEE, 222228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Dmitrenko Dmitrijs, Maggioni Emanuela, and Obrist Marianna. 2017. OSpace: Towards a systematic exploration of olfactory interaction spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS’17). ACM, New York, NY, 171180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3134121 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Dmitrenko Dmitrijs, Maggioni Emanuela, and Obrist Marianna. 2018. I smell trouble: Using multiple scents to convey driving-relevant information. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 234238. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3243015 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Dmitrenko Dmitrijs, Maggioni Emanuela, and Obrist Marianna. 2019. Towards a framework for validating the matching between notifications and scents in olfactory in-car interaction. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’19). ACM, New York, NY, Article LBW2119, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Dobbelstein David, Herrdum Steffen, and Rukzio Enrico. 2017. inScent: A wearable olfactory display as an amplification for mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 130137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Ferdenzi Camille, Delplanque Sylvain, Atanassova Reni, and Sander David. 2016. Androstadienone’s influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific. Psychoneuroendocrinology 66 (2016), 166175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Firestein Stuart. 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413, 6852 (2001), 211218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Ghinea Gheorghita and Ademoye Oluwakemi. 2012. The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2012), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2071396.2071398 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Ghinea Gheorghita and Ademoye Oluwakemi. 2012. User perception of media content association in olfaction-enhanced multimedia. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 4, Article 52 (Nov. 2012), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2379790.2379794 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Giordano Robert. [n.d.]. Wordlist Maker—List Unique Words, Count Total Words. Retrieved from https://design215.com/toolbox/wordlist.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Gonçalves Frederica, Cabral Diogo, and Campos Pedro. 2018. CreaSenses: Fostering creativity through olfactory cues. In Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article 12, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3232078.3232090 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Herrera Nicolas S. and McMahan Ryan P.. 2014. Development of a simple and low-cost olfactory display for immersive media experiences. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (ImmersiveMe’14). ACM, New York, NY, 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660579.2660584 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Itou Shiori, Iseki Masaaki, Kato Shingo, and Nakamoto Takamichi. 2018. Olfactory and visual presentation using olfactory display using SAW atomizer and solenoid valves. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion. 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Kay Leslie M.. 2011. Olfactory coding: Random scents make sense. Curr. Biol. 21, 22 (2011), R928–R929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Kaye Joseph “Jofish”. 2004. Making Scents: Aromatic output for HCI. Interactions 11, 1 (2004), 4861. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Kim So-Jeong and Shin Dong-Hee. 2017. The effects of ambient scent on hedonic experience on online shopping. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM’17). ACM, New York, NY, Article 4, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022227.3022231 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] P. Brereton, B. A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, M. Turner, and M. Khalil. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 4 (2007), 571–583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Kroupi Eleni, Yazdani Ashkan, Vesin Jean-Marc, and Ebrahimi Touradj. 2014. EEG correlates of pleasant and unpleasant odor perception. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 11, 1s, Article 13 (Oct. 2014), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2637287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Kwan Jamie, Chu Jean Ho, Harley Daniel, McBride Melanie, and Mazalek Ali. 2016. Grasping cultural context through multisensory interactions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 482487. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856537 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Lai Mei-Kei. 2015. Universal scent blackbox: Engaging visitors communication through creating olfactory experience at art museum. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC’15). ACM, New York, NY, Article 27, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2775483 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Larsson Maria, Finkel Deborah, and Pedersen Nancy L.. 2000. Odor identification: Influences of age, gender, cognition, and personality. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 55, 5 (2000), P304–P310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Lötsch Jörn, Kringel Dario, and Hummel Thomas. 2019. Machine learning in human olfactory research. Chem. Senses 44, 1 (2019), 1122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Maggioni Emanuela, Cobden Robert, Dmitrenko Dmitrijs, and Obrist Marianna. 2018. Smell-O-Message: Integration of olfactory notifications into a messaging application to improve users’ performance. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 4554. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242975 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Martzke Jeffrey S., Kopala Lili C., and Good Kimberley P.. 1997. Olfactory dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders: Review and methodological considerations.Biol. Psychiatry 42, 8 (1997), 721–732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00442-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Metatla Oussama, Maggioni Emanuela, Cullen Clare, and Obrist Marianna. 2019. “Like Popcorn” Crossmodal correspondences between scents, 3D shapes and emotions in children. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Mizuno K., Mizuno N., Shinohara T., and Noda M.. 2004. Mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after delivery results in early recognition of own mother’s milk odour. Acta Paediatrica 93, 12 (2004), 16401645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Murray Niall, Ademoye Oluwakemi A., Ghinea Gheorghita, and Muntean Gabriel-Miro. 2017. A tutorial for olfaction-based multisensorial media application design and evaluation. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 5, Article 67 (Sept. 2017), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3108243 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Murray Niall, Lee Brian, Qiao Yuansong, and Muntean Gabriel-Miro. 2014. Multiple-Scent enhanced multimedia synchronization. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 11, 1s, Article 12 (Oct. 2014), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2637293 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Murray Niall, Lee Brian, Qiao Yuansong, and Muntean Gabriel-Miro. 2016. Olfaction-Enhanced multimedia. Comput. Surveys 48, 4 (Feb. 2016), 134. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816454 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Murray Niall, Qiao Yuansong, Lee Brian, Karunakar A. K., and Muntean Gabriel-Miro. 2013. Subjective evaluation of olfactory and visual media synchronization. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’13). ACM, New York, NY, 162171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2483977.2483999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Murray Niall, Qiao Yuansong, Lee Brian, and Muntean Gabriel-Miro. 2014. User-profile-based perceived olfactory and visual media synchronization. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 10, 1s, Article 11 (Jan. 2014), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Nakamoto Takamichi. 2013. Human Olfactory Displays and Interfaces: Odor Sensing and Presentation. IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Narumi Takuji, Nishizaka Shinya, Kajinami Takashi, Tanikawa Tomohiro, and Hirose Michitaka. 2011. Augmented reality flavors: Gustatory display based on edible marker and cross-modal interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 93102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978957 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Noguchi Daisuke, Sugimoto Sayumi, Bannai Yuichi, and Okada Ken-ichi. 2011. Time characteristics of olfaction in a single breath. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 8392. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978956 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] PCMAG. 2020. Can smell-o-vision save VR? Retrieved from https://www.pcmag.com/news/can-smell-o-vision- save-vr.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Ranasinghe Nimesha, Jain Pravar, Tram Nguyen Thi Ngoc, Tolley David, Liangkun Yan, Tung Chow Eason Wai, Yen Ching Chiuan, Do Ellen Yi-Luen, Koh Koon Chuan Raymond, and Shamaiah Kala. 2018. A demonstration of season traveller: Multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article D114, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186513 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Redd William H., Manne Sharon L., Peters Bruce, Jacobsen Paul B., and Schmidt Hilary. 1994. Fragrance administration to reduce anxiety during MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 4, 4 (1994), 623626. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880040419Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Richard Emmanuelle, Tijou Angèle, Richard Paul, and Ferrier J.-L.. 2006. Multi-modal virtual environments for education with haptic and olfactory feedback. Virtual Reality 10, 3–4 (2006), 207225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Saleme Estevão B., Covaci Alexandra, Mesfin Gebremariam, Santos Celso A. S., and Ghinea Gheorghita. 2019. Mulsemedia DIY: A survey of devices and a tutorial for building your own mulsemedia environment. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 3, Article Article 58 (June 2019), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319853 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Salminen Katri, Rantala Jussi, Isokoski Poika, Lehtonen Marko, Müller Philipp, Karjalainen Markus, Väliaho Jari, Kontunen Anton, Nieminen Ville, Leivo Joni, Telembeci Anca Andreea, Lekkala Jukka, Kallio Pasi, and Surakka Veikko. 2018. Olfactory display prototype for presenting and sensing authentic and synthetic odors. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 7377. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. [52] Schablitzky Sylvia and Pause Bettina M.. 2014. Sadness might isolate you in a non-smelling world: Olfactory perception and depression. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014), 45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Schleidt Margret, Neumann Peter, and Morishita Harumi. 1988. Pleasure and disgust: Memories and associations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in Germany and Japan. Chem. Senses 13, 2 (1988), 279293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Shaw Emily, Roper Tessa, Nilsson Tommy, Lawson Glyn, Cobb Sue V. G., and Miller Daniel. 2019. The heat is on: Exploring user behaviour in a multisensory virtual environment for fire evacuation. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19). ACM, New York, NY, Article 626, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300856 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. [55] Sugimoto Sayumi, Noguchi Daisuke, Bannnai Yuichi, and Okada Kenichi. 2010. Ink jet olfactory display enabling instantaneous switches of scents. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’10). ACM, New York, NY, 301310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1873994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Sullivan Regina M., Wilson Donald A., Ravel Nadine, and Mouly Anne-Marie. 2015. Olfactory memory networks: From emotional learning to social behaviors. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9 (2015), 36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Truong Khai. 2017. Pilot studies: When and how to conduct them when conducting user studies. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. Comm. 20, 4 (Apr. 2017), 811. https://doi.org/10.1145/3081016.3081020 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Warnock David, McGee-Lennon Marilyn, and Brewster Stephen. 2013. Multiple notification modalities and older users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 10911094. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466139 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. [59] Wedekind Claus, Seebeck Thomas, Bettens Florence, and Paepke Alexander J.. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 260, 1359 (1995), 245249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Weiser Mark and Brown John Seely. 1997. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond Calculation. Springer, New York, NY, 7585. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Wintersberger Philipp, Dmitrenko Dmitrijs, Schartmüller Clemens, Frison Anna-Katharina, Maggioni Emanuela, Obrist Marianna, and Riener Andreas. 2019. S(C)ENTINEL: Monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’19). ACM, New York, NY, 538546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302332 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. [62] worditout. 2020. Make a word cloud. Retrieved from https://worditout.com/word-cloud/create.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. [63] Yamada Tomoya, Yokoyama Satoshi, Tanikawa Tomohiro, Hirota Koichi, and Hirose Michitaka. 2006. Wearable olfactory display: Using odor in outdoor environment. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR’06). IEEE, 199206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. [64] Yanagida Yasuyuki. 2012. A survey of olfactory displays: Making and delivering scents. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Conference (SENSORS’12). IEEE, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. [65] Yiyuan Huang. 2015. Creation methodology of interactive art installation based on philosophy-understanding projection: Recreation of traditional chinese painting. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference (VRIC’15). ACM, New York, NY, Article 7, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2806173.2806179 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Defining Scents: A Systematic Literature Review of Olfactory-based Computing Systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
          ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 18, Issue 1
          January 2022
          517 pages
          ISSN:1551-6857
          EISSN:1551-6865
          DOI:10.1145/3505205
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 January 2022
          • Accepted: 1 June 2021
          • Revised: 1 April 2021
          • Received: 1 August 2020
          Published in tomm Volume 18, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • survey
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!