skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Data Subjects' Conceptualizations of and Attitudes Toward Automatic Emotion Recognition-Enabled Wellbeing Interventions on Social Media

Published:18 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Automatic emotion recognition (ER)-enabled wellbeing interventions use ER algorithms to infer the emotions of a data subject (i.e., a person about whom data is collected or processed to enable ER) based on data generated from their online interactions, such as social media activity, and intervene accordingly. The potential commercial applications of this technology are widely acknowledged, particularly in the context of social media. Yet, little is known about data subjects' conceptualizations of and attitudes toward automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions. To address this gap, we interviewed 13 US adult social media data subjects regarding social media-based automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions. We found that participants' attitudes toward automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions were predominantly negative. Negative attitudes were largely shaped by how participants compared their conceptualizations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to the humans that traditionally deliver wellbeing support. Comparisons between AI and human wellbeing interventions were based upon human attributes participants doubted AI could hold: 1) helpfulness and authentic care; 2) personal and professional expertise; 3) morality; and 4) benevolence through shared humanity. In some cases, participants' attitudes toward automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions shifted when participants conceptualized automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions' impact on others, rather than themselves. Though with reluctance, a minority of participants held more positive attitudes toward their conceptualizations of automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions, citing their potential to benefit others: 1) by supporting academic research; 2) by increasing access to wellbeing support; and 3) through egregious harm prevention. However, most participants anticipated harms associated with their conceptualizations of automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions for others, such as re-traumatization, the spread of inaccurate health information, inappropriate surveillance, and interventions informed by inaccurate predictions. Lastly, while participants had qualms about automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions, we identified three development and delivery qualities of automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions upon which their attitudes toward them depended: 1) accuracy; 2) contextual sensitivity; and 3) positive outcome. Our study is not motivated to make normative statements about whether or how automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions should exist, but to center voices of the data subjects affected by this technology. We argue for the inclusion of data subjects in the development of requirements for ethical and trustworthy ER applications. To that end, we discuss ethical, social, and policy implications of our findings, suggesting that automatic ER-enabled wellbeing interventions imagined by participants are incompatible with aims to promote trustworthy, socially aware, and responsible AI technologies in the current practical and regulatory landscape in the US.

References

  1. Regulation (EU) 2016/679. 2016. Data Protection Act 2018, c. 12. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=ENGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hessa Albalooshi, Shahram Rahmanian, and Rahul Venkatesh Kumar. 2018. EmotionX-SmartDubai_NLP: Detecting User Emotions In Social Media Text. In [email protected].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Talayeh Aledavood, Ana Maria Triana Hoyos, Tuomas Alakörkkö, Kimmo Kaski, Jari Saramäki, Erkki Isometsä, and Richard K. Darst. 2017. Data Collection for Mental Health Studies Through Digital Platforms: Requirements and Design of a Prototype. JMIR research protocols, Vol. 6, 6 (June 2017), e110. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6919Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tawfiq Ammari, Jofish Kaye, Janice Y. Tsai, and Frank Bentley. 2019. Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 26, 3 (April 2019), 17:1--17:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tawfiq Ammari, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. [n.d.]. Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs. ( [n.,d.]), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nazanin Andalibi. 2017. Self-disclosure and Response Behaviors in Socially Stigmatized Contexts on Social Media: The Case of Miscarriage. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248--253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nazanin Andalibi. 2019. What happens after disclosing stigmatized experiences on identified social media: Individual, dyadic, and social/network outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nazanin Andalibi. 2020. Disclosure, Privacy, and Stigma on Social Media: Examining Non-Disclosure of Distressing Experiences. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 27, 3, Article 18 (May 2020), 43 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nazanin Andalibi and Justin Buss. 2020. The Human in Emotion Recognition on Social Media: Attitudes, Outcomes, Risks. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018a. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018b. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, 6 (Dec. 2018), 31:1--31:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2018a. Social Support, Reciprocity, and Anonymity in Responses to Sexual Abuse Disclosures on Social Media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, 5 (Oct. 2018), 28:1--28:35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3906--3918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nazanin Andalibi, Margaret E. Morris, and Andrea Forte. 2018b. Testing Waters, Sending Clues: Indirect Disclosures of Socially Stigmatized Experiences on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 19:1--19:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nazanin Andalibi, Pinar Ozturk, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: the case of# depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1485--1500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Florian Arendt, Mario Haim, and Sebastian Scherr. 2020. Investigating Google's suicide-prevention efforts in celebrity suicides using agent-based testing: A cross-national study in four European countries. Social Science & Medicine (Feb. 2020), 112692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112692Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Louise Barkhuus. 2012. The mismeasurement of privacy: using contextual integrity to reconsider privacy in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 367--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ian Barnett and John Torous. 2019. Ethics, Transparency, and Public Health at the Intersection of Innovation and Facebook's Suicide Prevention Efforts. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 170, 8 (Feb. 2019), 565--566. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0366 Publisher: American College of Physicians.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Benjamin Goggin. 2019. Inside Facebook's suicide algorithm: Here's how the company uses artificial intelligence to predict your mental state from your posts. Business Insider (June 2019). https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-is-using-ai-to-try-to-predict-if-youre-suicidal-2018--12 Journal Abbreviation: Business Insider Publisher: Insider, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Adrian Benton, Glen Coppersmith, and Mark Dredze. 2017. Ethical Research Protocols for Social Media Health Research. In Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain, 94--102. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17--1612Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alan L. Berman and Gregory Carter. [n.d.]. Technological Advances and the Future of Suicide Prevention: Ethical, Legal, and Empirical Challenges. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Vol. n/a, n/a ( [n.,d.]). https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12610 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/sltb.12610.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dinesh Bhugra, Allan Tasman, Soumitra Pathare, Stefan Priebe, Shubulade Smith, John Torous, Melissa R Arbuckle, Alex Langford, Renato D Alarcón, Helen Fung Kum Chiu, Michael B First, Jerald Kay, Charlene Sunkel, Anita Thapar, Pichet Udomratn, Florence K Baingana, Dévora Kestel, Roger Man Kin Ng, Anita Patel, Livia De Picker, Kwame Julius McKenzie, Driss Moussaoui, Matt Muijen, Peter Bartlett, Sophie Davison, Tim Exworthy, Nasser Loza, Diana Rose, Julio Torales, Mark Brown, Helen Christensen, Joseph Firth, Matcheri Keshavan, Ang Li, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, Til Wykes, Hussien Elkholy, Gurvinder Kalra, Kate F Lovett, Michael J Travis, and Antonio Ventriglio. 2017. The WPA- Lancet Psychiatry Commission on the Future of Psychiatry. The Lancet Psychiatry, Vol. 4, 10 (Oct. 2017), 775--818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30333--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sam Biddle. 2020. Police Surveilled George Floyd Protests With Help From Twitter-Affiliated Startup Dataminr. https://theintercept.com/2020/07/09/twitter-dataminr-police-spy-surveillance-black-lives-matter-protests/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael L. Birnbaum, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Asra F. Rizvi, Munmun De Choudhury, and John M. Kane. 2017. A Collaborative Approach to Identifying Social Media Markers of Schizophrenia by Employing Machine Learning and Clinical Appraisals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19, 8 (2017), e289. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jacob Bor, Atheendar S Venkataramani, David R Williams, and Alexander C Tsai. 2018. Police killings and their spillover effects on the mental health of black Americans: a population-based, quasi-experimental study. The Lancet, Vol. 392, 10144 (2018), 302--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Gordon H. Bower. 1981. Mood and memory. American Psychologist, Vol. 36, 2 (1981), 129--148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn S. Dombrowski, Anita M. Gilbert, Nafiri Kusumakaulika, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. Stewarding a legacy: responsibilities and relationships in the management of post-mortem data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4157--4166. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557059Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Finn Brunton and Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Obfuscation: a user's guide for privacy and protest .The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England. OCLC: 927953450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Calvo and L. Nummenmaa. 2007. Processing of unattended emotional visual scenes. Journal of experimental psychology. General (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0096--3445.136.3.347Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rafael A. Calvo and Sidney D'Mello. 2010. Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Vol. 1, 1 (Jan. 2010), 18--37. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. M. Carroll. 2000. Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 13, 1 (Sept. 2000), 43--60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953--5438(00)00023-0 Publisher: Oxford Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Alessia Celeghin, Matteo Diano, Arianna Bagnis, Marco Viola, and Marco Tamietto. 2017. Basic Emotions in Human Neuroscience: Neuroimaging and Beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8 (Aug. 2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01432Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Electronic Privacy Information Center. [n.d.]. EPIC - In re HireVue. https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/hirevue/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevie Chancellor, Eric P. S. Baumer, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019 a. Who is the "Human" in Human-Centered Machine Learning: The Case of Predicting Mental Health from Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 147:1--147:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Stevie Chancellor, Michael L. Birnbaum, Eric D. Caine, Vincent M. B. Silenzio, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019 b. A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - FAT* '19. ACM Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, 79--88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287587Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Stevie Chancellor, Yannis Kalantidis, Jessica A. Pater, Munmun De Choudhury, and David A. Shamma. 2017. Multimodal Classification of Moderated Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3213--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. # thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1201--1213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Helen Christensen, Philip J. Batterham, and Bridianne O'Dea. 2014. E-Health Interventions for Suicide Prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 11, 8 (Aug. 2014), 8193--8212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110808193 Number: 8 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Sven-Åke. Christianson. 1992. The Handbook of emotion and memory : research and theory. Number xix, 507 p. :. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. :. Publication Title: The Handbook of emotion and memory : research and theory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mike Conway and Daniel O'Connor. 2016. Social media, big data, and mental health: current advances and ethical implications. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 9 (June 2016), 77--82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Glen Coppersmith, Mark Dredze, and Craig Harman. 2014. Quantifying Mental Health Signals in Twitter. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 51--60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14--3207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Glen A Coppersmith, Craig T Harman, and Mark H Dredze. [n.d.]. Measuring Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Twitter. ( [n.,d.]), 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaitlin L Costello and Diana Floegel. 2020. "Predictive ads are not doctors": Mental health tracking and technology companies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, 1 (2020), e250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Nick Couldry and Ulises Ali Mejias. 2019. The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism .Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Kate Crawford, Roel Dobbe, Theodora Dryer, Genevieve Fried, Ben Green, Elizabeth Kaziunas, Amba Kak, Varoon Mathur, Erin McElroy, Andrea Nill Sánchez, Deborah Raji, Joy Lisi Rankin, Rashida Richardson, Jason Schultz, Sarah Myers West, and Meredith Whittaker. [n.d.]. AI Now 2019 Report. Technical Report. 100 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Charles Darwin, 1809--1882. 1872. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Number vi, 374, 4 p., 7 leaves of plates (3 fold.) (4 p. at end advertisements) :. J. Murray, London :. Publication Title: The expression of the emotions in man and animals.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Deborah Sarah. David and Robert. Brannon. 1976. The Forty-nine percent majority : the male sex role. Number xiv, 338 p. ;. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Mass. :. Publication Title: The Forty-nine percent majority : the male sex role.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Michael Gamon. [n.d.] a. Not All Moods are Created Equal! Exploring Human Emotional States in Social Media. ( [n.,d.]), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, Eric J. Horvitz, and Aaron Hoff. 2014. Characterizing and predicting postpartum depression from shared facebook data. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 626--638. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531675Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting Depression via Social Media. AAAI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/predicting-depression-via-social-media/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Munmun De Choudhury, Choudhury Michael, and Gamon Scott Counts. [n.d.] b. Happy, Nervous or Surprised? Classification of Human Affective States in Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jose van Dijck. 2014. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 12, 2 (May 2014), 197--208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. J. Doyle, N. Caprani, and R. Bond. 2015. Older adults' attitudes to self-management of health and wellness through smart home data. In 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth). 129--136. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259279Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. J. A. Easterbrook. 1959. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, Vol. 66, 3 (May 1959), 183--201. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047707 Publisher: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Laura Eggertson. 2015. Social media embraces suicide prevention. CMAJ, Vol. 187, 11 (Aug. 2015), E333--E333. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109--5104 Publisher: CMAJ Section: News.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Paul. Ekman. 2003. Emotions revealed : recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life 1st ed. ed.). Number xvii, 267 p. :. Times Books, New York :. Publication Title: Emotions revealed : recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Paul Ekman. 2009. Darwin's contributions to our understanding of emotional expressions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 364, 1535 (Dec. 2009), 3449--3451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Paul. Ekman and Wallace V. Friesen. 2003. Unmasking the face : a guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Number xii, 212 p. :. Malor Books, Cambridge, MA :. Publication Title: Unmasking the face : a guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2007.00367.x _eprint: https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/12/4/1143/22316419/jjcmcom1143.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Gunther Eysenbach. 2009. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 11, 1 (2009), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157 Company: Journal of Medical Internet Research Distributor: Journal of Medical Internet Research Institution: Journal of Medical Internet Research Label: Journal of Medical Internet Research Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2018a. Beyond the Coded Gaze: Analyzing Expression of Mental Health and Illness on Instagram. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW, Article 51 (Nov. 2018), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2018b. Beyond the Coded Gaze: Analyzing Expression of Mental Health and Illness on Instagram. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2019 a. Everyday Experiences: Small Stories and Mental Illness on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2019 b. Everyday experiences: Small stories and mental illness on Instagram. In CHI 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Jessica L. Feuston, Alex S. Taylor, and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content Moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Casey Fiesler, Cliff Lampe, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. Reality and Perception of Copyright Terms of Service for Online Content Creation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1450--1461. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819931Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. [n.d.]. "Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social MediaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Society, Vol. 4, 1 ( [n.,d.]). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Janet Finch. 1987. THE VIGNETTE TECHNIQUE IN SURVEY RESEARCH. Sociology, Vol. 21, 1 (1987), 105--114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42854387 Publisher: Sage Publications, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. FINDER. 2020. Emotion recognition technology in the financial sector -- Curse or blessing? https://thefinderproject.eu/2020/01/07/emotion-recognition-technology-in-the-financial-sector-curse-or-blessing/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Elizabeth Ford, Keegan Curlewis, Akkapon Wongkoblap, and Vasa Curcin. 2019. Public Opinions on Using Social Media Content to Identify Users With Depression and Target Mental Health Care Advertising: Mixed Methods Survey. JMIR Mental Health, Vol. 6, 11 (2019), e12942. https://doi.org/10.2196/12942 Company: JMIR Mental Health Distributor: JMIR Mental Health Institution: JMIR Mental Health Label: JMIR Mental Health Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Brett M. Frischmann and Evan Selinger. 2018. Re-engineering humanity .Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot (Eds.). The MIT Press, 167--194. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Susan E Gindin. 2009. Nobody reads your privacy policy or online contract: Lessons learned and questions raised by the FTC's action against Sears. Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., Vol. 8 (2009), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Tasha Glenn and Scott Monteith. 2014. Privacy in the Digital World: Medical and Health Data Outside of HIPAA Protections. Current Psychiatry Reports, Vol. 16, 11 (Sept. 2014), 494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0494--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Norberto Nuno Gomes de Andrade, Dave Pawson, Dan Muriello, Lizzy Donahue, and Jennifer Guadagno. 2018. Ethics and Artificial Intelligence: Suicide Prevention on Facebook. Philosophy & technology, Vol. 31, 4 (2018), 669--684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0336-0 Place: Dordrecht Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. John F. Gunn III and David Lester. 2013. Using google searches on the internet to monitor suicidal behavior. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 148, 2 (June 2013), 411--412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Mario Haim, Florian Arendt, and Sebastian Scherr. 2017. Abyss or Shelter? On the Relevance of Web Search Engines' Search Results When People Google for Suicide. Health Communication, Vol. 32, 2 (Feb. 2017), 253--258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1113484 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1113484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1176--1190. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Blake Hallinan, Jed R Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2020. Unexpected expectations: Public reaction to the Facebook emotional contagion study. New Media & Society, Vol. 22, 6 (June 2020), 1076--1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819876944 Publisher: SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism? The Social Implications of Embedded Gender Recognition Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Alex Hanna and Meredith Whittaker. [n.d.]. Opinion: Timnit Gebru's Exit From Google Exposes a Crisis in AI. Wired ( [n.,d.]). https://www.wired.com/story/timnit-gebru-exit-google-exposes-crisis-in-ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Carl L. Hanson, Scott H. Burton, Christophe Giraud-Carrier, Josh H. West, Michael D. Barnes, and Bret Hansen. 2013. Tweaking and Tweeting: Exploring Twitter for Nonmedical Use of a Psychostimulant Drug (Adderall) Among College Students. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15, 4 (2013), e62. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2503 Company: Journal of Medical Internet Research Distributor: Journal of Medical Internet Research Institution: Journal of Medical Internet Research Label: Journal of Medical Internet Research Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Aya Hassouneh, A.M. Mutawa, and Murugappan M. 2020. Development of a Real-Time Emotion Recognition System Using Facial Expressions and EEG based on machine learning and deep neural network methods. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Vol. 20 (2020), 100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Andrew C. High, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, and Saraswathi Bellur. 2014. Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 34 (May 2014), 79--88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Chris Jay Hoofnagle and Jan Whittington. 2013. Free: accounting for the costs of the internet's most popular price. UCLA L. Rev., Vol. 61 (2013), 606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Kimberly A Houser and W Gregory Voss. 2018. GDPR: The end of Google and facebook or a new paradigm in data privacy. Rich. JL & Tech., Vol. 25 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Elise Hu. [n.d.]. Facebook Manipulates Our Moods For Science And Commerce: A Roundup. https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2014/06/30/326929138/facebook-manipulates-our-moods-for-science-and-commerce-a-roundupGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Kit Huckvale, Svetha Venkatesh, and Helen Christensen. 2019. Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety. npj Digital Medicine, Vol. 2, 1 (Sept. 2019), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0166--1 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Rhidian Hughes. 1998. Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 20, 3 (1998), 381--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Sarah E Igo. 2020. The known citizen: a history of privacy in modern America. OCLC: 1111377193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Digital Life Initiative. 2018. Facebook and Google Are the New Data Brokers. https://www.dli.tech.cornell.edu/post/facebook-and-google-are-the-new-data-brokersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. A. Jaimes, D. Gatica-Perez, N. Sebe, and T. S. Huang. 2007. Guest Editors' Introduction: Human-Centered Computing--Toward a Human Revolution. Computer, Vol. 40, 5 (May 2007), 30--34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.169Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Maurice Jakesch, Megan French, Xiao Ma, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Mor Naaman. 2019. AI-Mediated Communication: How the Perception That Profile Text Was Written by AI Affects Trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300469Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Dr William James. 2013. What is an Emotion? Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Ayn de Jesus. [n.d.]. Artificial Intelligence in Video Marketing - Emotion Recognition, Video Generation, and More. https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/artificial-intelligence-for-video-marketing-emotion-recognition-video-generation-and-more/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Bobbie Johnson and Las Vegas. 2010. Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder. The Guardian (Jan. 2010). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Kimberly Barsamian Kahn, Phillip Atiba Goff, J. Katherine Lee, and Diane Motamed. 2016. Protecting Whiteness: White Phenotypic Racial Stereotypicality Reduces Police Use of Force. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 7, 5 (July 2016), 403--411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616633505 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Olivia J. Kirtley and Rory C. O'Connor. 2020. Suicide prevention is everyone's business: Challenges and opportunities for Google. Social Science & Medicine (Jan. 2020), 112691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112691Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Funda Kivran-Swaine, Jeremy Ting, Jed Richards Brubaker, Rannie Teodoro, and Mor Naaman. [n.d.]. Understanding Loneliness in Social Awareness Streams: Expressions and Responses. ( [n.,d.]), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, 24 (June 2014), 8788. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Elizabeth M. Lawrence. 2017. Why Do College Graduates Behave More Healthfully than Those Who Are Less Educated? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 58, 3 (2017), 291--306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146517715671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Jennifer S. Lerner, Ye Li, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and Karim S. Kassam. 2015. Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 66 (Jan. 2015), 799--823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213--115043Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Kevin Litman-Navarro. 2019. Opinion textbar We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster. The New York Times (June 2019). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/12/opinion/facebook-google-privacy-policies.html, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/12/opinion/facebook-google-privacy-policies.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Jorge Lopez?Castroman, Bilel Moulahi, Jérôme Azé, Sandra Bringay, Julie Deninotti, Sebastien Guillaume, and Enrique Baca?Garcia. 2020. Mining social networks to improve suicide prevention: A scoping review. Journal of Neuroscience Research, Vol. 98, 4 (2020), 616--625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24404 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jnr.24404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Brian Lubars and Chenhao Tan. 2019. Ask Not What AI Can Do, But What AI Should Do: Towards a Framework of Task Delegability. CoRR, Vol. abs/1902.03245 (2019). arxiv: 1902.03245 http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03245Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Jennifer Lynch. 2018. Face Off: Law Enforcement Use of Face Recognition Technology. https://www.eff.org/wp/law-enforcement-use-face-recognitionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Anmol Madan, Manuel Cebrian, David Lazer, and Alex Pentland. 2010. Social sensing for epidemiological behavior change. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291--300. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. M. Magdin, T. Sulka, J. Tomanova, and M. Vozar. 2019. Voice Analysis Using PRAAT Software and Classification of User Emotional State. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5, 6 (Sept. 2019), 33--. http://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A600161373/AONE?u=umuser&sid=zotero&xid=104652f4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Lydia Manikonda and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. Modeling and Understanding Visual Attributes of Mental Health Disclosures in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 170--181. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Mason Marks. 2019. Artificial Intelligence-Based Suicide Prediction. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2019), 24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Kirsten E. Martin and Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Measuring Privacy: An Empirical Test Using Context To Expose Confounding Variables. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2709584. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709584Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Eli Zimmerman Twitter Eli has been eagerly pursuing a journalistic career since he left the University of Maryl, 's Philip Merrill School of Journalism Previously, Eli was a staff reporter for medical trade publication Frontline Medical News, Where He Experienced the Impact of Continuous Education, evolving teaching methods through the medical lens When not in the office, and Eli is busy scanning the web for the latest podcasts or stepping into the boxing ring for a few rounds. [n.d.]. GoGuardian Develops a New AI-Enabled Cloud Filter for K--12 Schools. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2019/02/goguardian-develops-new-ai-enabled-cloud-filter-k-12-schoolsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. John McCormick. 2019. What AI Can Tell From Listening to You. Wall Street Journal (April 2019). https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-ai-can-tell-from-listening-to-you-11554169408Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Kwame McKenzie and Kamaldeep Bhui. 2007. Institutional racism in mental health care. BMJ : British Medical Journal, Vol. 334, 7595 (March 2007), 649--650. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39163.395972.80Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Andrew McStay. [n.d.]. Emotional AI: The Rise of Empathic Media. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326294717_Emotional_AI_The_Rise_of_Empathic_MediaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Karen McVeigh. 2014. Samaritans Twitter app identifying user's moods criticised as invasive. The Guardian (Nov. 2014). https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/04/samaritans-twitter-app-mental-health-depressionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Robinson Meyer. 2014. Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything-we-know-about-facebooks-secret-mood-manipulation-experiment/373648/ Section: Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Jude Mikal, Samantha Hurst, and Mike Conway. 2016. Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study. BMC medical ethics, Vol. 17, 1 (2016), 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Margaret Mitchell, Kristy Hollingshead, and Glen Coppersmith. 2015. Quantifying the Language of Schizophrenia in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, Colorado, 11--20. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15--1202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. Dan Muriello, Lizzy Donahue, Danny Ben-David, Umut Ozertem, and Reshef Shilon. 2018. Under the hood: Suicide prevention tools powered by AI. https://engineering.fb.com/ml-applications/under-the-hood-suicide-prevention-tools-powered-by-ai/ Section: ML Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Mark Myslín, Shu-Hong Zhu, Wendy Chapman, and Mike Conway. 2013. Using Twitter to Examine Smoking Behavior and Perceptions of Emerging Tobacco Products. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15, 8 (2013), e174. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2534 Company: Journal of Medical Internet Research Distributor: Journal of Medical Internet Research Institution: Journal of Medical Internet Research Label: Journal of Medical Internet Research Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc., Toronto, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. M. Namara, H. Sloan, P. Jaiswal, and B. P. Knijnenburg. 2018. The Potential for User-Tailored Privacy on Facebook. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC). 31--42. https://doi.org/10.1109/PAC.2018.00010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Natasha Singer. 2018. Creepy or Not? Your Privacy Concerns Probably Reflect Your Politics. New York Times (Online) (April 2018). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/technology/privacy-concerns-politics.html Journal Abbreviation: New York Times (Online) Publisher: New York Times Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. James P. Nehf. 2010. The FTC's Proposed Framework for Privacy Protection Online: A Move toward Substantive Controls or Just More Notice and Choice Electronic Commerce Law. William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 37, 4 (2010), 1727--1744. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wmitch37&i=1737Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Casey Newton. 2020. How Facebook is preparing for a surge in depressed and anxious users. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/19/21185204/facebook-coronavirus-depression-anxiety-content-moderation-mark-zuckerberg-interviewGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, Vol. 79, 1 (Feb. 2004), 119--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Frank A. Pasquale. 2020. More Than a Feeling. https://reallifemag.com/more-than-a-feeling/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Jessica A Pater, Oliver L Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2016. "Hunger Hurts but Starving Works" Characterizing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1185--1200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Janice Penni. 2017. The future of online social networks (OSN): A measurement analysis using social media tools and application. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, 5 (Aug. 2017), 498--517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. R W Picard, S Papert, W Bender, B Blumberg, C Breazeal, D Cavallo, T Machover, M Resnick, D Roy, and C Strohecker. 2004. Affective Learning - A Manifesto. BT Technology Journal, Vol. 22, 4 (Oct. 2004), 253--269. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047603.37042.33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Harold A. Pollack and Keith Humphreys. 2020. Reducing Violent Incidents between Police Officers and People with Psychiatric or Substance Use Disorders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 687, 1 (Jan. 2020), 166--184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219897057 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  135. Juan Carlos Quiroz, Elena Geangu, and Min Hooi Yong. 2018. Emotion Recognition Using Smart Watch Sensor Data: Mixed-Design Study. JMIR Mental Health, Vol. 5, 3 (Aug. 2018), e10153. https://doi.org/10.2196/10153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Andrew G. Reece and Christopher M. Danforth. 2017. Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data Science, Vol. 6, 1 (Dec. 2017), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0110-z Number: 1 Publisher: SpringerOpen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Farig Sadeque, Dongfang Xu, and Steven Bethard. 2018. Measuring the Latency of Depression Detection in Social Media. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 495--503. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Najmeh Samadiani, Guangyan Huang, Borui Cai, Wei Luo, Chi-Hung Chi, Yong Xiang, and Jing He. 2019. A Review on Automatic Facial Expression Recognition Systems Assisted by Multimodal Sensor Data. Sensors, Vol. 19, 8 (Jan. 2019), 1863. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081863 Number: 8 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  139. Andrea Scarantino. 2015. Basic emotions, psychological construction, and the problem of variability. In The psychological construction of emotion. Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, 334--376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Maya Schenwar, Macaré Joe, and Alana Yu-lan Price. 2016. Who do you serve, who do you protect?: police violence and resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books, Chicago, Illinois. OCLC: 975049067.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Klaus R. Scherer, Angela. Schorr, and Tom. Johnstone. 2001. Appraisal processes in emotion : theory, methods, research. Number xiv, 478 p. : in Series in affective science. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York :. Publication Title: Appraisal processes in emotion : theory, methods, research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Andrew D. Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A. Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, and Janet Vertesi. 2019. Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - FAT* '19. ACM Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, 59--68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Evan Selinger and Woodrow Hartzog. 2016. Facebook's emotional contagion study and the ethical problem of co-opted identity in mediated environments where users lack control. Research Ethics, Vol. 12, 1 (Jan. 2016), 35--43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579531 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Nisha John, and Maya Sahu. 2020. Influence of social media on mental health: a systematic review. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. Publish Ahead of Print (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000631Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Natasha Singer. 2018. In Screening for Suicide Risk, Facebook Takes On Tricky Public Health Role. The New York Times (Dec. 2018). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/31/technology/facebook-suicide-screening-algorithm.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Vivek K. Singh and Rishav R. Agarwal. 2016. Cooperative phoneotypes: exploring phone-based behavioral markers of cooperation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 646--657. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971755Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Luke Stark and Jesse Hoey. 2020. The Ethics of Emotion in AI Systems. Technical Report. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ad4uGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. George Szmukler. 2015. Compulsion and "coercion" in mental health care. World Psychiatry, Vol. 14, 3 (Oct. 2015), 259--261. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. Ziying Tan, Xingyun Liu, Xiaoqian Liu, Qijin Cheng, and Tingshao Zhu. 2017. Designing Microblog Direct Messages to Engage Social Media Users With Suicide Ideation: Interview and Survey Study on Weibo. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19, 12 (Dec. 2017), e381. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  150. Marilyn D. Thomas, Nicholas P. Jewell, and Amani M. Allen. 2021. Black and unarmed: statistical interaction between age, perceived mental illness, and geographic region among males fatally shot by police using case-only design. Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 53 (Jan. 2021), 42--49.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.08.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. John Torous, Mathew V Kiang, Jeanette Lorme, and Jukka-Pekka Onnela. 2016. New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research. JMIR Mental Health, Vol. 3, 2 (May 2016). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  152. Sho Tsugawa, Yusuke Kikuchi, Fumio Kishino, Kosuke Nakajima, Yuichi Itoh, and Hiroyuki Ohsaki. 2015. Recognizing Depression from Twitter Activity. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3187--3196. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  153. Donghyeon Won, Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld, and Jungseock Joo. 2017. Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Mountain View, California, USA) (MM '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 786--794. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123266.3123282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  154. Richmond Y. Wong, Deirdre K. Mulligan, and John Chuang. 2017a. Using science fiction texts to surface user reflections on privacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213--216. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3123080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. Richmond Y. Wong, Ellen Van Wyk, and James Pierce. 2017b. Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. (June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. Hao Yan, Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft, Micah Goodman, Melissa Krauss, Sanmay Das, and Patricia Cavazos-Rehg. 2019. Automatic detection of eating disorder-related social media posts that could benefit from a mental health intervention. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 52, 10 (2019), 1150--1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. Shoshana Zuboff. 2020. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power first trade paperback edition ed.). PublicAffairs, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Data Subjects' Conceptualizations of and Attitudes Toward Automatic Emotion Recognition-Enabled Wellbeing Interventions on Social Media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!