skip to main content
research-article

Umbrella meshes: elastic mechanisms for freeform shape deployment

Published:22 July 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present a computational inverse design framework for a new class of volumetric deployable structures that have compact rest states and deploy into bending-active 3D target surfaces. Umbrella meshes consist of elastic beams, rigid plates, and hinge joints that can be directly printed or assembled in a zero-energy fabrication state. During deployment, as the elastic beams of varying heights rotate from vertical to horizontal configurations, the entire structure transforms from a compact block into a target curved surface. Umbrella Meshes encode both intrinsic and extrinsic curvature of the target surface and in principle are free from the area expansion ratio bounds of past auxetic material systems.

We build a reduced physics-based simulation framework to accurately and efficiently model the complex interaction between the elastically deforming components. To determine the mesh topology and optimal shape parameters for approximating a given target surface, we propose an inverse design optimization algorithm initialized with conformal flattening. Our algorithm minimizes the structure's strain energy in its deployed state and optimizes actuation forces so that the final deployed structure is in stable equilibrium close to the desired surface with few or no external constraints. We validate our approach by fabricating a series of physical models at various scales using different manufacturing techniques.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

152-283-supp-video.mp4

supplemental material

3528223.3530089.mov

presentation

References

  1. LIW Arnouts, Thierry J Massart, Niels De Temmerman, and PZ Berke. 2018. Computational modelling of the transformation of bistable scissor structures with geometrical imperfections. Engineering Structures 177 (2018), 409--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Artelys. 2021. Artelys Knitro - Nonlinear optimization solver. https://www.artelys.com/en/optimization-tools/knitroGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Miklós Bergou, Basile Audoly, Etienne Vouga, Max Wardetzky, and Eitan Grinspun. 2010. Discrete viscous threads. ACM T Graphic 29, 4 (2010), 116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Miklós Bergou, Max Wardetzky, Stephen Robinson, Basile Audoly, and Eitan Grinspun. 2008. Discrete elastic rods. ACM T Graphic 27, 3 (2008), 63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Bickel, M. Baecher, M. Otaduy, W. Matusik, H. Pfister, and M. Gross. 2009. Capture and Modeling of Non-Linear Heterogeneous Soft Tissue. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH02+ 28, 3 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tian Chen, Osama R Bilal, Robert Lang, Chiara Daraio, and Kristina Shea. 2019. Autonomous deployment of a solar panel using elastic origami and distributed shape-memory-polymer actuators. Physical Review Applied 11, 6 (2019), 064069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Tian Chen, Julian Panetta, Max Schnaubelt, and Mark Pauly. 2021. Bistable auxetic surface structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 4 (2021), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xiang Chen, Changxi Zheng, Weiwei Xu, and Kun Zhou. 2014. An Asymptotic Numerical Method for Inverse Elastic Shape Design. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 95 (jul 2014), 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Akash Garg, Andrew O Sageman-Furnas, Bailin Deng, Yonghao Yue, Eitan Grinspun, Mark Pauly, and Max Wardetzky. 2014. Wire mesh design. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33, 4 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ruslan Guseinov, Eder Miguel, and Bernd Bickel. 2017. CurveUps: Shaping Objects from Flat Plates with Tension-Actuated Curvature. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 64 (7 2017), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Charles Hoberman. 1991. Radial expansion/retraction truss structures. US Patent 5,024,031.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Jourdan, Melina Skouras, Etienne Vouga, and Adrien Bousseau. 2020. Printing-on-Fabric Meta-Material for Self-Shaping Architectural Models. In Advances in Architectural Geometry. http://www-sop.inria.fr/reves/Basilic/2020/JSVB20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mina Konaković, Keenan Crane, Bailin Deng, Sofien Bouaziz, Daniel Piker, and Mark Pauly. 2016. Beyond developable: computational design and fabrication with auxetic materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mina Konaković-Luković, Julian Panetta, Keenan Crane, and Mark Pauly. 2018. Rapid deployment of curved surfaces via programmable auxetics. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Julian Lienhard and Christoph Gengnagel. 2018. Recent developments in bending-active structures. In Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, Vol. 2018. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ligang Liu, Lei Zhang, Yin Xu, Craig Gotsman, and Steven J Gortler. 2008. A local/global approach to mesh parameterization. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 27. Wiley Online Library, 1495--1504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Luigi Malomo, Jesús Pérez, Emmanuel Iarussi, Nico Pietroni, Eder Miguel, Paolo Cignoni, and Bernd Bickel. 2018. FlexMaps: computational design of flat flexible shells for shaping 3D objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 6 (2018), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J Michael McCarthy and Gim Song Soh. 2010. Geometric design of linkages. Vol. 11. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Robert McNeel et al. 2010. Rhinoceros 3D, Version 6.0. Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle, WA (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Giulio Molinari, Manfred Quack, Vitaly Dmitriev, Manfred Morari, Patrick Jenny, and Paolo Ermanni. 2011. Aero-structural optimization of morphing airfoils for adaptive wings. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22, 10 (2011), 1075--1089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Julian Panetta, Florin Isvoranu, Tian Chen, Emmanuel Siéfert, Benoît Roman, and Mark Pauly. 2021. Computational inverse design of surface-based inflatables. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 4 (2021), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Julian Panetta, Mina Konaković-Luković, Florin Isvoranu, Etienne Bouleau, and Mark Pauly. 2019. X-Shells: A new class of deployable beam structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Julian Panetta, Abtin Rahimian, and Denis Zorin. 2017. Worst-Case Stress Relief for Microstructures. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 122 (jul 2017), 16 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jesús Pérez, Miguel A Otaduy, and Bernhard Thomaszewski. 2017. Computational design and automated fabrication of kirchhoff-plateau surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jesus Perez, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Stelian Coros, Bernd Bickel, José A. Canabal, Robert Sumner, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2015. Design and Fabrication of Flexible Rod Meshes. ACM Trans. on Graphics (Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH) 34, 4 (2015). http://www.gmrv.es/Publications/2015/PTCBCSO15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stefan Pillwein, Kurt Leimer, Michael Birsak, and Przemyslaw Musialski. 2020. On Elastic Geodesic Grids and Their Planar to Spatial Deployment. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 125 (July 2020), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Stefan Pillwein and Przemyslaw Musialski. 2021. Generalized Deployable Elastic Geodesic Grids. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08883 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Christina L Randall, Evin Gultepe, and David H Gracias. 2012. Self-folding devices and materials for biomedical applications. Trends in biotechnology 30, 3 (2012), 138--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yingying Ren, Julian Panetta, Tian Chen, Florin Isvoranu, Samuel Poincloux, Christopher Brandt, Alison Martin, and Mark Pauly. 2021. 3D weaving with curved ribbons. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 4 (2021), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kelvin Roovers and Niels De Temmerman. 2017. Deployable scissor grids consisting of translational units. International Journal of Solids and Structures 121 (2017), 45--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kelvin Roovers, Lara Alegria Mira, and Niels De Temmerman. 2013. From surface to scissor structure. In Proceedings of the First Conference Transformables, Seville, Editorial Starbooks, Seville, Spain, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Andrew O Sageman-Furnas, Albert Chern, Mirela Ben-Chen, and Amir Vaxman. 2019. Chebyshev nets from commuting PolyVector fields. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rohan Sawhney and Keenan Crane. 2017. Boundary first flattening. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 37, 1 (2017), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Christian Schumacher, Jonas Zehnder, and Moritz Bächer. 2018. Set-in-Stone: Worst-Case Optimization of Structures Weak in Tension. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 6, Article 252 (Dec. 2018), 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Mélina Skouras, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Bernd Bickel, and Markus Gross. 2012. Computational Design of Rubber Balloons. Comput. Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mélina Skouras, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Stelian Coros, Bernd Bickel, and Markus Gross. 2013. Computational Design of Actuated Deformable Characters. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, Article 82 (jul 2013), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yichao Tang, Gaojian Lin, Shu Yang, Yun Kyu Yi, Randall D Kamien, and Jie Yin. 2017. Programmable Kiri-Kirigami Metamaterials. Advanced Materials 29, 10 (2017), 1604262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Hideshi Tomita, Takashi Higaki, Toshiki Kobayashi, Takanari Fujii, and Kazuto Fujimoto. 2015. Stenting for curved lesions using a novel curved balloon: Preliminary experimental study. Journal of Cardiology 66, 2 (2015), 120--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ran Zhang, Thomas Auzinger, and Bernd Bickel. 2021. Computational Design of Planar Multistable Compliant Structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 5 (2021), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ran Zhang, Shiwei Wang, Xuejin Chen, Chao Ding, Luo Jiang, Jie Zhou, and Ligang Liu. 2015. Designing planar deployable objects via scissor structures. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 2 (2015), 1051--1062.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiaoting Zhang, Guoxin Fang, Melina Skouras, Gwenda Gieseler, Charlie C. L. Wang, and Emily Whiting. 2019. Computational Design of Fabric Formwork. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 4, Article 109 (jul 2019), 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Changxi Zheng, Timothy Sun, and Xiang Chen. 2016. Deployable 3D linkages with collision avoidance.. In Symposium on Computer Animation. 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Umbrella meshes: elastic mechanisms for freeform shape deployment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
      ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 41, Issue 4
      July 2022
      1978 pages
      ISSN:0730-0301
      EISSN:1557-7368
      DOI:10.1145/3528223
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 July 2022
      Published in tog Volume 41, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader