skip to main content
10.1145/3532719.3543237acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A Comparison of Zoom-In Transition Methods for Multiscale VR

Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

When navigating within an unfamiliar virtual environment in VR, transitions between pre-defined viewpoints are known to facilitate spatial awareness of a user. Previously, different viewpoint transition techniques had been investigated, but mainly for single-scale environments. We present a comparative study of zoom-in transition techniques, where the viewpoint of a user is being smoothly transitioned from a large level of scale (LoS) to a smaller LoS in a multiscale virtual environment (MVE) with a nested structure. We identify that orbiting first before zooming in is preferred over other alternatives when transitioning to a viewpoint at a small LoS.

References

  1. Ryohei Komiyama, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2017. JackIn space: designing a seamless transition between first and third person view for effective telepresence collaborations. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Regis Kopper, Tao Ni, Doug A Bowman, and Marcio Pinho. 2006. Design and evaluation of navigation techniques for multiscale virtual environments. In Ieee virtual reality conference. 175–182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jong-In Lee, Paul Asente, Byungmoon Kim, Yeojin Kim, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2020. Evaluating Automatic Parameter Control Methods for Locomotion in Multiscale Virtual Environments. In 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kasra Rahimi, Colin Banigan, and Eric D Ragan. 2018. Scene transitions and teleportation in virtual reality and the implications for spatial awareness and sickness. In IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2273–2287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. George Robertson, Stuart K Card, and Jock D Mackinlay. 1989. The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 10–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mengu Sukan, Steven Feiner, Barbara Tversky, and Semih Energin. 2012. Quick viewpoint switching for manipulating virtual objects in hand-held augmented reality using stored snapshots. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 217–226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Posters
    July 2022
    132 pages
    ISBN:9781450393614
    DOI:10.1145/3532719

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format