10.1145/3472714.3473656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

eBUX of OERs for PTC: Student and Faculty eBook User Experiences (eBUX) of Open Educational Resources (OERs) for Professional and Technical Communication (PTC)

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This report analyzes the digital/electronic textbook user experience (eBUX) of web-based open educational resources (OERs) for professional and technical communication (PTC). Data and information were gathered from students enrolled in introductory PTC courses (with IRB oversight and input from faculty and writing program directors) via online surveys (Google Forms), collaborative documents (Google Docs), remote interviews (Zoom), learning management system analytics (Desire2Learn), workshop documentation (pre-pandemic), and email correspondence. User research revealed issues of use and usability with web-based open-access PTC textbooks related to functional specifications, content requirements, interface and interaction design, information architecture, navigation, and aesthetics. The conclusion discusses the evolution of digital OERs for PTC over the past quarter century and reflects on their future.

References

  1. Phillip Grimaldi, Mallick D. Basu, Andrew E. Waters, Richard G. Baraniuk. 2019. Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLoS ONE 14(3):e0212508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212508Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeff Falk. 2020. OpenStax surpasses $1 billion in textbook savings, with wide-ranging impact on teaching, learning and student success. OpenStax.org website.https://openstax.org/press/openstax-surpasses-1-billion-textbook-savings-wide-ranging-impact-teaching-learning-and-student-successGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. UNESCO. 2002. Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries. Paris, 1-3 July 2002: final report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. UNESCO. 2012. OER Declaration. World Open Educational Resources (OER) Congress. Paris, June 20-22, 2012: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/English_Paris_OER_Declaration.pdf; see also https://en.unesco.org/oer/paris-declarationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. GovTrack. 2021. S. 1036 (116th): Affordable College Textbook Act. GovTrack.us. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/s1036Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gross, A., Hamlin, A., Merck, B., Rubio, C., Naas, J., Savage, M., and DeSilva, M. 2017. Open Oregon Educational Resources: https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/technicalwriting/; see also the following Canvas course containing materials to go along with Open Oregon's Technical Writing OER: https://lor.instructure.com/resources/355626b1a0194d1782df3e605d089a5fGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reardon, T., Powell, T., Arnett, J., Logan, M., Race, C., McMurrey, D., 2021. Online Technical Communication. Kennesaw State. https://alg.manifoldapp.org/projects/open-tcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McMurrey, D. 2017. Online Technical Writing. https://www.prismnet.com/∼hcexres/textbook/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarah Read, Jordana Bowen, and Henry Covey. 2019. OER Guide for WR-227 Instructors: Open Educational Resources for Technical Communication. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/pdxopen/27/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sarah Read, Jordana Bowen, and Henry Covey. 2022 (currently accepted for publication). Open Educational Resources and Technical and Professional Communication: Challenges and Opportunities Amid the OER Movement. Programmatic Perspectives. Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonathan E. Arnett. 2018. If You Build It, Will They Come?: Research into Students’ Use of an Open Educational Resource in Technical Communication, IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), Toronto, ON, 207-214, doi: 10.1109/ProComm.2018.00048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. McMurrey, D. 2020. Correspondence. For a history of OERs, see: Bliss, T. J., & Smith, M. (2017). A brief history of open educational resources. In: R. S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 9–27). London, UK: Ubiquity Press. doi:10.5334/bbc.bGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [8] Samantha Knoerzer. 2020. The Role of Publishers in the Changing Book Market: 5 Questions with Hugh McGuire. Learn Self-Publishing Fast (blog). https://learnselfpublishingfast.com/the-role-of-publishers-in-the-changing-book-market-5-questions-with-hugh-mcguire/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Oregon Writing and English Advisory Committee (OWEAC). 2018. Outcomes Statement: Contextualizing Document for Updated OWEAC Outcomes for WR 227—2018. https://oweac.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/contextualizing-document-for-updated-oweac-outcomes-for-wr-227-3.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2015-2016. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonathan E. Arnett. 2021. Correspondence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)110
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!