skip to main content
research-article

A Deep Content-Based Model for Persian Rumor Verification

Published:29 November 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

During the development of social media, there has been a transformation in social communication. Despite their positive applications in social interactions and news spread, it also provides an ideal platform for spreading rumors. Rumors can endanger the security of society in normal or critical situations. Therefore, it is important to detect and verify the rumors in the early stage of their spreading. Many research works have focused on social attributes in the social network to solve the problem of rumor detection and verification, while less attention has been paid to content features. The social and structural features of rumors develop over time and are not available in the early stage of rumor. Therefore, this study presented a content-based model to verify the Persian rumors on Twitter and Telegram early. The proposed model demonstrates the important role of content in spreading rumors and generates a better-integrated representation for each source rumor document by fusing its semantic, pragmatic, and syntactic information. First, contextual word embeddings of the source rumor are generated by a hybrid model based on ParsBERT and parallel CapsNets. Then, pragmatic and syntactic features of the rumor are extracted and concatenated with embeddings to capture the rich information for rumor verification. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrated that the proposed model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art models in the early rumor verification task. Also, it can enhance the performance of the classifier from 2% to 11% on Twitter and from 5% to 23% on Telegram. These results validate the model's effectiveness when limited content information is available.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Zubiaga A., Aker A., Bontcheva K., Liakata M., Procter R., Liakata M., and Procter R.. 2018. Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51 (2018), 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3161603Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Mikolov T., Chen K., Corrado G., and Dean J.. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR’13) - Work. Track Proc., 2013. http://ronan.collobert.com/senna/. (accessed December 29, 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Pennington J., Socher R., and Manning C.. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods of the Natural Language Processors. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 2014, pp. 15321543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Bojanowski P., Grave E., Joulin A., and Mikolov T.. 2017. Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5 (2017), 135146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Castillo C., Mendoza M., and Poblete B.. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW’11). ACM Press, New York, 2011, p. 675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963500Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Yang F., Liu Y., Yu X., and Yang M.. 2012. Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on the Minimum Data Semantics (MDS’12). ACM Press, New York, 2012, pp. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2350190.2350203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Chua A. Y. K. and Banerjee S.. 2016. Linguistic predictors of rumor veracity on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 24th International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS'16), Vol I. 387--391. http://www.iaeng.org/IMECS2016/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Tausczik Y. R. and Pennebaker J. W.. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29 (2010), 2454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Kwon S., Cha M., Jung K., Chen W., and Wang Y.. 2013. Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’13). IEEE, 2013, pp. 11031108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.61Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Wu K., Yang S., and Zhu K. Q.. 2015. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structures. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’15). IEEE, 2015, pp. 651662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2015.7113322Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Yong Z., Yao H., and Wu Y.. 2018. Rumors detection in Sina Weibo based on text and user characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd IEEE Advances in Information and Managing Automated Control Conference (IMCEC’18). IEEE, 2018, pp. 13801386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCEC.2018.8469468Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Lin D., Lv Y., and Cao D.. 2012. Rumor diffusion purpose analysis from social attribute to social content. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Asian Language Processes (IALP’15), IEEE, 2015, pp. 107110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP.2015.7451543Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Zhao Z., Resnick P., and Mei Q.. 2015. Enquiring minds. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW’15). ACM, New York, 2015, pp. 13951405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] S. Vosoughi. 2015. Automatic detection and verification of rumors on Twitter. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/98553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] V. Qazvinian, E. Rosengren, D. R. Radev, and Q. Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs, In Proc. Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process., Association for Computational Linguistics. 1589--1599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Hamidian S. and Diab M.. 2016. Rumor identification and belief investigation on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on Computer Approaches to Subjective Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 2016, pp. 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-0403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Floos A. Y. M., Yahya A., and Floos M.. 2016. Arabic rumours identification by measuring the credibility of Arabic tweet content. Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res. 7 (2016), 7283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKSR.2016040105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] R. Moin, ZU. Rehman, K. Mahmood, M. E. Alzahrani, and M. Q. Saleem. 2018. Framework for rumors detection in social media. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 9 (2018), 439--444. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090557Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Kochkina E., Liakata M., and Zubiaga A.. 2018. All-in-one: Multi-task learning for rumour verification. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computer Linguistics (2018), pp. 34023413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Zubiaga A., Liakata M., and Procter R.. 2017. Exploiting context for rumour detection in social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 2017, pp. 109123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Kumar A., Sangwan S. R., and Nayyar A.. 2019. Rumour veracity detection on Twitter using particle swarm optimized shallow classifiers. Multimed. Tools Appl. 78 (2019), 2408324101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Dang A., Moh'd A., Islam A., and Milios E.. 2019. Early detection of rumor veracity in social media. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Zamani S., Asadpour M., and Moazzami D.. 2017. Rumor detection for Persian Tweets. In Proceedings of the 2017 25th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE’17), 2017, pp. 15321536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2017.7985287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] S. D. Mahmoodabad, S. Farzi, and D. B. Bakhtiarvand. 2018. Persian rumor detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST'18). 597--602. DOI: 10.1109/ISTEL.2018.8661007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Zarharan M., Ahangar S., Rezvaninejad F. S., Bidhendi M. L., Jalali S. S., Eetemadi S., Pilehvar M. T., and Minaei-Bidgoli B., Persian Stance Classification Dataset, (n.d.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh Z., Feizi-Derakhshi M.-R., and Sharifi A.. 2020. A speech act classifier for Persian texts and its application in identifying rumors. J. Soft Comput. Inf. Technol. (JSCIT) Vol. 9 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh Z., Feizi-Derakhshi M.-R., Ramezani M., Rahkar-Farshi T., Asgari-Chenaghlu M., Nikzad-Khasmakhi N., Feizi-Derakhshi A.-R., Ranjbar-Khadivi M., Zafarani-Moattar E., and Balafar M.-A.. 2020. A model to measure the spread power of rumors. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv2002.07563. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Yuan C., Ma Q., Zhou W., Han J., and Hu S.. 2019. Jointly embedding the local and global relations of heterogeneous graph for rumor detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 2019, pp. 796805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Qazvinian V., Rosengren E., Radev D. R., and Mei Q.. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods, Natural Language Processes. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011, pp. 15891599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Vosoughi S.. 2015. Automatic detection and verification of rumors on Twitter, (2015). https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/98553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Zamani S., Asadpour M., and Moazzami D.. 2017. Rumor detection for Persian Tweets. In Proceedings of the 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering. IEEE, 2017, pp. 15321536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2017.7985287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Mahmoodabad S. D., Farzi S., and Bakhtiarvand D. B.. 2018. Persian rumor detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2018 9th International Symposium on Telecommunications. IEEE, 2018, pp. 597602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTEL.2018.8661007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] J. Ma, W. Gao, P. Mitra, S. Kwon, B. J. Jansen, K.-F. Wong, and M. Cha. 2016. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'16). AAAI Press, 3818--3824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] F. Yu, Q. Liu, S. Wu, L. Wang, and T. Tan. 2017. A convolutional approach for misinformation identification. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3901--3907. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/545Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Poddar L., Hsu W., Lee M. L., and Subramaniyam S.. 2018. Predicting stances in Twitter conversations for detecting veracity of rumors: A neural approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 30th International Conference Tools with Artificial Intelligence. IEEE, 2018, pp. 6572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Li L., Cai G., and Chen N.. 2018. A rumor events detection method based on deep bidirectional GRU neural network. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image and Visual Computing (ICIVC’18). IEEE, 2018, pp. 755759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Chen T., Li X., Yin H., and Zhang J.. 2018. Call attention to rumors: Deep attention based recurrent neural networks for early rumor detection. In Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Springer, 2018, pp. 4052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04503-6_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Qian F., Gong C., Sharma K., and Liu Y.. 2018. Neural user response generator: Fake news detection with collective user intelligence. In Proceedings of IJCAI, 2018, pp. 38343840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Ma B., Lin D., and Cao D.. 2017. Content representation for microblog rumor detection. In Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. Springer-Verlag, 2017, pp. 245251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46562-3_16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Geng Y., Lin Z., Fu P., and Wang W.. 2019. Rumor detection on social media: A multi-view model using self-attention mechanism. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including the Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics. Springer-Verlag, 2019, pp. 339352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22734-0_25Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Singhal S., Shah R. R., Chakraborty T., Kumaraguru P., and Satoh S.. 2019. SpotFake: A multi-modal framework for fake news detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Multimedia and Big Data (BigMM’19). IEEE, 2019, pp. 3947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BigMM.2019.00-44Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Zhou K., Shu C., Li B., and Lau J. H.. 2019. Early rumour detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL'19). 16141623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Lotfi S., Mirzarezaee M., Hosseinzadeh M., and Seydi V.. 2021. Detection of rumor conversations in Twitter using graph convolutional networks. Appl. Intell. (2021), 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02036-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Goldani M. H., Momtazi S., and Safabakhsh R.. 2021. Detecting fake news with capsule neural networks. Appl. Soft Comput. 101 (2021), 106991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106991Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Sridhar S. and Sanagavarapu S.. 2021. Fake news detection and analysis using multitask learning with BiLSTM CapsNet model. In Proceedings of the 2021 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Data Science and Engineering. IEEE, 2021, pp. 905911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/Confluence51648.2021.9377080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh Z., Feizi-Derakhshi M.-R., and Sharifi A.. 2020. A semi-supervised model for Persian rumor verification based on content information. Multimed. Tools Appl. (2020), 129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Li W., Liu P., Zhang Q., and Liu W.. 2019. Future Internet: An improved approach for text sentiment classification based on a deep neural network via a sentiment attention mechanism. Futur. Internet. 11 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11040096Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Liu Y. and Wu Y.-F. B.. 2018. Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Kumar S., Asthana R., Upadhyay S., Upreti N., and Akbar M.. 2019. Fake news detection using deep learning models: A novel approach. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. (2019), e3767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Volkova S., Shaffer K., Jang J. Y., and Hodas N.. 2017. Separating facts from fiction: Linguistic models to classify suspicious and trusted news posts on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 2017, pp. 647653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Chen Y.-C., Liu Z.-Y., and Kao H.-Y.. 2017. IKM at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Convolutional neural networks for stance detection and rumor verification. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantics Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 2017, pp. 465469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S17-2081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Zhao G. and Yang P.. 2020. Pretrained embeddings for stance detection with hierarchical capsule network on social media. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 39 (2020), 132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3412362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Feizi-Derakhshi A. R., Feizi-Derakhshi M. R., Ranjbar-Khadivi M., Nikzad-Khasmakhi N., Ramezani M., Rahkar-Farshi T., Zafarani-Moattar E., Asgari-Changhlu M., and Jahan-Bakhsh Z.. 2019. Sepehr_RumTel01, 1 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17632/JW3ZWF8RDP.1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. [54] Farahani M., Gharachorloo M., Farahani M., and Manthouri M.. 2020. ParsBERT: Transformer-based model for Persian language understanding. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv2005.12515. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL'19). 4171--4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Sabour S., Frosst N., and Hinton G. E.. 2017. Dynamic routing between capsules. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 3859--3869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Fentaw H. W. and Kim T.-H.. 2019. Design and investigation of capsule networks for sentence classification. Appl. Sci. 9 (2019), 2200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Yang M., Zhao W., Ye J., Lei Z., Zhao Z., and Zhang S.. 2018. Investigating capsule networks with dynamic routing for text classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods of Natural Language Processes. Association for Computational Linguistics, 31103119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Kim J., Jang S., Park E., and Choi S.. 2020. Text classification using capsules. Neurocomputing. 376 (2020), 214221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. [60] Liang K.-W., Tseng Y.-H., and Chang P.-C.. 2019. Parallel capsule neural networks for sound event detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 Asia-Pacific Signal Information Processing Association Summit Conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 19331936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Austin J. L.. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Koller A. and Searle J. R.. 1970. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Language (Baltim). 46 (1970), 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. [63] J. R. Searle. 1979. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1--29. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Homayounpour M. and Soltani P.. 2010. Speech acts classification of Persian language texts using three machine learning methods. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research 2, 1 (2010), 65--71. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=208218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Zhou L., Burgoon J. K., Nunamaker J. F., and Twitchell D.. 2004. Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Gr. Decis. Negot. 13 (2004), 81106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6fGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Zhou X., Jain A., Phoha V. V., and Zafarani R.. 2020. Fake news early detection: A theory-driven model. Digit. Threat. Res. Pract. 1 (2020), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Afrooz G. A.. 2011. Ravanshenasy-e shayee [Psychological Bases of Rumor], Islamic Culture Publishing Office, Tehran, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. [68] Bijad A.. 2018. Ravanshenasi-e shayee [Rumor psychology]. Vania, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. [69] Kashefi O., Nasri M., and Kanani K.. 2010. Automatic spell checking in Persian language. Supreme Council Inf. Commun. Technol. (SCICT), Tehran, Iran (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. [70] Moradi H., Ahmadi F., and Feizi-Derakhshi M.-R.. 2017. A hybrid approach for Persian-named entity recognition. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 41 (2017), 215222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] Oroumchian F., Tasharofi S., Amiri H., Hojjat H., and Raja F.. 2006. Creating a Feasible Corpus for Persian POS Tagging. Department of Electrical Computer Engineering. University of Tehran. (2006), 19. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.2154&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Golfam A., Afrashi A., and Moghadam G.. 2014. Conceptualization of the Persian simple verbs of motion: A cognitive approach. J. Lang. West. Iran. Dialects. 1 (2014), 103122. http://jlw.razi.ac.ir/article_275_en.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. [73] Mohammad S. M. and Turney P. D.. 2013. Crowdsourcing: A word-emotion association lexicon. In Computer Intelligence 2013, pp. 436465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Jiang Q., Chen L., Xu R., Ao X., and Yang M.. 2019. A challenge dataset and effective models for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Processing. 2019, pp. 62816286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Deep Content-Based Model for Persian Rumor Verification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
      ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 21, Issue 1
      January 2022
      442 pages
      ISSN:2375-4699
      EISSN:2375-4702
      DOI:10.1145/3494068
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 November 2021
      • Accepted: 1 September 2021
      • Revised: 1 July 2021
      • Received: 1 October 2020
      Published in tallip Volume 21, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)134
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!