skip to main content
research-article

Argus: Predictable Millimeter-Wave Picocells with Vision and Learning Augmentation

Published:28 February 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We propose Argus, a system to enable millimeter-wave (mmWave) deployers to quickly complete site-surveys without sacrificing the accuracy and effectiveness of thorough network deployment surveys. Argus first models the mmWave reflection profile of an environment, considering dominant reflectors, and then use this model to find locations that maximize the usability of the reflectors. The key component in Argus is an efficient machine learning model that can map the visual data to the mmWave signal reflections of an environment and can accurately predict mmWave signal profile at any unobserved locations. It allows Argus to find the best picocell locations to provide maximum coverage and also lets users self-localize accurately anywhere in the environment. Furthermore, Argus allows mmWave picocells to predict device's orientation accurately and enables object tagging and retrieval for VR/AR applications. Currently, we implement and test Argus on two different buildings consisting of multiple different indoor environments. However, the generalization capability of Argus can easily update the model for unseen environments, and thus, Argus can be deployed to any indoor environment with little or no model fine-tuning.

References

  1. IEEE P802.11 - Task Group ay, “Status of Project IEEE 802.11ay,” http://www.ieee802.org/11/Reports/tgay_update.htm, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BIBentryALTinterwordspacing3GPP: A Global Initiative, “The Mobile Broadband Standard: Release 17,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.3gpp.org/release-17BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mathew K. Samimi and Theodore S. Rappaport, “3-D Statistical Channel Model for Millimeter-Wave Outdoor Mobile Broadband Communications,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Theodore S. Rappaport and Eshar Ben-Dor and James N. Murdock and Yijun Qiao, “38 GHz and 60 GHz Angle-Dependent Propagation for Cellular and Peer-to-Peer Wireless Communications,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hao Xu and Vikas Kukshya and Theodore S. Rappaport, “Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of 60-GHz Indoor Channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 20, no. 3, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sanjib Sur and Vignesh Venkateswaran and Xinyu Zhang and Parmesh Ramanathan, “60 GHz Indoor Networking through Flexible Beams: A Link-Level Profiling,” in Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sanjib Sur and Xinyu Zhang and Parmesh Ramanathan and Ranveer Chandra, “BeamSpy: Enabling Robust 60 GHz Links Under Blockage,” in Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christopher R. Anderson and Theodore S. Rappaport, “In-Building Wideband Partition Loss Measurements at 2.5 and 60 GHz,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 3, no. 3, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Theodore S. Rappaport and Felix Gutierrez and Eshar Ben-Dor and James N. Murdock and Yijun Qiao and Jonathan I. Tamir, “Broadband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Models Using Adaptive-Beam Antennas for Outdoor Urban Cellular Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 4, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Peter F. M. Smulders, “Statistical Characterization of 60-GHz Indoor Radio Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, no. 10, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ahmed M. Al-Samman and Tharek A. Rahman and Marwan H. Azmi and M.N. Hindia, “Large-scale path loss models and time dispersion in an outdoor line-of-sight environment for 5G wireless communications,” AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 70, no. 11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Virk, Usman Tahir and Haneda, Katsuyuki, “Modeling Human Blockage at 5G Millimeter-Wave Frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 3, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Moltchanov, Dmitri and Ometov, Aleksandr and Kustarev, Pavel and Evsutin, Oleg and Hosek, Jiri and Koucheryavy, Yevgeni, “Analytical TCP Model for Millimeter-Wave 5G NR Systems in Dynamic Human Body Blockage Environment,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 14, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sanjib Sur and Xinyu Zhang, “Scoping Environment for Robust 60 GHz Link Deployment,” in Invited paper at Information Theory and Applications, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wei, Teng and Zhou, Anfu and Zhang, Xinyu, “Facilitating Robust 60 GHz Network Deployment by Sensing Ambient Reflectors,” in Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Timothy Dayne Hooks and Hem Regmi and Sanjib Sur, “Poster: VisualMM: Visual Data and Learning Aided 5G Picocell Placement,” in Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (HotMobile), 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingCisco, “Site Survey Guidelines for WLAN Deployment,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/116057-site-survey-guidelines-wlan-00.htmlBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingiBwave Solutions, “iBwave Design: A Single Solution to Streamline the Design of All Your Indoor Wireless Network Projects,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibwave.com/ibwave-designBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingSecureEdge Networks, “Software that Makes WiFi More Intelligent,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.securedgenetworks.com/softwareBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingTransition Products Inc., “Wireless Site Surveys,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.tpi1.com/services/wireless-site-surveys/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingExterNetworks Inc., “Wireless Site Survey,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.extnoc.com/wireless-site-surveyBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingVisiWave, “Visualize Your Wireless Network,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.visiwave.com/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingMade by WiFi Inc., “How Much Does A Wireless Site Survey Cost And Is It Worth It For My Business” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.madebywifi.com/blog/how-much-does-a-wireless-site-survey-cost-and-is-it-worth-it-for-my-business/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingExterNetworks Inc., “Wireless Site Survey -- Outdoor Survey for upto 100,000 Sq. Ft,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.extnoc.com/store/wireless-outdoor-survey-100000sqft/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingRemcom, “Wireless InSite: 3D Wireless Prediction Software,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.remcom.com/wireless-insite-em-propagation-softwareBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingAltair Engineering, Inc., “Altair Feko Applications,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.altair.com/feko-applications/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingSiradel, “Software for Wireless Network and Smart City Planning,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.siradel.com/solutions/software/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingSonicWall, “WiFi Planner: Elevate Your WiFi User Experience with the Right Design,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sonicwall.com/products/secure-wireless/wifi-planner/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanjib Sur and Xinyu Zhang, “Scoping Environment to Assist 60 GHz Link Deployment,” in Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) Poster, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Basar, Ertugrul and Di Renzo, Marco and De Rosny, Julien and Debbah, Merouane and Alouini, Mohamed-Slim and Zhang, Rui, “Wireless Communications Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingGsmarena, “Asus Zenfone AR ZS571KL,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsmarena.com/asus_zenfone_ar_zs571kl-8502.phpBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingSilicon Radar GmbH, “24 GHz Products,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://siliconradar.com/products/#24ghz-radar-chipsBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingSanjib Sur, “Software-Hardware Reconfigurable Systems for Mobile Millimeter-Wave Networks,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cse.sc.edu/ sur/projects/nsf1910853BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. M. Soumekh, Synthetic Aperture Radar Signal Processing .hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nozhan Hosseini and Mahfuza Khatun and Changyu Guo and Kairui Du and Ozgur Ozdemir and David Matolak and Ismail Guvenc and Hani Mehrpouyan, “Attenuation of Several Common Building Materials: Millimeter-Wave Frequency Bands 28, 73, and 91 GHz,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Timothy A. Thomas and Huan Cong Nguyen and George R. MacCartney Jr. and Theodore S. Rappaport, “3D mmWave Channel Model Proposal,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yaniv Azar and George N. Wong and Kevin Wang and Rimma Mayzus and Jocelyn K. Schulz and Hang Zhao and Felix Gutierrez and DuckDong Hwang and Theodore S. Rappaport, “28 GHz Propagation Measurements for Outdoor Cellular Communications using Steerable Beam Antennas in New York City,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingGoogle, “Tango,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe10ExwzCqkBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. BIBentryALTinterwordspacing----, “ARCore,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://developers.google.com/arBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Iro Armeni and Ozan Sener and Amir R. Zamir and Helen Jiang and Ioannis Brilakis and Martin Fischer and Silvio Savarese, “3D Semantic Parsing of Large-Scale Indoor Spaces,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Alexander Maltsev and Roman Maslennikov and Artyom Sevastyanov and Alexey Lomayev and Alexey Khoryaev, “Statistical Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems in Conference Room Environment,” in In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Chao Dong and Chen Change Loy and Kaiming He and Xiaoou Tang, “Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 2, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Wenming Yang and Xuechen Zhang and Yapeng Tian and Wei Wang and Jing-Hao Xue and Qingmin Liao, “Deep Learning for Single Image Super-Resolution: A Brief Review,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 21, no. 12, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Kevin de Haan and Yair Rivenson and Yichen Wu and Aydogan Ozcan, “Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction and Enhancement in Optical Microscopy,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 108, no. 1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Saiprasad Ravishankar and Jong Chul Ye and Jeffrey A. Fessler, “Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-Adaptive Methods and Machine Learning,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 108, no. 1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Florian Knoll and Kerstin Hammernik and Chi Zhang and Steen Moeller and Thomas Pock and Daniel K. Sodickson, “Deep-Learning Methods for Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction: A Survey of the Current Approaches, Trends, and Issues,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 37, no. 1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarabandi, K and Vahidpour, M and Moallem, M and East, J, “Compact Beam Scanning 240 GHz Radar for Navigation and Collision Avoidance,” in Micro-and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications III, vol. 8031, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Mosalanejad, Mohammad and Ocket, Ilja and Soens, Charlotte and Vandenbosch, Guy AE, “Multilayer Compact Grid Antenna Array for 79 GHz Automotive Radar Applications,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 17, no. 9, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Rappaport, Theodore S, Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice .hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Prentice Hall, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanjib Sur and Ioannis Pefkianakis and Xinyu Zhang and Kyu-Han Kim, “Towards Scalable and Ubiquitous Millimeter-Wave Wireless Networks,” in Proc. of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Song, Rongguo and Wang, Zhe and Zu, Haoran and Chen, Qiang and Mao, Boyang and Wu, Zhi Peng and He, Daping, “Wideband and Low Sidelobe Graphene Antenna Array for 5G Applications,” Sci. Bull, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Huang, He and Li, Xiaoping and Liu, Yanming, “5G MIMO Antenna Based on Vector Synthetic Mechanism,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 17, no. 6, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Pandya, Sharnil and Wakchaure, Manoj Ashok and Shankar, Ravi and Annam, Jagadeeswara Rao, “Analysis of NOMA-OFDM 5G Wireless System Using Deep Neural Network,” The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Li, Tian-Hao and Khandaker, Muhammad RA and Tariq, Faisal and Wong, Kai-Kit and Khan, Risala T, “Learning the wireless V2I channels using deep neural networks,” in 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall), 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Ravi, Nagarathna and Rani, P Vimala and Shalinie, S Mercy, “Secure Deep Neural (SeDeN) Framework for 5G Wireless Networks,” in 2019 10th International Conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT), 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Gu, Jiuxiang and Wang, Zhenhua and Kuen, Jason and Ma, Lianyang and Shahroudy, Amir and Shuai, Bing and Liu, Ting and Wang, Xingxing and Wang, Gang and Cai, Jianfei and others, “Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networks,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 77, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang, Chen-Lin and Luo, Jian-Hao and Wei, Xiu-Shen and Wu, Jianxin, “In Defense of Fully Connected Layers in Visual Representation Transfer,” in Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingKeras, “Keras Applications,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://keras.io/api/applications/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman, “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. He, Kaiming and Zhang, Xiangyu and Ren, Shaoqing and Sun, Jian, “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Szegedy, Christian and Vanhoucke, Vincent and Ioffe, Sergey and Shlens, Jon and Wojna, Zbigniew, “Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. G. Huang and Z. Liu and L. Van Der Maaten and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely Connected Convolutional Networks,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingAndrew G. Howard and Menglong Zhu and Bo Chen and Dmitry Kalenichenko and Weijun Wang and Tobias Weyand and Marco Andreetto and Hartwig Adam, “MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandler, Mark and Howard, Andrew and Zhu, Menglong and Zhmoginov, Andrey and Chen, Liang-Chieh, “Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Qi, Charles R. and Su, Hao and Mo, Kaichun and Guibas, Leonidas J., “PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), July 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingScikit-Learn, “OneHotEncoder,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.OneHotEncoder.htmlBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Tsai, Chun-Wei and Cho, Hsin-Hung and Shih, Timothy K and Pan, Jeng-Shyang and Rodrigues, Joel JPC, “Metaheuristics for the deployment of 5G,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 6, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Xiao, Zhu and Liu, Hongjing and Havyarimana, Vincent and Li, Tong and Wang, Dong, “Analytical study on multi-tier 5G heterogeneous small cell networks: Coverage performance and energy efficiency,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Im, Chaehun and Jung, Sunghoon and Lee, Chungyoung, “A deep autoencoder approach to received signal strength-based localization with unknown channel parameters,” in 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Sathish, L and Bhuvaneswari, Y Satya and Devi, B Satya Sri and Nandan, Durgesh, “Analysis of Received Signal Strength Based on User Position Locating by Using ML Methods,” in International Conference on Emerging Trends and Advances in Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. e Silva, Pedro Figueiredo and Richter, Philipp and Talvitie, Jukka and Laitinen, Elina and Lohan, Elena Simona, “Challenges and solutions in Received Signal Strength-based seamless positioning,” in Geographical and Fingerprinting Data to Create Systems for Indoor Positioning and Indoor/Outdoor Navigation, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Menta, Estifanos Yohannes and Malm, Nicolas and J"antti, Riku and Ruttik, Kalle and Costa, Mário and Lepp"anen, Kari, “On the performance of AoA-based localization in 5G ultra--dense networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Siriwardhana, Yushan and Porambage, Pawani and Liyanage, Madhusanka and Ylianttila, Mika, “A Survey on Mobile Augmented Reality With 5G Mobile Edge Computing: Architectures, Applications, and Technical Aspects,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 2, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Yang, Chang-Fa and Wu, Boau-Cheng and Ko, Chuen-Jyi, “A Ray-Tracing Method for Modeling Indoor Wave Propagation and Penetration,” IEEE transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 46, no. 6, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Shihao Ju, Syed Hashim Ali Shah, Muhammad Affan Javed, Jun Li, Girish Palteru, Jyotish Robin, Yunchou Xing, Ojas Kanhere, Theodore S. Rappaport, “Scattering Mechanisms and Modeling for Terahertz Wireless Communications,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Amini, Navid and Sarrafzadeh, Majid and Vahdatpour, Alireza and Xu, Wenyao, “Accelerometer-based on-body sensor localization for health and medical monitoring applications,” Pervasive and mobile computing, vol. 7, no. 6, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Hsu, Ching-Hsien and Yu, Chia-Hao, “An accelerometer based approach for indoor localization,” in 2009 Symposia and Workshops on Ubiquitous, Autonomic and Trusted Computing. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IEEE, 2009, pp. 223--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Alam, Fakhrul and Faulkner, Nathaniel and Legg, Mathew and Demidenko, Serge, “Indoor visible light positioning using spring-relaxation technique in real-world setting,” Ieee Access, vol. 7, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Sarfraz, M and Rizvi, SM Ali J, “Indoor navigational aid system for the visually impaired,” in Geometric Modeling and Imaging (GMAI'07). hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IEEE, 2007, pp. 127--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Ayyalasomayajula, Roshan and Arun, Aditya and Wu, Chenfeng and Sharma, Sanatan and Sethi, Abhishek Rajkumar and Vasisht, Deepak and Bharadia, Dinesh, “Deep Learning Based Wireless Localization for Indoor Navigation,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Jain, Puneet and Manweiler, Justin and Roy Choudhury, Romit, “OverLay: Practical Mobile Augmented Reality,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. “Understanding Categorical Cross-Entropy Loss, Binary Cross-Entropy Loss, Softmax Loss, Logistic Loss, Focal Loss and all those confusing names,” https://gombru.github.io/2018/05/23/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Sheen, David M and McMakin, Douglas L and Hall, Thomas E, “Three-dimensional millimeter-wave imaging for concealed weapon detection,” IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques, vol. 49, no. 9, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. “Real-Time Appearance-Based Mapping,” http://introlab.github.io/rtabmap/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. “Optimizers,” https://keras.io/api/optimizers/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingOpen-Source, “TensorFlow,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.tensorflow.org/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingNVIDIA, “GEFORCE,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingGoogle, “Cloud TPU,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/tpuBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingNVIDIA, “RTX A6000,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/rtx-a6000/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Erik Dahlman and Stefan Parkvall and Johan Skold, 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology .hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Elsevier, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingGoogle, “Google Street View,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/streetview/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingVerizon, “Explore 4G LTE and 5G Network Coverage in Your Area,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.verizon.com/coverage-map/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingT-Mobile USA, Inc., “5G & 4G LTE Coverage,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/coverage-mapBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingAT&T, “Nationwide 5G,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.att.com/5g/coverage-map/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Stefan Parkvall and Erik Dahlman and Anders Furuskar and Mattias Frenne, “NR: The New 5G Radio Access Technology,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 1, no. 4, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingTelefonaktiebolaget L. M. Ericsson, “5G Fixed Wireless Access,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ericsson.com/en/fixed-wireless-accessBIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingDARPA, “DARPA T-MUSIC,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2020-02-04BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. BIBentryALTinterwordspacingVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., “DREAM: D-Band Radio Solution Enabling Up To 100 Gbps Reconfigurable Approach for Meshed Beyond 5G networks,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.h2020-dream.eu/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Fadhil Firyaguna and Jacek Kibilda and Carlo Galiotto and Nicola Marchetti, “Coverage and Spectral Efficiency of Indoor mmWave Networks with Ceiling-Mounted Access Points,” in IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Rony Kumer Saha, “On Maximizing Energy and Spectral Efficiencies Using Small Cells in 5G and Beyond Networks,” MDPI Sensors, vol. 20, no. 6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Alimpertis, Emmanouil and Markopoulou, Athina and Butts, Carter and Psounis, Konstantinos, “City-Wide Signal Strength Maps: Prediction with Random Forests,” in The World Wide Web Conference, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Sulyman, Ahmed Iyanda and Nassar, Almuthanna T. and Samimi, Mathew K. and Maccartney, George R. and Rappaport, Theodore S. and Alsanie, Abdulhameed, “Radio propagation path loss models for 5G cellular networks in the 28 GHZ and 38 GHZ millimeter-wave bands,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 9, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Deng, Sijia and MacCartney, Geoge R. and Rappaport, Theodore S., “Indoor and Outdoor 5G Diffraction Measurements and Models at 10, 20, and 26 GHz,” in 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Hossain, Ferdous and Geok, Tan Kim and Rahman, Tharek Abd and Hindia, Mohammad Nour and Dimyati, Kaharudin and Ahmed, Sharif and Tso, Chih P. and Abd Rahman, Noor Ziela, “An Efficient 3-D Ray Tracing Method: Prediction of Indoor Radio Propagation at 28 GHz in 5G Network,” Electronics, vol. 8, no. 3, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Narayanan, Arvind and Ramadan, Eman and Mehta, Rishabh and Hu, Xinyue and Liu, Qingxu and Fezeu, Rostand A. K. and Dayalan, Udhaya Kumar and Verma, Saurabh and Ji, Peiqi and Li, Tao and Qian, Feng and Zhang, Zhi-Li, “Lumos5G: Mapping and Predicting Commercial MmWave 5G Throughput,” in Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Wei, Teng and Zhang, Xinyu, “Pose Information Assisted 60 GHz Networks: Towards Seamless Coverage and Mobility Support,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Tsukamoto, Yu and Hirayama, Haruhisa and Moon, Seung II and Nanba, Shinobu and Shinbo, Hiroyuki, “Feedback Control for Adaptive Function Placement in Uncertain Traffic Changes on an Advanced 5G System,” in 2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC), 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Mathew, Anitha P and Arthi, M and Babu, K Vinoth, “An uniform clustering based coverage and cost effective placement of serving nodes for 5G,” in 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation and Media Technology (ICEEIMT), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Khan, Shah Khalid and Naseem, Usman and Sattar, Abdul and Waheed, Nazar and Mir, Adnan and Qazi, Atika and Ismail, Muhammad, “UAV-aided 5G Network in Suburban, Urban, Dense Urban, and High-rise Urban Environments,” in 2020 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Bartoletti, Stefania and Conti, Andrea and Dardari, Davide and Giorgetti, Andrea, “5G localization and context-awareness,” University of Bologna, University of Ferrara, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Khan, Muhammad Alee and Saeed, Nasir and Ahmad, Arbab Waheed and Lee, Chankil, “Location Awareness in 5G Networks Using RSS Measurements for Public Safety Applications,” IEEE Access, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Belay, Abebe and Yen, Lei and Renu, Sakthidasan and Lin, Hsin-piao and Jeng, Shiann-Shiun, “Indoor Localization at 5 GHz Using Dynamic Machine Learning Approach (DMLA),” in 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Meng, Jiayi and Sharma, Abhigyan and Tran, Tuyen X. and Balasubramanian, Bharath and Jung, Gueyoung and Hiltunen, Matti and Charlie Hu, Y., “A Study of Network-Side 5G User Localization Using Angle-Based Fingerprints,” in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Pandey, Ankur and Pinky, Pinky and Kumar, Sudhir, “Localization Using Stochastic Gradient Descent Method in a 5G Network,” in 2018 15th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. El Boudani, Brahim and Kanaris, Loizos and Kokkinis, Akis and Kyriacou, Michalis and Chrysoulas, Christos and Stavrou, Stavros and Dagiuklas, Tasos, “Implementing Deep Learning Techniques in 5G IoT Networks for 3D Indoor Positioning: DELTA (DeEp Learning-Based Co-operaTive Architecture),” Sensors, vol. 20, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Klus, Roman and Klus, Lucie and Solomitckii, Dmitrii and Valkama, Mikko and Talvitie, Jukka, “Deep Learning Based Localization and HO Optimization in 5G NR Networks,” in 2020 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Butt, M. Majid and Rao, Anil and Yoon, Daejung, “RF Fingerprinting and Deep Learning Assisted UE Positioning in 5G,” in 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. Jason Orlosky and Kiyoshi Kiyokawa and Haruo Takemura, “Virtual and Augmented Reality on the 5G Highway,” Journal of Information Processing, vol. 25, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Baratè, Adriano and Haus, Goffredo and Ludovico, Luca Andrea and Pagani, Elena and Scarabottolo, Nello, “5G technology for augmented and virtual reality in education,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Developments, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. Verde, Sebastiano and Marcon, Marco and Milani, Simone and Tubaro, Stefano, “Advanced Assistive Maintenance Based on Augmented Reality and 5G Networking,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 24, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Argus: Predictable Millimeter-Wave Picocells with Vision and Learning Augmentation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!