skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

A Socio-Ecological Approach to Activity Games for Girls

Published:06 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Most American girls are not meeting physical activity guidelines, placing them at risk for adverse health consequences. In response, our team developed Frolic, an evidence-based mobile application to address this problem through play. Frolic uses a socio-ecological framework and behavioral design principles to address barriers and social norms that are specific to girls. Parents are leveraged as important sources of support and motivation, with key design elements to help girls initiate play, adapt to the space, and play independently. The current paper contributes design principles for creating socio-ecological activity games for girls. In addition, we contribute the design of Frolic itself, a game constructed according to these guidelines, and outline future intervention studies with the app itself. Finally, we provide the perspectives of professional game designers and health experts on our work and interpretative insights for game designers and researchers who hope to work in this space.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

V5chip246VF.mp4

Supplemental video

References

  1. Donald Athene. 2013. Reinforcing Gender Stereotypes: How Our Schools Narrow Children's Choices. The Guardian , Vol. 9 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Susan H Babey, Joelle Wolstein, and Allison L Diamant. 2016. Adolescent physical activity: role of school support, role models, and social participation in racial and income disparities. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert Bandura and David C McClelland. 1977. Social learning theory . Vol. 1. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Katherine W Bauer, Melissa C Nelson, Kerri N Boutelle, and Dianne Neumark-Sztainer. 2008. Parental influences on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behavior: longitudinal findings from Project EAT-II. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Adrian E Bauman, James F Sallis, David A Dzewaltowski, and Neville Owen. 2002. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christine M Beckman and Melissa Mazmanian. 2020. Dreams of the overworked: Living, working, and parenting in the digital age .Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jen Beeston, Christopher Power, Paul Cairns, and Mark Barlet. 2018. Characteristics and Motivations of Players with Disabilities in Digital Games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11352 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shlomo Berkovsky, Mac Coombe, Jill Freyne, Dipak Bhandari, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2010. Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Martha Bleeker, Nicholas Beyler, Susanne James-Burdumy, and Jane Fortson. 2015. The impact of playworks on boys' and girls' physical activity during recess. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank W Booth, Christian K Roberts, and Matthew J Laye. 2011. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Soufiane Boufous, Caroline Finch, and Adrian Bauman. 2004. Parental safety concerns--a barrier to sport and physical activity in children?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karolina Boxberger and Anne Kerstin Reimers. 2019. Parental correlates of outdoor play in boys and girls aged 0 to 12-A systematic review. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D Ellen Boyle, Nancy L Marshall, and Wendy W Robeson. 2003. Gender at play: Fourth-grade girls and boys on the playground. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maria J Camacho-Minano, Nicole M LaVoi, and Daheia J Barr-Anderson. 2011. Interventions to promote physical activity among young and adolescent girls: a systematic review. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicole Cameron and Louise Humbert. 2020. "Strong girls' in physical education: opportunities for social justice education. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anna Carlile. 2020. The experiences of transgender and non-binary children and young people and their parents in healthcare settings in England, UK: Interviews with members of a family support group. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alison Carver, Anna Timperio, Kylie Hesketh, and David Crawford. 2010. Are children and adolescents less active if parents restrict their physical activity and active transport due to perceived risk?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Justine Cassell. 1998. Chess For Girls? Feminism and Computer Games Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Justine Cassell and Meg Cramer. 2008. High tech or high risk: Moral panics about girls online .MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shira Chess. 2017. Ready player two: Women gamers and designed identity .U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Isabel Clemente. 2013. Barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity for children with disabilities. A Systematic Literature Review. Jonkoping Univeristy. School of Education And Comunication (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ashley Colley, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Allen Yilun Lin, Donald Degraen, Benjamin Fischman, Jonna H"akkil"a, Kate Kuehl, Valentina Nisi, Nuno Jardim Nunes, Nina Wenig, et almbox. 2017. The geography of Pokémon GO: beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Méabh Corr, Jennifer McSharry, and Elaine M Murtagh. 2019. Adolescent girls' perceptions of physical activity: A systematic review of qualitative studies. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Greg Costikyan. 2013. Uncertainty in games .Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sabrina Culyba. 2018. The Transformational Framework: A process tool for the development of Transformational games .Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Amanda J Daley. 2009. Can exergaming contribute to improving physical activity levels and health outcomes in children?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirsten Krahnstoever Davison, Tanja M Cutting, and Leann L Birch. 2003. Parents' activity-related parenting practices predict girls' physical activity. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Laura MS Dekkers, Brenda RJ Jansen, Elske Salemink, and Hilde M Huizenga. 2017. Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale: Measurement invariance among adolescent boys and girls and relationships with anxiety and risk taking. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Laurie A Dinnebeil, Mary Boat, and Youlmi Bae. 2013. Integrating principles of universal design into the early childhood curriculum. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayley K Dohnt and Marika Tiggemann. 2006. Body image concerns in young girls: The role of peers and media prior to adolescence. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenna Drenten, Robert L Harrison, and Nicholas J Pendarvis. 2019. Video gaming as a gendered pursuit. In Handbook of Research on Gender and Marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Samuel C Dumith, Denise P Gigante, Marlos R Domingues, and Harold W Kohl III. 2011. Physical activity change during adolescence: a systematic review and a pooled analysis. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Cordelia Fine and Emma Rush. 2018. "Why does all the girls have to buy pink stuff?" The ethics and science of the gendered toy marketing debate. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zan Gao, Tao Zhang, and David Stodden. 2013. Children's physical activity levels and psychological correlates in interactive dance versus aerobic dance. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott D Gest, Alice J Davidson, Kelly L Rulison, James Moody, and Janet A Welsh. 2007. Features of groups and status hierarchies in girls' and boys' early adolescent peer networks. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Regina Guthold, Melanie J Cowan, Christine S Autenrieth, Laura Kann, and Leanne M Riley. 2010. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among schoolchildren: a 34-country comparison. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kylie Hesketh, Elizabeth Waters, J Green, L Salmon, and J Williams. 2005. Healthy eating, activity and obesity prevention: a qualitative study of parent and child perceptions in Australia. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kathryn R Hesketh, Rajalakshmi Lakshman, and Esther MF van Sluijs. 2017. Barriers and facilitators to young children's physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative literature. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Alexis Hiniker, Sarita Y Schoenebeck, and Julie A Kientz. 2016a. Not at the dinner table: Parents' and children's perspectives on family technology rules. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Alexis Hiniker, Hyewon Suh, Sabina Cao, and Julie A Kientz. 2016b. Screen time tantrums: how families manage screen media experiences for toddlers and preschoolers. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tad Hirsch, Catherine Lim, and Jennifer J Otten. 2016. What's for lunch? A socio-ecological approach to childcare nutrition. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Mary Jo Kane, Nicole LaVoi, Diane Wiese-Bjornstal, Margaret Duncan, Jeanne Nichols, Kelley Pettee, and Barbara Ainsworth. 2007. The 2007 Tucker center research report: Developing physically active girls: An evidence-based multidisciplinary approach. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. T. Kashdan, M. Gallagher, P. Silvia, Beate P. Winterstein, W. Breen, Daniel Terhar, and Michael F. Steger. 2009. The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Pamela M. Kato. 2010. Video Games in Health Care: Closing the Gap. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Peter T Katzmarzyk, Kara D Denstel, Kim Beals, Jordan Carlson, Scott E Crouter, Thomas L McKenzie, Russell R Pate, Susan B Sisson, Amanda E Staiano, Heidi Stanish, et almbox. 2018. Results from the United States 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Christina Kelley, Lauren Wilcox, Wendy Ng, Jade Schiffer, and Jessica Hammer. 2017. Design features in games for health: disciplinary and interdisciplinary expert perspectives. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Madina Khamzina, Kaustubh V Parab, Ruopeng An, Tiffany Bullard, and Diana S Grigsby-Toussaint. 2020. Impact of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Heather Kitzman-Ulrich, Dawn K Wilson, Sara M St George, Hannah Lawman, Michelle Segal, and Amanda Fairchild. 2010. The integration of a family systems approach for understanding youth obesity, physical activity, and dietary programs. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Miroslaw Kofta. 1993. Uncertainty, mental models, and learned helplessness: An anatomy of control loss. In Control motivation and social cognition. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Harold W Kohl III, Heather D Cook, et almbox. 2013. Educating the student body: Taking physical activity and physical education to school .National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Annette Lareau. 2011. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life .Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lauri Lehtonen, Maximus D Kaos, Raine Kajastila, Leo Holsti, Janne Karsisto, Sami Pekkola, Joni V"ah"am"aki, Lassi Vapaakallio, and Perttu H"am"al"ainen. 2019. Movement Empowerment in a Multiplayer Mixed-Reality Trampoline Game. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Anna-Karin Lindqvist, Darla Castelli, Josef Hallberg, and Stina Rutberg. 2018. The praise and price of pokemon GO: A qualitative study of children's and parents' experiences. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Natalia Liszewska, Urte Scholz, Theda Radtke, Karolina Horodyska, Michal Liszewski, and Aleksandra Luszczynska. 2018. Association between children's physical activity and parental practices enhancing children's physical activity: The moderating effects of children's BMI z-score. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Elizabeth J Lyons, Deborah F Tate, Dianne S Ward, J Michael Bowling, Kurt M Ribisl, and Sriram Kalyararaman. 2011. Energy expenditure and enjoyment during video game play: differences by game type. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Ann E Maloney, T Carter Bethea, Kristine S Kelsey, Julie T Marks, Sadye Paez, Angela M Rosenberg, Diane J Catellier, Robert M Hamer, and Linmarie Sikich. 2008. A pilot of a video game (DDR) to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary screen time. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Carmen Mangiron. 2012. Exploring new paths towards game accessibility. In Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility at the Crossroads. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Christopher M Marlow. 2009. Games & learning in landscape architecture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Louise C Mâsse, Teresia M O'Connor, Andrew W Tu, Sheryl O Hughes, Mark R Beauchamp, and Tom Baranowski. 2017. Conceptualizing physical activity parenting practices using expert informed concept mapping analysis. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Kerry R McGannon, Rebecca Busanich, Chad SG Witcher, and Robert J Schinke. 2014. A social ecological exploration of physical activity influences among rural men and women across life stages. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Maureen T Mcguire, Peter J Hannan, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Nicole H Falkner Cossrow, and Mary Story. 2002. Parental correlates of physical activity in a racially/ethnically diverse adolescent sample. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Kenneth R McLeroy, Daniel Bibeau, Allan Steckler, and Karen Glanz. 1988. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Marjo Anette Kristiina Meht"al"a , Arja Kaarina S"a"akslahti, Mari Elina Inkinen, and Marita Eija Helena Poskiparta. 2014. A socio-ecological approach to physical activity interventions in childcare: a systematic review. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Marianne Meier. 2015. The value of female sporting role models. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas W Milburn and Robert S Billings. 1976. Decision-making perspectives from psychology: Dealing with risk and uncertainty. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Sean A Munson and Sunny Consolvo. 2012. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. In 2012 6th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (pervasivehealth) and workshops. .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Margaret K Nelson. 2010. Parenting out of control: Anxious parents in uncertain times .NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Katherine W Bauer, Sarah Friend, Peter J Hannan, Mary Story, and Jerica M Berge. 2010. Family weight talk and dieting: how much do they matter for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors in adolescent girls?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Why Are Rooie Rules Nice. [n.d.]. Beyond the Rules of the Game: Why Are Rooie Rules Nice? ( [n.,d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Mark Nielsen, Jessica Cucchiaro, and Jumana Mohamedally. 2012. When the transmission of culture is child's play. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Elinor Ochs and Tamar Kremer-Sadlik. 2013. Fast-forward family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America .Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Amanda Ochsner. 2015. Lessons learned with girls, games, and design. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Justen O'connor, Laura Alfrey, and Phillip Payne. 2012. Beyond games and sports: A socio-ecological approach to physical education. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Carl J Palad, Siddharth Yarlagadda, and Fatima Cody Stanford. 2019. Weight stigma and its impact on paediatric care. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Cody Phillips, Daniel Johnson, Madison Klarkowski, Melanie Jade White, and Leanne Hides. 2018. The impact of rewards and trait reward responsiveness on player motivation. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Haris Pojskic and Bahareh Eslami. 2018. Relationship between obesity, physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness levels in children and adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina: an analysis of gender differences. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. C Roberts. 2012. Most 10 year-olds have been on a diet: study; 53 percent of 13-year-old girls have issues with how their bodies look. Daily news (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. J. Roemmich, MS MayaJLambiase, Thomas F. McCarthy, D. Feda, and Karl F Kozlowski. 2012. Autonomy supportive environments and mastery as basic factors to motivate physical activity in children: a controlled laboratory study. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Taylor Rose, Mary Barker, Chandni Maria Jacob, Leanne Morrison, Wendy Lawrence, Sofia Strömmer, Christina Vogel, Kathryn Woods-Townsend, David Farrell, Hazel Inskip, et almbox. 2017. A systematic review of digital interventions for improving the diet and physical activity behaviors of adolescents. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Pedro F Saint-Maurice, Youngwon Kim, Gregory J Welk, and Glenn A Gaesser. 2016. Kids are not little adults: what MET threshold captures sedentary behavior in children?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Jesse Schell. 2008. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses .CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Dorothy L Schmalz and Deborah L Kerstetter. 2006. Girlie girls and manly men: chidren's stigma consciousness of gender in sports and physical activities. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Ai Shibata, Koichiro Oka, Kazuhiro Harada, Yoshio Nakamura, and Isao Muraoka. 2009. Psychological, social, and environmental factors to meeting physical activity recommendations among Japanese adults. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Mary M Smyth and Heather I Anderson. 2000. Coping with clumsiness in the school playground: Social and physical play in children with coordination impairments. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Pooja S Tandon, Chuan Zhou, James F Sallis, Kelli L Cain, Lawrence D Frank, and Brian E Saelens. 2012. Home environment relationships with children's physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Tina L Taylor. 2009. Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture .Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Wendell C Taylor, Antronette K Yancey, Joanne Leslie, Nancy G Murray, Sharon S Cummings, Suzanne A Sharkey, Christiane Wert, Jeanette James, Octavia Miles, and William J McCarthy. 2000. Physical activity among African American and Latino middle school girls: consistent beliefs, expectations, and experiences across two sites. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Rohan M Telford, Richard D Telford, Lisa S Olive, Thomas Cochrane, and Rachel Davey. 2016. Why are girls less physically active than boys? Findings from the LOOK longitudinal study. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Alexandra To, Elaine Fath, Eda Zhang, Safinah Ali, Catherine Kildunne, Anny Fan, Jessica Hammer, and Geoff Kaufman. 2016. Tandem Transformational Game Design: A Game Design Process Case Study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Joanne Trigwell, Rebecca Catherine Murphy, Nigel Timothy Cable, Gareth Stratton, and Paula Mary Watson. 2015. Parental views of children's physical activity: a qualitative study with parents from multi-ethnic backgrounds living in England. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. H Shellae Versey. 2014. Centering perspectives on Black women, hair politics, and physical activity. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Jill Vialet. 2008. The elephant on the playground. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Maihan B Vu, Dale Murrie, Vivian Gonzalez, and Jared B Jobe. 2006. Listening to girls and boys talk about girls' physical activity behaviors. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Sarah Whitehead and Stuart Biddle. 2008. Adolescent girls' perceptions of physical activity: A focus group study. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Dean Wilcox. 2020. Drama and Digital Arts Cultures. By David Cameron, Michael Anderson and Rebecca Wotzko. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2017. Pp. 332.pounds 75/$102 Hb;pounds 28.99/$39.95 Pb..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Kate Wilcox. 2012. The girlification of Lego. https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/7671177/The-girlification-of-LegoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Atilla Wohllebe. 2020. Consumer Acceptance of App Push Notifications: Systematic Review on the Influence of Frequency. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Fiona Y Wong. 2017. Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: a cross-sectional study. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Chunyan Yu, Xiayun Zuo, Robert W Blum, Deborah L Tolman, Anna Kågesten, Kristin Mmari, Sara De Meyer, Kristien Michielsen, Sharmistha Basu, Rajib Acharya, et almbox. 2017. Marching to a different drummer: A cross-cultural comparison of young adolescents who challenge gender norms. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Hope E Yungblut, Robert J Schinke, and Kerry R McGannon. 2012. Views of adolescent female youth on physical activity during early adolescence. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Socio-Ecological Approach to Activity Games for Girls

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!