Abstract
Owing to the advancements in communication and computation technologies, the dream of commercialized connected and autonomous cars is becoming a reality. However, among other challenges such as environmental pollution, cost, maintenance, security, and privacy, the ownership of vehicles (especially for Autonomous Vehicles) is the major obstacle in the realization of this technology at the commercial level. Furthermore, the business model of pay-as-you-go type services further attracts the consumer, because there is no need for upfront investment. In this vein, the idea of car-sharing (aka carpooling) is getting ground due to, at least in part, its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and affordable choice of transportation. Carpooling systems are still in their infancy and face challenges such as scheduling, matching passengers interests, business model, security, privacy, and communication. To date, a plethora of research work has already been done covering different aspects of carpooling services (ranging from applications to communication and technologies); however, there is still a lack of a holistic, comprehensive survey that can be a one-stop-shop for the researchers in this area to (i) find all the relevant information and (ii) identify the future research directions. To fill these research challenges, this article provides a comprehensive survey on carpooling in autonomous and connected vehicles and covers architecture, components, and solutions, including scheduling, matching, mobility, pricing models of carpooling. We also discuss the current challenges in carpooling and identify future research directions. This survey is aimed to spur further discussion among the research community for the effective realization of carpooling.
- [1] . 2016. Autonomous vehicles, trust, and driving alternatives: A survey of consumer preferences. Massachusetts Inst. Technol, AgeLab, Cambridge 1 (2016), 16.Google Scholar
- [2] . 1 December 2012. Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 223, 2 (1 December 2012), 295–303.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [3] . 2011. Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 17 (2011), 532–550.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [4] . 2016. Meeting points in ridesharing: A privacy-preserving approach. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 72 (2016), 239–253.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [5] . 2018. Sride: A privacy-preserving ridesharing system. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. 40–50.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [6] . 2019. Impacts of integrating shared autonomous vehicles into a Peer-to-Peer ridesharing system. Proc. Comput. Sci. 151 (
1 2019), 511–518. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [7] . 2013. Peer-to-Peer service sharing platforms: Driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’13).Google Scholar
- [8] . 2009. Solving the multi-criteria time-dependent routing and scheduling problem in a multimodal fixed scheduled network. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 192, 1 (2009), 18–28.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [9] . 2019. Demand for Emerging Transportation Systems: Modeling Adoption, Satisfaction, and Mobility Patterns. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- [10] . 2016. Price-aware real-time ride-sharing at scale: An auction-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1–10.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [11] . 2017. Modeling and querying trajectories using Neo4j spatial and TimeTree for carpool matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA’17). 219–222.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [12] . 2020. Reinforcing cloud environments via index policy for bursty workloads. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS’20). IEEE, 1–7.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [13] . 2018. Exploring computing at the edge: A multi-interface system architecture enabled mobile device cloud. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet’18). IEEE, 1–4.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [14] . 2020. Low-latency vehicular edge: A vehicular infrastructure model for 5G. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 98 (2020), 101968.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [15] . 2019. A mobility management architecture for seamless delivery of 5G-IoT services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’19). IEEE, 1–7.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [16] . 2019. Reinforcing the edge: Autonomous energy management for mobile device clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS’19). IEEE, 44–49.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [17] . 2015. Promoting carpooling with distributed schedule coordination and incentive alignment of contacts. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 1837–1842.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [18] . 2019. Online vehicle routing: The edge of optimization in large-scale applications. Operat. Res. 67, 1 (2019), 143–162.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [19] . 2012. Dynamic carpooling mobility services based on secure multi-agent platform. In Proceedings of the Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS’12). 1–6.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [20] . 2012. Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 1st MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing. 13–16.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [21] . 2014. An intelligent and fair GA carpooling scheduler as a social solution for greener transportation. In Proceedings of the17th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON’14). 182–186.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [22] . 2021. Optimizing carpool formation along high-occupancy vehicle lanes. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 293, 3 (2021), 1097–1112. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [23] . 2018. Carpooling: Facts and new trends. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive. 1–4.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [24] . 2017. Trust-based cooperative social system applied to a carpooling platform for smartphones. Sensors 17, 2 (2017), 245.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [25] . 2017. Will automated vehicles negatively impact traffic flow?J. Adv. Transport. (2017), 1–17.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [26] . 2004. A distributed geographic information system for the daily car pooling problem. Comput. Operat. Res. 31, 13 (2004), 2263–2278.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [27] . 2012. Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transp. Rev. 32, 1 (2012), 93–112.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [28] . 2014. The alliance between optimization and multi-agent system for the management of the dynamic carpooling. In Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. Springer, 193–202.Google Scholar
- [29] . 2020. A Tabu Search based metaheuristic for dynamic carpooling optimization. Comput. Industr. Eng. 140 (2020), 106217.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [30] . 2018. Price-and-time-aware dynamic ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’18). IEEE, 1061–1072.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [31] . 2013. Privacy-preserving trajectory data publishing by local suppression. Inf. Sci. 231 (2013), 83–97.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [32] . 2015. Management of a Shared, Autonomous, Electric Vehicle Fleet: Vehicle Choice, Charging Infrastructure & Pricing Strategies. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- [33] . 2016. Management of a shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet: Implications of pricing schemes. Transport. Res. Rec. 2572, 1 (2016), 37–46.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [34] . 2016. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 94 (2016), 243–254.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [35] . 2017. Clarifying fog computing and networking: 10 questions and answers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 4 (2017), 18–20.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [36] . 2012. A cloud computing framework for real-time carpooling services. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science, Service Science and Data Mining (ISSDM’12). 266–271.Google Scholar
- [37] . 2016. Stochastic set-based particle swarm optimization based on local exploration for solving the carpool service problem. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 46, 8 (2016), 1771–1783.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [38] . 2015. Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: A test case for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation 42, 3 (2015), 413–433.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [39] . 2017. Economic effects of automated vehicles. J. Transport. Res. Board2606 (2017), 106–114.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [40] . 2018. Synchronizing heterogeneous vehicles in a routing and scheduling context. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Project Management and Scheduling. 79.Google Scholar
- [41] . 2012. A novel trust based algorithm for carpooling transportation systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON’12). 1077–1082.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [42] . 2015. Grouping similar trajectories for carpooling purposes. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS’15). 234–239.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [43] . 2015. Perceived risks and trust experience in a service of Carpooling. In Proceedings of the 22nd ITS World Congress.Google Scholar
- [44] . 2010. A wireless communications laboratory on cellular network planning. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53, 4 (2010), 653–661.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [45] . 2016. Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling?Transport. Res. D: Transport Environ. 42 (2016), 1–15.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [46] . 2019. A unified equilibrium framework of new shared mobility systems. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 129 (2019), 50–78.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [47] . 2006. The importance of information flows temporal attributes for the efficient scheduling of dynamic demand responsive transport services. J. Adv. Transport. 40, 1 (2006), 23–46.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [48] . 2014. Prototype implementation of a scalable real-time dynamic carpooling and ride-sharing application. Informatica 38, 3 (2014).Google Scholar
- [49] . 2013. Real-time carpooling and ride-sharing: Position paper on design concepts, distribution and cloud computing strategies. In Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. 781–786.Google Scholar
- [50] . 2018. Optimizing carpool scheduling algorithm through partition merging. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’18). 1–6.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [51] . 2016. Proactive and reactive carpooling recommendation system based on spatiotemporal and geosocial data. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’16). 1–8.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [52] . 2020. Modeling and solving the multimodal car-and ride-sharing problem. arXiv:2001.05490. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05490.Google Scholar
- [53] . 2015. Research on optimization model of taxi-carpooling expenses based on the passengers’ personalized demand. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS’15). 246–249.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [54] . 1997. The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24, 4 (1997), 349–376.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [55] . 2003. The car pooling problem: Heuristic algorithms based on savings functions. J. Adv. Transport. 37, 3 (2003), 243–272.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [56] . 2012. A push service for carpooling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. 685–691.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [57] . 2014. Towards privacy-driven design of a dynamic carpooling system. Perv. Mobile Comput. 14 (2014), 71–82.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [58] . November 2013. Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 57 (November 2013), 28–46.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [59] . 2003. George Mason University (GMU) Fairfax campus transportation system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. 77–82.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [60] . 2011. Research Commentary: Increasing the Flexibility of Legacy Systems. Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res. 2, 2 (2011), 39–55.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [61] . 2016. Optimal pick up point selection for effective ride sharing. IEEE Trans. Big Data 3, 2 (2016), 154–168.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [62] . 2016. Privacy-aware dynamic ride sharing. ACM Trans. Spatial Algor. Syst. 2, 1 (2016), 1–41.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [63] . 2013. An Analysis of issues against the adoption of Dynamic Carpooling.
arxiv:1306.0361. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0361.Google Scholar - [64] . 2017. Never drive alone: Boosting carpooling with network analysis. Inf. Syst. 64 (2017), 237–257.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [65] . 2017. PrivatePool: Privacy-preserving ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 30th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF’17). IEEE, 276–291.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [66] . 2019. Mobility traffic model based on combination of multiple transportation forms in the smart city. In Proceedings of the 15th International Wireless Communications Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’19). 14–19.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [67] . 2014. Theory and practice in large carpooling problems. Proc. Comput. Sci. 32 (2014), 339–347.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [68] . 2016. Smart peer car pooling system. In Proceedings of the 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC’16). IEEE, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [69] . 2017. Dynamic intra-modal carpooling with transhipment: Formalization and first combinatorial exact solution. In Proceedings of the IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing Communications, Cloud Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI’17). 1–8.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [70] . 2014. Intelligent carpool routing for urban ridesharing by mining gps trajectories. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 15, 5 (2014), 2286–2296.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [71] . 2018. Privacy-Preserving partner selection for ride-sharing services. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 67, 7 (2018), 5994–6005.Google Scholar
- [72] . 2012. The ridematching problem with time windows in dynamic ridesharing: A model and a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, 1–8.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [73] . 2017. Commuter ride-sharing using topology-based vehicle trajectory clustering: Methodology, application and impact evaluation. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 85 (2017), 573–590.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [74] . 2018. Coalitional game based carpooling algorithms for quality of experience. In Proceedings of the IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS’18). 1–5.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [75] . 2019. Utility-Aware batch-processing algorithms for dynamic carpooling based on double auction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Parallel Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing Communications, Social Computing Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom’19). 1059–1063.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [76] . 2018. A heuristic multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving the carpool services problem featuring high-occupancy-vehicle itineraries. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 19, 8 (2018), 2663–2674.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [77] . 2015. A genetic-algorithm-based approach to solve carpool service problems in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 1 (2015), 352–364.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [78] . 2019. An ant path-oriented carpooling allocation approach to optimize the carpool service problem with time windows. IEEE Syst. J. 13, 1 (2019), 994–1005.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [79] . 2014. Optimization of the carpool service problem via a fuzzy-controlled genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 5 (2014), 1698–1712.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [80] . 2013. Large scale real-time ridesharing with service guarantee on road networks. arXiv:1302.6666. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6666.Google Scholar
- [81] . 2013. Privacy-aware route tracing and revocation games in VANET-based clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’13). 730–735. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [82] . 2019. Integration of VANET and 5G Security: A review of design and implementation issues. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 101 (2019), 843–864. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [83] . 2018. Autonomous cars: Social and economic implications. IT Profess. 20, 6 (
November 2018), 70–77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [84] . 2017. Recommendation system for carpooling and regular taxicab services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC’17). 1–8.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [85] M. N. Jean. 2014. France falls out of love with the car. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/09/france-car-ownership-sales-downturn.Google Scholar
- [86] . 2011. Vehicle sharing services optimization based on multi-agent approach. IFAC Proc. Vol. 44, 1 (2011), 13040–13045.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [87] . 2015. Services-Oriented computing using the compact genetic algorithm for solving the carpool services problem. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 5 (2015), 2711–2722.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [88] . 2019. Self-Organizing neuroevolution for solving carpool service problem with dynamic capacity to alternate matches. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 30, 4 (2019), 1048–1060.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [89] . 2013. Optimizing the carpool service problem with genetic algorithm in service-based computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 478–485.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [90] . 2020. Analysis of the potential demand for battery electric vehicle sharing: Mode share and spatiotemporal distribution. J. Transport Geogr. 82 (2020), 102630.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [91] . 2007. Jam-avoiding adaptive cruise control (ACC) and its impact on traffic dynamics. In Traffic and Granular Flow’05. Springer, 633–643.Google Scholar
- [92] . 2019. Perception layer security in Internet of Things. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 100 (2019), 144–164.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [93] . 2016. Your Grandmother’s Driverless Car. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/06/beep-beep/489029/.Google Scholar
- [94] . 2017. Real-Time carpooling system on android terminal using session initiation protocol and location based service. J. Comput. Theoret. Nanosci. 14, 4 (2017), 2069–2076.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [95] . 2018. Optimization based on taxi carpooling preferences and pricing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD’18). 108–112.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [96] . 2019. Efficient and privacy-preserving carpooling using blockchain-assisted vehicular fog computing. IEEE IoT J. 6, 3 (2019), 4573–4584.Google Scholar
- [97] . 2017. Achieving differential privacy of trajectory data publishing in participatory sensing. Inf. Sci. 400 (2017), 1–13.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [98] . 2018. Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: A demand-side model. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 107 (2018), 102–123.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [99] . 2018. Studying the benefits of carpooling in an urban area using automatic vehicle identification data. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 93 (2018), 367–380.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [100] . 2016. A dynamic pricing method for carpooling service based on coalitional game analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS’16). 78–85.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [101] . 2012. Location privacy preservation in collaborative spectrum sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’12). IEEE, 729–737.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [102] . 2019. An evolutionary multiobjective carpool algorithm using set-based operator based on simulated binary crossover. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 49, 9 (2019), 3432–3442.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [103] . 2010. When transportation meets communication: V2P over VANETs. In Proceedings of the IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 567–576.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [104] . 2020. Mobility-Aware dynamic taxi ridesharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’20). IEEE, 961–972.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [105] . 2017. Peer-to-Peer ridesharing with ride-back on high-occupancy-vehicle lanes: Toward a practical alternative mode for daily commuting. Transport. Res. Rec. 2668, 1 (2017), 21–28.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [106] . 2011. Optimal dynamic pricing strategies for high-occupancy/toll lanes. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 19, 1 (2011), 64–74.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [107] . 2019. pRide: Privacy-Preserving Ride Matching Over Road Networks for Online Ride-Hailing Service. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 14, 7 (2019), 1791–1802.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [108] . 2018. Path optimization of taxi carpooling. PLoS One 13, 8 (2018).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [109] . 2017. Designing optimal autonomous vehicle sharing and reservation systems: A linear programming approach. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 84 (2017), 124–141.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [110] . 2017. The morning commute problem with ridesharing and dynamic parking charges. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 106 (2017), 345–374.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [111] . 2013. T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service. In Proceedings of the IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’13). IEEE, 410–421.Google Scholar
- [112] . 2014. Real-time city-scale taxi ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 7 (2014), 1782–1795.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [113] . 2021. Proactive scheduling and resource management for connected autonomous vehicles: A data science perspective. IEEE Sens. J. 21, 22 (2021), 25151–25160. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [114] . 2017. Dynamic carpooling in urban areas: Design and experimentation with a multi-objective route matching algorith. Sustainability 9, 2 (2017), 254.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [115] . 2019. Urban arterial road optimization and design combined with hov carpooling under connected vehicle environment. J. Adv. Transport. 2019 (2019).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [116] . 2013. Preventing brute force attacks against stack canary protection on networking servers. In Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications. IEEE, 243–250.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [117] . 2015. A trustworthy distributed social carpool method. In European Conference on Parallel Processing. Springer, 324–335.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [118] . 2017. A decomposition algorithm to solve the multi-hop peer-to-peer ride-matching problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 99 (2017), 1–29.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [119] . 2017. A real-time algorithm to solve the peer-to-peer ride-matching problem in a flexible ridesharing system. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 106 (2017), 218–236.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [120] . 2017. Using bilateral trading to increase ridership and user permanence in ridesharing systems. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 102 (2017), 60–77.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [121] . 2017. Promoting peer-to-peer ridesharing services as transit system feeders. Transport. Res. Rec. 2650, 1 (2017), 74–83.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [122] . 2009. Just-in-Time carpooling without elaborate preplanning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (Webist’09). 219–224.Google Scholar
- [123] . 2011. Automated wireless carpooling system for an eco-friendly travel. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, Vol. 4. 325–329.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [124] . 2017. Goal-Driven approach to optimize matching mechanism in electric vehicles ride-sharing system. Energy Proc. 105 (2017), 2273–2280.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [125] . 2018. Mass customizing paratransit services with a ridesharing option. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. (2018).Google Scholar
- [126] . 2018. Teranga Go!: Carpooling Collaborative Consumption Community with multi-criteria hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set opinions to build confidence and trust. Appl. Soft Comput. 67 (2018), 941–952.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [127] . 2019. The new optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows using multi-objective discrete learnable evolution model. Soft Comput. (2019), 1–29.Google Scholar
- [128] . 2019. A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 123 (2019), 323–346.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [129] . 2013. Dynamic carpooling application development on Android platform. Int. J. Innovat. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2, 3 (2013), 136–139.Google Scholar
- [130] . 2017. Securing fog computing for internet of things applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 1 (2017), 601–628.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [131] . 2016. AMA: Anonymous mutual authentication with traceability in carpooling systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC’16). IEEE, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [132] . 2017. Taxi recommender system using ridesharing service. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS’17). IEEE, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [133] . 2016. Systems and methods for providing transportation discounts in shared rides.
US Patent App. 14/794,425. Google Scholar - [134] . 2003. Trusted Computing Platforms: TCPA Technology in Context. Prentice Hall Professional.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [135] . 2015. A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 5 (2015), 2587–2598.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [136] . 2011. Urban traffic demand control based on carpooling: A case of Nanjing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering. 1863–1866.Google Scholar
- [137] . 2018. Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 115 (2018), 32–48.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [138] . 2017. Oride: A privacy-preserving yet accountable ride-hailing service. In Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’17). 1235–1252.Google Scholar
- [139] . 2017. Privateride: A privacy-enhanced ride-hailing service. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2017, 2 (2017), 38–56.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [140] . 2018. An optimal ride sharing recommendation framework for carpooling services. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 62296–62313.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [141] . 2016. Optimization of carpooling based on complete subgraphs. In Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC’16). 9294–9299.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [142] . 2015. A security and privacy review of VANETs. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 6 (2015), 2985–2996.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [143] . 2016. Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Pol. 45 (2016), 168–178.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [144] . 2016. A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 18, 5 (2016), 1066–1077.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [145] . 2017. The Ridesharing Revolution: Economic Survey and Synthesis, Vol. IV. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- [146] . 2019. Reputation assessment mechanism for carpooling applications based on clustering user travel preferences. Int. J. Transport. Sci. Technol. 8, 1 (2019), 68–81.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [147] . 2016. Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 73 (2016), 147–166.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [148] . 2018. A scalable non-myopic dynamic dial-a-ride and pricing problem for competitive on-demand mobility systems. Transport. Res. C: Emerg. Technol. 91 (2018), 192–208.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [149] . 2010. A distributed dijkstra’s algorithm for the implementation of a Real Time Carpooling Service with an optimized aspect on siblings. In Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 795–800.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [150] . 2010. Ortic: A novel approach towards optimized real time carpooling with an advanced network representation model on siblings. IFAC Proc. Vol. 43, 8 (2010), 367–375.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [151] . 2011. A distributed optimized approach based on the multi agent concept for the implementation of a real time carpooling service with an optimization aspect on siblings. Int. J. Eng. 5, 2 (2011), 217.Google Scholar
- [152] . 2011. A novel approach based on a distributed dynamic graph modeling set up over a subdivision process to deal with distributed optimized real time carpooling requests. In Proceedings of the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC’11). 1311–1316.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [153] . 2007. Reducing greenhouse emissions and fuel consumption: Sustainable approaches for surface transportation. IATSS Res. 31, 1 (2007), 6–20.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [154] . 2018. The Benefits of Carpooling.
Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7jx6z631. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [155] . 2013. Heuristic optimization algorithms of multi-carpooling problem based on two-stage clustering. J. Comput. Res. Dev. (2013).Google Scholar
- [156] . 2019. A survey on internet of vehicles: Applications, security issues & solutions. Vehic. Commun. 20 (2019), 100182.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [157] . 2016. The environmental impact of autonomous vehicles depends on adoption patterns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12 (2016), 6119–6121.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [158] . 2012. Overview of 3GPP LTE-advanced carrier aggregation for 4G wireless communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50, 2 (2012), 122–130.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [159] . 2017. Privacy-Preserving ride sharing scheme for autonomous vehicles in big data era. IEEE IoT J. 4, 2 (2017), 611–618.Google Scholar
- [160] . 2020. Carpool for big data: Enabling efficient crowd cooperation in data market for pervasive AI. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. (2020), 1–1.Google Scholar
- [161] . 2009. Cooperative (rather than autonomous) vehicle-highway automation systems. IEEE Intell. Transport. Syst. Ma. 1, 1 (2009), 10–19. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [162] . 2012. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transport. Res. Rec. 2324, 1 (2012), 63–70.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [163] . 2019. A survey of taxi ride sharing system architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP’19). IEEE, 144–149.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [164] . 2015. Feasibility and issues for establishing network-based carpooling scheme. Perv. Mobile Comput. 24 (2015), 4–15.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [165] . 2019. The implications of the sharing economy for transport. Transport Rev. 39, 2 (2019), 226–242.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [166] . 2015. The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 82 (2015), 36–53.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [167] . 2016. Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 91 (2016), 190–207.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [168] . 2020. A survey of 5G technology evolution, standards, and infrastructure associated with vehicle-to-everything communications by internet of vehicles. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 117593–117614. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [169] . 2016. Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpooling system. J. Adv. Transport. 50, 2 (2016), 240–254.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [170] . 2016. An evolutionary approach to solve the dynamic multi-hop ridematching problem. SIMULATION (2016).Google Scholar
- [171] . 2020. Future intelligent and secure vehicular network toward 6G: Machine-Learning approaches. Proc. IEEE 108, 2 (2020), 292–307. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [172] . 2017. A jointly differentially private scheduling protocol for ridesharing services. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 12, 10 (2017), 2444–2456.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [173] . 2016. Ensuring trust and privacy in large carpooling problems. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication (CIC’16), Vol. 14. 1–11.Google Scholar
- [174] . 2016. Providing together security, location privacy and trust for moving objects. Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol. 9, 3 (2016), 221–240.Google Scholar
- [175] . 2016. Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: New challenges in carpooling and parking services. In Proceeding of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication (CIC’16), Vol. 14.Google Scholar
- [176] . 2018. Efficient and privacy-preserving dynamic spatial query scheme for ride-hailing services. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 67, 11 (2018), 11084–11097.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [177] . 2016. Less transmissions, more throughput: Bringing carpool to public WLANs. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 15, 5 (2016), 1168–1181.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [178] . 2018. Stable matching for dynamic ride-sharing systems. Transport. Sci. 52, 4 (2018), 850–867.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [179] . 2016. Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform. Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 93 (2016), 212–231.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [180] . 2020. MaaS for the suburban market: Incorporating carpooling in the mix. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 131 (2020), 206–218.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [181] . 2018. Modeling passengers’ choice in ride-hailing service with dedicated-ride option and ride-sharing option. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering. 94–98.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [182] . 2014. Privacy preserving shortest path routing with an application to navigation. Perv. Mobile Comput. 13 (2014), 142–149.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [183] . 2019. A carpool matching model with both social and route networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 75 (2019), 90–102.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [184] . 2019. Evaluation of urban taxi-carpooling matching schemes based on entropy weight fuzzy matter-element. Appl. Soft Comput. 81 (2019), 105493.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [185] . 2014. Algorithm research of taxi carpooling based on fuzzy clustering and fuzzy recognition. J. Transport. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 14, 5 (2014), 119–125.Google Scholar
- [186] . 2017. Carpooling scheme selection for taxi carpooling passengers: A multi-objective model and optimisation algorithm. Arch. Transport 42 (2017).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [187] . 2018. Cloud/fog computing resource management and pricing for blockchain networks. IEEE IoT J. 6, 3 (2018), 4585–4600.Google Scholar
- [188] . 2014. A car pooling model and solution method with stochastic vehicle travel times. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 15, 1 (2014), 47–61.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [189] . 2019. Employee ridesharing: Reinforcement learning and choice modeling. In Proceedings of the 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS’19).Google Scholar
- [190] . 1999. Carpooling and congestion pricing in a multilane highway with high-occupancy-vehicle lanes. Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 33, 2 (1999), 139–155.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [191] . 2019. Activity-Based shared mobility model for smart transportation. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM’19). 599–604.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [192] . 2019. PSRide: Privacy-Preserving shared ride matching for online ride hailing systems. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. (2019), 1–1.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [193] . 2019. lpRide: Lightweight and privacy-preserving ride matching over road networks in online ride hailing systems. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 68, 11 (2019), 10418–10428.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [194] . 2019. Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 127 (2019), 178–200.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [195] . 2012. TicTac: From transfer-incapable carpooling to transfer-allowed carpooling. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’12). 268–273.Google Scholar
- [196] . 2014. Dynamic taxi pricing. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. (2014).Google Scholar
- [197] . 2017. Surge pricing and labor supply in the ride-sourcing market. Transport. Res. Proc. 23, 2–21 (2017), 5–2.Google Scholar
- [198] . 2020. Pricing and allocation algorithm designs in dynamic ridesharing system. Theor. Comput. Sci. 803 (2020), 94–104.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [199] . 2014. A carpooling recommendation system for taxicab services. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2, 3 (2014), 254–266.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [200] . 2013. CallCab: A unified recommendation system for carpooling and regular taxicab services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE, 439–447.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [201] . 2016. Carpooling service for large-scale taxicab networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 12, 3 (2016), 1–35.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [202] . 2016. An augmented estimation of distribution algorithm for multi-carpooling problem with time window. In Proceedings of the IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). 1–5.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [203] . 2016. A research the dynamic pricing strategy of taxi software. J. Tangsh. Univ. 29, 6 (2016), 78–84.Google Scholar
- [204] . 2019. Research on taxi pricing model and optimization for carpooling detour problem. J. Adv. Transport. (2019).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [205] . 2018. Research on taxi driver strategy game evolution with carpooling detour. J. Adv. Transport. (2018).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [206] . 2017. Taxi carpooling model and carpooling effects simulation. Int. J. Simul. Process Model. 12, 3–4 (2017), 338–346.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [207] . 2015. Data services for carpooling based on large-scale traffic data analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 672–679.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [208] . 2020. Minimizing the average arriving distance in carpooling. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 16, 1 (2020), 1550147719899369.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [209] . 2019. Design of intelligent carpooling program based on big data analysis and multi-information perception. Clust. Comput. 22, 1 (2019), 521–532.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- [210] . 2019. Modeling lane-choice behavior to optimize pricing strategy for HOT lanes: A support vector regression approach. J. Transport. Eng. A: Syst. 145, 4 (2019), 04019004.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [211] . 2018. ASAP: An anonymous smart-parking and payment scheme in vehicular networks. IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput. (2018).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Carpooling in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Current Solutions and Future Directions
Recommendations
Dynamic intersections and self-driving vehicles
ICCPS '18: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical SystemsConnected and automated vehicles are expected to be at the core of future intelligent transportation systems. One of the main practical challenges for self-driving vehicles on public roads is safe cooperation and collaboration among multiple vehicles ...
Cooperative driving of connected autonomous vehicles using responsibility-sensitive safety (RSS) rules
ICCPS '21: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 12th International Conference on Cyber-Physical SystemsConnected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) are expected to enable reliable and efficient transportation systems. Most motion planning algorithms for multi-agent systems are not completely safe because they implicitly assume that all vehicles/agents will ...
Roadrunner+: An Autonomous Intersection Management Cooperating with Connected Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians with Spillback Considered
The recent emergence of Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) enables the Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) system, replacing traffic signals and human driving operations for improved safety and road efficiency. When CAVs approach an intersection, ...





Comments