skip to main content
research-article

On Social Contagion in Gamification: The Power of Influencers in a Location-Based Gameful System

Published:06 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Social connections shape our behaviour because of peer pressure and social contagion. This phenomenon is amplified in online networks by particularly influential individuals: influencers. Although this concept originated in social media, recent research shows how influencers can also exist in games and affect players' long-term retention. Prolonged retention caused by influencers could benefit gameful systems, especially if the system's goal is positive behavioural change. Retention is desirable because it can aid in internalizing new habits. Therefore, we investigated retention influencers' presence within a location-based persuasive gamified system (Play&Go) and their influence on other behaviours (i.e., the pursuit of a gamification goal), via social network analysis techniques. Results show how retention influencers exist in Play&Go and how studying different influence types (which push the systems' goals) may lead to different influencer groups. Our findings emphasize the importance of social mechanics in location-based gamification and discuss the value of understanding a player community to improve game design.

References

  1. Sumayah Abu-Dawood. 2016. The cognitive and social motivational affordances of gamification in e-learning environment. In 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). IEEE, 373--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gregory Afentoulidis, Zoltán Szlávik, Jie Yang, and Alessandro Bozzon. 2018. Social gamification in enterprise crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. 135--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lars Backstrom, Ravi Kumar, Cameron Marlow, Jasmine Novak, and Andrew Tomkins. 2008. Preferential behavior in online groups. In WSDM'08 - Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 117--127. https://doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eytan Bakshy, Brian Karrer, and Lada A. Adamic. 2009. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM Press, New York, USA, 325--334. https://doi.org/10.1145/1566374.1566421Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eytan Bakshy, Winter A. Mason, Jake M. Hofman, and Duncan J. Watts. 2011. Everyone's an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings WSDM'11 . 65--74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935845Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Albert Bandura et almbox. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes , Vol. 50, 2 (1991), 248--287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin , Vol. 117, 3 (1995), 497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anita L Blanchard. 2007. Developing a sense of virtual community measure. CyberPsychology & Behavior , Vol. 10, 6 (2007), 827--830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Phillip Bonacich. 1987. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures . Amer. J. Sociology , Vol. 92, 5 (3 1987), 1170--1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Carlos Borrego, Joan Borrell, and Sergi Robles. 2019. Hey, influencer! Message delivery to social central nodes in social opportunistic networks. Computer Communications , Vol. 137 (2019), 81--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Phil E Brown and Junlan Feng. 2011. Measuring user influence on twitter using modified k-shell decomposition. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alessandro Canossa, Ahmad Azadvar, Casper Harteveld, Anders Drachen, and Sebastian Deterding. 2019. Influencers in multiplayer online shooters: Evidence of social contagion in playtime and social play. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabricio Benevenuto, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2010. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. David Crandall, Dan Cosley, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Siddharth Suri. 2008. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In Proceedings of SIGKDD'08. 160--168. https://doi.org/10.1145/1401890.1401914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nicole Crenshaw and Bonnie Nardi. 2014. What's in a name? Naming practices in online video games. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play . 67--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Laura Dabbish, Robert Kraut, and Jordan Patton. 2012. Communication and commitment in an online game team. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 879--888.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yvonne AW De Kort and Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn. 2008. People, places, and play: player experience in a socio-spatial context. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) , Vol. 6, 2 (2008), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Luis De-Marcos, Eva Garcia-Lopez, and Antonio Garcia-Cabot. 2016. On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education , Vol. 95 (2016), 99--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry , Vol. 11, 4 (2000), 227--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sebastian Deterding. 2015. The lens of intrinsic skill atoms: A method for gameful design. Human-Computer Interaction , Vol. 30, 3--4 (2015), 294--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification . Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference. ACM, 2011. (2011), 9--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nicolas Ducheneaut, Nicholas Yee, Eric Nickell, and Robert J Moore. 2006. " Alone together?" Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems . 407--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nicolas Ducheneaut, Nicholas Yee, Eric Nickell, and Robert J. Moore. 2007. The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 839--848. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240750Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511761942Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Seymour Epstein. 1998. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In Advanced personality . Springer, 211--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Linton C. Freeman. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification . Social Networks , Vol. 1, 3 (1 1978), 215--239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378--8733(78)90021--7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Catherine O Fritz, Peter E Morris, and Jennifer J Richler. 2012. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General , Vol. 141, 1 (2012), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Andrew R. Gilpin. 1993. Table for Conversion of Kendall'S Tau to Spearman'S Rho Within the Context of Measures of Magnitude of Effect for Meta-Analysis . Educational and Psychological Measurement , Vol. 53, 1 (3 1993), 87--92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mark Granovetter. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure . Amer. J. Sociology , Vol. 91 (1985), 481--510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2780199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Mark S. Granovetter. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties . Amer. J. Sociology , Vol. 78, 6 (5 1973), 1360--1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Juho Hamari and Jonna Koivisto. 2015. "Working out for likes": An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 50 (2015), 333--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. John Harris and Mark Hancock. 2019. To asymmetry and beyond! Improving social connectedness by increasing designed interdependence in cooperative play. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lobna Hassan, Antonio Dias, and Juho Hamari. 2019. How motivational feedback increases user's benefits and continued use: A study on gamification, quantified-self and social networking. International Journal of Information Management , Vol. 46 (2019), 151--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kai Huotari and Juho Hamari. 2017. A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets , Vol. 27, 1 (2017), 21--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Katja Hutter, Johann Füller, Julia Hautz, Volker Bilgram, and Kurt Matzler. 2015. Machiavellianism or morality: which behavior pays off in online innovation contests? Journal of management information systems , Vol. 32, 3 (2015), 197--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Katherine Isbister. 2010. Enabling social play: A framework for design and evaluation. In Evaluating user experience in games . Springer, 11--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2019. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management , Vol. 45 (2019), 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Markus Krause, Marc Mogalle, Henning Pohl, and Joseph Jay Williams. 2015. A playful game changer: Fostering student retention in online education with social gamification. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Gregory W Kurtzman, Susan C Day, Dylan S Small, Marta Lynch, Jingsan Zhu, Wenli Wang, Charles AL Rareshide, and Mitesh S Patel. 2018. Social incentives and gamification to promote weight loss: the LOSE IT randomized, controlled trial. Journal of general internal medicine , Vol. 33, 10 (2018), 1669--1675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Presence, explicated. Communication theory , Vol. 14, 1 (2004), 27--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Nikoletta Zampeta Legaki, Nannan Xi, Juho Hamari, and Vassilios Assimakopoulos. 2019. Gamification of The Future: An Experiment on Gamifying Education of Forecasting .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Enrica Loria. 2019. A Framework to Infer Player Experience and Inform Customized Content Generation in Gameful Systems. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts . 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Enrica Loria, Johanna Pirker, Anders Drachen, and Annapaola Marconi. 2020. Do Influencers Influence? - Analyzing Players' Activity in an Online Multiplayer Game. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Regan L. Mandryk, Julian Frommel, Ashley Armstrong, and Daniel Johnson. 2020. How Passion for Playing World of Warcraft Predicts In-Game Social Capital, Loneliness, and Wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology , Vol. 11 (2020), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Annapaola Marconi and Enrica Loria. 2020. Sustainable Mobility in Smart Cities: The Key Role of Gamified Motivational Systems for Citizens' Engagement and Behavior Change. In Implications of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in Urban and Rural Environments: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global, 211--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Winter Mason and Aaron Clauset. 2013. Friends ftw! friendship and competition in halo: Reach. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 375--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Benedikt Morschheuser, Marc Riar, Juho Hamari, and Alexander Maedche. 2017. How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game. Computers in human behavior , Vol. 77 (2017), 169--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Lennart E. Nacke and Sebastian Deterding. 2017. The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 71 (2017), 450 -- 454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.062Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Lennart E Nacke, Matthias Klauser, and Paul Prescod. 2014. Social player analytics in a Facebook health game. KHCI (2014), 180--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. M. E.J. Newman. 2005. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks . Social Networks , Vol. 27, 1 (1 2005), 39--54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Hyunsoo Park and Kyung Joong Kim. 2015. Social network analysis of high-level players in multiplayer online battle arena game. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8852. Springer Verlag, 223--226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--15168--7_28Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Johanna Pirker, André Rattinger, Anders Drachen, and Rafet Sifa. 2018. Analyzing player networks in Destiny . Entertainment Computing , Vol. 25 (3 2018), 71--83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.12.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Andrew K Przybylski, C Scott Rigby, and Richard M Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of general psychology , Vol. 14, 2 (2010), 154--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. André Rattinger, Günter Wallner, Anders Drachen, Johanna Pirker, and Rafet Sifa. 2016. Integrating and inspecting combined behavioral profiling and social network models in Destiny. In LNCS, Vol. 9926. Springer Verlag, 77--89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--46100--7_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Lu'is Filipe Rodrigues, Ab'ilio Oliveira, and Carlos J Costa. 2016. Playing seriously--How gamification and social cues influence bank customers to use gamified e-business applications. Computers in human behavior , Vol. 63 (2016), 392--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan Rogers. 2017. The motivational pull of video game feedback, rules, and social interaction: Another self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 73 (2017), 446--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Michael Ruckenstein. 1991. Homo ludens: a study of the play element in culture. Leisure and Ethics , Vol. 237 (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion , Vol. 30, 4 (2006), 344--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Michael Helfried Schiller, Gunter Wallner, Christopher Schinnerl, Alexander Monte Calvo, Johanna Pirker, Rafet Sifa, and Anders Drachen. 2018. Inside the Group: Investigating Social Structures in Player Groups and Their Influence on Activity . IEEE Transactions on Games (7 2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tg.2018.2858024Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. John Scott. 1988. Social network analysis. 227 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Jerry Scripps, Pang Ning Tan, and Abdol Hossein Esfahanian. 2009. Measuring the effects of preprocessing decisions and network forces in dynamic network analysis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD'09 . 747--755. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Magy Seif El-Nasr, Anders Drachen, and Alessandro Canossa. 2013. Introduction . In Game Analytics . Springer London, 3--12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4471--4769--5_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Magy Seif El-Nasr and Erica Kleinman. 2020. Data-Driven Game Development: Ethical Considerations. In International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiaolin Shi, Jun Zhu, Rui Cai, and Lei Zhang. 2009. User grouping behavior in online forums. In Proceedings of SIGKDD '09 . ACM Press, New York, USA, 777--785. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Karthik Subbian, Charu C. Aggarwal, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2016. Querying and tracking influencers in social streams. In WSDM 2016 - Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining . Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, New York, USA, 493--502. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Ching-I Teng. 2017. Impact of avatar identification on online gamer loyalty: Perspectives of social identity and social capital theories. International Journal of Information Management , Vol. 37, 6 (2017), 601--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Sarah-Kristin Thiel. 2016. Reward-based vs. social gamification: Exploring effectiveness of gamefulness in public participation. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Sho Tsugawa and Kazuma Kimura. 2018. Identifying influencers from sampled social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , Vol. 507 (2018), 294--303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Amy Voida, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. The individual and the group in console gaming. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 371--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Günter Wallner, Christopher Schinnerl, Michael Helfried Schiller, Alexander Monte Calvo, Johanna Pirker, Rafet Sifa, and Anders Drachen. 2019. Beyond the individual: Understanding social structures of an online player matchmaking website . Entertainment Computing , Vol. 30 (5 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.01.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Nannan Xi and Juho Hamari. 2019. Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management , Vol. 46 (2019), 210--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On Social Contagion in Gamification: The Power of Influencers in a Location-Based Gameful System

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!