skip to main content
research-article

A Study on the Construction of the Evaluation System of the Teaching Ability of Students using Pattern Recognition for Studying Majoring in Badminton in the Mixed Learning Model of Physical Education Majors and Self-Learning System

Published:12 November 2022Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: ACM is issuing a formal Expression of Concern for all papers published in the TALLIP Special Issue on Self-Learning Systems and Pattern Recognition and Exploitation for Multimedia Asian Information Processing while a thorough investigation takes place with regards to the integrity of the peer review process. ACM strongly suggests that papers in this special issue not be cited in the literature until ACM's investigation has concluded and final decisions have been made regarding the integrity of the peer review process.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With my country's ongoing education reform and the continuous development of information technology-enabled education methods, the teaching environment and conditions of various universities have greatly improved, and information technology is changing the learning methods of college students at an alarming speed. This is the advantage of the blended learning model. In badminton as a specialization of physical education, strengthening the professional ability training of college badminton students is an important reform in the direction of achieving for the current talent training goal of our country. In the present teaching environment, the traditional classroom teaching mode and online learning mode coexist and each has their own advantages. Based on the investigation and analysis of the current situation of badminton students' teaching ability, this article proposes methods such as the literature method, expert interview method, questionnaire survey method, derivative Delphi method, and so on, and designs and constructs a future-oriented badminton student teaching ability evaluation system. An in-depth study of the blended learning model has provided a certain theoretical and practical basis. The experimental results of this article show that by selecting two periods of indicators and calculating the weights, it can be seen that in the large-scale badminton teaching ability evaluation system, the badminton teaching organization and management ability (26%), and badminton skills and tactics are satisfactory, and the execution ability is also satisfactory (35%), which is relatively large, and the sum of the two exceeds 60%. The blended learning model exploits the advantages of traditional teaching, combined with online learning to promote the development of students' professional badminton practice ability.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Zou H., Jin S., Sun J., and Dai Y.. 2016. A cavity preparation evaluation system in the skill assessment of dental students. Journal of Dental Education 80, 8 (2016), 930937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Veisi H., Liaghati H., and Alipour A.. 2016. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Indicators 60, (Jan. 2016), 644654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Lentillon-Kaestner V. and Patelli G.. 2016. Effects of grouping forms, student gender and ability level on the pleasure experienced in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 35, 3 (2016), 251262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Myronidis D., Papageorgiou C., and Theophanous S.. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process. Natural Hazards 81, 1 (2016), 245263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Ossadnik W., Schinke S., and Kaspar R. H.. 2016. Group aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: A comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation 25, 2 (2016), 421457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Soewono M.. 2018. The relative importance of food server attentiveness and wait Time: The case of a full-service restaurant (replication in jakarta). Polar Biology 20, 20 (2018), 259272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Al Qubaisi A., Badri M., Mohaidat J., Al Rashedi H., Yang G., Al Rashedi A., and Greer K.. 2016. An analytic hierarchy process for school quality and inspection. International Journal of Educational Management 30, 3 (2016), 437459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Calabrese A., Costa R., Levialdi N., and Menichini T.. 2016. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 121, May 10 (2016), 248264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Yokoo T. and Nishijima T.. 2019. Change of initiative problem-solving ability in high school physical education in a year. Japan Journal of Human Growth and Development Research 82 (2019), 4555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] HangUk, Cheon. 2017. Exploring physical educational value of scuba diving : Focused on the physical education ability of the 2015 revised curriculum. The Korean Journal of Physical Education 56, 4 (2017), 219233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Ma Y.. 2019. Cultivation of the ability of creating and arranging aerobics in physical education majors. World Scientific Research Journal 5, 9 (2019), 8893.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Yokoo T. and Nishijima T.. 2019. Study of process of initiative problem-solving ability in physical education program in high school. Japan Journal of Human Growth and Development Research 82 (2019), 1424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Saravanan V., Pralhaddas K. D., Kothari D. P., and Woungang I.. 2015. An optimizing pipeline stall reduction algorithm for power and performance on multi-core CPUs. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences 5, 2 (2015), 113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Xie C., Li G., Cai H., Jiang L., and Xiong N. N.. 2017. Dynamic weight-based individual similarity calculation for information searching in social computing. IEEE Systems Journal 11, 1 (2017), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Son L. H., Ngan R. T., Ali M., Fujita H., Abdel-Basset M., Giang N. L., Manogaran G., and Priyan M. K.. 2020. A new representation of intuitionistic fuzzy systems and their applications in critical decision making. IEEE Intelligent Systems 35, 1 (2020), 617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Namahoot C. S. and Thailand Lobo D. A.. 2019. Tourism web analysis and clustering tool using a word weight calculation algorithm. Journal of Computer Science 30, 2 (2019), 116125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Lee S. H., Ahn H. S., Kim H. S., Heo Y., Bae J. R., Kim K. S., Ham S. H., Lee S. M., and Roh M.. 2016. A study on weight estimation and calculation of the pipe rack structures for FPSO EPC projects. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 53, 5 (2016), 362370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Gao J., Wang H., and Shen H.. 2020. Smartly handling renewable energy instability in supporting a cloud datacenter. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Birchall A. and Marsh J. W.. 2016. The mayak worker dosimetry system (MWDS-2013): How to weight the absorbed dose to different lung regions in the calculation of lung dose. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 176, 1–2 (2016), 95101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Agarwal C., Mhatre A., Patra S., Chaudhury S., and Goswami A.. 2019. Algebraic reconstruction technique combined with Monte Carlo method for weight matrix calculation in gamma ray transmission tomography. SN Applied Sciences 1, 10 (2019), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Zhang N., Han Y., Crespo R. G., and Martinez O. S.. 2020. Physical education teaching for saving energy in basketball sports athletics using hidden markov and motion model. Computational Intelligence 37, 3 (2020), 11251140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Mamonov V. I. and Krylov I. K.. 2019. Use of constants of carbon and ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene fiber for calculation of density of unidirectional composites. Inorganic Materials: Applied Research 10, 5 (2019), 10151022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Wang Y., Muthu B., and Sivaparthipan C. B.. 2021. Internet of things driven physical activity recognition system for physical education. Microprocessors and Microsystems 81, (2021), 103723. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Ramaswamy V. V. and Singh A.. 2019. Can small for gestational age status affect the weight-based formula for calculation of insertional length of endotracheal tube in neonates? Indian pediatrics 56, 8 (2019), 694695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Rohde-Brandenburger K. and Koffler C.. 2018. Commentary on “Correction to: On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments” by Koffler and Rohde-Brandeburger (2018). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, 3 (2019), 397399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Zhang T., El-Latif A. A., Wang N., Li Q., and Liu X.. 2012. A new image segmentation method via fusing NCut eigenvectors maps. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Image Processing. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Lin Y. N., Hsia L. H., and Hwang G. J.. 2022. Fostering motor skills in physical education: A mobile technology-supported ICRA flipped learning model. Computers & Education 177, (2022), 104380. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Liang F.. 2022. Auxiliary teaching of badminton basic movements based on wireless network communication and kinect. Journal of Sensors (2022). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Qi S., Li S., and Zhang J.. 2021. Designing a teaching assistant system for physical education using web technology. Mobile Information Systems, (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Huang H., Zhang Y., Pang G., and Ye A.. 2021. Quantitative of badminton practice based on wireless sensor network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, (2021). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Metzler M. and Colquitt G.. 2021. Instructional Models for Physical Education. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Balatska L., Moseychuk Y., Moldovan A., Nakonechnyi I., Горюк Goriuk P., Dotsyuk L., and Vaskan I.. 2021. Education of students majoring In “Physical Education And Sports” On The Knowledge Of Olympic Education (On The Example Of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Universitaria Consortium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Study on the Construction of the Evaluation System of the Teaching Ability of Students using Pattern Recognition for Studying Majoring in Badminton in the Mixed Learning Model of Physical Education Majors and Self-Learning System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
      ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 21, Issue 6
      November 2022
      372 pages
      ISSN:2375-4699
      EISSN:2375-4702
      DOI:10.1145/3568970
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 November 2022
      • Online AM: 4 May 2022
      • Accepted: 17 March 2022
      • Revised: 8 March 2022
      • Received: 2 February 2022
      Published in tallip Volume 21, Issue 6

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!