skip to main content
research-article

Playing Cool - Winter Weather's Influence on Location-Based Gaming

Published:06 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Location-based games are highly dependent on the physical environment. One important but often overlooked factor is weather. In this paper we focus on winter weather, as this is a common weather that is often not designed for specifically. By performing a qualitative observation, interview, and questionnaire study of families during and after playing a GPS-based mobile game in a winter setting, this paper studies how winter conditions affected the gaming experience. Three main factors were observed to have a big impact on the gaming experience: snow, ice and cold. We outline ways these weather conditions were found to be both obstacles, and adding value to the game. Finally, we suggest design implications for winter weather, mainly; the need for short games due to cold, adaption of gameplay for movement in snow, to avoid interactions based on handling the phone, and to adapt maps to the effects of snow and ice. By explaining how winter conditions affect the gaming experience, location-based games can be better adapted for these weather conditions, and thereby help in making better design decisions.

References

  1. Alavesa, P. and Xu, Y. 2020. Unblurring the boundary between daily life and gameplay in location-based mobile games, visual online ethnography on Pokémon GO. Behaviour & Information Technology. 0, 0 (Sep. 2020), 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1825810.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Back, J., Heeffer, C., Paget, S., Rau, A., Sallnäs Pysander, E.-L. and Waern, A. 2016. Designing Children's Digital-Physical Play in Natural Outdoors Settings. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 1359--1366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Back, J., Heeffer, C., Paget, S., Rau, A., Sallnäs Pysander, E.L. and Waern, A. 2016. Designing for Children's Outdoor Play. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 28--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Back, J., Turmo Vidal, L., Waern, A., Paget, S. and Sallnäs Pysander, E.-L. 2018. Playing Close to Home: Interaction and Emerging Play in Outdoor Play Installations. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 156:1--156:11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Paxton, M., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M. and Row-Farr, J. 2006. Can You See Me Now? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 13, 1 (Mar. 2006), 100--133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1143518.1143522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benford, S., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Rowland, D., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Row-Farr, J., Oldroyd, A. and Sutton, J. 2004. Uncle Roy All Around You: Implicating the City in a Location-Based Performance. Proc. ACE 2004. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benford, S. and Giannachi, G. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Benford, S., Magerkurth, C. and Ljungstrand, P. 2005. Bridging the physical and digital in pervasive gaming. Commun. ACM. 48, 3 (Mar. 2005), 54--57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1047671.1047704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clements, R. 2004. An Investigation of the Status of Outdoor Play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. 5, 1 (Mar. 2004), 68--80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2004.5.1.10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Forsler, I. and Guyard, C. 2020. Screen Time and the Young Brain - A Contemporary Moral Panic? Making Time for Digital Lives: Beyond Chronotopia. A. Kaun, C. Pentzold, and C. Lohmeier, eds. Rowman & Littlefield. 25--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiniker, A., Radesky, J.S., Livingstone, S. and Blum-Ross, A. 2019. Moving Beyond "The Great Screen Time Debate" in the Design of Technology for Children. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jackson, S. 1981. Killer -- The Game of Assassination. Steve Jackson Games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarkiewicz, P., Frankhammar, M. and Fernaeus, Y. 2008. In the hands of children: exploring the use of mobile phone functionality in casual play settings. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (2008), 375--378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liedtka, J. 2015. Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 32, 6 (2015), 925--938. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lund, K., Coulton, P. and Wilson, A. 2011. Participation inequality in mobile location games. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2011), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Maniccia, D.M., Davison, K.K., Marshall, S.J., Manganello, J.A. and Dennison, B.A. 2011. A Meta-analysis of Interventions That Target Children's Screen Time for Reduction. Pediatrics. 128, 1 (Jul. 2011), e193--e210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010--2353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Montola, M. Exploring the Edge of the Magic Circle: Defining Pervasive Games. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Montola, M. 2009. Games and Pervasive Games. Pervasive Games. Elsevier. 7--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Montola, M., Stenros, J. and Waern, A. 2009. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Muñoz, S.-A. 2009. Children in the Outdoors - A Literature Review. Sustainable Development Research Centre.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pokémon GO Revenue and Usage Statistics (2020): 2017. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/pokemon-go-statistics/. Accessed: 2020-09--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reis, S. and Correia, N. 2012. Playing with the Weather. Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2012 (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), 172--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Reis, S., Romão, T. and Correia, N. 2010. Pervasive play for everyone using the weather. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE '10 (Taipei, Taiwan, 2010), 104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sallnäs Pysander, E.-L., Back, J., Waern, A. and Paget, S. 2020. The DigiPhysical Playscape. Making Smart Cities More Playable: Exploring Playable Cities. A. Nijholt, ed. Springer. 207--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Suits, B. 2005. The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Broadview Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Traditional Assassin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Waern, A., Balan, E. and Nevelsteen, K. 2012. Athletes and street acrobats: designing for play as a community value in parkour. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012), 869--878.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Walther, B.K. 2005. Atomic actions -- molecular experience: theory of pervasive gaming. Computers in Entertainment. 3, 3 (Jul. 2005), 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wetzel, R., Blum, L., Feng, F., Oppermann, L. and Straeubig, M. 2011. Tidy City: A Location-based Game for City Exploration Based on User-created Content. Proceedings of Mensch & Computer (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wood, G. 2014. Using play as a lens to bridge the physical with the digital. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Oct. 2014), 307--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wood, G., Back, J., Choi, J.H., Dylan, T. and Louw, M. 2019. Designing for Outdoor Play. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zombies, Run! https://www.zombiesrungame.com. Accessed: 2013-02--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 2013. Ingress. Niantic Labs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 2016. Pokémon GO. Niantic, Inc., The Pokémon Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Playing Cool - Winter Weather's Influence on Location-Based Gaming

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!