skip to main content
survey

Carpooling in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Current Solutions and Future Directions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 September 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Owing to the advancements in communication and computation technologies, the dream of commercialized connected and autonomous cars is becoming a reality. However, among other challenges such as environmental pollution, cost, maintenance, security, and privacy, the ownership of vehicles (especially for Autonomous Vehicles) is the major obstacle in the realization of this technology at the commercial level. Furthermore, the business model of pay-as-you-go type services further attracts the consumer, because there is no need for upfront investment. In this vein, the idea of car-sharing (aka carpooling) is getting ground due to, at least in part, its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and affordable choice of transportation. Carpooling systems are still in their infancy and face challenges such as scheduling, matching passengers interests, business model, security, privacy, and communication. To date, a plethora of research work has already been done covering different aspects of carpooling services (ranging from applications to communication and technologies); however, there is still a lack of a holistic, comprehensive survey that can be a one-stop-shop for the researchers in this area to (i) find all the relevant information and (ii) identify the future research directions. To fill these research challenges, this article provides a comprehensive survey on carpooling in autonomous and connected vehicles and covers architecture, components, and solutions, including scheduling, matching, mobility, pricing models of carpooling. We also discuss the current challenges in carpooling and identify future research directions. This survey is aimed to spur further discussion among the research community for the effective realization of carpooling.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Abraham Hillary, Lee Chaiwoo, Brady Samantha, Fitzgerald Craig, Mehler Bruce, Reimer Bryan, and Coughlin Joseph F.. 2016. Autonomous vehicles, trust, and driving alternatives: A survey of consumer preferences. Massachusetts Inst. Technol, AgeLab, Cambridge 1 (2016), 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Agatz Niels, Erera Alan, Savelsbergh Martin, and Wang Xing. 1 December 2012. Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 223, 2 (1 December 2012), 295303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Agatz Niels, Erera Alan L., Savelsbergh Martin W. P., and Wang Xing. 2011. Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 17 (2011), 532550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Aïvodji Ulrich Matchi, Gambs Sébastien, Huguet Marie-José, and Killijian Marc-Olivier. 2016. Meeting points in ridesharing: A privacy-preserving approach. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 72 (2016), 239253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Aïvodji Ulrich Matchi, Huguenin Kévin, Huguet Marie-José, and Killijian Marc-Olivier. 2018. Sride: A privacy-preserving ridesharing system. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. 4050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] An Sunghi, Nam Daisik, and Jayakrishnan R.. 2019. Impacts of integrating shared autonomous vehicles into a Peer-to-Peer ridesharing system. Proc. Comput. Sci. 151 (1 2019), 511518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Andersson Magnus, Hjalmarsson Anders, and Avital Michel. 2013. Peer-to-Peer service sharing platforms: Driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Androutsopoulos Konstantinos N. and Zografos Konstantinos G.. 2009. Solving the multi-criteria time-dependent routing and scheduling problem in a multimodal fixed scheduled network. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 192, 1 (2009), 1828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Antoniou Constantinos, Efthymiou Dimitrios, and Chaniotakis Emmanouil Manos. 2019. Demand for Emerging Transportation Systems: Modeling Adoption, Satisfaction, and Mobility Patterns. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Asghari Mohammad, Deng Dingxiong, Shahabi Cyrus, Demiryurek Ugur, and Li Yaguang. 2016. Price-aware real-time ride-sharing at scale: An auction-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Bakkal F., Eken S., Savaş N. S., and Sayar A.. 2017. Modeling and querying trajectories using Neo4j spatial and TimeTree for carpool matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA’17). 219222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Aloqaily Moayad, Tunde-Onadele Olufogorehan, Yang Zhengyu, and Reisslein Martin. 2020. Reinforcing cloud environments via index policy for bursty workloads. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS’20). IEEE, 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Aloqaily Moayad, Zaman Faisal, and Jararweh Yaser. 2018. Exploring computing at the edge: A multi-interface system architecture enabled mobile device cloud. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet’18). IEEE, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Otoum Safa, Aloqaily Moayad, Ridhawi Ismaeel Al, and Jararweh Yaser. 2020. Low-latency vehicular edge: A vehicular infrastructure model for 5G. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 98 (2020), 101968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Zaman Faisal, Aloqaily Moayad, Ridhawi Ismaeel Al, Jararweh Yaser, and Salameh Haythem Bany. 2019. A mobility management architecture for seamless delivery of 5G-IoT services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’19). IEEE, 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Zaman Faisal, Aloqaily Moayad, Alrabaee Saed, Gorlatova Maria, and Reisslein Martin. 2019. Reinforcing the edge: Autonomous energy management for mobile device clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS’19). IEEE, 4449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Banerjee D. and Srivastava B.. 2015. Promoting carpooling with distributed schedule coordination and incentive alignment of contacts. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 18371842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Bertsimas Dimitris, Jaillet Patrick, and Martin Sébastien. 2019. Online vehicle routing: The edge of optimization in large-scale applications. Operat. Res. 67, 1 (2019), 143162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Bonhomme C., Arnould G., and Khadraoui D.. 2012. Dynamic carpooling mobility services based on secure multi-agent platform. In Proceedings of the Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS’12). 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Bonomi Flavio, Milito Rodolfo, Zhu Jiang, and Addepalli Sateesh. 2012. Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 1st MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing. 1316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Boukhater C. M., Dakroub O., Lahoud F., Awad M., and Artail H.. 2014. An intelligent and fair GA carpooling scheduler as a social solution for greener transportation. In Proceedings of the17th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON’14). 182186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Boysen Nils, Briskorn Dirk, Schwerdfeger Stefan, and Stephan Konrad. 2021. Optimizing carpool formation along high-occupancy vehicle lanes. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 293, 3 (2021), 10971112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Bresciani C., Colorni A., Costa F., Luè A., and Studer L.. 2018. Carpooling: Facts and new trends. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive. 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Caballero-Gil Cándido, Caballero-Gil Pino, Molina-Gil Jezabel, Martín-Fernández Francisco, and Loia Vincenzo. 2017. Trust-based cooperative social system applied to a carpooling platform for smartphones. Sensors 17, 2 (2017), 245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Calvert S. C., Schakel W. J., and Lint C. J. W. van. 2017. Will automated vehicles negatively impact traffic flow?J. Adv. Transport. (2017), 117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Calvo Roberto Wolfler, Luigi Fabio de, Haastrup Palle, and Maniezzo Vittorio. 2004. A distributed geographic information system for the daily car pooling problem. Comput. Operat. Res. 31, 13 (2004), 22632278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Chan Nelson D. and Shaheen Susan A.. 2012. Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transp. Rev. 32, 1 (2012), 93112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Cheikh Sondes Ben and Hammadi Slim. 2014. The alliance between optimization and multi-agent system for the management of the dynamic carpooling. In Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. Springer, 193202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Cheikh-Graiet Sondes Ben, Dotoli Mariagrazia, and Hammadi Slim. 2020. A Tabu Search based metaheuristic for dynamic carpooling optimization. Comput. Industr. Eng. 140 (2020), 106217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Chen Lu, Zhong Qilu, Xiao Xiaokui, Gao Yunjun, Jin Pengfei, and Jensen Christian S.. 2018. Price-and-time-aware dynamic ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’18). IEEE, 10611072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Chen Rui, Fung Benjamin C. M., Mohammed Noman, Desai Bipin C., and Wang Ke. 2013. Privacy-preserving trajectory data publishing by local suppression. Inf. Sci. 231 (2013), 8397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Chen Tong Donna et al. 2015. Management of a Shared, Autonomous, Electric Vehicle Fleet: Vehicle Choice, Charging Infrastructure & Pricing Strategies. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Virginia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Chen T. Donna and Kockelman Kara M.. 2016. Management of a shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet: Implications of pricing schemes. Transport. Res. Rec. 2572, 1 (2016), 3746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Chen T. Donna, Kockelman Kara M., and Hanna Josiah P.. 2016. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 94 (2016), 243254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Chiang Mung, Ha Sangtae, Chih-Lin I., Risso Fulvio, and Zhang Tao. 2017. Clarifying fog computing and networking: 10 questions and answers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 4 (2017), 1820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] Lin Chih-Hsiang, Jiau Ming-Kai, and Huang Shih-Chia. 2012. A cloud computing framework for real-time carpooling services. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science, Service Science and Data Mining (ISSDM’12). 266271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Chou S., Jiau M., and Huang S.. 2016. Stochastic set-based particle swarm optimization based on local exploration for solving the carpool service problem. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 46, 8 (2016), 17711783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Ciari Francesco, Balac Milos, and Balmer Michael. 2015. Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: A test case for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation 42, 3 (2015), 413433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Clements Lewis M. and Kockelman Kara M.. 2017. Economic effects of automated vehicles. J. Transport. Res. Board2606 (2017), 106114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Coindreau Marc-Antoine, Gallay Olivier, and Zufferey Nicolas. 2018. Synchronizing heterogeneous vehicles in a routing and scheduling context. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Project Management and Scheduling. 79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Collotta M., Pau G., Salerno V. M., and Scatà G.. 2012. A novel trust based algorithm for carpooling transportation systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON’12). 10771082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Cruz M. O., Macedo H., and Guimarães A.. 2015. Grouping similar trajectories for carpooling purposes. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS’15). 234239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Créno Lisa and Cahour Beatrice. 2015. Perceived risks and trust experience in a service of Carpooling. In Proceedings of the 22nd ITS World Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Dawy Zaher, Husseini Ahmad, Yaacoub Elias, and Al-Kanj Lina. 2010. A wireless communications laboratory on cellular network planning. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53, 4 (2010), 653661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Delhomme Patricia and Gheorghiu Alexandra. 2016. Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling?Transport. Res. D: Transport Environ. 42 (2016), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Di Xuan and Ban Xuegang Jeff. 2019. A unified equilibrium framework of new shared mobility systems. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 129 (2019), 5078.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Diana Marco. 2006. The importance of information flows temporal attributes for the efficient scheduling of dynamic demand responsive transport services. J. Adv. Transport. 40, 1 (2006), 2346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Dimitrijević Dejan, Dimitrieski Vladimir, and Nedić Nemanja. 2014. Prototype implementation of a scalable real-time dynamic carpooling and ride-sharing application. Informatica 38, 3 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Dimitrijević D., Nedić N., and Dimitrieski V.. 2013. Real-time carpooling and ride-sharing: Position paper on design concepts, distribution and cloud computing strategies. In Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. 781786.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Duan Y., Mosharraf T., Wu J., and Zheng H.. 2018. Optimizing carpool scheduling algorithm through partition merging. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’18). 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Elbery A., ElNainay M., and Rakha H.. 2016. Proactive and reactive carpooling recommendation system based on spatiotemporal and geosocial data. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’16). 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Enzi Miriam, Parragh Sophie N., Pisinger David, and Prandtstetter Matthias. 2020. Modeling and solving the multimodal car-and ride-sharing problem. arXiv:2001.05490. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] Feng H., Sengbin Y., Ruichun H., and Xiaoyao W.. 2015. Research on optimization model of taxi-carpooling expenses based on the passengers’ personalized demand. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS’15). 246249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Ferguson Erik. 1997. The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24, 4 (1997), 349376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Ferrari Emilio, Manzini Riccardo, Pareschi Arrigo, Persona Alessandro, and Regattieri Alberto. 2003. The car pooling problem: Heuristic algorithms based on savings functions. J. Adv. Transport. 37, 3 (2003), 243272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Fougères A., Canalda P., Ecarot T., Samaali A., and Guglielmetti L.. 2012. A push service for carpooling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. 685691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Friginal Jesús, Gambs Sébastien, Guiochet Jérémie, and Killijian Marc-Olivier. 2014. Towards privacy-driven design of a dynamic carpooling system. Perv. Mobile Comput. 14 (2014), 7182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Furuhata Masabumi, Dessouky Maged, Ordóñez Fernando, Brunet Marc-Etienne, Wang Xiaoqing, and Koenig Sven. November 2013. Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 57 (November 2013), 2846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Gadsby E., Jaimes S., Najarian L., Sanchez M., Sujlana R., Donohue G. L., and Coyne M.. 2003. George Mason University (GMU) Fairfax campus transportation system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. 7782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Garrison William L., Wellar Barry, MacKinnon Ross, Black William R., and Getis Arthur. 2011. Research Commentary: Increasing the Flexibility of Legacy Systems. Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res. 2, 2 (2011), 3955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. [61] Goel Preeti, Kulik Lars, and Ramamohanarao Kotagiri. 2016. Optimal pick up point selection for effective ride sharing. IEEE Trans. Big Data 3, 2 (2016), 154168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Goel Preeti, Kulik Lars, and Ramamohanarao Kotagiri. 2016. Privacy-aware dynamic ride sharing. ACM Trans. Spatial Algor. Syst. 2, 1 (2016), 141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Graziotin Daniel. 2013. An Analysis of issues against the adoption of Dynamic Carpooling. arxiv:1306.0361. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Guidotti Riccardo, Nanni Mirco, Rinzivillo Salvatore, Pedreschi Dino, and Giannotti Fosca. 2017. Never drive alone: Boosting carpooling with network analysis. Inf. Syst. 64 (2017), 237257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. [65] Hallgren Per, Orlandi Claudio, and Sabelfeld Andrei. 2017. PrivatePool: Privacy-preserving ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF’17). IEEE, 276291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Hariz M. B., Said D., and Mouftah H. T.. 2019. Mobility traffic model based on combination of multiple transportation forms in the smart city. In Proceedings of the 15th International Wireless Communications Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’19). 1419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Hartman Irith Ben-Arroyo, Keren Daniel, Dbai Abed Abu, Cohen Elad, Knapen Luk, Janssens Davy, et al. 2014. Theory and practice in large carpooling problems. Proc. Comput. Sci. 32 (2014), 339347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. [68] Hasan Raza, Bhatti Abdul Hadi, Hayat Mohammad Sohail, Gebreyohannes Haftamu Menker, Ali Syed Imran, and Syed Abeer Javed. 2016. Smart peer car pooling system. In Proceedings of the 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC’16). IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Hassine M., Canalda P., and Hassine I.. 2017. Dynamic intra-modal carpooling with transhipment: Formalization and first combinatorial exact solution. In Proceedings of the IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing Communications, Cloud Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI’17). 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] He W., Hwang K., and Li D.. 2014. Intelligent carpool routing for urban ridesharing by mining gps trajectories. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 15, 5 (2014), 22862296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] He Y., Ni J., Wang X., Niu B., Li F., and Shen X.. 2018. Privacy-Preserving partner selection for ride-sharing services. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 67, 7 (2018), 59946005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Herbawi Wesam and Weber Michael. 2012. The ridematching problem with time windows in dynamic ridesharing: A model and a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Hong Zihan, Chen Ying, Mahmassani Hani S., and Xu Shuang. 2017. Commuter ride-sharing using topology-based vehicle trajectory clustering: Methodology, application and impact evaluation. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 85 (2017), 573590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Huang J., Wu J., and Chen L.. 2018. Coalitional game based carpooling algorithms for quality of experience. In Proceedings of the IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS’18). 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. [75] Huang J., Wu J., Chen L., and Yan J.. 2019. Utility-Aware batch-processing algorithms for dynamic carpooling based on double auction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Parallel Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing Communications, Social Computing Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom’19). 10591063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. [76] Huang S., Jiau M., and Chong K.. 2018. A heuristic multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving the carpool services problem featuring high-occupancy-vehicle itineraries. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 19, 8 (2018), 26632674.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. [77] Huang S., Jiau M., and Lin C.. 2015. A genetic-algorithm-based approach to solve carpool service problems in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 1 (2015), 352364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. [78] Huang S., Jiau M., and Liu Y.. 2019. An ant path-oriented carpooling allocation approach to optimize the carpool service problem with time windows. IEEE Syst. J. 13, 1 (2019), 9941005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. [79] Huang Shih-Chia, Jiau Ming-Kai, and Lin Chih-Hsiang. 2014. Optimization of the carpool service problem via a fuzzy-controlled genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 5 (2014), 16981712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. [80] Huang Yan, Jin Ruoming, Bastani Favyen, and Wang Xiaoyang Sean. 2013. Large scale real-time ridesharing with service guarantee on road networks. arXiv:1302.6666. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. [81] Hussain R., Abbas F., Son J., Eun H., and Oh H.. 2013. Privacy-aware route tracing and revocation games in VANET-based clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’13). 730735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. [82] Hussain Rasheed, Hussain Fatima, and Zeadally Sherali. 2019. Integration of VANET and 5G Security: A review of design and implementation issues. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 101 (2019), 843864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. [83] Hussain R., Lee J., and Zeadally S.. 2018. Autonomous cars: Social and economic implications. IT Profess. 20, 6 (November 2018), 7077. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. [84] Jadhao R. B. and Patil J. M.. 2017. Recommendation system for carpooling and regular taxicab services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC’17). 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. [85] M. N. Jean. 2014. France falls out of love with the car. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/09/france-car-ownership-sales-downturn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. [86] Jeribi Karama, Mejri Hinda, Zgaya Hayfa, and Hammadi Slim. 2011. Vehicle sharing services optimization based on multi-agent approach. IFAC Proc. Vol. 44, 1 (2011), 1304013045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. [87] Jiau M. and Huang S.. 2015. Services-Oriented computing using the compact genetic algorithm for solving the carpool services problem. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 5 (2015), 27112722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. [88] Jiau M. and Huang S.. 2019. Self-Organizing neuroevolution for solving carpool service problem with dynamic capacity to alternate matches. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 30, 4 (2019), 10481060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. [89] Jiau M., Huang S., and Lin C.. 2013. Optimizing the carpool service problem with genetic algorithm in service-based computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 478485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. [90] Jin Fanglei, Yao Enjian, and An Kun. 2020. Analysis of the potential demand for battery electric vehicle sharing: Mode share and spatiotemporal distribution. J. Transport Geogr. 82 (2020), 102630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. [91] Kesting Arne, Treiber Martin, Schönhof Martin, Kranke Florian, and Helbing Dirk. 2007. Jam-avoiding adaptive cruise control (ACC) and its impact on traffic dynamics. In Traffic and Granular Flow’05. Springer, 633643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. [92] Khattak Hasan Ali, Shah Munam Ali, Khan Sangeen, Ali Ihsan, and Imran Muhammad. 2019. Perception layer security in Internet of Things. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 100 (2019), 144164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. [93] Lafrance Adrienne. 2016. Your Grandmother’s Driverless Car. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/06/beep-beep/489029/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. [94] Li Desheng, He Qian, Liu Chunli, and Yu Hongjie. 2017. Real-Time carpooling system on android terminal using session initiation protocol and location based service. J. Comput. Theoret. Nanosci. 14, 4 (2017), 20692076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. [95] Li J., Huang T., Chen S., and Yang Y.. 2018. Optimization based on taxi carpooling preferences and pricing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD’18). 108112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. [96] Li M., Zhu L., and Lin X.. 2019. Efficient and privacy-preserving carpooling using blockchain-assisted vehicular fog computing. IEEE IoT J. 6, 3 (2019), 45734584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. [97] Li Meng, Zhu Liehuang, Zhang Zijian, and Xu Rixin. 2017. Achieving differential privacy of trajectory data publishing in participatory sensing. Inf. Sci. 400 (2017), 113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. [98] Li Qing, Liao Feixiong, Timmermans Harry J. P., Huang Haijun, and Zhou Jing. 2018. Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: A demand-side model. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 107 (2018), 102123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. [99] Li Ruimin, Liu Zhiyong, and Zhang Ruibo. 2018. Studying the benefits of carpooling in an urban area using automatic vehicle identification data. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 93 (2018), 367380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. [100] Li S., Fei F., Ruihan D., Yu S., and Dou W.. 2016. A dynamic pricing method for carpooling service based on coalitional game analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS’16). 7885.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. [101] Li Shuai, Zhu Haojin, Gao Zhaoyu, Guan Xinping, Xing Kai, and Shen Xuemin. 2012. Location privacy preservation in collaborative spectrum sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’12). IEEE, 729737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. [102] Lin J., Huang S., and Jiau M.. 2019. An evolutionary multiobjective carpool algorithm using set-based operator based on simulated binary crossover. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 49, 9 (2019), 34323442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. [103] Liu Nianbo, Liu Ming, Cao Jiannong, Chen Guihai, and Lou Wei. 2010. When transportation meets communication: V2P over VANETs. In Proceedings of the IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 567576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. [104] Liu Zhidan, Gong Zengyang, Li Jiangzhou, and Wu Kaishun. 2020. Mobility-Aware dynamic taxi ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’20). IEEE, 961972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. [105] Lloret-Batlle Roger, Masoud Neda, and Nam Daisik. 2017. Peer-to-Peer ridesharing with ride-back on high-occupancy-vehicle lanes: Toward a practical alternative mode for daily commuting. Transport. Res. Rec. 2668, 1 (2017), 2128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. [106] Lou Yingyan, Yin Yafeng, and Laval Jorge A.. 2011. Optimal dynamic pricing strategies for high-occupancy/toll lanes. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 19, 1 (2011), 6474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. [107] Luo Y., Jia X., Fu S., and Xu M.. 2019. pRide: Privacy-Preserving Ride Matching Over Road Networks for Online Ride-Hailing Service. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 14, 7 (2019), 17911802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. [108] Ma Changxi, He Ruichun, and Zhang Wei. 2018. Path optimization of taxi carpooling. PLoS One 13, 8 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. [109] Ma Jiaqi, Li Xiaopeng, Zhou Fang, and Hao Wei. 2017. Designing optimal autonomous vehicle sharing and reservation systems: A linear programming approach. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 84 (2017), 124141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. [110] Ma Rui and Zhang H. M.. 2017. The morning commute problem with ridesharing and dynamic parking charges. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 106 (2017), 345374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. [111] Ma Shuo, Zheng Yu, and Wolfson Ouri. 2013. T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service. In Proceedings of the IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’13). IEEE, 410421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. [112] Ma Shuo, Zheng Yu, and Wolfson Ouri. 2014. Real-time city-scale taxi ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 7 (2014), 17821795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. [113] Malik Sayyam, Khattak Hasan Ali, Ameer Zoobia, Shoaib Umar, Rauf Hafiz Tayyab, and Song Houbing. 2021. Proactive scheduling and resource management for connected autonomous vehicles: A data science perspective. IEEE Sens. J. 21, 22 (2021), 25151–25160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. [114] Mallus Matteo, Colistra Giuseppe, Atzori Luigi, Murroni Maurizio, and Pilloni Virginia. 2017. Dynamic carpooling in urban areas: Design and experimentation with a multi-objective route matching algorith. Sustainability 9, 2 (2017), 254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. [115] Mao Lina, Li Wenquan, Hu Pengsen, Zhou Guiliang, Zhang Huiting, and Zhou Xuanyu. 2019. Urban arterial road optimization and design combined with hov carpooling under connected vehicle environment. J. Adv. Transport. 2019 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. [116] Marco-Gisbert Hector and Ripoll Ismael. 2013. Preventing brute force attacks against stack canary protection on networking servers. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications. IEEE, 243250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. [117] Martín-Fernández Francisco, Caballero-Gil Cándido, and Caballero-Gil Pino. 2015. A trustworthy distributed social carpool method. In European Conference on Parallel Processing. Springer, 324335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. [118] Masoud Neda and Jayakrishnan R.. 2017. A decomposition algorithm to solve the multi-hop peer-to-peer ride-matching problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 99 (2017), 129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. [119] Masoud Neda and Jayakrishnan R.. 2017. A real-time algorithm to solve the peer-to-peer ride-matching problem in a flexible ridesharing system. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 106 (2017), 218236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. [120] Masoud Neda, Lloret-Batlle Roger, and Jayakrishnan R.. 2017. Using bilateral trading to increase ridership and user permanence in ridesharing systems. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 102 (2017), 6077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. [121] Masoud Neda, Nam Daisik, Yu Jiangbo, and Jayakrishnan R.. 2017. Promoting peer-to-peer ridesharing services as transit system feeders. Transport. Res. Rec. 2650, 1 (2017), 7483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. [122] Massaro Dominic W., Chaney Benjamin, Bigler Stephanie, Lancaster Jessica, Iyer Suresh, Gawade Mrunal, Eccleston Michael, Gurrola Edith, and Lopez Angelica. 2009. Just-in-Time carpooling without elaborate preplanning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (Webist’09). 219224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. [123] Megalingam R. K., Nair R. N., and Radhakrishnan V.. 2011. Automated wireless carpooling system for an eco-friendly travel. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, Vol. 4. 325329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  124. [124] Meng Hui, Ran Lun, Chen Jing, and Jiao Zihao. 2017. Goal-Driven approach to optimize matching mechanism in electric vehicles ride-sharing system. Energy Proc. 105 (2017), 22732280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. [125] Mo Daniel Y., Wang Yue, Lee Y. C. E., and Tseng Mitchell M.. 2018. Mass customizing paratransit services with a ridesharing option. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. [126] Montes Rosana, Sanchez Ana M., Villar Pedro, and Herrera Francisco. 2018. Teranga Go!: Carpooling Collaborative Consumption Community with multi-criteria hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set opinions to build confidence and trust. Appl. Soft Comput. 67 (2018), 941952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. [127] Moradi Behzad. 2019. The new optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows using multi-objective discrete learnable evolution model. Soft Comput. (2019), 129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. [128] Mourad Abood, Puchinger Jakob, and Chu Chengbin. 2019. A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 123 (2019), 323346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. [129] Nagare Deepak B., More Kishor L., Tanwar Nitin S., Kulkarni S. S., and Gunda Kalyan C.. 2013. Dynamic carpooling application development on Android platform. Int. J. Innovat. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2, 3 (2013), 136139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. [130] Ni Jianbing, Zhang Kuan, Lin Xiaodong, and Shen Xuemin Sherman. 2017. Securing fog computing for internet of things applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 1 (2017), 601628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. [131] Ni Jianbing, Zhang Kuan, Lin Xiaodong, Yang Haomiao, and Shen Xuemin Sherman. 2016. AMA: Anonymous mutual authentication with traceability in carpooling systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC’16). IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. [132] Pamula Rajendra and Chakraborty Rini. 2017. Taxi recommender system using ridesharing service. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS’17). IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. [133] Paul Sunil, Khanna Jahan, Wong Robert, and Moran Robert. 2016. Systems and methods for providing transportation discounts in shared rides. US Patent App. 14/794,425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. [134] Pearson Siani and Balacheff Boris. 2003. Trusted Computing Platforms: TCPA Technology in Context. Prentice Hall Professional.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. [135] Pelzer Dominik, Xiao Jiajian, Zehe Daniel, Lees Michael H., Knoll Alois C., and Aydt Heiko. 2015. A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 5 (2015), 25872598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. [136] Gong Pengfei and Li Wenquan. 2011. Urban traffic demand control based on carpooling: A case of Nanjing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering. 18631866.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. [137] Perboli Guido, Ferrero Francesco, Musso Stefano, and Vesco Andrea. 2018. Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 115 (2018), 3248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  138. [138] Pham Anh, Dacosta Italo, Endignoux Guillaume, Pastoriza Juan Ramon Troncoso, Huguenin Kévin, and Hubaux Jean-Pierre. 2017. Oride: A privacy-preserving yet accountable ride-hailing service. In Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’17). 12351252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. [139] Pham Anh, Dacosta Italo, Jacot-Guillarmod Bastien, Huguenin Kévin, Hajar Taha, Tramèr Florian, Gligor Virgil, and Hubaux Jean-Pierre. 2017. Privateride: A privacy-enhanced ride-hailing service. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2017, 2 (2017), 3856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. [140] Qadir H., Khalid O., Khan M. U. S., Khan A. U. R., and Nawaz R.. 2018. An optimal ride sharing recommendation framework for carpooling services. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 6229662313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  141. [141] Qi X., Wang L., and Wang X.. 2016. Optimization of carpooling based on complete subgraphs. In Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC’16). 92949299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  142. [142] Qu Fengzhong, Wu Zhihui, Wang Fei-Yue, and Cho Woong. 2015. A security and privacy review of VANETs. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 6 (2015), 29852996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. [143] Rayle Lisa, Dai Danielle, Chan Nelson, Cervero Robert, and Shaheen Susan. 2016. Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Pol. 45 (2016), 168178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  144. [144] Rios-Torres Jackeline and Malikopoulos Andreas A.. 2016. A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 18, 5 (2016), 10661077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. [145] Hahn Robert Metcalfe and Robert. 2017. The Ridesharing Revolution: Economic Survey and Synthesis, Vol. IV. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. [146] Salamanis Athanasios, Kehagias Dionysios D., Tsoukalas Dimitrios, and Tzovaras Dimitrios. 2019. Reputation assessment mechanism for carpooling applications based on clustering user travel preferences. Int. J. Transport. Sci. Technol. 8, 1 (2019), 6881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  147. [147] Sánchez David, Martínez Sergio, and Domingo-Ferrer Josep. 2016. Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 73 (2016), 147166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  148. [148] Sayarshad Hamid R. and Gao H. Oliver. 2018. A scalable non-myopic dynamic dial-a-ride and pricing problem for competitive on-demand mobility systems. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 91 (2018), 192208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. [149] Sghaier Manel, Zgaya Hayfa, Hammadi Slim, and Tahon Christian. 2010. A distributed dijkstra’s algorithm for the implementation of a Real Time Carpooling Service with an optimized aspect on siblings. In Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 795800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  150. [150] Sghaier Manel, Zgaya Hayfa, Hammadi Slim, and Tahon Christian. 2010. Ortic: A novel approach towards optimized real time carpooling with an advanced network representation model on siblings. IFAC Proc. Vol. 43, 8 (2010), 367375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. [151] Sghaier Manel, Zgaya Hayfa, Hammadi Slim, and Tahon Christian. 2011. A distributed optimized approach based on the multi agent concept for the implementation of a real time carpooling service with an optimization aspect on siblings. Int. J. Eng. 5, 2 (2011), 217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. [152] Sghaier M., Zgaya H., Hammadi S., and Tahon C.. 2011. A novel approach based on a distributed dynamic graph modeling set up over a subdivision process to deal with distributed optimized real time carpooling requests. In Proceedings of the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC’11). 13111316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  153. [153] Shaheen Susan A. and Lipman Timothy E.. 2007. Reducing greenhouse emissions and fuel consumption: Sustainable approaches for surface transportation. IATSS Res. 31, 1 (2007), 620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  154. [154] Shaheen Susan, Cohen Adam, and Bayen Alexandre. 2018. The Benefits of Carpooling. Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7jx6z631. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  155. [155] Shao Z. Z., Wang H. G., Liu H., Song C., Meng C., and Yu H.. 2013. Heuristic optimization algorithms of multi-carpooling problem based on two-stage clustering. J. Comput. Res. Dev. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. [156] Sharma Surbhi and Kaushik Baijnath. 2019. A survey on internet of vehicles: Applications, security issues & solutions. Vehic. Commun. 20 (2019), 100182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. [157] Miller Brent R. Heard and Shelie A.. 2016. The environmental impact of autonomous vehicles depends on adoption patterns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12 (2016), 61196121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  158. [158] Shen Zukang, Papasakellariou Aris, Montojo Juan, Gerstenberger Dirk, and Xu Fangli. 2012. Overview of 3GPP LTE-advanced carrier aggregation for 4G wireless communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50, 2 (2012), 122130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  159. [159] Sherif A. B. T., Rabieh K., Mahmoud M. M. E. A., and Liang X.. 2017. Privacy-Preserving ride sharing scheme for autonomous vehicles in big data era. IEEE IoT J. 4, 2 (2017), 611618.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. [160] Shi Q. and Chen X.. 2020. Carpool for big data: Enabling efficient crowd cooperation in data market for pervasive AI. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. (2020), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. [161] Shladover Steven E.. 2009. Cooperative (rather than autonomous) vehicle-highway automation systems. IEEE Intell. Transport. Syst. Ma. 1, 1 (2009), 1019. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  162. [162] Shladover Steven E., Su Dongyan, and Lu Xiao-Yun. 2012. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transport. Res. Rec. 2324, 1 (2012), 6370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  163. [163] Silwal Shrawani, Gani Md Osman, and Raychoudhury Vaskar. 2019. A survey of taxi ride sharing system architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP’19). IEEE, 144149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  164. [164] Song Fei, Li Rong, and Zhou Huachun. 2015. Feasibility and issues for establishing network-based carpooling scheme. Perv. Mobile Comput. 24 (2015), 415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  165. [165] Standing Craig, Standing Susan, and Biermann Sharon. 2019. The implications of the sharing economy for transport. Transport Rev. 39, 2 (2019), 226242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  166. [166] Stiglic Mitja, Agatz Niels, Savelsbergh Martin, and Gradisar Mirko. 2015. The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 82 (2015), 3653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  167. [167] Stiglic Mitja, Agatz Niels, Savelsbergh Martin, and Gradisar Mirko. 2016. Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 91 (2016), 190207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  168. [168] Storck C. R. and Duarte-Figueiredo F.. 2020. A survey of 5G technology evolution, standards, and infrastructure associated with vehicle-to-everything communications by internet of vehicles. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 117593117614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  169. [169] Tahmasseby Shahram, Kattan Lina, and Barbour Brian. 2016. Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpooling system. J. Adv. Transport. 50, 2 (2016), 240254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  170. [170] Tahon Christian, Hammadi Slim, et al. 2016. An evolutionary approach to solve the dynamic multi-hop ridematching problem. SIMULATION (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. [171] Tang F., Kawamoto Y., Kato N., and Liu J.. 2020. Future intelligent and secure vehicular network toward 6G: Machine-Learning approaches. Proc. IEEE 108, 2 (2020), 292307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  172. [172] Tong Wei, Hua Jingyu, and Zhong Sheng. 2017. A jointly differentially private scheduling protocol for ridesharing services. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 12, 10 (2017), 24442456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. [173] Tyagi Amit Kumar and Niladhuri Sreenath. 2016. Ensuring trust and privacy in large carpooling problems. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication (CIC’16), Vol. 14. 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. [174] Tyagi Amit Kumar and Sreenath N.. 2016. Providing together security, location privacy and trust for moving objects. Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol. 9, 3 (2016), 221240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. [175] Tyagi Amit Kumar and Sreenath N.. 2016. Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: New challenges in carpooling and parking services. In Proceeding of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication (CIC’16), Vol. 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. [176] Wang Fengwei, Zhu Hui, Liu Ximeng, Lu Rongxing, Li Fenghua, Li Hui, and Zhang Songnian. 2018. Efficient and privacy-preserving dynamic spatial query scheme for ride-hailing services. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 67, 11 (2018), 1108411097.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  177. [177] Wang W., Chen Y., Zhang Q., Wu K., and Zhang J.. 2016. Less transmissions, more throughput: Bringing carpool to public WLANs. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 15, 5 (2016), 11681181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  178. [178] Wang Xing, Agatz Niels, and Erera Alan. 2018. Stable matching for dynamic ride-sharing systems. Transport. Sci. 52, 4 (2018), 850867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. [179] Wang Xiaolei, He Fang, Yang Hai, and Gao H. Oliver. 2016. Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 93 (2016), 212231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  180. [180] Wright Steve, Nelson John D., and Cottrill Caitlin D.. 2020. MaaS for the suburban market: Incorporating carpooling in the mix. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 131 (2020), 206218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  181. [181] Wu Yongzhong, Chen Xiangying, and Ma Jingwen. 2018. Modeling passengers’ choice in ride-hailing service with dedicated-ride option and ride-sharing option. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering. 9498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  182. [182] Xi Yong, Schwiebert Loren, and Shi Weisong. 2014. Privacy preserving shortest path routing with an application to navigation. Perv. Mobile Comput. 13 (2014), 142149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  183. [183] Xia Jizhe, Curtin Kevin M., Huang Jiajun, Wu Di, Xiu Wenqun, and Huang Zhengdong. 2019. A carpool matching model with both social and route networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 75 (2019), 90102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  184. [184] Xiao Qiang, He Ruichun, Ma Changxi, and Zhang Wei. 2019. Evaluation of urban taxi-carpooling matching schemes based on entropy weight fuzzy matter-element. Appl. Soft Comput. 81 (2019), 105493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  185. [185] Xiao Qiang, He RuiChun, Zhang Wei, and Ma C. X.. 2014. Algorithm research of taxi carpooling based on fuzzy clustering and fuzzy recognition. J. Transport. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 14, 5 (2014), 119125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. [186] Xiao Qiang and He R.-C.. 2017. Carpooling scheme selection for taxi carpooling passengers: A multi-objective model and optimisation algorithm. Arch. Transport 42 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  187. [187] Xiong Zehui, Feng Shaohan, Wang Wenbo, Niyato Dusit, Wang Ping, and Han Zhu. 2018. Cloud/fog computing resource management and pricing for blockchain networks. IEEE IoT J. 6, 3 (2018), 45854600.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. [188] Yan S., Chen C., and Chang S.. 2014. A car pooling model and solution method with stochastic vehicle travel times. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 15, 1 (2014), 4761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  189. [189] Yan Wangcheng, Zhou Wenjun, Tan Chang, and Fan Lei. 2019. Employee ridesharing: Reinforcement learning and choice modeling. In Proceedings of the 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. [190] Yang Hai and Huang Hai-Jun. 1999. Carpooling and congestion pricing in a multilane highway with high-occupancy-vehicle lanes. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 33, 2 (1999), 139155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  191. [191] Yeung S., Aziz H. M. A., and Madria S.. 2019. Activity-Based shared mobility model for smart transportation. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM’19). 599604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  192. [192] Yu H., Jia X., Zhang H., Yu X., and Shu J.. 2019. PSRide: Privacy-Preserving shared ride matching for online ride hailing systems. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. (2019), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  193. [193] Yu H., Shu J., Jia X., Zhang H., and Yu X.. 2019. lpRide: Lightweight and privacy-preserving ride matching over road networks in online ride hailing systems. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 68, 11 (2019), 1041810428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  194. [194] Yu Xiaojuan, Berg Vincent A. C. van den, and Verhoef Erik T.. 2019. Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 127 (2019), 178200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  195. [195] Hou Yunfei, Li X., and Qiao C.. 2012. TicTac: From transfer-incapable carpooling to transfer-allowed carpooling. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’12). 268273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. [196] Zeng Cheng and Oren Nir. 2014. Dynamic taxi pricing. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. [197] Zha Liteng, Yin Yafeng, and Du Yuchuan. 2017. Surge pricing and labor supply in the ride-sourcing market. Transport. Res. Proc. 23, 2–21 (2017), 5–2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. [198] Zhang Chaoli, Xie Jiapeng, Wu Fan, Gao Xiaofeng, and Chen Guihai. 2020. Pricing and allocation algorithm designs in dynamic ridesharing system. Theor. Comput. Sci. 803 (2020), 94104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  199. [199] Zhang D., He T., Liu Y., Lin S., and Stankovic J. A.. 2014. A carpooling recommendation system for taxicab services. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2, 3 (2014), 254266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  200. [200] Zhang Desheng, He Tian, Liu Yunhuai, and Stankovic John A.. 2013. CallCab: A unified recommendation system for carpooling and regular taxicab services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE, 439447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  201. [201] Zhang Desheng, He Tian, Zhang Fan, Lu Mingming, Liu Yunhuai, Lee Haengju, and Son Sang H.. 2016. Carpooling service for large-scale taxicab networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 12, 3 (2016), 135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  202. [202] Zhang F., Yang Z. J., Wang Y., and Kuang F.. 2016. An augmented estimation of distribution algorithm for multi-carpooling problem with time window. In Proceedings of the IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  203. [203] Zhang J. T.. 2016. A research the dynamic pricing strategy of taxi software. J. Tangsh. Univ. 29, 6 (2016), 7884.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. [204] Zhang Wei, He Ruichun, Chen Yong, Gao Mingxia, and Ma Changxi. 2019. Research on taxi pricing model and optimization for carpooling detour problem. J. Adv. Transport. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  205. [205] Zhang Wei, He Ruichun, Ma Changxi, and Gao Mingxia. 2018. Research on taxi driver strategy game evolution with carpooling detour. J. Adv. Transport. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  206. [206] Zhang Wei, He Ruichun, Xiao Qiang, and Ma Changxi. 2017. Taxi carpooling model and carpooling effects simulation. Int. J. Simul. Process Model. 12, 3–4 (2017), 338346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  207. [207] Zhang Z., Wang G., Cao B., and Han Y.. 2015. Data services for carpooling based on large-scale traffic data analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 672679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  208. [208] Zhao Tianlu, Yang Yongjian, and Wang En. 2020. Minimizing the average arriving distance in carpooling. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 16, 1 (2020), 1550147719899369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  209. [209] Zhou Guiliang, Lv Mengru, Bao Tianwen, Mao Lina, and Huang Kai. 2019. Design of intelligent carpooling program based on big data analysis and multi-information perception. Clust. Comput. 22, 1 (2019), 521532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  210. [210] Zhou Zhuping, Zhang Kai, Zhu Wenbo, and Wang Yinhai. 2019. Modeling lane-choice behavior to optimize pricing strategy for HOT lanes: A support vector regression approach. J. Transport. Eng. A: Syst. 145, 4 (2019), 04019004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  211. [211] Zhu Liehuang, Li Meng, Zhang Zijian, and Qin Zhan. 2018. ASAP: An anonymous smart-parking and payment scheme in vehicular networks. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Carpooling in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Current Solutions and Future Directions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Computing Surveys
            ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 54, Issue 10s
            January 2022
            831 pages
            ISSN:0360-0300
            EISSN:1557-7341
            DOI:10.1145/3551649
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 September 2022
            • Online AM: 14 January 2022
            • Accepted: 16 November 2021
            • Revised: 6 September 2021
            • Received: 26 April 2021
            Published in csur Volume 54, Issue 10s

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • survey
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Full Text

          View this article in Full Text.

          View Full Text

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format