Making Visible and Modeling the Underrepresented: Teachers' Reflections on Their Role Modeling in Higher Education

ABSTRACT

This work contributes to a better understanding of computing teachers' perceptions of themselves as role models. Role models are described as important to address under-representation, yet there is little in-depth research on how role modeling works and what university teachers in computing can model to broaden participation in the discipline. We will analyze teachers' reflections on how they may, or want to, be perceived by their students, particularly in terms of professional competencies, emotions and attitudes towards well-being. We will use and further develop an already existing framework on role modeling in computing, and we will relate our findings to existing research on computing and science identities. Modeling aspects outside the computing norm can help provide students with a wider notion of what it means to be a computer scientist. Besides developing the theoretical understanding of computing teachers as role models , our work can support various ways of developing computing teachers' competences and departments' teaching culture. The results are one way to contribute to student diversity and equitable access, and more broadly increase the relevance of computing education for sustainability.

References

1. Lucy Avraamidou. 2020. Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education 15, 2 (2020), 323--345.
2. Jonathan Black, Paul Curzon, Chrystie Myketiak, and Peter W McOwan. 2011. A study in engaging female students in computer science using role models. In Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, 63--67.
3. Heidi B Carlone and Angela Johnson. 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 44, 8 (2007), 1187--1218.
4. Stephen Frezza, Mats Daniels, Arnold Pears, Åsa Cajander, Viggo Kann, Amanpreet Kapoor, Roger McDermott, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mihaela Sabin, and Charles Wallace. 2018. Modelling competencies for computing education beyond 2020: a research based approach to defining competencies in the computing disciplines. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 148--174.
5. Donald E Gibson. 2004. Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior 65, 1 (2004), 134--156.
6. Virginia Grande. 2018. Lost for Words! Defining the Language Around Role Models in Engineering Education. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (FIE 2018). San Jose, USA.
7. Virginia Grande, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mats Daniels, and Matti Tedre. 2018. "Participating Under the Influence": How Role Models Affect the Computing Discipline, Profession, and Student Population. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (FIE 2018). San Jose, USA.
8. Andreas Ottemo, Maria Berge, and Eva Silfver. 2020. Contextualizing technology: Between gender pluralization and class reproduction. Science Education 104, 4 (2020), 693--713.
9. Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2017. Learning Computing at University: Participation and Identity: A Longitudinal Study. PhD Thesis. Uppsala University, Sweden.
10. Allison Scott, Alexis Martin, Frieda McAlear, and Sonia Koshy. 2017. Broadening participation in computing: examining experiences of girls of color. ACM Inroads 8, 4 (2017), 48--52.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education