skip to main content
research-article

Visual Simulation of Soil-Structure Destruction with Seepage Flows

Published:27 September 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper introduces a method for simulating soil-structure coupling with water, which involves a series of visual effects, including wet granular materials, seepage flows, capillary action between grains, and dam breaking simulation. We develop a seepage flow based SPH-DEM framework to handle soil and water particles interactions through a momentum exchange term. In this framework, water is seen as a seepage flow through porous media by Darcy's law; the seepage rate and the soil permeability are manipulated according to drag coefficient and soil porosity. A water saturation-based capillary model is used to capture various soil behaviors such as sandy soil and clay soil. Furthermore, the capillary model can dynamically adjust liquid bridge forces induced by surface tension between soil particles. The adhesion model describes the attraction ability between soil surfaces and water particles to achieve various visual effects for soil and water. Lastly, this framework can capture the complicated dam-breaking scenarios caused by overtopping flow or internal seepage erosion that are challenging to simulate.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Nadir Akinci, Gizem Akinci, and Matthias Teschner. 2013. Versatile surface tension and adhesion for SPH fluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 6 (2013), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nadir Akinci, Markus Ihmsen, Gizem Akinci, Barbara Solenthaler, and Matthias Teschner. 2012. Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. B. Anderson and Roy Jackson. 1967. Fluid Mechanical Description of Fluidized Beds. Equations of Motion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 6, 4 (1967), 527--539. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160024a007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jacob Bear and Alexander H-D Cheng. 2010. Modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Vol. 23. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Markus Becker and Matthias Teschner. 2007. Weakly compressible SPH for free surface flows. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. 209--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jan Bender and Dan Koschier. 2015. Divergence-free smoothed particle hydrodynamics. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on computer animation. 147--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ray M. Bowen. 1976. Theory of Mixtures. Continuum Physics. Butterworth-Heinemann. 1--127 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ha H Bui and Giang D Nguyen. 2017. A coupled fluid-solid SPH approach to modelling flow through deformable porous media. International Journal of Solids and Structures 125 (2017), 244--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shane J Burns, Petri T Piiroinen, and Kevin J Hanley. 2019. Critical time step for DEM simulations of dynamic systems using a Hertzian contact model. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 119, 5 (2019), 432--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Peter A Cundall and Otto DL Strack. 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. geotechnique 29, 1 (1979), 47--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilles Daviet and Florence Bertails-Descoubes. 2017. Simulation of Drucker-Prager granular flows inside Newtonian fluids. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A De Lazzer, M Dreyer, and HJ Rath. 1999. Particle- surface capillary forces. Langmuir 15, 13 (1999), 4551--4559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yun Fei, Christopher Batty, Eitan Grinspun, and Changxi Zheng. 2018. A multi-scale model for simulating liquid-fabric interactions. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yun Fei, Christopher Batty, Eitan Grinspun, and Changxi Zheng. 2019. A multi-scale model for coupling strands with shear-dependent liquid. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yun Fei, Henrique Teles Maia, Christopher Batty, Changxi Zheng, and Eitan Grinspun. 2017. A multi-scale model for simulating liquid-hair interactions. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chuyuan Fu, Qi Guo, Theodore Gast, Chenfanfu Jiang, and Joseph Teran. 2017. A polynomial particle-in-cell method. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 6 (2017), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ming Gao, Andre Pradhana, Xuchen Han, Qi Guo, Grant Kot, Eftychios Sifakis, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2018. Animating fluid sediment mixture in particle-laden flows. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Christoph Gissler, Andreas Henne, Stefan Band, Andreas Peer, and Matthias Teschner. 2020. An implicit compressible SPH solver for snow simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 4 (2020), 36--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christoph Gissler, Andreas Peer, Stefan Band, Jan Bender, and Matthias Teschner. 2019. Interlinked SPH pressure solvers for strong fluid-rigid coupling. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 1 (2019), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Prashant Goswami and Christopher Batty. 2014. Regional Time Stepping for SPH. In Eurographics 2014 - Short Papers, Eric Galin and Michael Wand (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/egsh.20141011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon Green. 2010. Particle simulation using cuda. NVIDIA whitepaper 6 (2010), 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kensuke Harasaki and Mitsuteru Asai. 2016. Fluid-soil multiphase flow simulation by an SPH-DEM coupled method. In The 2016 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM16), Jeju Island, Korea, August 28-September, Vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sébastien Hentz, Frédéric V Donzé, and Laurent Daudeville. 2004. Discrete element modelling of concrete submitted to dynamic loading at high strain rates. Computers & structures 82, 29-30 (2004), 2509--2524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yuanming Hu, Yu Fang, Ziheng Ge, Ziyin Qu, Yixin Zhu, Andre Pradhana, and Chenfanfu Jiang. 2018. A moving least squares material point method with displacement discontinuity and two-way rigid body coupling. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Libo Huang, Torsten Hädrich, and Dominik L Michels. 2019. On the accurate large-scale simulation of ferrofluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, Barbara Solenthaler, Christopher Horvath, and Matthias Teschner. 2013. Implicit incompressible SPH. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 3 (2013), 426--435.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacob N. Israelachvili. 2011. 17 - Adhesion and Wetting Phenomena. In Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Third Edition) (third edition ed.), Jacob N. Israelachvili (Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, 415--467. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375182-9.10017-XGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Chenfanfu Jiang, Theodore Gast, and Joseph Teran. 2017. Anisotropic elastoplasticity for cloth, knit and hair frictional contact. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, Andrew Selle, Joseph Teran, and Alexey Stomakhin. 2015. The affine particle-in-cell method. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 4 (2015), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, Joseph Teran, Alexey Stomakhin, and Andrew Selle. 2016. The material point method for simulating continuum materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Courses. 1--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y Jiang, C Li, S Deng, and SM Hu. 2020. A Divergence-free Mixture Model for Multiphase Fluids. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 69--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Victor Kaliakin. 2017. Soil Mechanics: Calculations, Principles, and Methods. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Richard Keiser, Bart Adams, Dominique Gasser, Paolo Bazzi, Philip Dutré, and Markus Gross. 2005. A unified lagrangian approach to solid-fluid animation. In Proceedings Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium Point-Based Graphics, 2005. IEEE, 125--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Dan Koschier, Jan Bender, Barbara Solenthaler, and Matthias Teschner. 2020. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics techniques for the physics based simulation of fluids and solids. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06944 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Toon Lenaerts, Bart Adams, and Philip Dutré. 2008. Porous flow in particle-based fluid simulations. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 27, 3 (2008), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Toon Lenaerts and Philip Dutré. 2009. Mixing fluids and granular materials. In Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics 2009), Vol. 28. 213--218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01360.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Guoping Lian, Colin Thornton, and Michael J. Adams. 1993. A Theoretical Study of the Liquid Bridge Forces between Two Rigid Spherical Bodies. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 161, 1(1993), 138--147. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1993.1452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Leon B Lucy. 1977. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The astronomical journal 82 (1977), 1013--1024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Joe J Monaghan. 1992. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics 30, 1 (1992), 543--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthias Müller, Barbara Solenthaler, Richard Keiser, and Markus Gross. 2005. Particle-based fluid-fluid interaction. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. 237--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Michael B Nielsen and Ole Østerby. 2013. A two-continua approach to Eulerian simulation of water spray. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 4 (2013), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Andreas Peer, Christoph Gissler, Stefan Band, and Matthias Teschner. 2018. An implicit SPH formulation for incompressible linearly elastic solids. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 135--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Andreas Peer, Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, and Matthias Teschner. 2015. An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 4 (2015), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Daniel J Price. 2012. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 3 (2012), 759--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yakov I Rabinovich, Madhavan S Esayanur, and Brij M Moudgil. 2005. Capillary forces between two spheres with a fixed volume liquid bridge: theory and experiment. Langmuir 21, 24 (2005), 10992--10997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Bo Ren, Chenfeng Li, Xiao Yan, Ming C Lin, Javier Bonet, and Shi-Min Hu. 2014. Multiple-fluid SPH simulation using a mixture model. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 5 (2014), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Bo Ren, Xu-Yun Yang, Ming C Lin, Nils Thuerey, Matthias Teschner, and Chenfeng Li. 2018. Visual simulation of multiple fluids in computer graphics: A state-of-the-art report. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 33, 3 (2018), 431--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Witawat Rungjiratananon, Zoltan Szego, Yoshihiro Kanamori, and Tomoyuki Nishita. 2008. Real-time animation of sand-water interaction. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 27. Wiley Online Library, 1887--1893.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Barbara Solenthaler and Renato Pajarola. 2009. Predictive-corrective incompressible SPH. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 papers. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Barbara Solenthaler, Jürg Schläfli, and Renato Pajarola. 2007. A unified particle model for fluid-solid interactions. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 18, 1 (2007), 69--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Deborah Sulsky, Shi-Jian Zhou, and Howard L Schreyer. 1995. Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Computer physics communications 87, 1-2 (1995), 236--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiaosong Sun, Mikio Sakai, and Yoshinori Yamada. 2013. Three-dimensional simulation of a solid-liquid flow by the DEM-SPH method. J. Comput. Phys. 248 (2013), 147--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Andre Pradhana Tampubolon, Theodore Gast, Gergely Klár, Chuyuan Fu, Joseph Teran, Chenfanfu Jiang, and Ken Museth. 2017. Multi-species simulation of porous sand and water mixtures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Hai Tan and Shenghong Chen. 2017. A hybrid DEM-SPH model for deformable landslide and its generated surge waves. Advances in Water Resources 108 (2017), 256--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Federico A Tavarez and Michael E Plesha. 2007. Discrete element method for modelling solid and particulate materials. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 70, 4 (2007), 379--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Christopher D Willett, Michael J Adams, Simon A Johnson, and Jonathan PK Seville. 2000. Capillary bridges between two spherical bodies. Langmuir 16, 24 (2000), 9396--9405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Qiong Xiao and Ji-Peng Wang. 2020. CFD-DEM simulations of seepage-induced erosion. Water 12, 3 (2020), 678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Wen-Jie Xu, Xue-Yang Dong, and Wen-Tao Ding. 2019. Analysis of fluid-particle interaction in granular materials using coupled SPH-DEM method. Powder Technology 353 (2019), 459--472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Xiao Yan, Yun-Tao Jiang, Chen-Feng Li, Ralph R Martin, and Shi-Min Hu. 2016. Multiphase SPH simulation for interactive fluids and solids. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Xiao Yan, C-F Li, X-S Chen, and S-M Hu. 2018. MPM simulation of interacting fluids and solids. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 183--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Tao Yang, Jian Chang, Ming C Lin, Ralph R Martin, Jian J Zhang, and Shi-Min Hu. 2017. A unified particle system framework for multi-phase, multi-material visual simulations. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 6 (2017), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Tao Yang, Jian Chang, Bo Ren, Ming C Lin, Jian Jun Zhang, and Shi-Min Hu. 2015. Fast multiple-fluid simulation using Helmholtz free energy. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 6 (2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Siti Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusoff, Ismail Bakar, DC Wijeyesekera, Adnan Zainorabidin, Mastura Azmi, and Harris Ramli. 2017. The effects of different compaction energy on geotechnical properties of kaolin and laterite. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1875. AIP Publishing LLC, 030009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Wenqi Zhong, Aibing Yu, Xuejiao Liu, Zhenbo Tong, and Hao Zhang. 2016. DEM/CFD-DEM modelling of non-spherical particulate systems: theoretical developments and applications. Powder Technology 302 (2016), 108--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. ZY Zhou, SB Kuang, KW Chu, and AB Yu. 2010. Discrete particle simulation of particle-fluid flow: model formulations and their applicability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 661 (2010), 482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Visual Simulation of Soil-Structure Destruction with Seepage Flows

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!