skip to main content
research-article

Computer Games as Social Sculptures: Rethinking the Discourse of Participation and Its Implications for Digital Game Design

Published:06 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

By drawing on Joseph Beuys's notion of "social sculpture" and bringing together the discussions on participation from participatory art, participatory design, and game design, this paper seeks to expand the notion of participation in digital play. The expansive definition of participation allows us to better grasp computer games as a critical platform for dialogue and action, and computer gameplay as a transformative process of sculpting social fabric. By analyzing existing games in light of the concept of social sculpture, this paper explores how Beuys's central tenet-the discourse of participation-can "politicize" the practice of digital gaming and game design. Furthermore, the paper proposes a participation-centered game design approach that is politically responsible and engaging, attempting to arrive at new knowledge that will help to make games that can function as a platform for participation and social commentary.

References

  1. Keshavarz, Mahmoud and Ramia Maze. 2013. Design and dissensus: framing and staging participation in design research. Design Philosophy Papers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aarseth, Espen J. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. JHU Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Salen, Katie and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Vahlo, Jukka. 2017. An enactive account of the autonomy of videogame gameplay. Game Studies, vol. 17, no. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, Claire. 2006. Participation. Whitechapel & The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Muller, Michael J and A Druin. 2007. Participatory design: The third space in HCI (revised). Handbook of HCI 2nd Edition. Mahway NJ USA: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wanick, Vanissa and Chaiane Bitelo. 2020. Exploring the use of participatory design in game design: a Brazilian perspective. International Journal of Serious Games, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Frasca, Gonzalo. 2001. Videogames of the oppressed: Videogames as a means for critical thinking and debate. School of Literature, communication, and culture, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson, Douglas and Miguel Sicart. 2010. Now it's personal: on abusive game design. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, pp. 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gyorody, Andrea Dana. 2017. 'Object into Action and Action into Object': Joseph Beuys and the Political Work of Social Sculpture. University of California, Los Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore, Alan W. 2010. A Brief Genealogy of Social Sculpture. Journal of Aesthetics & Protest, Web only article. [Online]. Available: http://www.joaap.org/webonly/moore.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Beuys, Joseph. 1982--87. 7000 Oaks. Performance & land art.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang, Laewoo, Steven J Jackson, and Phoebe Sengers. 2018. Intermodulation: improvisation and collaborative art practice for hci. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Van Klaveren, Rosanne. 2012. Artistic participatory practices as a vehicle for togetherness. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2, pp. 93--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cho, Eun Ji. 2013. Designing for sociability: a relational aesthetic approach to service encounter. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stiegler, Bernard. 2015. Symbolic misery, volume 2: The catastrophe of the sensible. Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nintendo EPD. 2020. Animal Crossing: New Horizons. Nintendo Switch. Nintendo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mojang. 2011. Minecraft PC game. Mojang.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aarseth, Espen. 2003. Playing Research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. In Proceedings of the digital arts and culture conference, pp. 28--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunne, Anthony and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sotamaa, Olli. 2007. Perceptions of Player in Game Design Literature. In DiGRA Conference: Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pereira, Luis Lucas and Licínio Roque. 2013. Understanding the Videogame Medium through Perspectives of Participation. In DiGRA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira, Luís Lucas, Rui Craveirinha, and Licinio Roque. 2019. A canvas for participation-centered game design. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 521--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Khaled, Rilla and Asimina Vasalou. 2014. Bridging serious games and participatory design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Khaled, Rilla, Vero Vanden Abeele, Maarten Van Mechelen, and Asimina Vasalou. 2014. Participatory design for serious game design: truth and lies. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play, pp. 457--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sundblad, Yngve. 2010. UTOPIA: Participatory design from Scandinavia to the world. In IFIP Conference on History of Nordic Computing: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 176--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gennari, Rosella et al. 2017. Children's emotions and quality of products in participatory game design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 101, pp. 45--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lukosch, Heide, Theo van Ruijven, and Alexander Verbraeck. 2012. The participatory design of a simulation training game. In Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC): IEEE, pp. 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ismail, Rozana and Roslina Ibrahim. 2017. PDEduGame: Towards participatory design process for educational game design in primary school. In 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS): IEEE, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jordan, Cara. 2013. The evolution of social sculpture in the United States: Joseph Beuys and the work of Suzanne Lacy and Rick Lowe. Public Art Dialogue, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 144--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Beuys, Joseph. 1972. Office for Direct Democracy by Referendum. Performance & conceptual art.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Beuys, Joseph. 1972. Sweeping Up. Performance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Boal, Augusto. 2000. Theater of the Oppressed. Pluto press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Freire, Paulo. 2018. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury publishing USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Bateman, Chris and Richard Boon. 2006. 21st century game design. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Flanagan, Mary. 2009. Critical play: Radical game design. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Leino, Olli Tapio. 2010. Emotions in play: On the constitution of emotion in solitary computer game play. PhD, IT University of Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Leino, Olli Tapio. 2016. STONE+ LIFE= EGG--Little Alchemy as a limit-idea for thinking about knowledge and discovery in computer games. In Proceedings of Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Boluk, Stephanie and Patrick LeMieux. 2017. Metagaming: Playing, competing, spectating, cheating, trading, making, and breaking videogames. U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrington, Johnathan. 2020. Workshops of Our Own: Analysing Constraint Play in Digital Games. City University of Hong Kong.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Molleindustria. 2020. Democratic Socialism Simulator. PC game. Molleindustria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Bogost, Ian. 2011. How to do things with videogames. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharp, John. 2015. Works of game: On the aesthetics of games and art. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Arcangel, Cory. 2002. Super Mario Clouds. Installation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Humble, Rod. 2007. The Marriage. Flash game. Rod Humble.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Rohrer, Jason. 2007. Passage. PC game. Jason Rohrer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Molleindustria. 2005. The McDonald's Videogame. Flash game. Molleindustria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Molleindustria. 2008. Faith Fighter. Flash game. Molleindustria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Molleindustria. 2011. Phone Story. Android game. Molleindustria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Molleindustria. 2013. The Best Amendment. Flash game. Molleindustria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Webster, Andrew. 2013. "The Best Amendment': NRA blowback spawns an irreverent game about guns. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2013/3/19/4122824/the-best-amendment-an-unofficial-nra-game (accessed June 1, 2021 ).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Frasca, Gonzalo. 2004. Madrid Flash game. Newsgaming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Pedercini, Paolo. 2020. Democratic Socialism Simulator -- Release Notes. https://www.molleindustria.org/blog/democratic-socialism-simulator-release-notes/ (accessed June 1, 2021 ).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker, D. 2020. "Amazon only functions because it is a predatory system that isn't beholden to any standards?". Comment on the post ?Democratic Socialism Simulator Lets You Tax The Rich, Nationalize Amazon", Kotaku. https://kotaku.com/democratic-socialism-simulator-lets-you-tax-the-rich-n-1841817633 (accessed July 21, 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. gravelrodtito. 2020. "the developer is an actual socialist but he also said the game is supposed to be simulating what a Sanders-like?". Comment on Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/f79rto/democratic_socialism_simulator_lets_you_tax_the/ (accessed July 21, 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mesch, Claudia. 2007. Institutionalizing social sculpture: Beuys' Office for direct democracy through referendum installation, 1972. Joseph Beuys: The reader, pp. 198--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Galloway, Alexander R. 2006. Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Galloway, Alexander R. 2004. Social realism in gaming. Game studies, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Webster, Andrew. 2020. The creators of Animal Crossing hope New Horizons can be "an escape' in difficult times. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/18/21185608/animal-crossing-new-horizons-nintendo-switch-coronavirus-escape-interview (accessed June 1, 2021 ).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. PippenFTS. 2020. The Earth in Minecraft, 1:1 scale ...for the first time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_bW3ab8YAk (accessed June 1, 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Bogost, Ian. 2007. Persuasive games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Swain, Chris. 2007. Designing Games to Effect Social Change. In DiGRA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Dyer-Witheford, Nick and Greig De Peuter. 2009. Games of empire: Global capitalism and video games. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Petersen, Søren Mørk. 2008. Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sotamaa, Olli and Hanna Wirman. 2015. Online games modifications and user generated content. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, pp. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Kücklich, Julian. 2005. Precarious Playbour: Modders and the Digital Games Industry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Samuel, Ben. 2016. Crafting stories through play. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Wellenreiter, Michael. 2015. Screenwriting and authorial control in narrative video games. Journal of Screenwriting, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 343--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Acharya, Devi and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2019. Building worlds together: understanding collaborative co-creation of game worlds. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Treanor, Mike and Michael Mateas. 2009. Newsgames-Procedural Rhetoric Meets Political Cartoons. In DiGRA Conference: Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Frasca, Gonzalo. 2003. September 12th. Flash game. Newsgaming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer Games as Social Sculptures: Rethinking the Discourse of Participation and Its Implications for Digital Game Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!