skip to main content
research-article

True seams: modeling seams in digital garments

Published:22 July 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Seams play a fundamental role in the way a garment looks, fits, feels and behaves. Seams can have very different shapes and mechanical properties depending on how fabric is overlapped, folded and stitched together, with garment designers often choosing specific seam and stitch type combinations depending on the appearance and behavior they want for the garment. Yet, virtually all 3D CAD tools for fashion and visual effects ignore most of the visual and mechanical complexity of seams, and just treat them as joint edges, their simplest possible form, drastically limiting the fidelity of digital garments. In this paper, we present a method that models seams following their true, real-life construction. Each seam brings together and overlaps the fabric pieces to be sewn, folds the fabric according to the type of seam, and stitches the resulting assembly following the type of stitch. To avoid dealing with the complexities of folding in 3D space, we cast the problem into a sequence of simpler 2D problems where we can easily shape the seam and produce a result free of self-intersections, before lifting the folded geometry back to 3D space. We run a series of constrained optimizations to enforce spatial properties in these 2D settings, allowing us to treat asymmetric seams, gatherings and overlapping construction orders. Using a variety of common seams and stitches, we show how our approach substantially improves the visual appearance of full garments, for a better and more predictive digital replica.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

062-469-supp-video.mp4

supplemental material

3528223.3530128.mp4

presentation

References

  1. Assembil. 2013. How patterns work: The fundamental principles of pattern making and sewing in fashion design. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aric Bartle, Alla Sheffer, Vladimir G. Kim, Danny M. Kaufman, Nicholas Vining, and Floraine Berthouzoz. 2016. Physics-driven pattern adjustment for direct 3D garmentediting. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 35, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Floraine Berthouzoz, Akash Garg, Danny M. Kaufman, Eitan Grinspun, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2013. Parsing sewing patterns into 3D garments. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 32, 4 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Remi Brouet, Alla Sheffer, Laurence Boissieux, and Marie-Paule Cani. 2012. Design preserving garment transfer. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 31, 4 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Chung. 1999. The effect of assembly methods of a garment on fabric drape. Ph.D. Dissertation. Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gabriel Cirio, Jorge Lopez-Moreno, David Miraut, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2014. Yarn-level simulation of woven cloth. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Asia) 33, 6 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gabriel Cirio, Jorge Lopez-Moreno, and Miguel A. Otaduy. 2017. Yarn-Level Cloth Simulation with Sliding Persistent Contacts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 2 (2017), 1152--1162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jonathan Cohen, Amitabh Varshney, Dinesh Manocha, Greg Turk, Hans Weber, Pankaj Agarwal, Frederick Brooks, and William Wright. 1996. Simplification envelopes. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eitan Grinspun, Anil N. Hirani, Mathieu Desbrun, and Peter Schröder. 2003. Discrete Shells. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. Eurographics Association, 62--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. JL Hu and Siuping Chung. 2000. Bending Behavior of Woven Fabrics with Vertical Seams. Textile Research Journal 70 (02 2000), 148--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Hu, S. Chung, and M. Lo. 1997. Effect of seams on fabric drape. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 9 (3 1997), 220--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang Hu, Jinlianand Ma, George Baciu, Wingo Sai-Keung Wong, and Weiyuan Zhang. 2006. Modelling Multi-layer Seam Puckering. Textile Research Journal 76, 9 (2006), 665--673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yuki Igarashi, Takeo Igarashi, and Hiromasa Suzuki. 2008. Automatically adding seam allowance to cloth pattern. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Posters.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Inui, H. Okabe, and T. Yamaraka. 2001. Simulation of seam pucker on two strips of fabric sewn together. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 13 (02 2001), 53--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Inui and T. Yamaraka. 1998. Seam pucker simulation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 13, 2 (1998), 128--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. ISO 4915:1991. 1991. Textiles - Stitch types - Classification and terminology. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO 4916:1991. 1991. Textiles - Seam types - Classification and terminology. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamini Jhanji. 2018. Computer-aided design - garment designing and patternmaking. In Automation in Garment Manufacturing, Rajkishore Nayak and Rajiv Padhye (Eds.). Woodhead Publishing, 253 -- 290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michael Keckeisen, Matthias Feurer, and Markus Wacker. 2004. Tailor Tools for Interactive Design of Clothing in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 182--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Minchen Li, Alla Sheffer, Eitan Grinspun, and Nicholas Vining. 2018. Foldsketch: Enriching Garments with Physically Reproducible Folds. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 133 (jul 2018), 13 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shufang Lu, P.Y. Mok, and Xiaogang Jin. 2017. A new design concept: 3D to 2D textile pattern design for garments. Computer-Aided Design 89 (2017), 35 -- 49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liang Ma, Jinlian Hu, and George Baciu. 2006. Generating Seams and Wrinkles for Virtual Clothing. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications (VRCIA). 205--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Takashi Maekawa. 1999. An overview of offset curves and surfaces. Computer-Aided Design 31, 3 (1999), 165--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yuwei Meng, Charlie C.L. Wang, and Xiaogang Jin. 2012. Flexible shape control for automatic resizing of apparel products. Computer-Aided Design 44, 1 (2012), 68 -- 76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Juan Montes, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Sudhir Mudur, and Tiberiu Popa. 2020. Computational Design of Skintight Clothing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 39, 4 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fatemeh Mousazadegan, Siamak Saharkhiz, and Masoud Latifi. 2012. Prediction of tension seam pucker formation by finite-element model. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 24 (06 2012), 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Simon Pabst, Sybille Krzywinski, Andrea Schenk, and Bernhard Thomaszewski. 2008. Seams and Bending in Cloth Simulation. In Workshop in Virtual Reality Interactions and Physical Simulation (VRIPHYS). 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jianbo Peng, Daniel Kristjansson, and Denis Zorin. 2004. Interactive Modeling of Topologically Complex Geometric Detail. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 635--643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Binh Pham. 1992. Offset curves and surfaces: a brief survey. Computer-Aided Design 24, 4 (1992), 223--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Serban D Porumbescu, Brian Budge, Louis Feng, and Kenneth I Joy. 2005. Shell maps. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 24, 3 (2005), 626--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xavier Provot. 1995. Deformation Constraints in a Mass-Spring Model to Describe Rigid Cloth Behaviour. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI). 147--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott Roland, Mathew D. Janda, and Charles Lowry. 2015. Implementation of Modeling and Simulation of Textile Seam and Joints for Parachute Design Applications. In Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jos Stam. 1998. Evaluation of loop subdivision surfaces. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kara Sukran. 2020. Comparison of sewn fabric bonding rigidities obtained by heart loop method: effects of different stitch types and seam directions. Industria Textila 71, 2 (2020), 105--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Nobuyuki Umetani, Danny M. Kaufman, Takeo Igarashi, and Eitan Grinspun. 2011. Sensitive Couture for Interactive Garment Modeling and Editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 30, 4 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Pascal Volino, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and François Faure. 2009. A simple approach to nonlinear tensile stiffness for accurate cloth simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 4 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Huamin Wang. 2018. Rule-free sewing pattern adjustment with precision and efficiency. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 37, 4 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Katja Wolff, Philipp Herholz, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung. 2019. Reflection Symmetry in Textured Sewing Patterns. In Vision, Modeling and Visualization. The Eurographics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Katja Wolff and Olga Sorkine-Hornung. 2019. Wallpaper Pattern Alignment along Garment Seams. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH) 38, 4 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yunchu Yang. 2014. Investigating Seamed Woven Fabric Drape Using Experimental and Virtual Approaches. Fibers and Polymers 15 (10 2014), 2217--2224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. True seams: modeling seams in digital garments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 41, Issue 4
        July 2022
        1978 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/3528223
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 July 2022
        Published in tog Volume 41, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)120
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader