skip to main content
research-article

(Don't) Mind the Step: Investigating the Effect of Digital Social Cues on Navigation Decisions

Published:05 November 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

It is well established that the presence of other people and the physical traces of their activities impact our navigation decisions, e.g. following a path in a park where trails are worn by frequent passage. Here we investigate such effect within a digital setup where social cues are displayed on the floor. We contribute the first lab study (n=24) investigating how social cues, presented as footprints on an interactive floor display, can impact navigation decisions. We particularly explore two task-based scenarios: exploration and search. A direct comparison of path choices did not reveal significant effects in both tasks but a further qualitative analysis showed that social cues affected path choices depending on how participants interpreted them. Additionally, results revealed a pattern of direct decision-making behaviours when social cues were present. We discuss how these insights can contribute to designing engaging floor interfaces that guide navigation decisions using social cues.

References

  1. Hamed S Alavi, Elizabeth F Churchill, Mikael Wiberg, Denis Lalanne, Peter Dalsgaard, Ava Fatah gen Schieck, and Yvonne Rogers. 2019. Introduction to Human-Building Interaction (HBI) Interfacing HCI with Architecture and Urban Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Luluah Albarrak, Oussama Metatla, and Anne Roudaut. 2020. Exploring the Design of History-Enriched Floor Interfaces for Asynchronous Navigation Support. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mohammed Ibrahim Alhojailan. 2012. Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. 1, 1 (2012), 39--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegaß, Albrecht Schmidt, Jörg Müller, and Nemanja Memarovic. 2012. How to evaluate public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Florian Alt, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Thomas Kubitza, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Interaction techniques for creating and exchanging content with public displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1709--1718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Paul Arthur and Romedi Passini. 1992. Wayfinding: people, signs, and architecture .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert Beyer, Florian Alt, Jörg Müller, Albrecht Schmidt, Karsten Isakovic, Stefan Klose, Manuel Schiewe, and Ivo Haulsen. 2011. Audience behavior around large interactive cylindrical screens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1021--1030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mark Bilandzic, Marcus Foth, and Alexander De Luca. 2008. CityFlocks: designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 174--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stephen Bitgood. 2002. Environmental psychology in museums, zoos, and other exhibition centers. In In Handbook of environmental. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stephen Bitgood. 2006. An analysis of visitor circulation: Movement patterns and the general value principle. Curator: The Museum Journal , Vol. 49, 4 (2006), 463--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sebastian Boring, Dominikus Baur, Andreas Butz, Sean Gustafson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. Touch projector: mobile interaction through video. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2287--2296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology , Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harry Brignull and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT, Vol. 3. 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yoon Kyung Choi. 1999. The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , Vol. 26, 2 (1999), 241--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ruth C. Dalton, Christoph Holscher, and Daniel R. Montello. 2019. Wayfinding as a Social Activity. Frontiers in Psychology , Vol. 10 (2019), 142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ruth Conroy Dalton, Renato Troffa, John Zacharias, and Christoph Hoelscher. 2011. Visual information in the built environment and its effect on wayfinding and explorative behavior. Urban diversities--environmental and social issues (2011), 6--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rudolph P Darken and John L Sibert. 1996. Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems . 142--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paul Dourish. 1999. Where the footprints lead: Tracking down other roles for social navigation. In Social navigation of information space. Springer, 15--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul Dourish and Matthew Chalmers. 1994. Running out of space: Models of information navigation. In Short paper presented at HCI , Vol. 94. 23--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. B Emo Nax. 2014. Real-world wayfinding experiments: Individual preferences, decisions and the space syntax approach at street corners . Ph.D. Dissertation. UCL (University College London).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fredrik Espinoza, Per Persson, Anna Sandin, Hanna Nyström, Elenor Cacciatore, and Markus Bylund. 2001. Geonotes: Social and navigational aspects of location-based information systems. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing . Springer, 2--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rosta Farzan and Peter Brusilovsky. 2018. Social navigation. In Social information access . Springer, 142--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Masahiro Furukawa, Hiromi Yoshikawa, Taku Hachisu, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2011. Vection field for pedestrian traffic control. In Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tommy G"arling, Erik Lindberg, and Timo M"antyl"a. 1983. Orientation in buildings: Effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids. Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 68, 1 (1983), 177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mojgan Ghare, Marvin Pafla, Caroline Wong, James R Wallace, and Stacey D Scott. 2018. Increasing passersby engagement with public large interactive displays: A study of proxemics and conation. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. David Gibson. 2009. The wayfinding handbook: Information design for public places .Princeton Architectural Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholas A Giudice, Jonathan Z Bakdash, and Gordon E Legge. 2007. Wayfinding with words: spatial learning and navigation using dynamically updated verbal descriptions. Psychological research , Vol. 71, 3 (2007), 347--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Michael R Hill. 1982. Spatial structure and decision-making aspects of pedestrian route selection through an urban environment. (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Christoph Hölscher, Tobias Meilinger, Georg Vrachliotis, Martin Brösamle, and Markus Knauff. 2006. Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology , Vol. 26, 4 (2006), 284--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristina Höök. 2003. Social navigation: from the web to the mobile. In Mensch & Computer 2003 . Springer, 17--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Andrew Irlitti, Thammathip Piumsomboon, Daniel Jackson, and Bruce H Thomas. 2019. Conveying spatial awareness cues in xR collaborations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , Vol. 25, 11 (2019), 3178--3189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Wendy Ju and David Sirkin. 2010. Animate objects: How physical motion encourages public interaction. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 40--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hannu Kukka, Heidi Oja, Vassilis Kostakos, Jorge Goncc alves, and Timo Ojala. 2013. What makes you click: exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1699--1708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ute Leonards, John G Fennell, Gaby Oliva, Alex Drake, and David W Redmill. 2015. Treacherous Pavements: Paving Slab Patterns Modify Intended Walking Directions. PloS one , Vol. 10, 6 (2015), e0130034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Bohyeon Lim, Yvonne Rogers, and Neil Sebire. 2019. Designing to Distract: Can Interactive Technologies Reduce Visitor Anxiety in a Children's Hospital Setting?. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. , Vol. 26, 2, Article 9 (April 2019), bibinfonumpages19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301427Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Casimir JH Ludwig, Nicholas Alexander, Kate L Howard, Alicja A Jedrzejewska, Isha Mundkur, and David Redmill. 2018. The influence of visual flow and perceptual load on locomotion speed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , Vol. 80, 1 (2018), 69--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Lauren H Mandel and Kelly A LeMeur. 2018. User wayfinding strategies in public library facilities. Library & Information Science Research , Vol. 40, 1 (2018), 38--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Paul Marshall, Richard Morris, Yvonne Rogers, Stefan Kreitmayer, and Matt Davies. 2011. Rethinking'multi-user' an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3033--3042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A John Maule and Anne C Edland. 1997. The effects of time pressure on human judgment and decision making. Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (1997), 189--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A John Maule, G Robert J Hockey, and Larissa Bdzola. 2000. Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta psychologica , Vol. 104, 3 (2000), 283--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. JH McDonald. 2014. Handbook of Biological Statistics., 3rd edn.(Sparky House Publishing: Baltimore, MD.). (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kathleen Mclean McLean. 1993. Planning for people in museum exhibitions .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Fanxing Meng and Wei Zhang. 2014. Way-finding during a fire emergency: an experimental study in a virtual environment. Ergonomics , Vol. 57, 6 (2014), 816--827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , Vol. 27, 6 (2011), 562--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Beatrice Monastero and David K McGookin. 2018. Traces: Studying a public reactive floor-projection of walking trajectories to support social awareness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Daniel R Montello and Corina Sas. 2006. Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jörg Müller, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, and Antonio Krüger. 2009a. Reflectivesigns: Digital signs that adapt to audience attention. In International conference on pervasive computing. Springer, 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jörg Müller, Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Michael Nischt, and Florian Alt. 2012. Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 297--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009b. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing . Springer, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Timo Ojala, Vassilis Kostakos, Hannu Kukka, Tommi Heikkinen, Tomas Linden, Marko Jurmu, Simo Hosio, Fabio Kruger, and Daniele Zanni. 2012. Multipurpose interactive public displays in the wild: Three years later. Computer , Vol. 45, 5 (2012), 42--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Patrick Olivier, Han Cao, Stephen W Gilroy, and Daniel G Jackson. 2007. Crossmodal ambient displays. In People and Computers XX-Engage . Springer, 3--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch! interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1285--1294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. John Peponis, Craig Zimring, and Yoon Kyung Choi. 1990. Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and behavior , Vol. 22, 5 (1990), 555--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. David A Robillard. 1982. Public space design in museums .Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research, University of Wisconsin ?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yvonne Rogers, William R Hazlewood, Paul Marshall, Nick Dalton, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Ambient influence: Can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change?. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Enrico Rukzio, Michael Müller, and Robert Hardy. 2009. Design, implementation and evaluation of a novel public display for pedestrian navigation: the rotating compass. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 113--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Susanne Schmidt, Frank Steinicke, Andrew Irlitti, and Bruce H Thomas. 2018. Floor-projected guidance cues for collaborative exploration of spatial augmented reality setups. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. 279--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. PN Seneviratne and JF Morrall. 1985. Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians. Transportation Planning and Technology , Vol. 10, 2 (1985), 147--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Ola Svenson and A John Maule. 1993. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making .Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Faisal Taher and Keith Cheverst. 2011. Exploring user preferences for indoor navigation support through a combination of mobile and fixed displays. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services . 201--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Maurice Ten Koppel, Gilles Bailly, Jörg Müller, and Robert Walter. 2012. Chained displays: configurations of public displays can be used to influence actor-, audience-, and passer-by behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 317--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Tasos Varoudis. 2011. Ambient displays: influencing movement patterns. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction . Springer, 52--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jo Vermeulen, Kris Luyten, Karin Coninx, Nicolai Marquardt, and Jon Bird. 2015. Proxemic flow: Dynamic peripheral floor visualizations for revealing and mediating large surface interactions. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction . Springer, 264--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Elisângela Vilar, Francisco Rebelo, and Paulo Noriega. 2014. Indoor human wayfinding performance using vertical and horizontal signage in virtual reality. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries , Vol. 24, 6 (2014), 601--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Elisângela Vilar, Francisco Rebelo, Paulo Noriega, Júlia Teles, and Christopher Mayhorn. 2013. The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Applied ergonomics , Vol. 44, 4 (2013), 618--627.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Elisângela Vilar, Lu'is Teixeira, Francisco Rebelo, Paulo Noriega, and Júlia Teles. 2012. Using environmental affordances to direct people natural movement indoors. Work , Vol. 41, Supplement 1 (2012), 1149--1156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology . 137--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Dirk Vom Lehn, Christian Heath, and Jon Hindmarsh. 2001. Exhibiting interaction: Conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symbolic interaction , Vol. 24, 2 (2001), 189--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Jan M Wiener, Simon J Büchner, and Christoph Hölscher. 2009. Taxonomy of human wayfinding tasks: A knowledge-based approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation , Vol. 9, 2 (2009), 152--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Julie R Williamson and John Williamson. 2014. Analysing pedestrian traffic around public displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. John Zacharias. 2001. Path choice and visual stimuli: signs of human activity and architecture. Journal of environmental psychology , Vol. 21, 4 (2001), 341--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Hantao Zhao, Tyler Thrash, Armin Grossrieder, Mubbasir Kapadia, Mehdi Moussa"id, Christoph Hölscher, and Victor R Schinazi. 2020. The interaction between map complexity and crowd movement on navigation decisions in virtual reality. Royal Society open science , Vol. 7, 3 (2020), 191523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. (Don't) Mind the Step: Investigating the Effect of Digital Social Cues on Navigation Decisions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!