skip to main content
10.1145/3532719.3543233acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Public Access

Do We Measure What We Perceive? Comparison of Perceptual and Computed Differences between Hand Animations

Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

An increased interest in public motion capture data has allowed for the use of data-driven animation algorithms through neural networks. While motion capture data is increasingly accessible, data sets have become too large to sort through manually. Similarity metrics quantify how different two motions are and can be used to search databases much faster when compared to manual searches as well as to train neural networks. However, the most popular similarity metrics are not informed by human perception, resulting in the potential for data that is not perceptually similar being labeled as such by these metrics. We conducted an experiment with hand motions to identify how large the differences between human perception and common similarity metrics are. In this study, participants watched two animations of hand motions, one altered and the other unaltered, and scored their similarity on a 7-point Likert scale. In our comparisons, we found that none of the tested similarity metrics correlated with human judged scores of similarity.

References

  1. Funda Durupinar. 2021. Perception of Human Motion Similarity Based on Laban Movement Analysis. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2021 (Virtual Event, France) (SAP ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474451.3476241Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sophie Jörg, Jessica Hodgins, and Carol O’Sullivan. 2010. The Perception of Finger Motions. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Los Angeles, California) (APGV ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/1836248.1836273Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jan Sedmidubsky, Petr Elias, Petra Budikova, and Pavel Zezula. 2021. Content-Based Management of Human Motion Data: Survey and Challenges. IEEE Access 9(2021), 64241–64255. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yingying Wang, Jean E Fox Tree, Marilyn Walker, and Michael Neff. 2016. Assessing the impact of hand motion on virtual character personality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 13, 2 (2016), 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Posters
    July 2022
    132 pages
    ISBN:9781450393614
    DOI:10.1145/3532719

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format