skip to main content
research-article

Research on Teaching Reform of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents Training Course in Local Undergraduate Universities Based on Intelligent Blended Learning

Published:28 November 2022Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: ACM is issuing a formal Expression of Concern for all papers published in the TALLIP Special Issue on Self-Learning Systems and Pattern Recognition and Exploitation for Multimedia Asian Information Processing while a thorough investigation takes place with regards to the integrity of the peer review process. ACM strongly suggests that papers in this special issue not be cited in the literature until ACM's investigation has concluded and final decisions have been made regarding the integrity of the peer review process.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In order to make college development better accord with the development demand of regional society, the innovation and entrepreneurship (IE) training course reform in local undergraduate colleges is studied. To begin with, the research background as well as necessity of the teaching reform of basic courses in local undergraduate colleges for IE are analyzed. Moreover, the current situation of IE education (IEE) in the local undergraduate colleges in Shaanxi Province is investigated to understand the implementation status of IEE in local undergraduate colleges in Shaanxi Province. Then, the adverse factors affecting the IEE implementation process are studied. Finally, the adverse factors and the causes of the problems are analyzed. From the four aspects of educational philosophy, curriculum structure, curriculum content as well as teaching staff, the suggestions and programs of basic courses reform for IEE are provided. The survey results show that more than 50% of the students have their own unique understanding of IEE, and think that IEE is quite necessary and helpful for their own development. The school has also attached importance to IEE, but the effect is mediocre at present. It suggests that students’ demand for IEE cannot be satisfied now. The methods and survey results proposed give guidance as well as data support to the IEE reform in local undergraduate colleges.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Xiao S., Kong Q., Song M., et al. 2019. Teaching reform of CNC technology course under the ideological and political education. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research 2, 10 (2019), 3641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Wang L. and Zhang E.. 2020. Exploration and practice of teaching reform of industrial robot course based on application ability training. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 780, 3 (2020), 032017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Soegoto E. S. and Luckyardi S.. 2020. Computerized entrepreneurship education – special review on life quality in digital era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1477, 3 (2020), 032017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Alliance P.. 2018. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 9. Education and continuous professional development: Shaping the future of PRM. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 54, 2 (2018), 279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Huang Q.. 2019. Research on the hybrid teaching reform of online open course three-dimensional classroom. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research 2, 9 (2019), 5561.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Wang T.. 2019. Exploring the mode of entrepreneurship education based on the legal-business compound competency in China. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 10551055.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Yan Y.. 2018. Teaching research on higher vocational pre-school education of professional art course based on innovation and entrepreneurship education. Creative Education 9, 5 (2018), 713718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Jin C., Luo Y., Sun H., et al. 2019. Development of college students' innovation and entrepreneurship ability under the model of personalized education. Asian Agricultural Research 11, 03 (2019), 9092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Huang L. H. and Chen Z. H.. 2020. Research on the teaching reform of the basic computer teaching course assisted by artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1533, 3 (2020), 032042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Liu J. S. and Yang X. J.. 2019. Reform and research on teaching mode of computer basic course in college. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 123 (2019), 02204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Luo J.. 2020. Teaching reform of ideological and political courses based on “Internet +”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1533, 4 (2020), 042020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Zhang J., Lin Z. K., Tang W. X., et al. 2020. Research on teaching mode of Introduction to Mechanical Engineering course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1707, 1 (2020), 012021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Meng L., Gu Z., Li F., et al. 2021. Application of BP neural network on quantitative evaluation of curriculum reform in advanced education-A case study of signal and system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1774, 1 (2021), 012047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Hess D. J. and Maki A.. 2019. Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher-education curriculum reform. Journal of Cleaner Production 228 (Aug. 10), (2019), 11571166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Rekh S. and Chandy A.. 2020. Implementation of academia 4.0 for engineering college education. Procedia Computer Science 172 (2020), 673678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Liu J.. 2020. Efficient algorithm of splitting and merging classes on elective course of college education. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 768 (2020), 072003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Balon R.. 2021. Why shorten undergraduate medical education over college education?. Academic Medicine 96, 2 (2021), 165165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Davies N.. 2019. Foreign/second language education and technology in the future. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 16, 3-4 (2019), 516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Chedrawi C., Howayeck P., and Tarhini A.. 2019. CSR and legitimacy in higher education accreditation programs, an isomorphic approach of Lebanese business schools. Quality Assurance in Education 27, 1 (2019), 7081.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Andronis L., Maredza M., and Petrou S.. 2019. Measuring, valuing and including forgone childhood education and leisure time costs in economic evaluation: Methods, challenges and the way forward. Social Science & Medicine 237 (2019), 112475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Fairchild N.. 2020. Queering the data: The somatechnics of English early childhood education and care teachers. Somatechnics 10, 1 (2020), 5272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Halkos G. and Petrou K. N.. 2020. The relationship between MSW and education: WKC evidence from 25 OECD countries. Waste Management 114 (2020), 240252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Berns J. S., Coull S., Paskin D., et al. 2020. Reflections on a crisis in graduate medical education: The closure of Hahnemann University Hospital. Academic Medicine 95, 4 (2020), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Hard L.. 2018. Horizontal violence in early childhood education and care: Implications for leadership enactment. Australian Journal of Early Childhood 31 (2018), 4048.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Kampelmann S., Rycx F., Saks Y., et al. 2018. Does education raise productivity and wages equally? The moderating role of age and gender. Iza Journal of Labor Economics 7, 1 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Ellaway R. H., Chou C. L., and Kalet A. L.. 2018. Situating remediation: Accommodating success and failure in medical education systems. Academic Medicine 93, 3 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Brantlinger E. A. and Guskin S. L.. 2018. Implications of social and cultural differences for special education with specific recommendations. Focus on Exceptional Children 18, 1 (2018), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Baldassarre M. T., Caivano D., Dimauro G., et al. 2018. Cloud computing for education: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Transactions on Education 61, 3 (2018), 234244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Zhao H. and Liu Y.. 2018. Where has all the education gone? Everywhere but into growth. Computational Economics 51, 1 (2018), 3574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Shervin A., Brianna P., and Marisa K.. 2018. Education and income predict future emotional well-being of Whites but not Blacks: A ten-year cohort. Brain Sciences 8, 7 (2018), 122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Xiao H. and Chen Q.. 2020. Research on influence factors of college students employment satisfaction based on structural equation model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1629, 1 (2020), 012090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Li H. and Jiao L.. 2021. Research on innovation and entrepreneurship education and practice in Shandong Province based on the internet. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1744, 3 (2021), 032092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Research on Teaching Reform of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents Training Course in Local Undergraduate Universities Based on Intelligent Blended Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
      ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 21, Issue 6
      November 2022
      372 pages
      ISSN:2375-4699
      EISSN:2375-4702
      DOI:10.1145/3568970
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2022
      • Online AM: 19 October 2022
      • Accepted: 28 March 2022
      • Revised: 9 March 2022
      • Received: 2 February 2022
      Published in tallip Volume 21, Issue 6

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!