skip to main content
research-article

The MADE-Axis: A Modular Actuated Device to Embody the Axis of a Data Dimension

Published:05 November 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Tangible controls-especially sliders and rotary knobs-have been explored in a wide range of interactive applications for desktop and immersive environments. Studies have shown that they support greater precision and provide proprioceptive benefits, such as support for eyes-free interaction. However, such controls tend to be expressly designed for specific applications. We draw inspiration from a bespoke controller for immersive data visualisation, but decompose this design into a simple, wireless, composable unit featuring two actuated sliders and a rotary encoder. Through these controller units, we explore the interaction opportunities around actuated sliders; supporting precise selection, infinite scrolling, adaptive data representations, and rich haptic feedback; all within a mode-less interaction space. We demonstrate the controllers' use for simple, ad hoc desktop interaction,before moving on to more complex, multi-dimensional interactions in VR and AR. We show that the flexibility and composability of these actuated controllers provides an emergent design space which covers the range of interactive dynamics for visual analysis. In a user study involving pairs performing collaborative visual analysis tasks in mixed-reality, our participants were able to easily compose rich visualisations, make insights and discuss their findings.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

V5iss501sVF..mp4

Supplemental video

References

  1. A. Batch, A. Cunningham, M. Cordeil, N. Elmqvist, T. Dwyer, B. H. Thomas , and K. Marriott. 2020. There Is No Spoon: Evaluating Performance, Space Use, and Presence with Expert Domain Users in Immersive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 26, 1 (2020), 536--546. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934803Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Lonni Besancc on, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Hybrid Tactile/Tangible Interaction for 3D Data Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 881--890. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599217 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01372922øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lonni Besanc con, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Mouse, Tactile, and Tangible Input for 3D Manipulation. In Proc. CHI . ACM, New York, 4727--4740. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025863 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01436206øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lonni Besanc con, Mickael Sereno, Lingyun Yu, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2019. Hybrid Touch/Tangible Spatial 3D Data Selection. Computer Graphics Forum , Vol. 38, 3 (June 2019), 553--567. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13710 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02079308øatext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lonni Besanc con, Anders Ynnerman, Daniel F Keefe, Lingyun Yu, and Tobias Isenberg. 2021. The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D Visualization . Computer Graphics Forum (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14189Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Verena Biener, Daniel Schneider, Travis Gesslein, Alexander Otte, Bastian Kuth, Per Ola Kristensson, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Jens Grubert. 2020. Breaking the Screen: Interaction Across Touchscreen Boundaries in Virtual Reality for Mobile Knowledge Workers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 26, 12 (2020), 3490--3502. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Simon Butscher, Sebastian Hubenschmid, Jens Müller, Johannes Fuchs, and Harald Reiterer. 2018. Clusters, Trends, and Outliers: How Immersive Technologies Can Facilitate the Collaborative Analysis of Multidimensional Data .Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173664Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Alvaro Cassinelli and Masatoshi Ishikawa. 2009. Volume slicing display. In SIGGRAPH ASIA Art Gallery & Emerging Technologies. 88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1665137.1665207 hrefhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.600.8017øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marco Cavallo, Mishal Dolakia, Matous Havlena, Kenneth Ocheltree, and Mark Podlaseck. 2019. Immersive Insights: A Hybrid Analytics System ForCollaborative Exploratory Data Analysis. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Parramatta, NSW, Australia) (VRST '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, bibinfonumpages12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jarry HT Claessen and Jarke J Van Wijk. 2011. Flexible linked axes for multivariate data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 17, 12 (2011), 2310--2316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maxime Cordeil, Benjamin Bach, Andrew Cunningham, Bastian Montoya, Ross T Smith, Bruce H Thomas, and Tim Dwyer. 2020. Embodied Axes: Tangible, Actuated Interaction for 3D Augmented Reality Data Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Maxime Cordeil, Benjamin Bach, Yongchao Li, Elliott Wilson, and Tim Dwyer. 2017. Design space for spatio-data coordination: Tangible interaction devices for immersive information visualisation. In 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). IEEE, 46--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Cordeil, B. Bach , Yongchao Li, E. Wilson, and T. Dwyer. 2017. Design space for spatio-data coordination: Tangible interaction devices for immersive information visualisation. In 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 46--50. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Maxime Cordeil, Andrew Cunningham, Tim Dwyer, Bruce H. Thomas, and Kim Marriott. 2017. ImAxes: Immersive Axes as Embodied Affordances for Interactive Multivariate Data Visualisation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Québec City, QC, Canada) (UIST '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71--83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126613 hrefhttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-01024053/file/00_Camera_ready_IEEE.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David Coyle, James Moore, Per Ola Kristensson, Paul Fletcher, and Alan Blackwell. 2012. I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 2025--2034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gerwin de Haan, Michal Koutek, and Frits H. Post. 2002. Towards Intuitive Exploration Tools for Data Visualization in VR. In Proc. VRST (Hong Kong, China). ACM, New York, 105--112. https://doi.org/10.1145/585740.585758 hrefhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.113.8779øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is .MIT press Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. 2017. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/mlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Barrett Ens, Benjamin Bach, Maxime Cordeil, Ulrich Engelke, Marcos Serrano, Wesley Willett, Arnaud Prouzeau, Christoph Anthes, Wolfgang Büschel, Cody Dunne, Tim Dwyer, Jens Grubert, Jason H. Haga, Nurit Kirshenbaum, Dylan Kobayashi, Tica Lin, Monsurat Olaosebikan, Fabian Pointecker, David Saffo, Nazmus Saquib, Dieter Schmalstieg, Danielle Albers Szafir, Matt Whitlock, and Yalong Yang. 2021. Grand Challenges in Immersive Analytics .Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3446866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. George W Fitzmaurice. 1996. Graspable User Interfaces . Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Toronto, Canada. http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/ gf/papers/PhD%20-%20Graspable%20UIs/Thesis.gf.html hrefhttp://www.dgp.toronto.edu/ gf/papers/PhD%20-%20Graspable%20UIs/Thesis.gf.htmløatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Nadia Cheng, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. Jamming User Interfaces: Programmable Particle Stiffness and Sensing for Malleable and Shape-Changing Devices. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (UIST '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519--528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. InFORM: Dynamic Physical Affordances and Constraints through Shape and Object Actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417--426. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Travis Gesslein, Verena Biener, Philipp Gagel, Daniel Schneider, Per Ola Kristensson, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Jens Grubert. 2020. Pen-based Interaction with Spreadsheets in Mobile Virtual Reality. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) . 361--373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00063Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Steven R. Gomez, Radu Jianu, and David H. Laidlaw. 2010. A Fiducial-Based Tangible User Interface for White Matter Tractography. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 373--381. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--17274--8_37 hrefhttp://vis.cs.brown.edu/docs/pdf/Gomez-2010-FBT.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Samuel Gratzl, Nils Gehlenborg, Alexander Lex, Hanspeter Pfister, and Marc Streit. 2014. Domino: Extracting, comparing, and manipulating subsets across multiple tabular datasets. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , Vol. 20, 12 (2014), 2023--2032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jens Grubert, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2020. Back to the Future: Revisiting Mouse and Keyboard Interaction for HMD-based Immersive Analytics. arxiv: 2009.02927 [cs.HC]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeffrey Heer and Ben Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis: A Taxonomy of Tools That Support the Fluent and Flexible Use of Visualizations. Queue , Vol. 10, 2 (Feb. 2012), 30--55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133416.2146416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ken Hinckley, Randy Pausch, John C Goble, and Neal F Kassell. 1994. Passive Real-World Interface Props for Neurosurgical Visualization. In Proc. CHI . ACM, New York, 452--458. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191821 hrefhttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c24a/8d7fe22f9f2270634c5a7d9bfff301938802.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sebastian Hubenschmid, Johannes Zagermann, Simon Butscher, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. STREAM: Exploring the Combination of Spatially-Aware Tablets with Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Analytics .Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014a. Constructive Visualization. In ACM conference on Designing Interactive Systems in 2014 (DIS '14 Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems). ACM, ACM , Vancouver, Canada, Pages 433--442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566 Best Paper Honorable Mention.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Samuel Huron, Yvonne Jansen, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2014b. Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens . IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 20, 12 (Aug. 2014), 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346292 hrefhttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-01024053/file/00_Camera_ready_IEEE.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Petra Isenberg, Danyel Fisher, Sharoda A. Paul, Meredith Ringel Morris, Kori Inkpen, and Mary Czerwinski. 2012. Co-located Collaborative Visual Analytics Around a Tabletop Display . IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 18, 5 (2012), 689--702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.287 Appeared in pre-print 12/2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proc. CHI . ACM, New York, 234--241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715 hrefhttps://tangible.media.mit.edu/project/tangible-bits/øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Paul Issartel, Florimond Guéniat, and Meryem Ammi. 2014. Slicing Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality. In Proc. 3DUI. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 39--42. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2014.6798839 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00992132øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Brian Jackson, Tung Yuen Lau, Damien Schroeder, Kimani C Toussaint, and Daniel F Keefe. 2013. A Lightweight Tangible 3D Interface for Interactive Visualization of Thin Fiber Structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2802--2809. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.121 hrefhttps://bret-jackson.com/papers/vis13-propbased-fiber-vis.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the Efficiency of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013). ACM, ACM, Paris, France, 2593--2602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481359 hrefhttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-00781831/file/Evaluating_the_Efficiency_of_Physical_Visualizations.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Waqas Javed and Niklas Elmqvist. 2012. Exploring the design space of composite visualization. In 2012 ieee pacific visualization symposium. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rajiv Khadka, James Money, and Amy Banić. 2018. Body-Prop Interaction: Augmented Open Discs and Egocentric Body-Based Interaction for Exploring Immersive Visualizations. In Proc. ISS (Tokyo, Japan). ACM, New York, 327--332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279778.3281458 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/329106608_Body-Prop_Interaction_Augmented_Open_Discs_and_Egocentric_Body-Based_Interaction_for_Exploring_Immersive_Visualizationsøatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. P. Koytek, C. Perin , J. Vermeulen, E. André, and S. Carpendale. 2018. MyBrush: Brushing and Linking with Personal Agency. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 24, 1 (2018), 605--615. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743859 hrefhttps://innovis.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/supplemental/MyBrush/2018_VIS_mybrush.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Mathieu Le Goc, Lawrence H Kim, Ali Parsaei, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Pierre Dragicevic, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Zooids: Building Blocks for Swarm User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). Tokyo, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984547 hrefhttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-01391281/file/SwarmUIs_no_copyright.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mathieu Le Goc, Charles Perin, Sean Follmer, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2019 a. Dynamic Composite Data Physicalization Using Wheeled Micro-Robots . IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 737--747. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865159 hrefhttps://hal.inria.fr/hal-01848436v2/file/Dynamic_Composite_Data_Physicalization_Using_Wheeled_Micro_Robots_nocopyright.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mathieu Le Goc, Charles Perin, Sean Follmer, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2019 b. Dynamic Composite Data Physicalization Using Wheeled Micro-Robots . IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 737--747. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Benjamin Lee, Xiaoyun Hu, Maxime Cordeil, Arnaud Prouzeau, Bernhard Jenny, and Tim Dwyer. 2021. Shared Surfaces and Spaces: Collaborative Data Visualisation in a Co-located Immersive Environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 27, 2 (2021), 1171--1181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030450 hrefhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00050øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, Alex Olwal, Samuel Luescher, Akimitsu Hogge, Jinha Lee, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. Sublimate: State-Changing Virtual and Physical Rendering to Augment Interaction with Shape Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1441--1450. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466191 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/266653955_Sublimate_State-Changing_Virtual_and_Physical_Rendering_to_Augment_Interaction_with_Shape_Displaysøatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Daniel Leithinger and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. Relief: A Scalable Actuated Shape Display. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 221--222. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709928 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/221308622_Relief_A_Scalable_Actuated_Shape_Displayøatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Catherine Letondal, Christophe Hurter, Rémi Lesbordes, Jean-Luc Vinot, and Stéphane Conversy. 2013. Flights in my hands: coherence concerns in designing Strip'TIC, a tangible space for air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2175--2184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lars Lischke, Paweł W. Woundefinedniak, Sven Mayer, Andreas Preikschat, and Morten Fjeld. 2017. Using Variable Movement Resistance Sliders for Remote Discrete Input. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Brighton, United Kingdom) (ISS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 116--125. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3134135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. David López, Lora Oehlberg, Candemir Doger, and Tobias Isenberg. 2016. Towards an Understanding of Mobile Touch Navigation in a Stereoscopic Viewing Environment for 3D Data Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 22, 5 (May 2016), 1616--1629. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2440233 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01174618øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Karljohan Lundin (Palmerius), Matthew Cooper, Anders Persson, Daniel Evestedt, and Anders Ynnerman. 2007. Enabling design and interactive selection of haptic modes. Virtual Reality (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0033--7 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/220530356_Enabling_design_and_interactive_selection_of_haptic_modesøatext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Karljohan Lundin (Palmerius), Mattias Sillé;n, Matthew Cooper, and Anders Ynnerman. 2005. Haptic Visualization of Computational Fluid Dynamics Data Using Reactive Forces. In International Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis, San Jose, USA. 95--102. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.587029 hrefhttp://webstaff.itn.liu.se/ karlu20/papers/lundin05haptic.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim Marriott, Falk Schreiber, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Nathalie Henry Riche, Takayuki Itoh, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Bruce H Thomas. 2018. Immersive Analytics . Vol. 11190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelber, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030-01388--2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul Marshall, Rowanne Fleck, Amanda Harris, Jochen Rick, Eva Hornecker, Yvonne Rogers, Nicola Yuill, and Nick Sheep Dalton. 2009. Fighting for control: Children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations. In Proc. CHI. ACM, New York, 2149--2152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519027 hrefhttp://mcs.open.ac.uk/pervasive/pdfs/marshallCHI09.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Izabel C. Olson, Zeina Atrash Leong, Uri Wilensky, and Mike S. Horn. 2011. “It's just a toolbar!” Using tangibles to help children manage conflict around a multi-touch tabletop. In Proc. TEI. ACM, New York, 29--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935709 hrefhttps://ccl.northwestern.edu/2011/p29-olson.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ivan Poupyrev, Tatsushi Nashida, Shigeaki Maruyama, Jun Rekimoto, and Yasufumi Yamaji. 2004. Lumen: Interactive Visual and Shape Display for Calm Computing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Emerging Technologies (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17. https://doi.org/10.1145/1186155.1186173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Anne Roudaut, Abhijit Karnik, Markus Löchtefeld, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. Morphees: Toward High "Shape Resolution" in Self-Actuated Flexible Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 593--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470738 hrefhttps://www.anneroudaut.fr/papers/roudaut_chi13b.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Cheryl Savery, Christophe Hurter, Ré mi Lesbordes, Maxime Cordeil, and T. C. Nicholas Graham. 2013. When Paper Meets Multi-touch: A Study of Multi-modal Interactions in Air Traffic Control. In Human-Computer Interaction textendash INTERACT 2013. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 196--213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--40477--1_12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Steven Schkolne, Hiroshi Ishii, and Peter Schroder. 2004. Immersive design of DNA molecules with a tangible interface. In Proc. Visualization . IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 227--234. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2004.47 hrefhttps://authors.library.caltech.edu/72861/1/01372201.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Bertrand Schneider, Kshitij Sharma, Sébastien Cuendet, Guillaume Zufferey, Pierre Dillenbourg, and Roy D Pea. 2015. 3D tangibles facilitate joint visual attention in dyads. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Mickael Sereno, Xiyao Wang, Lonni Besanc con, Michael J Mcguffin, and Tobias Isenberg. 2021. Collaborative Work in Augmented Reality: A Survey . IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3032761 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02971697/file/Sereno_2021_CWA.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Peng Song, Wooi Boon Goh, Chi-Wing Fu, Qiang Meng, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2011. WYSIWYF: Exploring and Annotating Volume Data with a Tangible Handheld Device. In Proc. CHI . ACM, New York, 1333--1342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979140 hrefhttp://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/aswbgoh/publication/CHI2011_WYSIWYF.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Martin Spindler, Sophie Stellmach, and Raimund Dachselt. 2009. PaperLens: Advanced Magic Lens Interaction Above the Tabletop. In Proc. ITS (Banff, Alberta, Canada). ACM, New York, 69--76. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731920 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/221540233_PaperLens_Advanced_magic_lens_interaction_above_the_tabletopøatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Martin Spindler, Christian Tominski, Heidrun Schumann, and Raimund Dachselt. 2010. Tangible Views for Information Visualization. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Saarbrücken, Germany) (ITS '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 157--166. https://doi.org/10.1145/1936652.1936684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Paul Strohmeier and Kasper Hornbæk. 2017. Generating Haptic Textures with a Vibrotactile Actuator. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4994--5005. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, Christian Weichel, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3237--3246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii, and Robert JK Jacob. 2003. Tangible Query Interfaces: Physically Constrained Tokens for Manipulating Database Queries.. In INTERACT, Vol. 3. 279--286. hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/2565314_Tangible_Query_Interfaces_Physically_Constrained_Tokens_for_Manipulating_Database_Queriesøatext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Sebastian Ullrich and Tornsten Kuhlen. 2012. Haptic Palpation for Medical Simulation in Virtual Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 18, 4 (April 2012), 617--625. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.46Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. T. van Reimersdahl, F. Bley, T. Kuhlen, and C. H. Bischof. 2003. Haptic Rendering Techniques for the Interactive Exploration of CFD Datasets in Virtual Environments. In Proc. Workshop on Virtual Environments (Zurich, Switzerland). ACM, New York, 241--246. https://doi.org/10.1145/769953.769981 hrefhttps://doi.org/10.1145/769953.769981øatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Christophe Viau and Michael J McGuffin. 2012. ConnectedCharts: explicit visualization of relationships between data graphics. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 31. Wiley Online Library, 1285--1294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Xiyao Wang, David Rousseau, Lonni Besanc con, Mickael Sereno, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2020. Towards an Understanding of Augmented Reality Extensions for Existing 3D Data Analysis Tools. In CHI '20 - 38th SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. Honolulu, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376657 hrefhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02442690/file/revision.pdføatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Lesley Xie, Alissa N. Antle, and Nima Motamedi. 2008. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proc. TEI . ACM, New York, 191--198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347433 hrefhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/221308791_Are_tangibles_more_fun_Comparing_children's_enjoyment_and_engagement_using_physical_graphical_and_tangible_user_interfacesøatext.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The MADE-Axis: A Modular Actuated Device to Embody the Axis of a Data Dimension

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue ISS
          ISS
          November 2021
          481 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3498314
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 November 2021
          Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue ISS

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!