skip to main content
research-article

A Large-Scale Synthetic Gait Dataset Towards in-the-Wild Simulation and Comparison Study

Published:05 January 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Gait recognition has a rapid development in recent years. However, current gait recognition focuses primarily on ideal laboratory scenes, leaving the gait in the wild unexplored. One of the main reasons is the difficulty of collecting in-the-wild gait datasets, which must ensure diversity of both intrinsic and extrinsic human gait factors. To remedy this problem, we propose to construct a large-scale gait dataset with the help of controllable computer simulation. In detail, to diversify the intrinsic factors of gait, we generate numerous characters with diverse attributes and associate them with various types of walking styles. To diversify the extrinsic factors of gait, we build a complicated scene with a dense camera layout. Then we design an automatic generation toolkit under Unity3D for simulating the walking scenarios and capturing the gait data. As a result, we obtain a dataset simulating towards the in-the-wild scenario, called VersatileGait, which has more than one million silhouette sequences of 10,000 subjects with diverse scenarios. VersatileGait possesses several nice properties, including huge dataset size, diverse pedestrian attributes, complicated camera layout, high-quality annotations, small domain gap with the real one, good scalability for new demands, and no privacy issues. By conducting a series of experiments, we first explore the effects of different factors on gait recognition. We further illustrate the effectiveness of using our dataset to pre-train models, which obtain considerable performance gain on CASIA-B, OU-MVLP, and CASIA-E. Besides, we show the great potential of the fine-grained labels other than the ID label in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of models. Our dataset and its corresponding generation toolkit are available at https://github.com/peterzpy/VersatileGait.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] 2021. CASIA-E. Retrieved May 29, 2021 from http://hid2020.iapr-tc4.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] 2021. Mixamo. Retrieved May 29, 2021 from https://www.mixamo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] 2021. Unity3D. Retrieved May 29, 2021 from https://unity.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Ariyanto Gunawan and Nixon Mark S.. 2011. Model-based 3D gait biometrics. In Proceedings of the IJCB. 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Azzakhnini Safaa, Ballihi Lahoucine, and Aboutajdine Driss. 2018. Combining facial parts for learning gender, ethnicity, and emotional state based on RGB-D information. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 14, 1s (2018), 19:1–19:14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Bak Slawomir, Carr Peter, and Lalonde Jean-Francois. 2018. Domain adaptation through synthesis for unsupervised person re-identification. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.189205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Balazia Michal and Sojka Petr. 2018. Gait recognition from motion capture data. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 14, 1s (2018), 22:1–22:18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Bashir Khalid, Xiang Tao, and Gong Shaogang. 2009. Gait recognition using gait entropy image. In Proceedings of the ICDP. 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Bastioni Manuel, Re Simone, and Misra Shakti. 2008. Ideas and methods for modeling 3D human figures: The principal algorithms used by MakeHuman and their implementation in a new approach to parametric modeling. In Proceedings of the Bangalore Compute Conference.16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Bodor Robert, Drenner Andrew, Fehr Duc, Masoud Osama, and Papanikolopoulos Nikolaos. 2009. View-independent human motion classification using image-based reconstruction. Image and Vision Computing 27, 8 (2009), 11941206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Bouchrika Imed. 2018. A survey of using biometrics for smart visual surveillance: Gait recognition. In Proceedings of the Surveillance in Action. 323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Boulgouris Nikolaos V. and Chi Zhiwei X.. 2007. Gait recognition based on human body components. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.I–353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Chao Hanqing, He Yiwei, Zhang Junping, and Feng Jianfeng. 2019. Gaitset: Regarding gait as a set for cross-view gait recognition. In Proceedings of the AAAI. 81268133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Chattopadhyay Pratik, Sural Shamik, and Mukherjee Jayanta. 2014. Frontal gait recognition from incomplete sequences using RGB-D camera. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 9, 11 (2014), 18431856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Patrick Connor and Arun Ross. 2018. Biometric recognition by gait: A survey of modalities and features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 167 (2018), 1–27. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] DeCann Brian, Ross Arun, and Dawson Jeremy. 2013. Investigating gait recognition in the short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectrum: Dataset and challenges. In Proceedings of the SPIE Biometric Surveillance Technology for Human and Activity Identification. 101116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Fabbri Matteo, Lanzi Fabio, Calderara Simone, Palazzi Andrea, Vezzani Roberto, and Cucchiara Rita. 2018. Learning to detect and track visible and occluded body joints in a virtual world. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.430446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Fan Chao, Peng Yunjie, Cao Chunshui, Liu Xu, Hou Saihui, Chi Jiannan, Huang Yongzhen, Li Qing, and He Zhiqiang. 2020. Gaitpart: Temporal part-based model for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.1421314221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Gafurov Davrondzhon. 2007. A survey of biometric gait recognition: Approaches, security and challenges. In Proceedings of the Annual Norwegian Computer Science Conference.1921.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Goffredo Michela, Bouchrika Imed, Carter John N., and Nixon Mark S.. 2009. Self-calibrating view-invariant gait biometrics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 40, 4 (2009), 9971008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] R. Gross and J. Shi. 2001. The CMU motion of body (MoBo) database. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-18, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Han Jinguang and Bir Bhanu. 2006. Individual recognition using gait energy image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 2 (2006), 316322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Hofmann Martin, Geiger Jürgen, Bachmann Sebastian, Schuller Björn, and Rigoll Gerhard. 2014. The TUM gait from audio, image and depth (GAID) database: Multimodal recognition of subjects and traits. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 25, 1 (2014), 195206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Hofmann Martin, Sural Shamik, and Rigoll Gerhard. 2011. Gait recognition in the presence of occlusion: A new dataset and baseline algorithms. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Hou Saihui, Cao Chunshui, Liu Xu, and Huang Yongzhen. 2020. Gait lateral network: Learning discriminative and compact representations for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.382398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Hou Saihui, Liu Xu, Cao Chunshui, and Huang Yongzhen. 2021. Set residual network for silhouette-based gait recognition. IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science 3, 3 (2021), 384393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Hu Yuan-Ting, Chen Hong-Shuo, Hui Kexin, Huang Jia-Bin, and Schwing Alexander G.. 2019. Sail-vos: Semantic amodal instance level video object segmentation-a synthetic dataset and baselines. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.31053115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Huang Xiaohu, Zhu Duowang, Wang Hao, Wang Xinggang, Yang Bo, He Botao, Liu Wenyu, and Feng Bin. 2021. Context-sensitive temporal feature learning for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. Comput. Vis.1290912918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Huang Zhen, Xue Dixiu, Shen Xu, Tian Xinmei, Li Houqiang, Huang Jianqiang, and Hua Xian-Sheng. 2021. 3D Local convolutional neural networks for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.1492014929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Iwama Haruyuki, Okumura Mayu, Makihara Yasushi, and Yagi Yasushi. 2012. The ou-isir gait database comprising the large population dataset and performance evaluation of gait recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 7, 5 (2012), 15111521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Jun Kooksung, Lee Deok-Won, Lee Kyoobin, Lee Sanghyub, and Kim Mun Sang. 2020. Feature extraction using an RNN autoencoder for skeleton-based abnormal gait recognition. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 1919619207. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Kusakunniran Worapan, Wu Qiang, Zhang Jian, Li Hongdong, and Wang Liang. 2013. Recognizing gaits across views through correlated motion co-clustering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23, 2 (2013), 696709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Kusakunniran Worapan, Wu Qiang, Zhang Jian, Ma Yi, and Li Hongdong. 2013. A new view-invariant feature for cross-view gait recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 8, 10 (2013), 16421653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Li Xiang, Makihara Yasushi, Xu Chi, Yagi Yasushi, and Ren Mingwu. 2020. Gait recognition via semi-supervised disentangled representation learning to identity and covariate features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.1330913319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Li Xiang, Makihara Yasushi, Xu Chi, Yagi Yasushi, Yu Shiqi, and Ren Mingwu. 2020. End-to-end model-based gait recognition. In Proceedings of the ACCV. 320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Liao Rijun, Yu Shiqi, An Weizhi, and Huang Yongzhen. 2020. A model-based gait recognition method with body pose and human prior knowledge. Pattern Recognition 98 (2020), 107069. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Lin Beibei, Zhang Shunli, and Bao Feng. 2020. Gait recognition with multiple-temporal-scale 3D convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 30543062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Lin Beibei, Zhang Shunli, and Yu Xin. 2021. Gait recognition via effective global-local feature representation and local temporal aggregation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.1464814656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Yu-Sheng Lin, Zhe-Yu Liu, Yu-An Chen, Yu-Siang Wang, Ya-Liang Chang, and Winston H. Hsu. 2021. XCos: An explainable cosine metric for face verification task. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 17, 3s (2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Luo Yawei, Zheng Liang, Guan Tao, Yu Junqing, and Yang Yi. 2019. Taking a closer look at domain shift: Category-level adversaries for semantics consistent domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.25072516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Makihara Yasushi, Sagawa Ryusuke, Mukaigawa Yasuhiro, Echigo Tomio, and Yagi Yasushi. 2006. Gait recognition using a view transformation model in the frequency domain. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.151163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Makihara Yasushi, Suzuki Atsuyuki, Muramatsu Daigo, Li Xiang, and Yagi Yasushi. 2017. Joint intensity and spatial metric learning for robust gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.57055715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Prakash Aayush, Debnath Shoubhik, Lafleche Jean-Francois, Cameracci Eric, State Gavriel, and Law Marc T.. 2021. Self-supervised real-to-sim scene generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 16044–16054.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Pushparani M. and Sasikala D.. 2012. A survey of gait recognition approaches using PCA and ICA. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Tech. 12, 10 (2012), 975–980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Qi Lei, Wang Lei, Huo Jing, Shi Yinghuan, and Gao Yang. 2021. GreyReID: A Novel two-stream deep framework with RGB-Grey information for person re-Identification. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 17, 1 (2021), 122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Rida Imad, Almaadeed Noor, and Almaadeed Somaya. 2019. Robust gait recognition: A comprehensive survey. IET Biometrics 8, 1 (2019), 1428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Ruder Sebastian. 2017. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv:1706.05098. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05098.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Samangooei Sina and Nixon Mark S.. 2010. Performing content-based retrieval of humans using gait biometrics. Multimedia Tools and Applications 49, 1 (2010), 195212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Sankaranarayanan Swami, Balaji Yogesh, Jain Arpit, Lim Ser Nam, and Chellappa Rama. 2018. Learning from synthetic data: Addressing domain shift for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.37523761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Sarkar Sudeep, Phillips P. Jonathon, Liu Zongyi, Vega Isidro Robledo, Grother Patrick, and Bowyer Kevin W.. 2005. The humanid gait challenge problem: Data sets, performance, and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27, 2 (2005), 162177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Sepas-Moghaddam Alireza and Etemad Ali. 2022. Deep gait recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Shen Ling, Hong Richang, Zhang Haoran, Tian Xinmei, and Wang Meng. 2019. Video retrieval with similarity-preserving deep temporal hashing. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 15, 4 (2019), 116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Singh Jasvinder Pal, Arora Sakshi, Jain Sanjeev, and SoM Uday Pratap Singh. 2019. A Multi-Gait dataset for human recognition under occlusion scenario. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques. 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. [54] Su Ge, Lin Bo, Luo Wei, Yin Jianwei, Deng Shuiguang, Gao Honghao, and Xu Renjun. 2021. Hypomimia recognition in parkinson’s disease with semantic features. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 17, 3s (2021), 120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. [55] Su Hang, Zhu Xiatian, and Gong S.. 2017. Deep learning logo detection with data expansion by synthesising context. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (2017), 530539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Sugandhi K, Wahid Farha Fatina, and Raju G.. 2016. Feature extraction methods for human gait recognition–a survey. In Proceedings of the ICACDS. 377385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] Takemura Noriko, Makihara Yasushi, Muramatsu Daigo, Echigo Tomio, and Yagi Yasushi. 2018. Multi-view large population gait dataset and its performance evaluation for cross-view gait recognition. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications 10, 1 (2018), 114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Tan Daoliang, Huang Kaiqi, Yu Shiqi, and Tan Tieniu. 2006. Efficient night gait recognition based on template matching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 10001003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Tjeerd Vdp, Austin P. C., and Steyerberg E. W.. 2014. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: A simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Medical Research Methodology 14, 1 (2014), 113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Tremblay Jonathan, Prakash Aayush, Acuna David, Brophy Mark, Jampani Varun, Anil Cem, To Thang, Cameracci Eric, Boochoon Shaad, and Birchfield Stan. 2018. Training deep networks with synthetic data: Bridging the reality gap by domain randomization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Worksh.969977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Varol Gul, Romero Javier, Martin Xavier, Mahmood Naureen, Black Michael J., Laptev Ivan, and Schmid Cordelia. 2017. Learning from synthetic humans. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.109117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Wan Changsheng, Wang Li, and Phoha Vir V.. 2018. A survey on gait recognition. ACM Computing Surveys 51, 5 (2018), 135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Wang Guanan, Gong Shaogang, Cheng Jian, and Hou Zengguang. 2020. Faster person re-identification. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.275292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. [64] Wang Liang, Ning Huazhong, Hu Weiming, and Tan Tieniu. 2002. Gait recognition based on procrustes shape analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.433436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. [65] Wang Qi, Gao Junyu, Lin Wei, and Yuan Yuan. 2019. Learning from synthetic data for crowd counting in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.81988207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Wang Xueping, Wang Yunhong, and Li Weixin. 2019. U-Net conditional GANs for photo-realistic and identity-preserving facial expression synthesis. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 15, 3s (2019), 123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Wang Yanan, Liao Shengcai, and Shao Ling. 2020. Surpassing real-world source training data: Random 3d characters for generalizable person re-identification. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 34223430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] Xiang Suncheng, Fu Yuzhuo, You Guanjie, and Liu Ting. 2020. Unsupervised domain adaptation through synthesis for person re-identification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Xu Chi, Makihara Yasushi, Li Xiang, Yagi Yasushi, and Lu Jianfeng. 2021. Cross-view gait recognition using pairwise spatial transformer networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 31, 1 (2021), 260274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. [70] Xu Chi, Makihara Yasushi, Ogi Gakuto, Li Xiang, Yagi Yasushi, and Lu Jianfeng. 2017. The ou-isir gait database comprising the large population dataset with age and performance evaluation of age estimation. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications 9, 1 (2017), 114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] Yu Shiqi, Tan Daoliang, and Tan Tieniu. 2006. A framework for evaluating the effect of view angle, clothing and carrying condition on gait recognition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.441444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Yu Tuo, Jin Haiming, Tan Wai-Tian, and Nahrstedt Klara. 2018. SKEPRID: Pose and illumination change-resistant skeleton-based person re-Identification. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 14, 4 (2018), 24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. [73] Zhang Yang, David Philip, and Gong Boqing. 2017. Curriculum domain adaptation for semantic segmentation of urban scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.20202030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Zhang Ziyuan, Tran Luan, Yin Xi, Atoum Yousef, Liu Xiaoming, Wan Jian, and Wang Nanxin. 2019. Gait recognition via disentangled representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.47104719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. [75] Aite Zhao, Jianbo Li, Junyu Dong, Lin Qi, Qianni Zhang, Ning Li, Xin Wang, and Huiyu Zhou. 2021. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. [76] Zhao Guoying, Liu Guoyi, Li Hua, and Pietikainen Matti. 2006. 3D gait recognition using multiple cameras. In Proceedings of the FGR. 529534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. [77] Zhao Sicheng, Li Bo, Yue Xiangyu, Gu Yang, Xu Pengfei, Hu Runbo, Chai Hua, and Keutzer Kurt. 2019. Multi-source domain adaptation for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.72857298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. [78] Zheng Jia, Zhang Junfei, Li Jing, Tang Rui, Gao Shenghua, and Zhou Zihan. 2019. Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.519535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Large-Scale Synthetic Gait Dataset Towards in-the-Wild Simulation and Comparison Study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 19, Issue 1
        January 2023
        505 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/3572858
        • Editor:
        • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 January 2023
        • Online AM: 21 July 2022
        • Accepted: 7 February 2022
        • Revised: 21 January 2022
        • Received: 1 August 2021
        Published in tomm Volume 19, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)269
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!