skip to main content
10.1145/3532719.3543223acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Non-Line-of-Sight Transient Rendering

Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transient imaging methods often analyze time-resolved light transport for applications such as range imaging, reflectance estimation and, especially, non-line-of-sight (NLOS) imaging, which targets the reconstruction of hidden geometry using measurements of indirect diffuse reflections emitted by a laser. Transient rendering is a key tool for developing such new applications. In this work, we introduce a set of simple, yet effective subpath sampling techniques targeting transient light transport simulation in occluded scenes. We analyze the usual capture setups of NLOS scenes, where the light and camera indirectly aim at hidden geometry through a secondary surface. We leverage that configuration to reduce the integration path space. We implement our techniques in our modified version of Mitsuba 2, adapted for transient light transport, allowing us to support parallelization, polarization, and differentiable rendering.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Wenzheng Chen, Fangyin Wei, Kiriakos N Kutulakos, Szymon Rusinkiewicz, and Felix Heide. 2020. Learned feature embeddings for non-line-of-sight imaging and recognition. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 6 (2020), 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Julian Iseringhausen and Matthias B Hullin. 2020. Non-line-of-sight reconstruction using efficient transient rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 1 (2020), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Adrian Jarabo and Victor Arellano. 2018. Bidirectional rendering of vector light transport. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 96–105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adrian Jarabo, Julio Marco, Adolfo Munoz, Raul Buisan, Wojciech Jarosz, and Diego Gutierrez. 2014. A framework for transient rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 33, 6 (2014), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Xiaochun Liu, Ibón Guillén, Marco La Manna, Ji Hyun Nam, Syed Azer Reza, Toan Huu Le, Adrian Jarabo, Diego Gutierrez, and Andreas Velten. 2019. Non-line-of-sight imaging using phasor-field virtual wave optics. Nature 572, 7771 (2019), 620–623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Merlin Nimier-David, Delio Vicini, Tizian Zeltner, and Wenzel Jakob. 2019. Mitsuba 2: A retargetable forward and inverse renderer. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 6 (2019), 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Adithya Pediredla, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Ioannis Gkioulekas. 2019. Ellipsoidal path connections for time-gated rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 38, 4 (2019), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chia-Yin Tsai, Aswin C Sankaranarayanan, and Ioannis Gkioulekas. 2019. Beyond Volumetric Albedo–A Surface Optimization Framework for Non-Line-Of-Sight Imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1545–1555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Posters
    July 2022
    132 pages
    ISBN:9781450393614
    DOI:10.1145/3532719

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)102
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF3532719.3543223.2.pdf

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format