skip to main content
10.1145/3503823.3503841acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Double Auction Offloading: Challenges and Opportunities for Energy Efficient Telecommunication Networks

Published:22 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The continuing traffic growth and the need for improved user experience and ubiquitous connectivity force the industry to extend the telecommunications network infrastructure by installing numerous Base Stations (BSs) and Small Cells (SCs), thus incurring significant additional capital and operational expenditures. As a result, energy and cost effective solutions for network management are sought. In this paper, we introduce the concept of traffic offloading and infrastructure sharing, where operators can either buy and sell capacity and roam their traffic among each other, or they can offload their traffic to third party operating SCs. These mechanisms enable full utilization of cell capacity when the traffic is high and savings on low traffic BSs and SCs, which can be switched off when the traffic is low. As there are multiple stakeholders in the same geographical area, different network architectures and their particular aspects (e.g., infrastructure and spectrum ownership, role in the market, responsibilities and demands) must be taken into consideration. We propose a double auction mechanism that reconciles the different interests and demands of the participants and we assess the performance of the resulting system in terms of energy for different traffic loads.

References

  1. [1] Cisco, “Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2017-2022”, Feb. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] X. Bao, Y. Lin, U. Lee, I. Rimac, and R. R. Choudhury, “Dataspotting: Exploiting naturally clustered mobile devices to offload cellular traffic”, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2013, pp. 420-424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] D. E. Meddour, T. Rasheed, and Y. Gourhant, “On the role of infrastructure sharing for mobile network operators in emerging markets”, Comput. Netw., vol. 55, no. 7, May 2011, pp. 1567-1591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] B. Leng, P. Mansourifard, and B. Krishnamachari, “Microeconomic analysis of base-station sharing in green cellular networks”, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, May 2014, pp. 1132-1140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] A. Bousia, E. Kartsakli, A. Antonopoulos, L. Alonso, and C. Verikoukis, “Game-theoretic infrastructure sharing in multioperator cellular networks”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Commun., vol. 65, no. 5, Jun. 2015, pp. 3326-3341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] L. Gao, G. Iossifidis, H. Jianwei, and L. Tassiulas, “Economics of mobile data offloading”, in Proc. IEEE Workshop INFOCOM, Apr. 2013, pp. 3303-3308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] S. Dimatteo, P. Hui, B. Han, and V. O. K. Li, “Cellular traffic offloading through WiFi networks”, in Proc. IEEE MASS, Oct. 2011, pp. 3303-3308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] W. Dong et al., “iDEAL: Incentivized dynamic cellular offloading via auctions”, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2013, pp. 755-763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] W.Dong, S.Rallapalli, R.Jana, L.Qiu, K.K.Ramakrishnan, L.Razoumov, Y.Zhang, and T.Won Cho, “iDEAL: Incentivized dynamic cellular offloading via auctions”, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol.22, no.4, Aug. 2014, pp.1271-1284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] A. Bousia, E. Kartsakli, A. Antonopoulos, L. Alonso, and C.Verikoukis, “Multiobjective auction-based switching off scheme in heterogeneous networks: To bid or not to bid?”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, vol. 65, no. 1, Nov. 2016, pp. 9168-9180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] S.Paris, F.Martignon, I.Filippini, and L.Chen, “A bandwidth trading marketplace for mobile data offloading,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2013, pp. 430-434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] F. Sun, F. Hou, H. Zhou, B. Liu, J. Chen, and L. Gui, “Equilibriums in the Mobile Virtual Network Operator Oriented Data Offloading”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2749600.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] World Heritage Encyclopedia, “List of mobile network operators of Europe”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] “Mobile telecommunications infrastructure provider IHS acquires Helios Towers Nigeria”, Jun. 2016. [Available at: https://techpoint.ng/2016/06/13/mobile-telecommunications-infrastructure-provider-ihs-acquires-htn/].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] M. A. Marsan and M. Meo, “Network sharing and its energy benefits: A study of European mobile network operators”, in IEEE GLOBECOM, 2013, pp. 2561-2567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Double Auction Offloading: Challenges and Opportunities for Energy Efficient Telecommunication Networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PCI '21: Proceedings of the 25th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
            November 2021
            499 pages

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 February 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format