skip to main content
research-article

Effect of Render Resolution on Gameplay Experience, Performance, and Simulator Sickness in Virtual Reality Games

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 May 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Higher resolution is one of the main directions and drivers in the development of virtual reality (VR) head-mounted displays (HMDs). However, given its associated higher cost, it is important to determine the benefits of having higher resolution on user experience. For non-VR games, higher resolution is often thought to lead to a better experience, but it is unexplored in VR games. This research aims to investigate the resolution tradeoff in gameplay experience, performance, and simulator sickness (SS) for VR games, particularly first-person shooter (FPS) games. To this end, we designed an experiment to collect gameplay experience, SS, and player performance data with a popular VR FPS game, Half-Life: Alyx. Our results indicate that 2K resolution is an important threshold for an enhanced gameplay experience without affecting performance and increasing SS levels. Moreover, the resolution from 1K to 4K has no significant difference in player performance. Our results can inform game developers and players in determining the type of HMD they want to use to balance the tradeoff between costs and benefits and achieve a more optimal experience.

References

  1. Stacy A Balk, Mary Anne Bertola, and Vaughan W Inman. 2013. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: Twenty Years Later. (2013), 257--263. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment. 1498Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Costas Boletsis and Jarl Erik Cedergren. 2019. VR Locomotion in the New Era of Virtual Reality: An Empirical Comparison of Prevalent Techniques. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7420781Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Matthew S Brennesholtz. 2018. 3-1: Invited Paper: VR Standards and Guidelines. In SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Vol. 49. Wiley Online Library, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pulkit Budhiraja, Mark Roman Miller, Abhishek K Modi, and David Forsyth. 2017. Rotation Blurring: Use of Artificial Blurring to Reduce Cybersickness in Virtual Reality First Person Shooters. (oct 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kajal Claypool and Mark Claypool. 2007. The effects of resolution on users playing First Person Shooter games. In Multimedia Computing and Networking 2007, Vol. 6504. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 65040B.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yasin Farmani and Robert J Teather. 2017. Player performance with different input devices in virtual reality first-person shooter games.. In SUI. 165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moira B. Flanagan, James G. May, and Thomas G. Dobie. 2004. The role of vection, eye movements and postural instability in the etiology of motion sickness. Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation 14, 4 (2004), 335--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Maria Frostling-Henningsson. 2009. First-person shooter games as a way of connecting to people:"Brothers in blood". Cyberpsychology & behavior 12, 5 (2009), 557--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jeff Hecht. 2016. Optical dreams, virtual reality. Optics and Photonics News 27, 6 (2016), 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Manuel López Ibáñez and Federico Peinado. 2016. Walking in VR: Measuring presence and simulator sickness in first-person virtual reality games. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1682 (2016), 49--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Yvonne A W de Kort, and Karolien Poels. 2013. The game experience questionnaire. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 46, 1 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel Johnson, M. John Gardner, and Ryan Perry. 2018. Validation of two game experience scales: The Player Experience of Need Satisfaction (PENS) and Game Experience Questionnaire (GEQ). International Journal of Human Computer Studies 118, February (2018), 38--46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (jul 1993), 203--220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Panagiotis Kourtesis, Simona Collina, Leonidas A.A. Doumas, and Sarah E. MacPherson. 2019. Technological Competence Is a Pre-condition for Effective Implementation of Virtual Reality Head Mounted Displays in Human Neuroscience: A Technological Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13, October (2019), 1--17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00342 arXiv:2101.08123Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrey Krekhov, Katharina Emmerich, Philipp Bergmann, Sebastian Cmentowski, and Jens Krüger. 2017. Self-transforming controllers for virtual reality first person shooters. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 517--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Przemysław Krompiec and Kyoungju Park. 2019. Enhanced player interaction using motion controllers for first-person shooting games in virtual reality. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 124548--124557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Xiang Li, Xiaohang Tang, Xin Tong, Rakesh Patibanda, Floyd Mueller, and Hai-Ning Liang. 2021. Myopic Bike and Say Hi: Games for Empathizing with The Myopic. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 333--338. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483505Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yilin Liu, Yiming Lin, Rongkai Shi, Yiming Luo, and Hai-Ning Liang. 2021. RelicVR: A Virtual Reality Game for Active Exploration of Archaeological Relics. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 326--332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483507Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yiming Luo, Jialin Wang, Hai-Ning Liang, Shan Luo, and Eng Gee Lim. 2021. Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Views and Display Types in the Teleoperation of Unmanned Ground Vehicles for Object Avoidance. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 418--425. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515455Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrew Mactavish. 2002. Technological pleasure: The performance and narrative of technology in Half-Life and other high-tech computer games. Screenplay: cinema/videogames/interfaces (2002), 33--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Toshiharu Matsushima, Kenta Seki, Shunichi Kimura, Yasushi Iwakabe, Tatsuya Yata, Yoshihiro Watanabe, Shinichi Komura, Makoto Uchida, and Takashi Nakamura. 2018. 51-1: Optimal Fast-Response LCD for High-Definition Virtual Reality Head Mounted Display. In SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Vol. 49. Wiley Online Library, 667--670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mark McGill, Alexander Ng, and Stephen Brewster. 2017. I am the passenger: How visual motion cues can influence sickness for in-car VR. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2017-May. 5655--5668. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Diego Monteiro, Hao Chen, Hai-Ning Liang, Huawei Tu, and Henry Dub. 2021a. Evaluating Performance and Gameplay of Virtual Reality Sickness Techniques in a First-Person Shooter Game. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoG52621.2021.9619145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Diego Monteiro, Hai-Ning Liang, Xiaohang Tang, and Pourang Irani. 2021b. Using Trajectory Compression Rate to Predict Changes in Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Games. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 138--146. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Diego Monteiro, Hai-Ning Liang, Jialin Wang, Hao Chen, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2020. An in-depth exploration of the effect of 2D/3D views and controller types on first person shooter games in virtual reality. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 713--724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Diego Monteiro, Hai-Ning Liang, Wenge Xu, Marvin Brucker, Vijayakumar Nanjappan, and Yong Yue. 2018. Evaluating enjoyment, presence, and emulator sickness in VR games based on first- and third- person viewing perspectives: Effect of Viewing Perspective in VR Gaming. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 29 (05 2018), e1830. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1830Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thiago M Porcino, Esteban Clua, Daniela Trevisan, Cristina N Vasconcelos, and Luis Valente. 2017. Minimizing cyber sickness in head mounted display systems: design guidelines and applications. In 2017 IEEE 5th international conference on serious games and applications for health (SeGAH). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ismo Rakkolainen, Matthew A Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2016. A Superwide-FOV Optical Design for Head-Mounted Displays.. In ICAT-EGVE. 45--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lisa Rebenitsch. 2015. Managing cybersickness in virtual reality. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 22, 1 (2015), 46--51. https://doi.org/10.1145/2810054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kwang-Ho Seok, YeolHo Kim, Wookho Son, Yoon Sang Kim, and Others. 2021. Using Visual Guides to Reduce Virtual Reality Sickness in First-Person Shooter Games: Correlation Analysis. JMIR Serious Games 9, 3 (2021), e18020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rongkai Shi, Hai-Ning Liang, Yu Wu, Difeng Yu, and Wenge Xu. 2021. Virtual Reality Sickness Mitigation Methods: A Comparative Study in a Racing Game. Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech. 4, 1, Article 8 (apr 2021), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Muhammad Firdaus Syawaludin, Chanho Kim, and Jae-In Hwana. 2019. Hybrid Camera System for Telepresence with Foveated Imaging. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1173--1174. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sebastian Von Mammen, Andreas Knote, and Sarah Edenhofer. 2016. Cyber sick but still having fun. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 325--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Séamas Weech, Jae Moon, and Nikolaus F. Troje. 2018. Influence of bone-conducted vibration on simulator sickness in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 13, 3 (2018), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sijing Wu, Cho Kin Cheng, Jing Feng, Lisa D'angelo, Claude Alain, and Ian Spence. 2012. Playing a first-person shooter video game induces neuroplastic change. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 24, 6 (2012), 1286--1293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wenge Xu, Hai-Ning Liang, Nilufar Baghaei, Xiaoyue Ma, Kangyou Yu, Xuanru Meng, and Shaoyue Wen. 2021a. Effects of an Immersive Virtual Reality Exergame on University Students' Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress: Pilot Feasibility and Usability Study. JMIR Serious Games 9, 4 (22 Nov 2021), e29330. https://doi.org/10.2196/29330Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wenge Xu, Hai-Ning Liang, Kangyou Yu, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2021b. Effect of Gameplay Uncertainty, Display Type, and Age on Virtual Reality Exergames. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 439, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wenge Xu, Hai-Ning Liang, Zeying Zhang, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2020. Studying the Effect of Display Type and Viewing Perspective on User Experience in Virtual Reality Exergames. Games for Health Journal (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Caglar Yildirim. 2019. Cybersickness during VR gaming undermines game enjoyment: A mediation model. Displays 59, February (2019), 35--43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2019.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Render Resolution on Gameplay Experience, Performance, and Simulator Sickness in Virtual Reality Games

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!